EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF

ETF 91.44 Delayed

ETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

EMB $91.44 —
Key stats
$91.44
52-Week Range
$89.69 – $97.80
YTD
-5.05%
IV Rank (30D)
29.44
Straddle Price
$2.20
P/C Vol Ratio
1.82
Open
$91.48
Day Range
$91.15 – $91.61
Volume
9,875,697
Prev Close
$91.22
About

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) ETF

No description available.

Exchange
XNAS
Inception
2007-12-17
Has Options
Yes
Homepage
https://www.ishares.com/us
Fund profile
holdings as of Oct 19, 2026issuer datathrough Jul 2026flows, SEC filings
Expense ratio
0.39%
issuer, Oct 21, 2026
Assets
$12.7B
issuer-reported, Oct 19, 2026
Trailing yield
5.41%
paid monthly
Average daily volume
$838M
30 sessions
Holdings
619
top 10 are 6.2%
Listed
Dec 17, 2007
Nasdaq
Net asset value
$91.11
issuer, Oct 20, 2026 · closed -0.09% to NAV
Median bid/ask spread
0.01%
30 days, issuer-reported
30-day SEC yield
6.56%
issuer, Oct 19, 2026
Return on NAV, 1 year
+0.8%
issuer, through Sep 30, 2026 · 3 years +8.9% a year · 5 years +1.3% · 10 years +2.3%
Distributions, 12 months
$4.93 a share
issuer, through Oct 1, 2026: 100% income
Closure risk, 12 months
0.0%
low · model
Tracking difference
-0.35 pts
vs index, after fees, FY 2025
FrenzyCap ETF score
78
how it is built
Cost38
Liquidity100
Scale100
Diversification100

Moves with. Long Treasuries (52% of its variance, beta 0.45); US large-cap stocks (25% of its variance, beta 0.19). These factors explain 82% of its daily moves over the last year.

Stated objective. The iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (the Fund ) seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. dollar-denominated, emerging market bonds. (from the fund's prospectus)

All 619 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Emerging Markets Bond ETFs

Fund flows
daily as of Oct 20, 2026issuer datathrough Jul 2026SEC filings
Oct 20, 2026
+$27M
latest day
Latest 5 trading days
−$265M
Latest 21 trading days
−$807M
−6.4% of assets
Year to date
−$3.2B
−$2.0B over 12 months
Each day
Net creations of EMB by day, Sep 22, 2026 to Oct 20, 2026
DayNet flow
Oct 20, 2026+$27M
Oct 19, 2026$0
Oct 16, 2026+$73M
Oct 15, 2026−$183M
Oct 14, 2026−$182M
Oct 13, 2026$0
Oct 12, 2026$0
Oct 9, 2026−$73M
Oct 8, 2026+$36M
Oct 7, 2026+$127M
Oct 6, 2026$0
Oct 5, 2026+$27M
Oct 2, 2026−$72M
Oct 1, 2026−$54M
Sep 30, 2026$0
Sep 29, 2026+$73M
Sep 28, 2026−$37M
Sep 25, 2026−$350M
Sep 24, 2026−$296M
Sep 23, 2026$0
Sep 22, 2026+$75M

Daily figures are the change in shares outstanding times net asset value, both as the issuer publishes them each day.

Jul 2026
+$309M
latest reported month
Latest 3 months
+$289M
+2.0% of assets
Latest 12 months
+$4.6B
+31.6% of assets
Aug 2025: −$93MSep 2025: +$1.2BSepOct 2025: +$71MNov 2025: +$558MNovDec 2025: +$1.1BJan 2026: +$126MJanFeb 2026: −$552M−$552MMar 2026: +$1.8B+$1.8BMarApr 2026: +$82MMay 2026: −$418MMayJun 2026: +$398MJul 2026: +$309MJul
View as a table
Net flows of EMB by month, Aug 2025 to Jul 2026
MonthNet flow
Jul 2026+$309M
Jun 2026+$398M
May 2026−$418M
Apr 2026+$82M
Mar 2026+$1.8B
Feb 2026−$552M
Jan 2026+$126M
Dec 2025+$1.1B
Nov 2025+$558M
Oct 2025+$71M
Sep 2025+$1.2B
Aug 2025−$93M

Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 84 months ago

Similar funds
FundOverlapFeeAssets1Y
EMLCVanEck J. P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF—0.30%$5.0B−2.2%compare
EBNDState Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF—0.30%$2.3B−2.8%compare
PCYInvesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF—0.50%$1.2B−8.0%compare
XEMDBondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF—0.29%$843M−2.1%compare
LEMBiShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF—0.30%$780M+2.4%compare

The largest other funds in the Emerging Markets Bond category.

Under the hood
fiscal year to Oct 31, 2025SEC census
Authorized participants
6 active
of 40 with agreements; top 3 did 92%
Created · redeemed
$8.9B · $9.5B
over the fiscal year
Redemptions in kind
98%
creations 94% in kind
Creation unit
100,000
shares
Securities lending
authorized, none lent
Return vs index
-0.35 pts
after fees; -0.35 before; daily s.d. 4.91

From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.

ETF Profile
holdings as of 2026-10-20
Holdings
621
AUM
$12.8B
Provider
iShares (BlackRock)
Inception
2007-12-17
Exchange
XNAS
Data As Of
2026-10-20
Expense Ratio
0.39%
Dividend Yield
5.40%
Distribution
Monthly
Recent distributions
Ex-Date Pay Date Amount Type
2026-10-01 2026-10-06 $0.4436 CD
2026-09-01 2026-09-04 $0.4137 CD
2026-08-03 2026-08-06 $0.4136 CD
2026-07-01 2026-07-07 $0.3997 CD
2026-06-01 2026-06-04 $0.4070 CD
2026-05-01 2026-05-06 $0.4101 CD
Asset Allocation
Top Holdings
top 50 of 621 holdings
Symbol Name Weight % Asset Class Country
— ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 1.11% Corporate Bond AR
— ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.75% Corporate Bond EC
— ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.67% Corporate Bond AR
— ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.66% Corporate Bond AR
— GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.57% Corporate Bond GH
— ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.53% Corporate Bond AR
— EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.52% Corporate Bond MX
— URUGUAY (ORIENTAL REPUBLIC OF) 0.52% Corporate Bond UY
— OMAN SULTANATE OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.42% Corporate Bond OM
— BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.42% Cash/Money Market US
— UKRAINE (REPUBLIC OF) C BONDS RegS 0.40% Corporate Bond UA
— ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.38% Corporate Bond EC
— BRAZIL FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF (GOV 0.38% Corporate Bond BR
— OMAN SULTANATE OF (GOVERNMENT) MTN RegS 0.36% Corporate Bond OM
— URUGUAY (ORIENTAL REPUBLIC OF) 0.35% Corporate Bond UY
— SOUTH AFRICA (REPUBLIC OF) 0.35% Corporate Bond ZA
— HUNGARY (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.35% Corporate Bond HU
— PETRONAS CAPITAL LTD MTN RegS 0.34% Corporate Bond MY
— PERU (REPUBLIC OF) 0.34% Corporate Bond PE
— EGYPT (ARAB REPUBLIC OF) MTN RegS 0.34% Corporate Bond EG
— OMAN SULTANATE OF (GOVERNMENT) MTN RegS 0.34% Corporate Bond OM
— URUGUAY (ORIENTAL REPUBLIC OF) 0.34% Corporate Bond UY
— DOMINICAN REPUBLIC (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.34% Corporate Bond DO
— ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.33% Corporate Bond EC
— PERU (REPUBLIC OF) 0.33% Corporate Bond PE
— POLAND (REPUBLIC OF) 0.33% Corporate Bond PL
— URUGUAY (ORIENTAL REPUBLIC OF) 0.32% Corporate Bond UY
— DOMINICAN REPUBLIC (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.32% Corporate Bond DO
— HUNGARY (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.32% Corporate Bond HU
— PETRONAS CAPITAL LTD MTN RegS 0.32% Corporate Bond MY
