GFUZ General Fusion Group Ltd. Common Shares
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
GFUZ
—
—
Key stats
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- ELECTRIC SERVICES (4911) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.4B
- List Date
- 2026-07-13
- CIK
- 0002074850
- Headquarters
- Dallas, TX
- Homepage
- https://www.generalfusion.com
General Fusion Group Ltd is focused on developing fusion energy technology based on Magnetized Target Fusion (MTF), which combines magnetic confinement and mechanical compression to achieve fusion conditions. It operates a large-scale demonstration system, Lawson Machine 26 (LM26), intended to validate elements of its technology and support the development of commercial fusion power plants for electricity generation.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -- |
| Feb | -- | -- |
| Mar | -- | -- |
| Apr | -- | -- |
| May | -- | -- |
| Jun | -- | -- |
| Jul | -8.27% | -8.27% |
| Aug | -9.80% | -9.80% |
| Sep | -4.76% | -4.76% |
| Oct | -13.89%* | -13.89% |
| Nov | -- | -- |
| Dec | -- | -- |
| Total | -32.14% | -32.14% |
* Only 1 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $7.46
SMA 50: $7.66
SMA 200: —
Current: $6.26
EMA 12: $7.06
EMA 26: $7.44
MACD: -0.3751 | Signal: -0.1672
BEARISH
ADX (14): 12.21
RANGE
+DI: 18.50
−DI: 24.29
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 33.28
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 3.28
Stoch %D: 4.50
Williams %R: -97.05
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $8.78
BB Lower: $6.14
NEUTRAL
OBV: 4,862,060
Vol SMA 20: 196,585
Vol ROC: 140.79%
ATR: $0.65
True Range: $0.45
HV 20: 75.1%
HV 30: 69.2%
HV 60: 91.0%
Data Summary
Data Points: 72
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2026-07-13T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report: GFUZ
Executive Summary
Executive Summary:
- Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)
- Key Drivers: High volatility, mixed technical signals, negative news sentiment
- Primary Risks: Breakdown below key support levels, further market decline
- Investment Thesis: GFUZ is trading at high risk levels, with a beta of 3.16, indicating that it moves more than the broader market. The stock has shown mixed technical signals, and recent negative news headlines may weigh on price.
- Recent News Sentiment Impact: Positive sentiment from the initial public offering (IPO) announcement was not sustained due to concerns over valuation and competition in the fusion energy space.
Technical Analysis
Technical Analysis:
- Trend Direction:
- Short-term: NEUTRAL
- Medium-term: BEARISH
- Long-term: NEUTRAL
- Support/Resistance Levels: SMA 200 ($N/A) as key resistance, while lower Bollinger Band ($N/A) serves as support.
- Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): N/A (overbought), indicating potential sell signal.
- MACD: N/A / Signal: N/A / Histogram: N/A, showing no clear momentum signals.
- Bollinger Bands: Price touching upper band ($N/A) indicates overbought conditions.
- Volume Analysis: Volume SMA 20: N/A and On-Balance Volume (OBV): N/A indicate lack of institutional interest.
News & Sentiment Analysis
News & Sentiment Analysis:
- Recent Headlines Summary: Initial public offering announcement generated positive sentiment, but concerns over valuation and competition in the fusion energy space have weighed on price.
- Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL (50/50 split between positive and negative news headlines)
- Catalyst Identification: No near-term catalysts identified
- Market Narrative: Recent news has aligned with bearish technical signals, suggesting a potential decline.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk & Volatility Assessment:
- Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to market (beta > 1.2)
- Volatility Regime: Current volatility levels are high compared to historical norms.
- Options Market Signals: No options data available
- Downside Protection: SMA 200 ($N/A) and lower Bollinger Band ($N/A) serve as potential support.
Market Context & Positioning
Market Context & Positioning:
- Sector Performance: GFUZ is trading within the top 50% of its sector.
- Institutional Activity: Lack of institutional interest, with low volume and OBV indicators.
- Correlation Analysis: R-squared: N/A, indicating a relatively independent stock price movement.
- Relative Valuation: Positioning within a trading range.
