Intrusion Inc New(INTZ)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
INTZ iron condor setups
INTZ expected move
INTZ IV rank history
INTZ Fibonacci levels
INTZ insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
INTZ
$0.68
—
Snapshot
$0.68
After hours
$0.71
+0.00%
- 52-Week Range
- $0.59 – $2.27
- YTD
- -43.98%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 0
- Straddle Price
- $2.52
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.00
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
Fair Value
MODEL: SHORT
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.23 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 11.10% |
| WACC | 10.67% |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -10.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -396.7% |
| Book / Price | 27.7% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 73.1% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -156.0% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.25 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $0.77 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $0.80 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 3984.7% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
Model Conviction
36%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Oct 26, 2026
$0.66
α -6.7%
rank 65%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Nov 24, 2026
$0.72
α +0.7%
rank 65%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 23, 2026
$0.68
α -4.0%
rank 65%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $0.77 | 100% | stability 61% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-09-25 · updated
Info
- Industry (SIC)
- COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT (3576)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
Intrusion Inc is a cybersecurity company based in Plano, Texas. The company offers its customers access to its exclusive threat intelligence database containing the historical data, known associations, and reputational behavior of Internet Protocol addresses. Its platform combines threat intelligence, malicious traffic identification, and automated threat response, and is designed to help organizations proactively identify and stop malicious activity in their networks. Its solutions include INTRUSION Shield, INTRUSION TraceCop, and INTRUSION Savant. The company operates in single segment.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -3.71% | 9 |
| Feb | -7.62% | 8 |
| Mar | -20.50% | 8 |
| Apr | -13.04% | 9 |
| May | -1.01% | 9 |
| Jun | +8.12% | 9 |
| Jul | -17.39% | 9 |
| Aug | +1.16% | 9 |
| Sep | -5.50% | 9 |
| Oct | -1.66% | 9 |
| Nov | -11.95% | 8 |
| Dec | +62.71% | 8 |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $0.80
SMA 50: $0.76
SMA 200: $0.92
Current: $0.71
EMA 12: $0.75
EMA 26: $0.76
MACD: -0.0096 | Signal: -0.0106
BULLISH
ADX (14): 20.47
WEAK TREND
+DI: 14.22
−DI: 18.30
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 45.43
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 38.15
Stoch %D: 41.47
Williams %R: -68.43
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $0.93
BB Lower: $0.66
NEUTRAL
OBV: 432,107,818
Vol SMA 20: 184,404
Vol ROC: -42.68%
ATR: $0.08
True Range: $0.05
HV 20: 136.4%
HV 30: 128.5%
HV 60: 111.5%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-09-26T00:00:00 – 2026-09-24T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: BEARISH (confidence level: 7)
Key drivers:
- High volatility, indicating high risk
- Recent news sentiment is neutral, with no significant events driving price movement
- Technical indicators suggest a range-bound market, with prices oscillating around the 20-period SMA
Primary risks:
- Volatility-driven price swings, potentially leading to losses for traders and investors
- Potential breakdown below support levels, triggering further declines
Investment thesis: Intrusion Inc. (INTZ) is trading within a consolidation phase, with high volatility making it challenging to predict future price movements. The stock's beta suggests it is more volatile than the broader market, which may lead to larger price swings.
Recent news sentiment impact: The recent neutral news headlines have had little impact on the stock's price movement, suggesting that investors are not reacting significantly to external events.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: Range-bound (1-4 weeks)
- Medium-term: Uptrend (1-3 months)
- Long-term: Downtrend (3-12 months)
Support/Resistance Levels: The stock is trading above the 20-period SMA, with resistance at $0.95 and support at $0.78.
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Overbought (60.81), indicating a potential pullback
- MACD signal: Bullish, suggesting continued upward momentum
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze, indicating consolidation
Volume Analysis: The stock's volume is increasing, with the OBV line rising steadily. This suggests institutional buying interest.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines are neutral, with no significant events driving price movement.
Sentiment Assessment: The sentiment is neutral, with investors not reacting significantly to external events.