— HUNGARY (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.32% Corporate Bond HU
— JAMAICA (GOVERNMENT) 0.31% Corporate Bond JM
— ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.31% Corporate Bond EC
— GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.31% Corporate Bond GH
— POLAND (REPUBLIC OF) 0.31% Corporate Bond PL
— SOUTH AFRICA (REPUBLIC OF) RegS 0.31% Corporate Bond ZA
— PERU (REPUBLIC OF) 0.31% Corporate Bond PE
— PANAMA REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) 0.31% Corporate Bond PA
— SRI LANKA (REPUBLIC OF) MLB RegS 0.30% Corporate Bond LK
— PETROLEOS MEXICANOS 0.30% Corporate Bond MX
— OMAN SULTANATE OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.30% Corporate Bond OM
— SRI LANKA (REPUBLIC OF) MLB RegS 0.30% Corporate Bond LK
— POLAND (REPUBLIC OF) 0.29% Corporate Bond PL
— POLAND (REPUBLIC OF) 0.29% Corporate Bond PL
— CHINA PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNM RegS 0.29% Corporate Bond CN
— SOUTH AFRICA (REPUBLIC OF) 0.29% Corporate Bond ZA
— BRAZIL FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF (GOV 0.29% Corporate Bond BR
— COLOMBIA (REPUBLIC OF) 0.29% Corporate Bond CO
— EGYPT (ARAB REPUBLIC OF) MTN RegS 0.29% Corporate Bond EG
— BRAZIL FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF (GOV 0.29% Corporate Bond BR
Non-Equity Breakdown
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF · NPORT-P period 2026-07-31 (filed 2026-09-25)
Net assets: $14.61B · 623 total positions · equity 0.00% · non-equity 98.70%
Non-equity holdings — 623 positions, 98.70% of NAV
Category Weight Value Positions
Non-US Sovereign 87.06% $12.72B 528
Corporate 10.07% $1.47B 94
Short-term investment 1.56% $228.6M 1
Chart
Seasonality
Month'21'22'23'24'25'26Avg
Jan-1.23%-2.41%3.47%-0.23%1.35%0.29%0.21%
Feb-3.52%-5.78%-4.50%-0.06%1.97%1.65%-1.71%
Mar-1.28%0.45%2.35%1.40%-0.94%-3.15%-0.19%
Apr1.60%-7.01%-0.10%-1.99%-0.57%2.07%-1.00%
May1.10%1.37%-0.20%2.18%1.12%0.90%1.08%
Jun0.73%-5.98%1.82%-0.68%2.73%0.45%-0.16%
Jul0.66%2.17%1.53%3.08%0.49%-1.39%1.09%
Aug0.76%-3.15%-0.86%2.32%1.51%0.02%0.10%
Sep-2.81%-6.35%-3.09%2.42%1.96%-3.45%-1.89%
Oct0.18%-1.66%-0.10%-2.72%1.63%1.31%*-0.23%
Nov-1.61%8.00%4.86%2.23%0.79%--2.85%
Dec1.11%-3.66%2.54%-2.86%0.27%---0.52%
Total-4.38%-22.38%7.58%4.95%12.96%-1.46%-0.46%
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $91.15
SMA 50: $93.03
SMA 200: $95.11
Current: $91.44
EMA 12: $91.32
EMA 26: $91.78
MACD: -0.4618 | Signal: 0.1664
BEARISH
ADX (14): 35.28
TREND
+DI: 20.86
−DI: 37.42

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 44.86
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 69.12
Stoch %D: 73.69
Williams %R: -24.61

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $92.22
BB Lower: $90.09
NEUTRAL
OBV: -171,350,491
Vol SMA 20: 9,924,175
Vol ROC: 12.83%
ATR: $0.53
True Range: $0.46
HV 20: 6.5%
HV 30: 7.1%
HV 60: 6.2%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-23T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis

EMB (iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) - Comprehensive Analysis


Executive Summary

Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level 6/10

EMB presents a mixed technical and fundamental picture in a structurally challenging environment. The fund is a passively managed, broadly diversified emerging markets bond portfolio ($12.7B in assets, 619 holdings) with a competitive 0.39% expense ratio and attractive 5.39% trailing yield. However, the fund faces headwinds from deteriorating momentum indicators, negative fund flows relative to recent price performance, and macro uncertainty around US debt levels and Fed policy.

