INLX Intellinetics, Inc.
XASE
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
What changed
Recent filings, trades and moves- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372) · industry map
- Exchange
- XASE
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 141
- List Date
- 2022-09-09
- CIK
- 0001081745
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-12 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- ($0.08)
- Headquarters
- Columbus, OH
- Homepage
- https://www.intellinetics.com
Intellinetics Inc is a document service and solutions software company serving both the small-to-medium business and governmental sectors. The company's digital transformation products and services are provided through two reporting segments: Software and Document Services. The Software segment consists of solutions involving software platforms, which allow customers to capture and manage all documents across operations such as scanned hard-copy documents and all digital documents including those from Microsoft Office 365, digital images, audio, video, and emails. The company's Document Servic…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -10.56% | 3.45% | 8.50% | -4.44% | 3.14% | 0.02% |
| Feb | -- | -5.38% | -1.83% | 66.67% | -8.05% | -6.79% | 8.92% |
| Mar | -- | -16.59% | -3.38% | -2.43% | 5.53% | -2.61% | -3.90% |
| Apr | -- | 6.05% | -2.44% | 9.89% | 2.67% | -4.27% | 2.38% |
| May | -- | 5.43% | -7.06% | -14.78% | -9.10% | -10.43% | -7.19% |
| Jun | -- | 9.23% | -2.78% | 4.92% | -1.26% | -15.51% | -1.08% |
| Jul | -- | -2.95% | 10.63% | 11.11% | -0.58% | -14.09% | 0.82% |
| Aug | -- | -1.18% | -10.34% | 25.63% | -3.58% | 2.27% | 2.56% |
| Sep | -- | 3.04% | 26.45% | 9.92% | 3.59% | 1.85% | 8.97% |
| Oct | -- | 5.79% | -5.33% | 24.02% | -18.18% | -21.59% | -3.06% |
| Nov | -- | 9.88% | 2.18% | 4.29% | -6.75% | -6.37%* | 0.65% |
| Dec | 0.00% | -0.23% | 22.22% | -5.37% | -6.26% | -- | 2.07% |
| Total | 0.00% | -1.20% | 28.27% | 225.57% | -39.31% | -55.44% | 26.31% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is the comprehensive stock analysis report for INLX:
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: BEARISH with confidence level 6/10
Key drivers and primary risks:
- Technical indicators suggest a bearish trend, with MACD indicating a bearish momentum signal.
- RSI is neutral, suggesting no clear overbought or oversold conditions.
- Beta analysis indicates that the stock moves opposite to the market.
Primary risk: The stock's negative beta and bearish momentum signals increase the likelihood of further price decline.
Recent news sentiment impact:
The recent news headlines are mixed, with some positive (neutral) news and one negative headline from Q4 earnings miss. This mixed sentiment has not had a significant impact on the technical indicators or market narrative.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: bearish, Medium-term: range-bound, Long-term: downtrend
Support/Resistance Levels: Key price levels to monitor are $6.21 (lower Bollinger Band), $6.94 (SMA 20), and $7.32 (SMA 50).
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral at 38.00
- MACD signal: Bearish momentum with -0.26 / Signal: -0.07 / Histogram: -0.19
- Bollinger Bands position: Range-bound, with price near the middle band
Volume Analysis: Volume trends are bearish, with a volume rate of change of -67.88%.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines are mixed, with some neutral and one negative headline from Q4 earnings miss.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral sentiment overall, with no significant bullish or bearish signals.
Catalyst Identification: No specific catalysts identified in the recent news headlines.
Market Narrative: The mixed news sentiment has not had a significant impact on the technical indicators or market narrative.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Negative beta -0.46, indicating that the stock moves opposite to the market.
Volatility Regime: Stock volatility is relatively high at 0.58.
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels are $6.21 (lower Bollinger Band) and $6.94 (SMA 20).
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: No sector performance data available.
Institutional Activity: No institutional activity data available.
Correlation Analysis: The stock's beta is -0.46, indicating a negative correlation with the market.
Relative Valuation: The stock is trading within a range, with no clear relative valuation signals.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: $6.21 (lower Bollinger Band), $6.94 (SMA 20), and $7.32 (SMA 50).
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No specific breakout or breakdown levels identified.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No time-sensitive catalysts identified.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set near the lower Bollinger Band at $6.21, with position sizing considerations based on the stock's volatility and market conditions.
