XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
ETFETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- BATS
- Inception
- 2022-06-28
- Has Options
- No
- Expense ratio
- 0.29% prospectus, filed Feb 27, 2026
- Assets
- $843M SEC filing, Jul 31, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 5.92% paid monthly
- Average daily volume
- $6.8M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 425 top 10 are 9.4%
- Listed
- Jun 28, 2022 Cboe BZX
- Tracking difference
- -0.28 pts vs index, after fees, FY 2025
Moves with. Long Treasuries (36% of its variance, beta 0.29); US large-cap stocks (27% of its variance, beta 0.17); US dollar (3% of its variance, beta -0.06). These factors explain 69% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (the Fund) seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. dollar-denominated emerging market bonds with an average life of below 10 years. (from the fund's prospectus)
All 425 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Emerging Markets Bond ETFs
- Jul 2026
- −$130M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- −$60M −7.1% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- +$408M +48.4% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | −$130M |
| Jun 2026 | +$58M |
| May 2026 | +$11M |
| Apr 2026 | +$18M |
| Mar 2026 | +$25M |
| Feb 2026 | +$54M |
| Jan 2026 | +$70M |
| Dec 2025 | +$122M |
| Nov 2025 | +$102M |
| Oct 2025 | +$68M |
| Sep 2025 | +$4.4M |
| Aug 2025 | +$4.3M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 51 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMBiShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | — | 0.39% | $12.7B | −4.7% | compare |
| EMLCVanEck J. P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | — | 0.30% | $5.0B | −2.2% | compare |
| EBNDState Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF | — | 0.30% | $2.3B | −2.8% | compare |
| PCYInvesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF | — | 0.50% | $1.2B | −8.0% | compare |
| LEMBiShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | — | 0.30% | $780M | +2.4% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Emerging Markets Bond category.
- Authorized participants
- 3 active of 6 with agreements; top 3 did 100%
- Created · redeemed
- $246M · $11M over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 94% creations 98% in kind
- Creation unit
- 50,000 shares
- Securities lending
- not authorized
- Return vs index
- -0.28 pts after fees; +0.01 before; daily s.d. 0.46
- Diversification status
- Non-diversified may concentrate in fewer issuers
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-06 | $0.1941 | CD |
| 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | $0.1953 | CD |
| 2026-08-03 | 2026-08-06 | $0.2386 | CD |
| 2026-07-01 | 2026-07-07 | $0.1995 | CD |
| 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-04 | $0.2132 | CD |
| 2026-05-01 | 2026-05-06 | $0.1978 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | REPUBLIC OF ARGE S/UP 07/09/35 | 1.76% | Debt | AR |
| — | REPUBLIC OF ECUA S/UP 07/31/35 | 1.30% | Debt | EC |
| — | REPUBLIC OF ARGE S/UP 01/09/38 | 1.03% | Debt | AR |
| — | REPUBLIC OF ARGE S/UP 07/09/30 | 0.97% | Debt | AR |
| — | REPUBLIC OF GHAN S/UP 07/03/35 | 0.91% | Debt | GH |
| — | REPUBLIC OF ARGE S/UP 07/09/41 | 0.84% | Debt | AR |
| — | EAGLE FUNDING LU 5.5% 08/17/30 | 0.71% | Debt | LU |
| — | UKRAINE GOVERNME S/UP 02/01/32 | 0.69% | Debt | UA |
| — | REPUBLIC OF ECU 8.75% 01/29/34 | 0.63% | Debt | EC |
