CLS Celestica, Inc.
XNYS
264.91
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
CLS
$264.91
—
Key stats
$264.91
- 52-Week Range
- $244.51 – $474.02
- YTD
- -12.40%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 72.49
- Straddle Price
- $50.80
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.90
- Market Cap
- $33.9B
- Open
- $268.00
- Day Range
- $253.71 – $268.00
- Volume
- 982,037
- Prev Close
- $269.01
Fair Value
MODEL: LONG
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.12% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.58 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 13.82% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 13.64% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +29.4pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +30.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 12 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.5B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 45.0% |
| Book / Price | 7.9% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 12.0% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 3.3% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.32 |
| Quality Score | 4/6 — high quality (12y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $330.67 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $344.62 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 11.4% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.2B |
| Market Cap | $31B |
Peers used for multiples: AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, LITE, MU, NVDA, TSM, WDC
60-Day Conviction
100%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Nov 23, 2026
$272.24
α +2.8%
rank 93%
conviction
98%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 22, 2026
$274.01
α +3.5%
rank 88%
conviction
91%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 20, 2027
$287.52
α +8.6%
rank 93%
conviction
100%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $193.70 | 19% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $235.52 | 9% | median 22.3× · 6 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $421.53 | 9% | median 28.7× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/B | $341.59 | 2% | median 16.0× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/S | $2615.98 | 6% | median 17.7× · 7 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $330.67 | 36% | stability 93% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $265.42 | 19% | 63 strikes · skew +0.07 |
As of 2026-10-23 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS (3672) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $33.9B
- Employees
- 29,591
- List Date
- 1998-06-30
- CIK
- 0001030894
- Next Earnings
- 2026-10-26 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- $2.88 (3 est.)
- Headquarters
- Toronto, A6
- Homepage
- https://www.celestica.com
Celestica Inc offers supply chain solutions. The company has two operating and reportable segments: Advanced Technology Solutions (ATS) and Connectivity & Cloud Solutions (CCS). The ATS segment consists of the ATS end market and is comprised of the Aerospace and Defense, Industrial, health tech, and Capital Equipment businesses. Its Capital Equipment business is comprised of the semiconductor, display, and robotics equipment businesses, and the CCS segment consists of Communications and Enterprise end markets, The Enterprise end market is comprised of its servers and storage businesses. The co…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 2.02% | 11.06% | 17.44% | 21.54% | 32.66% | -7.08% | 12.94% |
| Feb | 2.22% | -7.47% | -3.86% | 17.75% | -11.44% | -2.62% | -0.90% |
| Mar | -1.18% | 3.57% | -0.85% | -0.79% | -15.08% | 5.51% | -1.47% |
| Apr | -4.36% | -5.71% | -14.08% | -5.60% | 7.96% | 41.86% | 3.35% |
| May | 2.86% | 1.85% | 18.97% | 28.76% | 29.34% | -8.01% | 12.29% |
| Jun | -8.72% | -12.04% | 12.84% | 3.17% | 33.84% | -14.48% | 2.44% |
| Jul | 9.78% | 9.45% | 50.86% | -9.26% | 34.22% | -8.15% | 14.48% |
| Aug | 6.50% | -1.15% | 9.03% | 1.05% | 0.01% | -12.43% | 0.50% |
| Sep | -5.03% | -13.83% | 4.30% | 10.05% | 22.80% | 23.53% | 6.97% |
| Oct | 6.16% | 25.98% | -4.19% | 37.82% | 36.87% | -29.08%* | 12.26% |
| Nov | 0.00% | 0.81% | 11.68% | 21.39% | -1.32% | -- | 6.51% |
| Dec | 12.99% | 0.27% | 7.92% | 8.64% | -7.15% | -- | 4.53% |
| Total | 23.25% | 6.74% | 155.80% | 226.55% | 285.43% | -24.92% | 112.14% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $339.58
SMA 50: $329.01
SMA 200: $333.15
Current: $264.59
EMA 12: $309.53
EMA 26: $326.35
MACD: -16.8134 | Signal: -10.7214
BEARISH
ADX (14): 29.20
TREND
+DI: 11.87
−DI: 40.24
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 29.03
OVERSOLD
Stoch %K: 8.70
Stoch %D: 10.04
Williams %R: -91.99
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $414.96
BB Lower: $264.20
NEUTRAL
OBV: 177,050,064
Vol SMA 20: 2,111,929
Vol ROC: -21.81%
ATR: $21.22
True Range: $15.30
HV 20: 66.8%
HV 30: 65.9%
HV 60: 75.4%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-24T00:00:00 – 2026-10-22T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers and Primary Risks:
- Technical signals indicate a weak trend, with SMA 20 and EMA 12 diverging from the current price.