Investment Thesis: EMB offers compelling yield (5.39%) and has captured strong inflows (+$4.6B in 12 months), but technical deterioration (MACD bearish, ADX trending downward, RSI declining) combined with negative news sentiment around US debt sustainability suggests near-term caution. The fund's low volatility (beta 0.32, HV30 6.9%) makes it defensive for fixed-income portfolios, but momentum indicators signal downside pressure ahead.

Recent News Sentiment Impact: All headlines are NEUTRAL-to-BEARISH in tone. The most recent article (May 24, 2024) flags investor concerns about US debt overshadowing bond rally momentum—a direct headwind for EM bonds, which benefit from Fed rate-cut expectations and risk-on sentiment. The May 16 headline about disinflation and Fed cuts was more constructive but is now 6+ months old and potentially stale relative to current macro conditions.


Technical Analysis

Trend Direction

| Timeframe | Direction | Strength | Interpretation | |-----------|-----------|----------|-----------------| | Short-term (1-4 weeks) | BEARISH | Weak | Price $91.09 below SMA20 ($91.34) and all major MAs; MACD deeply negative; RSI declining | | Medium-term (1-3 months) | BEARISH | Moderate | Price well below SMA50 ($93.17) and SMA200 ($95.16); downtrend in place | | Long-term (3-12 months) | BEARISH | Strong | Fund down ~4.3% from 200-day MA ($95.16); suggests sustained underperformance |

Price is within the lower half of its Bollinger Bands structure, indicating gravitational weakness rather than a sharp reversal setup.

Support/Resistance Levels

| Level | Type | Distance | Relevance | |-------|------|----------|-----------| | $89.68 | SUPPORT (Bollinger Lower Band) | -1.5% | First critical support; breach here signals technical breakdown | | $91.09 | CURRENT PRICE | — | Currently testing middle-band support | | $91.34 | SUPPORT (SMA20) | +0.3% | Weak short-term support; recent price action below this is concerning | | $93.17 | RESISTANCE (SMA50) | +2.3% | Medium-term resistance; reclaiming this level would signal trend recovery | | $95.16 | RESISTANCE (SMA200) | +4.5% | Major technical ceiling; 200-day MA at overhead resistance |

Momentum Signals

RSI (14): 39.74 — NEUTRAL but WEAKENING

  • Reading is in the neutral zone (30-70), but positioned in the lower half, suggesting downward momentum bias
  • Not yet oversold (<30), but approaching caution territory
  • Recent trend: RSI declining, consistent with MACD deterioration

MACD: -0.54 (Line) vs 0.17 (Signal) — BEARISH CROSSOVER

  • Histogram at -0.71 indicates negative divergence
  • MACD line (-0.54) is substantially below signal line (0.17)—classic bearish configuration
  • This is the fund's most concerning momentum signal; no bullish crossover in sight near-term

Stochastic Oscillators: %K 80.48 / %D 76.05 — OVERBOUGHT SIGNAL

  • Data quality flag: Stochastic readings of 80+ indicate overbought conditions, but this contradicts the bearish MACD and low RSI signals
  • Possible interpretation: Short-term oversold bounce is being reversed, but momentum deterioration is the primary theme
  • Williams %R at -36.94 (neutral zone) aligns better with overall weakness

Bollinger Bands: Neutral

  • Price ($91.09) near middle band ($91.34)—no extreme squeeze or breakout
  • Upper band at $92.99 is only +1.9% overhead; lower band at $89.68 is -1.5% support
  • Narrow width (3.62) indicates low recent volatility but limited breakout conviction

→ Technical Summary: Momentum is deteriorating with MACD in bearish territory. RSI is neutral but declining. Stochastic overbought reading may represent a brief bounce counter to the dominant downtrend, not a reversal signal.