| — | REPUBLICA ORIEN 5.75% 10/28/34 | 0.54% | Debt | UY |
| — | UKRAINE GOVERNME S/UP 02/01/34 | 0.54% | Debt | UA |
| — | FED REPUBLIC O 6.625% 03/15/35 | 0.53% | Debt | BR |
| — | OMAN GOV INTER 5.625% 01/17/28 | 0.52% | Debt | OM |
| — | PETRONAS CAPITAL 3.5% 04/21/30 | 0.52% | Debt | MY |
| — | REPUBLIC OF GHAN S/UP 07/03/29 | 0.51% | Debt | GH |
| — | DOMINICAN REPU 4.875% 09/23/32 | 0.50% | Debt | DO |
| — | HUNGARY 5.5% 03/26/36 | 0.49% | Debt | HU |
| — | REPUBLIC OF SRI S/UP 03/15/33 | 0.49% | Debt | LK |
| — | UKRAINE GOVERNME S/UP 02/01/35 | 0.49% | Debt | UA |
| — | OMAN GOV INTERNTL 6% 08/01/29 | 0.49% | Debt | OM |
| — | REPUBLICA ORIE 5.442% 02/14/37 | 0.48% | Debt | UY |
| — | REPUBLC OF PERU 8.75%11/21/33 | 0.48% | Debt | PE |
| — | REPUBLIC OF PO 5.125% 09/18/34 | 0.48% | Debt | PL |
| — | REPUBLIC OF PE 2.783% 01/23/31 | 0.47% | Debt | PE |
| — | IVORY COAST 8.075% 04/01/36 | 0.46% | Debt | CI |
| — | REPUBLIC OF PO 4.875% 02/12/30 | 0.46% | Debt | PL |
| — | REPUBLIC OF PO 5.375% 02/12/35 | 0.45% | Debt | PL |
| — | REPUBLICA ORIE 4.375% 01/23/31 | 0.45% | Debt | UY |
| — | HUNGARY 6.125% 05/22/28 | 0.45% | Debt | HU |
| — | HUNGARY 6% 09/26/35 | 0.45% | Debt | HU |
| — | REPUBLIC OF N 10.375% 12/09/34 | 0.44% | Debt | NG |
| — | PETRONAS CAPITA 5.34% 04/03/35 | 0.44% | Debt | MY |
| — | REPUBLIC OF ANG 8.75% 04/14/32 | 0.43% | Debt | AO |
| — | REPUBLIC OF PANA 6.4% 02/14/35 | 0.42% | Debt | PA |
| — | FED REPUBLIC OF 6.25% 05/22/36 | 0.41% | Debt | BR |
| — | UKRAINE GOVERNME S/UP 02/01/36 | 0.41% | Debt | UA |
| — | REPUBLIC OF PO 4.875% 10/04/33 | 0.40% | Debt | PL |
| — | COSTA RICA GOVE 6.55% 04/03/34 | 0.40% | Debt | CR |
| — | REPUBLIC OF COLO 7.5% 02/02/34 | 0.40% | Debt | CO |
| — | ROMANIA 6.375% 01/30/34 | 0.40% | Debt | RO |
| — | REPUBLIC OF SOU 4.85% 09/30/29 | 0.40% | Debt | ZA |
| — | REPUBLIC OF PO 5.375% 04/14/36 | 0.40% | Debt | PL |
| — | REPUBLIC OF AN 9.244% 01/15/31 | 0.40% | Debt | AO |
| — | ROMANIA 5.75% 03/24/35 | 0.40% | Debt | RO |
| — | PETROLEOS MEXICA 6.7% 02/16/32 | 0.39% | Debt | MX |
| — | FED REPUBLIC O 3.875% 06/12/30 | 0.39% | Debt | BR |
| — | HUNGARY 6.25% 09/22/32 | 0.39% | Debt | HU |
| — | HUNGARY 2.125% 09/22/31 | 0.39% | Debt | HU |
| — | REPUBLIC OF NI 7.875% 02/16/32 | 0.38% | Debt | NG |
| — | ROMANIA 5.75% 09/16/30 | 0.38% | Debt | RO |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| US Govt Agency | 88.10% | $742.8M | 354 |
| Corporate | 10.29% | $86.8M | 71 |
| Month | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 2.46% | 0.82% | 1.46% | 1.29% | 1.51% |
| Feb | -- | -3.15% | 0.71% | 1.17% | 1.07% | -0.05% |
| Mar | -- | 1.62% | 1.52% | -1.04% | -2.38% | -0.07% |
| Apr | -- | -0.18% | -1.67% | 0.37% | 2.14% | 0.17% |
| May | -- | 0.19% | 1.56% | 1.57% | 0.81% | 1.03% |
| Jun | 0.00% | 1.68% | -0.26% | 2.11% | 0.11% | 0.73% |
| Jul | 1.24% | 1.45% | 2.53% | 0.53% | -0.61% | 1.03% |
| Aug | -1.42% | -0.36% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 0.10% | 0.23% |
| Sep | -4.92% | -1.55% | 2.28% | 0.74% | -2.73% | -1.24% |
| Oct | -0.98% | 0.67% | -0.91% | 2.09% | 0.95%* | 0.36% |
| Nov | 5.89% | 3.18% | 1.57% | 0.72% | -- | 2.84% |
| Dec | -2.67% | 1.48% | -1.64% | -0.11% | -- | -0.73% |
| Total | -3.16% | 7.57% | 8.07% | 11.55% | 0.64% | 4.93% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Click Frenzy-Pro™ for an AI analysis of this ticker.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
XEMD Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
XEMD Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|