- High volatility and beta suggest a high-risk stock.
- Negative news sentiment dominates recent headlines.
Investment Thesis: CLS's technical indicators suggest a potential downtrend, while its high volatility and beta increase the risk of significant losses. However, the recent earnings report showed strong Q1 results, which may have contributed to the current price level. Further analysis is needed to determine if this strength can be sustained or if it's just a temporary bounce.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The negative news headlines about Celestica's stock plummeting and the company's shares dropping despite strong Q1 earnings report may have contributed to the recent price decline. However, the overall news sentiment is mixed, with some positive stories about Canadian General Investments and Ninepoint Partners' anticipated monthly cash distributions.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Downtrend
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Weak trend
- Long-term (3-12 months): Uptrend
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $359.43
- Middle Line (SMA 50): $327.49
- Upper Bollinger Band: $432.54
Momentum Signals:
- RSI Interpretation: Neutral (50.40)
- MACD Signal: Bullish (crossover above signal line)
- Bollinger Bands Position: Neutral (price touching middle band)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Mixed news sentiment with negative headlines about Celestica's stock and earnings report, offset by positive stories about Canadian General Investments and Ninepoint Partners' anticipated monthly cash distributions.
Sentiment Assessment: NEGATIVE (due to dominant negative headlines)
Catalyst Identification: No specific catalysts identified in recent news headlines.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to market (beta >1.2).
Volatility Regime: High volatility, with an IV rank of 0.2% and a current IV of 72.1%.
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: Low (0.2%)
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: Bearish sentiment (2.74)
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: CLS's performance is relative to the S&P 500, with a correlation coefficient of 0.48.
Institutional Activity: No specific institutional activity signals identified.
Relative Valuation: CLS is trading within its historical range, but with a higher beta and volatility than the market.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $359.43
- Middle Line (SMA 50): $327.49
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Upper Bollinger Band: $432.54 (potential breakout)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No specific catalysts identified.
Risk Management: Consider stop-loss levels at the lower Bollinger Band or middle line (SMA 50) and position sizing considerations given the high volatility and beta of CLS.
Generated
News
All CLS news →
Under-the-radar AI suppliers Celestica and Marvell are posting explosive growth, and their valuations still have plenty of room to run.
AI stock Celestica has doubled the performance of the S&P 500 year-to-date. Shares are above a trendline entry near 353. The post Celestica Trounces S&P 500 As Earnings Outlook Brightens; Stock Offers Early Entry appeared first on Investor's Business Daily .
Celestica is above an early entry near 353 within a larger base after strong earnings performance in the second quarter. The post AI Play Celestica Flashes Three Buy Points Amid Strong Earnings Outlook appeared first on Investor's Business Daily .
A critical bottleneck in data centers is creating a massive runway for networking stocks like Celestica, according to Bernstein.
Showing 1–10 of 11
Page 1 of 2
Earnings History
4 of 7 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
12.36%
Avg Actual Move
11.30%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-29 | After-Close | 16.15% | 13.59% | 0.84x | Within |
| 2025-04-24 | After-Close | 11.18% | 3.35% | 0.30x | Within |
| 2025-07-28 | After-Close | 11.19% | 16.51% | 1.48x | Exceeded |
| 2025-10-27 | After-Close | 12.31% | 8.16% | 0.66x | Within |
| 2026-01-28 | After-Close | 11.25% | 13.10% | 1.16x | Exceeded |
| 2026-04-27 | After-Close | 11.77% | 14.37% | 1.22x | Exceeded |
| 2026-07-27 | After-Close | 12.69% | 10.04% | 0.79x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
CLS Options Activity & IV Rank
CLS IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 86.1%
7-DTE IV: 123.0%
Expected Move: $50.80
7-DTE Move: $36.65
Days to Exp: 28 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 1,225
Put Volume: 1,105
P/C Volume: 0.902
NEUTRAL
Call OI: 16,344
Put OI: 7,724
P/C OI: 0.473
Total OI: 24,068
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $26.05
ATM Put: $24.75
Call %: 9.8%
Put %: 9.3%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 19,649
Chain OI: 145,099
Last Updated: 10/23/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
LOW γ vs HISTORY
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 3rd percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
3%
vs own history
GEX tilt
-0.54
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
-0.12
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
+0.16
δ-decay vs time
? What is this?