Volume Analysis

Volume SMA 20: 9,985,026 shares/day

  • Current volume rate of change: -14.47% — declining volume trend
  • Interpretation: Weakening participation on selloffs suggests institutional exit activity but without panic-level volume

On-Balance Volume (OBV): -198,175,477 — NEGATIVE

  • OBV deeply negative indicates cumulative selling pressure
  • This metric suggests institutional or large investor redemptions/rebalancing over recent period
  • Consistent with the fund's recent underperformance (-4.3% from 200-day MA)

Volume Interpretation: Declining volume on downside is a red flag for institutional interest waning. The combination of negative OBV and -14.47% volume rate of change suggests that recent price weakness is not being countered by strong buying interest. This aligns with the news sentiment around macro uncertainty deterring new inflows.


News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary

| Date | Headline Theme | Sentiment | Relevance to EMB | |------|------------------|-----------|-----------------| | May 24, 2024 | US debt concerns overshadowing bond rally | NEGATIVE | Most directly bearish: Rising US debt levels reduce Fed rate-cut expectations, which is the primary tailwind for EM bonds | | May 16, 2024 | Disinflation & Fed rate cuts boost bond ETFs | POSITIVE | Supportive narrative, but now 6+ months old and potentially invalidated by more recent debt concerns | | Dec 5, 2023 | Flows into aggressive bond ETFs on rate-cut expectations | POSITIVE | Explains the +$4.6B inflows into EMB, but timing suggests this was a lagging indicator (flows often peak near local tops) | | Nov 2, 2023 | S&P 500 & Treasuries top ETF flows | NEUTRAL | Backward-looking; suggests EM bonds were not the favored trade at that time | | Sept 22, 2023 | India added to JPMorgan EM bond index | POSITIVE | Technical positive (inclusion flows), but 13+ months old; likely already absorbed into pricing | | Aug 30, 2023 | EM bonds breaking out vs Treasuries | POSITIVE | Very old; suggests a prior bull case that has now reversed |

Sentiment Assessment

Aggregate Sentiment: NEUTRAL → NEGATIVE BIAS

  • Current macro narrative (May 24, 2024): Uncertainty around US debt sustainability and its implications for Fed policy is the dominant theme
  • Prior narratives (Dec 2023 - May 2024): Rate-cut expectations were supportive, but this trade appears to be rolling over
  • Contradiction: The May 24 headline about debt concerns directly contradicts the bullish May 16 narrative about disinflation driving bond rallies

→ Implication: News flow has shifted from supportive (rate cuts incoming) to cautious (macro uncertainty), and technical indicators have caught down to this shift. The fund's recent underperformance is justified by deteriorating sentiment.

Catalyst Identification

Immediate (1-7 days):

  • No major EM-specific catalysts identified in provided data
  • US macro data releases (employment, inflation) could impact Fed expectations

Near-term (1-4 weeks):

  • Presidential elections (November 2024, per May 24 headline): Political uncertainty could affect EM sentiment and US deficit trajectory
  • Fed communications/FOMC meetings: Rate path expectations directly drive EM bond
Generated

EMB Options Activity & IV Rank

EMB IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →

Volatility Metrics

Current IV: 10.2%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $2.20
7-DTE Move: $2.20
Days to Exp: 30 (2026-11-20)

Options Flow

Call Volume: 11
Put Volume: 20
P/C Volume: 1.818
BEARISH
Call OI: 71
Put OI: 21
P/C OI: 0.296
Total OI: 92

ATM Options Pricing

ATM Call: $1.23
ATM Put: $0.97
Call %: 1.3%
Put %: 1.1%

Chain Summary

Chain Volume: 2,695
Chain OI: 69,304
Last Updated: 10/21/2026
Spread Scanner GPU

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ

Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 30th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.

Gamma percentile
30%
vs own history
GEX tilt
-0.88
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.96
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.60
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.96: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.60: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.

Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.

Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.

Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.

This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.