INLX Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 193
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
INLX Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 2 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
INLX Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-07| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | Robert Taglich | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +4,000 | $5.00 | $20.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-05 | Paul Seid | Director | Buy (P) | +162 | $5.15 | $834 | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-30 | Paul Seid | Director | Buy (P) | +184 | $5.15 | $948 | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-28 | Paul Seid | Director | Buy (P) | +1,088 | $5.15 | $5.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-18 | Paul Seid | Director | Buy (P) | +716 | $5.10 | $3.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-16 | Paul Seid | Director | Buy (P) | +1,128 | $5.23 | $5.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-01 | Robert Taglich | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +1,000 | $5.52 | $5.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-18 | Robert Taglich | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −4,304 | $6.57 | -$28.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-18 | Michael N Taglich | Director | Sell (S) | −4,304 | $6.57 | -$28.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-10 | Joseph D Spain | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER | Tax (F) | −843 | $7.25 | -$6.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-10 | Matthew L Chretien | CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER | Tax (F) | −3,510 | $7.44 | -$26.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-03 | Alison G. Forsythe | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | Mixed Tax −12,403 · Grant +36,131 |
+23,728 | $7.45 | $176.8K | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-09 | Michael N Taglich | Director | Sell (S) | −35,732 | $11.00 | -$393.1K | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-09 | Robert Taglich | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −35,732 | $11.00 | -$393.1K | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-25 | Michael N Taglich | Director | Grant (A) | +9,000 opt | — | EDGAR |
INLX Insider Holdings
8 insiders · @ $3.82| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michael N Taglich | Director | 1,500,728 | $5.73M | -$412.8K | 6 | 2026-06-18 |
| 2 | Robert Taglich | 10%+ Owner | 914,226 | $3.49M | -$392.4K | 5 | 2026-10-07 |
| 3 | Paul Seid | Director | 193,801 | $740.3K | $16.9K | 8 | 2026-10-05 |
| 4 | James F Desocio | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | 73,725 | $281.6K | $0 | 4 | 2025-06-25 |
| 5 | Matthew L Chretien | CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER | 51,775 | $197.8K | $0 | 4 | 2026-04-10 |
| 6 | John C Guttilla | Director | 46,810 | $178.8K | $152.8K | 6 | 2025-06-25 |
| 7 | Alison G. Forsythe | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | 36,131 | $138.0K | $0 | 1 | 2026-04-03 |
| 8 | Joseph D Spain | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER | 30,907 | $118.1K | $0 | 4 | 2026-04-10 |
INLX Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 7, 2026Directors 5
- John C Guttilla · since Nov 10, 2022
- Paul Seid · since Jun 22, 2023
- Stanley P. Jaworski Jr · since Dec 28, 2023
- Michael N Taglich · listed since Jan 2024
- Russell Jean Bernier · since Jun 18, 2025
Officers 3
- Alison G. Forsythe · Chief Executive Officer · since Feb 17, 2026
- Joseph D Spain · Chief Financial Officer · since Dec 6, 2016
- Matthew L Chretien · Chief Strategy Officer · listed since Mar 2019
10% owners 2
- Michael N Taglich · since Sep 1, 2014
- Robert Taglich · since Sep 1, 2014
Changes in the last 10 years (18)
| Feb 17, 2026 | Alison G. Forsythe became Chief Executive Officer |
| Jan 21, 2026 | The company announced the departure of James F Desocio from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jan 21, 2026 | The company announced the departure of James F Desocio as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jun 18, 2025 | Russell Jean Bernier became a director |
| Feb 18, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Roger E. Kahn from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jun 4, 2024 | The company announced the departure of William Cooke from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jan 4, 2024 | Michael N Taglich first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Dec 28, 2023 | Stanley P. Jaworski Jr became a director |
| Jun 22, 2023 | Paul Seid became a director |
| Apr 28, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Matthew L Chretien from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jan 16, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Sophie Pibouin from the board in an SEC filing |
| Nov 10, 2022 | John C Guttilla became a director |
| Oct 1, 2021 | William Cooke became a director |
| Mar 13, 2019 | Matthew L Chretien listed as Chief Strategy Officer (previously Chief Executive Officer) in SEC filings |
| Oct 5, 2017 | Roger E. Kahn became a director |
| Sep 25, 2017 | James F Desocio became a director |
| Sep 25, 2017 | James F Desocio became Chief Executive Officer |
| Dec 6, 2016 | Joseph D Spain became Chief Financial Officer |
Not reported recently (3)
- Rye D'Orazio · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 10, 2022
- Robert C Schroeder · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 18, 2021
- Murray H Gross · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 9, 2017
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-12 | 0001493152-26-037331 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $215,746 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $179,119 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $30,040 | $1.2B | 2026-11-06 |
| 4 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $261 | — | 2026-11-05 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
INLX vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT Microsoft Corp | $3.94T | 28.5 | +17.9% | +15.3% | 10 |
| PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. Class A Commo | $386.4B | 118.3 | +87.1% | +0.8% | 26 |
| ORCL Oracle Corp | $362.0B | 20.5 | +17.4% | −38.8% | 50 |
| SAP SAP SE | $269.4B | — | — | +0.2% | 4 |
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. Class A Commo | $222.1B | 3809.7 | +24.3% | +101.6% | 75 |
| SHOP Shopify Inc. Class A subordinate voting | $191.6B | 92.7 | +32.5% | −3.3% | 28 |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | $175.8B | 19.6 | +11.2% | −15.3% | 89 |
| NOW SERVICENOW, INC. | $105.8B | 73.9 | +21.8% | −30.3% | 0 |
| INLX Intellinetics, Inc. | $17M | — | — | −52.1% | — |
| Peer median | $245.8B | 73.9 | +21.8% | −1.5% | 27 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.