· 153 ATM contracts, 19k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
93%
+12.1
pts
EXTREME
ATM 102.9% / Wing 115.0%
30 DTE / 10d
80%
+9.4
pts
EXTREME
ATM 87.0% / Wing 96.4%
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)91.3HighOct 23
IV Rank (30 DTE)72.5MediumOct 23
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$50.80Oct 23
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 3.3127
Alpha: -20.88%
Correlation: 0.5420
R-Squared: 29.4%
Stock Volatility: 77.9%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own CLS
5 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $155.3M | #263 of 6285 | +151.1% | 13F | |
| Bridgewater Associates Hedge fund Ray Dalio | $120.6M | #26 of 997 | -37.1% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $80.9M | #198 of 3138 | -9.4% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $49.4M | #619 of 3716 | -5.2% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $6.3M | #872 of 4729 | +109.7% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
CLS Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 116,000,000 (as of 2026-06-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
44 filers$5.11B notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $1.38B | 27.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $1.09B | 21.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $598.97M | 11.72% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $231.17M | 4.52% | 2025-09-30 |
| 5 | Value Aligned Research Advisors, LLC | $179.37M | 3.51% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | CastleKnight Management LP | $175.10M | 3.43% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | PICTON MAHONEY ASSET MANAGEMENT | $170.73M | 3.34% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | MAPLELANE CAPITAL, LLC | $169.63M | 3.32% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $144.35M | 2.83% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Caption Management, LLC | $131.33M | 2.57% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Walleye Trading LLC | $125.64M | 2.46% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | PEAK6 LLC | $124.98M | 2.45% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $89.21M | 1.75% | 2025-09-30 |
| 14 | SIG North Trading, ULC | $74.86M | 1.47% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | Oribel Capital Management, LP | $56.69M | 1.11% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $53.84M | 1.05% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $51.98M | 1.02% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $35.35M | 0.69% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | Barclays PLC Custodian | $27.36M | 0.54% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | Bank of Montreal Custodian | $27.33M | 0.53% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $26.48M | 0.52% | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | Alphadyne Asset Management LP | $22.65M | 0.44% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $22.07M | 0.43% | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | Avestar Capital, LLC | $15.76M | 0.31% | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $14.88M | 0.29% | 2026-06-30 |
35 filers$4.15B notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $1.36B | 32.75% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $1.26B | 30.29% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $484.49M | 11.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $129.12M | 3.11% | 2025-09-30 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $127.94M | 3.08% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $121.27M | 2.92% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $118.78M | 2.86% | 2025-09-30 |
| 8 | SIG North Trading, ULC | $66.65M | 1.61% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Capula Management Ltd | $61.29M | 1.48% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $59.21M | 1.43% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Schonfeld Strategic Advisors LLC | $55.81M | 1.35% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Walleye Trading LLC | $55.70M | 1.34% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $42.68M | 1.03% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $31.30M | 0.75% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | Alphadyne Asset Management LP | $22.98M | 0.55% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | Royal Bank of Canada Custodian | $21.89M | 0.53% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $17.07M | 0.41% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $15.54M | 0.37% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | Two Sigma Investments, LP Custodian | $14.99M | 0.36% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $14.77M | 0.36% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | PEAK6 LLC | $13.24M | 0.32% | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | Avestar Capital, LLC | $12.04M | 0.29% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $10.51M | 0.25% | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian | $8.21M | 0.20% | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $7.44M | 0.18% | 2026-06-30 |