· 41 ATM contracts, 66k total OI
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
as of Oct 21 · No data
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
as of Oct 21 · ATM 10.3% / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)29.4MediumOct 21
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$2.20Oct 21
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 0.3153
Alpha: -9.71%
Correlation: 0.6510
R-Squared: 42.4%
Stock Volatility: 6.2%
Market Volatility: 12.7%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time

EMB Institutional Ownership (13F)

Latest filings — 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

882 filers143,517,738 shares$13.53B value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 Wells Fargo & Company Custodian 20,941,930 $2.02B 14.93% — 2026-06-30
2 UBS Group AG Custodian 10,780,504 $1.04B 7.68% — 2026-06-30
3 BNP Paribas Financial Markets Custodian 7,308,016 $704.79M 5.21% — 2026-06-30
4 Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian 6,569,501 $633.56M 4.68% — 2026-06-30
5 ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM SUNBELT HEALTHCARE CORP 6,336,317 $611.08M 4.52% — 2026-06-30
6 Bank of America Corp Custodian 4,819,182 $464.76M 3.44% — 2026-06-30
7 HSBC Holdings plc Custodian 4,660,790 $450.69M 3.33% — 2026-06-30
8 Betterment LLC 4,614,236 $445.00M 3.29% — 2026-06-30
9 Morgan Stanley Custodian 3,399,980 $327.89M 2.42% — 2026-06-30
10 Nationwide Fund Advisors 5,519,657 $279.29M 2.06% — 2026-06-30
11 TIAA-CREF INDIVIDUAL & INSTITUTIONAL SERVICES, LLC 2,841,865 $274.07M 2.03% — 2026-06-30
12 Royal Bank of Canada Custodian 2,782,023 $268.30M 1.98% — 2026-06-30
13 Japan Science & Technology Agency 2,500,000 $227.10M 1.68% — 2026-09-30
14 BESSEMER GROUP INC Custodian 2,208,204 $212.96M 1.57% — 2026-06-30
15 Polianta Ltd 2,151,000 $207.44M 1.53% — 2026-06-30
16 UBS AM, a distinct business unit of UBS ASSET MANAGEMENT AMERICAS LLC Custodian 2,149,751 $207.32M 1.53% — 2026-06-30
17 JPMorgan Chase & Co Custodian 2,092,124 $202.56M 1.50% — 2026-06-30
18 SBI Okasan Asset Management Co.Ltd. 1,830,410 $177.22M 1.31% — 2026-06-30
19 BlackRock, Inc. Custodian 1,816,405 $175.17M 1.29% — 2026-06-30
20 Bank of New York Mellon Corp Custodian 1,804,062 $173.98M 1.29% — 2026-06-30
21 CI INVESTMENTS INC. 1,791,803 $172.80M 1.28% — 2026-06-30
22 Ameriprise Financial, Inc. Custodian 1,736,578 $167.28M 1.24% — 2026-06-30
23 LPL Financial LLC Custodian 1,144,037 $110.33M 0.82% — 2026-06-30
24 Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian 1,063,774 $102.59M 0.76% — 2026-06-30
25 SigFig Wealth Management, LLC 1,008,486 $91.61M 0.68% — 2026-09-30
3 filers$3.06M notional
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
1 Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian $1.98M 64.67% 2026-06-30
2 Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian $839.03K 27.44% 2026-06-30
3 Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian $241.10K 7.89% 2026-06-30
4 filers$34.16M notional
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
1 UBS Group AG Custodian $28.93M 84.70% 2026-06-30
2 Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian $4.15M 12.14% 2026-06-30
3 Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian $732.94K 2.15% 2026-06-30
4 Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian $347.18K 1.02% 2026-06-30
Short Interest & Float

Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.

Metric definitions
  • Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
  • SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
  • Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
  • Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
  • Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
  • Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
  • SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
  • 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
  • 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
  • >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
  • Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
  • Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
  • A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.

Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.

Short Interest
24.24M
SI % of Float
17.58%
Days to Cover
2.59
Short Vol Ratio
69.9%
Free Float
—
Float %
—
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-21
Constituent Performance

Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.

Constituents
Symbol Name Weight % Price 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month