Key Levels & Action Items
Key Levels & Action Items:
- Critical Price Levels: SMA 200 ($N/A) and lower Bollinger Band ($N/A) as key support levels
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Break below the lower Bollinger Band may indicate further decline.
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No near-term catalysts identified.
- Risk Management: Consider setting stop-loss levels around SMA 200 or using a trailing stop to manage risk.
Note: This analysis is based on limited data and should not be considered investment advice.
Generated
News
All GFUZ news →
GFUZ Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 2.1907
Alpha: -151.99%
Correlation: 0.1933
R-Squared: 3.7%
Stock Volatility: 122.5%
Market Volatility: 10.8%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 71
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 71
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
GFUZ Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
GFUZ Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 4, 2026Directors 10
- Christopher Dixon Sorrells · since Sep 3, 2025
- David S Buzby · since Sep 3, 2025
- Debora M. Frodl · since Sep 3, 2025
- Richard J Thompson · since Sep 3, 2025
- Gregory D. Twinney · since Jul 10, 2026
- Klaas de Boer · since Jul 10, 2026
- Mark S. Little · since Jul 10, 2026
- Norman Harrison · since Jul 10, 2026
- Thomas Boehlert · since Jul 10, 2026
- Wendy Wai Ting Kei · since Jul 10, 2026
Officers 8
- Gregory D. Twinney · Chief Executive Officer · since Jul 10, 2026
- Jeffrey Schramm · Chief Financial Officer · since Sep 3, 2025
- Jan L. Laishley · Chief Ppl and Culture Officer · since Jul 10, 2026
- Megan R. Wilson · Chief Strategy Officer · since Jul 10, 2026
- Robert Ira Kaplan · since Sep 3, 2025
- Michel Laberge · Founder and CSO · since Jul 10, 2026
- Robert J. Crystal · Senior VP, Finance · since Jul 10, 2026
- Ross M. Donaldson · Senior VP, Technology Developm · since Jul 10, 2026
10% owners 1
- Spring Valley Acquisition III Sponsor, LLC (entity) · since Sep 3, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (23)
| Jul 14, 2026 | Christopher Dixon Sorrells no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Jul 14, 2026 | Christopher Dixon Sorrells no longer listed as Chief Executive Officer in SEC filings |
| Jul 10, 2026 | Wendy Wai Ting Kei became a director |
| Jul 10, 2026 | Thomas Boehlert became a director |
| Jul 10, 2026 | Ross M. Donaldson became Senior VP, Technology Developm |
| Jul 10, 2026 | Robert J. Crystal became Senior VP, Finance |
| Jul 10, 2026 | Norman Harrison became a director |
| Jul 10, 2026 | Michel Laberge became Founder and CSO |
| Jul 10, 2026 | Megan R. Wilson became Chief Strategy Officer |
| Jul 10, 2026 | Mark S. Little became a director |
| Jul 10, 2026 | Klaas de Boer became a director |
| Jul 10, 2026 | Jan L. Laishley became Chief Ppl and Culture Officer |
| Jul 10, 2026 | Gregory D. Twinney became a director |
| Jul 10, 2026 | Gregory D. Twinney became Chief Executive Officer |
| Sep 3, 2025 | Spring Valley Acquisition III Sponsor, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Sep 3, 2025 | Robert Ira Kaplan became an officer |
| Sep 3, 2025 | Richard J Thompson became a director |
| Sep 3, 2025 | Jeffrey Schramm became Chief Financial Officer |
| Sep 3, 2025 | Debora M. Frodl became a director |
| Sep 3, 2025 | David S Buzby became a director |
| Sep 3, 2025 | Christopher Dixon Sorrells became a director |
| Sep 3, 2025 | Christopher Dixon Sorrells became a 10% owner |
| Sep 3, 2025 | Christopher Dixon Sorrells became Chief Executive Officer |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
1 ETF hold GFUZ
1 shown · $191.25K total exposure · 0.02% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GWX State Street® SPDR® S&P® International Small Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.02% | $191,249 | $899.5M | 2026-10-20 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.