CLS Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-01Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | Robert Cascella | Director | Mixed | +46 | $366.47 | -$2.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-01 | Jill Kale | Director | Mixed | +89 | $366.47 | -$2.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-24 | Robert Mionis | Chief Executive Officer | Sell (S) | −23,396 | $364.22 | -$8.52M | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-24 | Todd C Cooper | President | Sell (S) | −20,118 | $360.00 | -$7.24M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-14 | Robert Mionis | Chief Executive Officer | Sell (S) | −23,496 | $362.39 | -$8.51M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-12 | Christopher W. Colpitts | Director | Grant (A) | +190 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-12 | Kulvinder Ahuja | Director | Grant (A) | +133 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-12 | Laurette T Koellner | Director | Grant (A) | +317 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-12 | Jill Kale | Director | Grant (A) | +190 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-12 | Robert Cascella | Director | Grant (A) | +142 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-12 | Robert Mionis | Chief Executive Officer | Grant (A) | +1,271 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-12 | Francoise Colpron | Director | Grant (A) | +203 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-12 | Amar Maletira | Director | Grant (A) | +142 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-12 | David Reeder | Director | Grant (A) | +133 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-06 | Mandeep Chawla | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −16,117 | $369.32 | -$5.95M | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
CLS Insider Holdings
11 insiders · @ $264.59
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robert Mionis | Chief Executive Officer | 467,809 | $123.78M | -$257.10M | 18 | 2026-09-24 |
| 2 | Jason Phillips | President | 133,700 | $35.38M | -$50.01M | 6 | 2026-02-06 |
| 3 | Mandeep Chawla | Chief Financial Officer | 74,427 | $19.69M | -$31.33M | 10 | 2026-08-06 |
| 4 | Todd C Cooper | President | 73,252 | $19.38M | -$54.11M | 10 | 2026-09-24 |
| 5 | Michael Max Wilson | Director | 28,886 | $7.64M | -$3.86M | 8 | 2026-05-20 |
| 6 | Alok K. Agrawal | Chief Strategy Officer | 23,402 | $6.19M | -$2.93M | 2 | 2025-02-05 |
| 7 | Leila Wong | Chief Human Resources Officer | 14,995 | $3.97M | -$12.53M | 6 | 2026-02-06 |
| 8 | Theodoros Tzevelekis | Chief Strategy Officer | 2,695 | $713.1K | $0 | 3 | 2026-02-06 |
| 9 | Laurette T Koellner | Director | 700 | $185.2K | $2.05M | 7 | 2026-08-12 |
| 10 | Jill Kale | Director | 512 | $135.5K | $0 | 10 | 2026-10-01 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
CLS Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 1, 2026Directors 9
- Francoise Colpron · since Dec 19, 2024
- Jill Kale · since Dec 19, 2024
- Kulvinder Ahuja · since Dec 19, 2024
- Robert Cascella · since Dec 19, 2024
- Amar Maletira · since Jan 1, 2025
- Robert Mionis · listed since Feb 2025
- Christopher W. Colpitts · since Jul 28, 2025
- Laurette T Koellner · listed since Oct 2025
- David Reeder · since May 1, 2026
Officers 9
- Robert Mionis · Chief Executive Officer · since Dec 19, 2024
- Jason Phillips · President · since Dec 19, 2024
- Todd C Cooper · President · since Dec 19, 2024
- Steven Gregg Dorwart · President · since Jul 6, 2026
- Todd Ankenmann · Chief Financial Officer · since Oct 1, 2026
- Douglas Michael Parker · Chief Legal Officer · since Dec 19, 2024
- Leila Wong · Chief Human Resources Officer · since Dec 19, 2024
- Yann L Etienvre · Chief Operations Officer · since Dec 19, 2024
- Theodoros Tzevelekis · Chief Strategy Officer · since May 26, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (30)
| Oct 1, 2026 | Todd Ankenmann became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jul 6, 2026 | Steven Gregg Dorwart became President |
| May 20, 2026 | Michael Max Wilson reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| May 1, 2026 | David Reeder became a director |
| Mar 24, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Michael Wilson from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jan 28, 2026 | Luis A Muller reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Laurette T Koellner first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Jul 28, 2025 | Christopher W. Colpitts became a director |
| May 26, 2025 | Theodoros Tzevelekis became Chief Strategy Officer |
| Feb 6, 2025 | Robert Mionis first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Feb 3, 2025 | Robert Mionis no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Feb 3, 2025 | Laurette T Koellner reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Jan 1, 2025 | Amar Maletira became a director |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Yann L Etienvre became Chief Operations Officer |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Todd C Cooper became President |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Robert Mionis became a director |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Robert Mionis became Chief Executive Officer |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Robert Cascella became a director |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Michael Wilson became a director |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Michael Max Wilson became a director |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Mandeep Chawla became Chief Financial Officer |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Luis A Muller became a director |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Leila Wong became Chief Human Resources Officer |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Laurette T Koellner became a director |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Kulvinder Ahuja became a director |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Jill Kale became a director |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Jason Phillips became President |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Francoise Colpron became a director |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Douglas Michael Parker became Chief Legal Officer |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Alok K. Agrawal became Chief Strategy Officer |
Not reported recently (2)
- Mandeep Chawla · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Aug 6, 2026
- Alok K. Agrawal · Last reported as Chief Strategy Officer in an SEC filing dated Feb 5, 2025
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
CLS Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-09-23
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
1 filing
· $7.2M notice value
· Last 90d:
