ELTK Eltek Ltd
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
What changed
Recent filings, trades and moves
- Industry (SIC)
- PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS (3672) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 352
- List Date
- 1997-01-22
- CIK
- 0001024672
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-17 (Pre-Market)
- Homepage
- https://www.nisteceltek.com
Eltek Ltd is engaged in the technology business sector that manufactures and supplies technologically new custom-made circuitry solutions. The company manufactures, markets, and sells custom-made printed circuit boards (PCBs), including high-density interconnect, flex-rigid and multi-layered boards. The Company markets its products mainly to the medical technology, defense and aerospace, industrial, telecom, and networking equipment industries. The geographic areas of the company are Israel, North America, the Netherlands, India, and Others. It generates the majority of its revenue from Israel…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 6.76% | -8.83% | 7.65% | 29.84% | 0.36% | 2.93% | 6.45% |
| Feb | 0.87% | 0.00% | -1.80% | -28.67% | 6.93% | -0.17% | -3.81% |
| Mar | 8.19% | 6.53% | -0.75% | -18.69% | -25.63% | -8.98% | -6.55% |
| Apr | -6.16% | 0.73% | -2.48% | 0.93% | -2.37% | 6.04% | -0.55% |
| May | 3.63% | 4.22% | 153.06% | 10.28% | 23.03% | 5.76% | 33.33% |
| Jun | 1.66% | -8.74% | 5.06% | -16.88% | 3.08% | 0.32% | -2.58% |
| Jul | 11.74% | 6.94% | -21.76% | 3.92% | 1.75% | -10.03% | -1.24% |
| Aug | 0.58% | -7.79% | 4.56% | 9.53% | -2.37% | -7.52% | -0.50% |
| Sep | -15.00% | -8.01% | 12.74% | 2.92% | 7.25% | -1.64% | -0.29% |
| Oct | -6.63% | 3.46% | -2.49% | -2.26% | 4.40% | -19.36% | -3.81% |
| Nov | -19.30% | 7.77% | 31.27% | 2.32% | -24.66% | 0.00%* | -0.43% |
| Dec | -16.99% | -2.74% | 7.64% | 3.95% | 2.00% | -- | -1.23% |
| Total | -31.18% | -8.47% | 245.68% | -15.15% | -15.54% | -30.56% | 24.13% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: ELTK
Executive Summary:
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level: 6)
Key Drivers:
- Trend direction: Short-term bearish, Medium-term neutral, Long-term bullish
- Support/Resistance Levels:
- Short-term support: $8.34 (SMA 20)
- Medium-term resistance: $9.43 (SMA 200)
- Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (66.29%)
- MACD signal: Bearish (0.12 / Signal: 0.15 / Histogram: -0.03)
Primary Risks:
- Technical correction potential based on bearish momentum signals
- Low volatility regime may not provide sufficient catalysts for price movement
Recent News Sentiment Impact: No recent news available; sentiment neutral.
Technical Analysis:
Trend Direction: Short-term bearish, Medium-term neutral, Long-term bullish
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Short-term support: $8.34 (SMA 20)
- Medium-term resistance: $9.43 (SMA 200)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (66.29%)
- MACD signal: Bearish (0.12 / Signal: 0.15 / Histogram: -0.03)
- Bollinger Bands position: Overbought
Volume Analysis: Volume trends and institutional interest signals:
- Volume SMA 20: 9497.60
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 899062.82
- Volume Rate of Change: -62.54%
News & Sentiment Analysis:
Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news available
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral sentiment due to lack of recent news
Catalyst Identification: No upcoming earnings or major events identified
Market Narrative: Market is generally neutral, with ELTK's price movement aligning with its technical signals
Risk & Volatility Assessment:
Beta Interpretation: Low risk relative to market (beta: 0.47)
Volatility Regime: Low volatility regime (stock moves less than market)
Options Market Signals: No options data available; sentiment neutral.
Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations:
- Short-term support: $8.34 (SMA 20)
- Risk management: Consider stop-loss levels around $9.00
Market Context & Positioning:
Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market: Neutral
Institutional Activity: No recent institutional interest signals
Correlation Analysis: ELTK moves relatively less than market (R-squared: 0.14)
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range
Key Levels & Action Items:
Critical Price Levels: Support/resistance to monitor:
- Short-term support: $8.34 (SMA 20)
- Medium-term resistance: $9.43 (SMA 200)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical levels that could trigger significant moves:
- Breakout above SMA 200: Bullish signal
- Breakdown below SMA 20: Bearish signal
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming earnings or major events identified
Risk Management: Consider stop-loss levels around $9.00
ELTK Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 238
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $735K | #2446 of 3138 | -3.7% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
ELTK Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 4 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
ELTK Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-23| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | Gad Dovev | Director | Mixed Exer +589 · Sell −852 |
−263 | $7.45 | -$3.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-22 | Gad Dovev | Director | Mixed Exer +2,945 · Sell −4,260 |
−1,315 | $7.45 | -$18.9K | EDGAR |
ELTK Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 23, 2026Directors 6
- David Rubner · since Mar 18, 2026
- Erez Meltzer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Ilana Lurie · since Mar 18, 2026
- Mordechai Marmorstein · since Mar 18, 2026
- Tsemah Revital Cohen · since Mar 18, 2026
- Amit Avraham Foox · since Aug 11, 2026
Officers 6
- Eli Yaffe · Chief Executive Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Yitzhak Zemach · Vice President Operations · since Mar 18, 2026
- Ron Freund · Chief Financial Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Yaniv Luria · Chief Information Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Raviv Segev · VP of Process & Technology · since Mar 18, 2026
- Tomer Segev · VP Sales and Marketing · since Mar 18, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (14)
| Sep 22, 2026 | Gad Dovev reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Aug 11, 2026 | Amit Avraham Foox became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Yitzhak Zemach became Vice President Operations |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Yaniv Luria became Chief Information Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Tsemah Revital Cohen became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Tomer Segev became VP Sales and Marketing |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Ron Freund became Chief Financial Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Raviv Segev became VP of Process & Technology |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Mordechai Marmorstein became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Ilana Lurie became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Gad Dovev became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Erez Meltzer became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Eli Yaffe became Chief Executive Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | David Rubner became a director |
ELTK Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-05-14What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | Dovev Gad | Director | 10,000 | $79.3K | 2026-05-13 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-23 | Yaffe Eli | Officer | 6,250 | $72.8K | 2024-05-22 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-05 | Yaffe Eli | Officer | 25,000 | $492.0K | 2024-02-02 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-01-23 | Yaffe Eli | Officer | 25,000 | $434.8K | 2024-01-22 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-01-10 | Yaffe Eli | Officer | 15,287 | $226.2K | 2024-01-09 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-01-09 | Nissan Yitzhak | Officer | 29,632 | $441.5K | 2024-01-08 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2023-12-29 | Yaffe Eli | Officer | 3,463 | $48.0K | 2023-12-29 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2023-12-27 | Nissan Yitzhak | Officer | 100,000 | $1.43M | 2023-12-27 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2023-12-20 | Nissan Yitzhak | Officer | 73,379 | $1.06M | 2023-12-19 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2023-12-15 | Nissan Yitzhak | Director | 45,789 | $762.4K | 2023-12-14 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
ELTK vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLEX Flex Ltd. Ordinary Shares | $28.9B | 29.4 | +12.2% | +19.5% | 51 |
| CLS Celestica, Inc. | $28.1B | 21.2 | +61.6% | −26.0% | 67 |
| JBL Jabil Inc. | $26.0B | 25.5 | +20.6% | +3.9% | 47 |
| SANM Sanmina Corp | $8.0B | 27.8 | +58.6% | −2.4% | 28 |
| TTMI TTM Technologies Inc | $7.9B | 28.7 | +37.6% | +2.3% | 34 |
| PLXS Plexus Corp | $5.5B | 30.3 | +14.2% | +34.8% | 60 |
| BHE Benchmark Electronics | $2.3B | 41.1 | +12.9% | +45.0% | 42 |
| CTS CTS Corporation | $1.7B | 24.3 | +7.6% | +40.2% | 57 |
| ELTK Eltek Ltd | $41M | — | — | −28.5% | — |
| Peer median | $8.0B | 28.2 | +17.4% | +11.7% | 49 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.