3 filings
· $87.4M notice value
· 3 unique filers
· 100% under 10b5-1 plans
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | Cooper Todd C | Officer | 20,118 | $7.24M | 2026-09-23 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-31 | MIONIS ROBERT | Officer | 205,949 | $74.14M | 2026-07-31 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-31 | CHAWLA MANDEEP | Officer | 17,000 | $5.99M | 2026-07-31 | RBC Dominion Securities Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-15 | MIONIS ROBERT | Officer | 140,000 | $56.00M | 2026-06-15 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-15 | CHAWLA MANDEEP | Officer | 17,000 | $6.68M | 2026-06-15 | RBC Dominion Securities Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | Wilson Michael Max | Director | 4,168 | $1.43M | 2026-05-19 | Canaccord Genuity | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-23 | LUIS MULLER | Director | 39,492 | $10.82M | 2026-03-23 | Kevin Reavey | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-06 | PHILLIPS JASON | Officer | 120,000 | $33.10M | 2026-02-05 | Janney Montgomery Scott LLC / St… | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-02 | Etienvre Yann L | Officer | 86,226 | $24.23M | 2026-02-02 | Canaccord Genuity | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-02 | Wong Leila | Officer | 29,950 | $8.42M | 2026-02-02 | Canaccord Genuity | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
113 ETFs hold CLS
25 shown · $2.12B total exposure · 0.15% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.10% | $664.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | Vanguard | 0.14% | $438.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | BAI iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.91% | $121.0M | $12.5B | 2026-10-21 |
| 4 | VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World Ex-US ETF | Vanguard | 0.11% | $107.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | Nport | 0.15% | $98.0M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 6 | EWC iShares MSCI Canada ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 1.18% | $89.1M | $7.5B | 2026-10-21 |
| 7 | IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.43% | $59.6M | $13.7B | 2026-10-21 |
| 8 | IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.09% | $51.0M | $57.1B | 2026-10-21 |
| 9 | SPDW State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.11% | $47.2M | $41.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 10 | FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | Nport | 0.66% | $46.0M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 11 | IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.13% | $44.1M | $33.7B | 2026-10-21 |
| 12 | VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $40.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 13 | ARTY iShares Future AI & Tech ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 1.04% | $40.5M | $3.7B | 2026-10-21 |
| 14 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.04% | $39.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 15 | IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $38.1M | $148.1B | 2026-10-21 |
| 16 | CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | Nport | 1.66% | $29.5M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 17 | ROBO ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index ETF | Nport | 1.41% | $28.1M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 18 | AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | Global X | 0.25% | $25.2M | — | 2026-10-22 |
| 19 | IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.17% | $19.2M | $10.6B | 2026-10-21 |
| 20 | TSME Thrivent Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | Nport | 1.81% | $19.0M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.11% | $18.8M | $17.6B | 2026-10-21 |
| 22 | SIXG Defiance Connective Technologies ETF | Nport | 1.38% | $14.0M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | UFOX Defiance Connective Technologies ETF | Nport | 1.38% | $14.0M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | ESGE iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.21% | $14.0M | $6.3B | 2026-10-21 |
| 25 | IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.15% | $13.8M | $9.0B | 2026-10-21 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
27.53
TTM Diluted EPS
$9.61
TTM Revenue
$15.59B
TTM Net Income
$1.12B
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$1.14B
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $4.70B | $368.80M | $3.17 | $410.90M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $4.05B | $212.30M | $1.83 | $356.30M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $3.65B | $267.50M | $2.30 | $250.60M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $3.19B | $267.80M | $2.31 | $126.20M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $2.89B | $211.00M | $1.82 | $152.40M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $2.65B | $86.20M | $0.74 | $130.30M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $2.55B | $151.70M | $1.29 | $143.40M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $2.50B | $89.50M | $0.75 | $122.80M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $2.39B | $95.00M | $0.80 | $99.60M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $2.21B | $91.80M | $0.77 | $108.10M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '22 | 2022-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
Q2 2026 • period ending 2026-06-30 • filed 2026-07-27
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
27.53
P/B
12.38
P/S
1.97
EV/EBITDA
19.88
EV/Sales
1.98
ROE
45.0%
ROA
11.4%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
3.73%
Debt/Equity
0.32
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$30.69B
as of 2026-10-23
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
4.44M
SI % of Float
3.52%
Days to Cover
1.95
Short Vol Ratio
38.4%
Free Float
126.11M
Float %
100.0%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-22 • Float 2026-10-02