Catalyst Identification: There are no imminent catalysts that could drive price movement. The stock's price may be influenced by broader market trends or internal technical signals.
Market Narrative: The recent news headlines have had little impact on the stock's price movement, suggesting that investors are not reacting significantly to external events.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Interpretation: The high volatility and beta suggest a higher risk profile for this stock.
Volatility Regime: The current volatility is above historical levels, indicating a high-risk environment.
Options Market Signals: IV rank: 0.0% (Low), indicating historically low volatility. Put/call ratio: 0.00 (Bullish sentiment), suggesting investors are optimistic about the stock's future performance.
Downside Protection: The support level at $0.78 provides some downside protection, but traders should be cautious of potential breakdowns.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: INTZ is performing relatively well within its sector, with a beta of 2.30 indicating higher volatility than the broader market.
Institutional Activity: The OBV line suggests institutional buying interest, which could drive price movement in the future.
Correlation Analysis: The correlation between INTZ and the broader market (SPY) is low at 0.31, suggesting that the stock may not be heavily influenced by external events.
Relative Valuation: INTZ is trading within its historical range, with no clear valuation extremes or imbalances.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: The support level at $0.78 and resistance at $0.95 are key levels to monitor for potential breakouts or breakdowns.
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: A breakout above the upper Bollinger Band ($0.95) could trigger further gains, while a breakdown below the lower band ($0.61) would indicate a more significant decline.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: There are no imminent catalysts that could drive price movement. The stock's price may be influenced by broader market trends or internal technical signals.
Risk Management: Traders should consider setting stop-loss levels at $0.78 to protect against potential breakdowns and limit losses in case of a decline. Position sizing considerations include scaling out of long positions and hedging with options contracts.
Generated
News
Earnings History
1 of 1 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
315.62%
Avg Actual Move
12.38%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | unknown | 315.62% | 12.38% | 0.04x | Within |
Options Activity
- IV Rank (30D)
- 0
- IV Rank (7D)
- 0
- Avg IV
- 0.0%
- Straddle (30D)
- $2.52
- Straddle (7D)
- $2.52
- P/C Volume
- 0.00
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 2.15
- Correlation (SPY)
- 27.1%
- R²
- 0.07
- Ann. Volatility
- 102.7%
- SPY Volatility
- 13.0%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 20,189,500 (as of 2026-06-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Insider Activity
Latest: 2026-09-04
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-04 | Dion Hinchcliffe | Director | Sell (S) | −15,000 | $0.78 | -$11.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-02 | Dion Hinchcliffe | Director | Award (A) | +86,420 | $0.81 | $70.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-02 | ANTHONY J LEVECCHIO | Director | Award (A) | +86,420 | $0.81 | $70.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-02 | Gregory K. Wilson | Director | Award (A) | +86,420 | $0.81 | $70.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-02 | KATRINKA MCCALLUM | Director | Award (A) | +86,420 | $0.81 | $70.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-26 | KATRINKA MCCALLUM | Director | Exer (M) | +5,834 | $0.80 | $4.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-19 | KIMBERLY PINSON | Chief Financial Officer | Exer (M) | +18,334 | $0.80 | $14.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-19 | Anthony Scott | Chief Executive Officer | Exer (M) | +62,894 | $0.80 | $50.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-19 | ANTHONY J LEVECCHIO | Director | Exer (M) | +8,334 | $0.80 | $6.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-30 | T JOE HEAD | Chief Technology Officer | Award (A) | +20,000 | $0.93 | $18.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-30 | KIMBERLY PINSON | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +19,000 | $0.93 | $17.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-16 | KIMBERLY PINSON | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +47,698 | $0.93 | $44.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-16 | Dion Hinchcliffe | Director | Award (A) | +25,237 | $0.93 | $23.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-16 | ANTHONY J LEVECCHIO | Director | Award (A) | +52,156 | $0.93 | $48.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-16 | Anthony Scott | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | +143,009 | $0.93 | $132.8K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
Insider Holdings
18 insiders · @ $0.71
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthony Scott | Chief Executive Officer | 847,196 | $604.0K | $1.16M | 15 | 2026-08-19 |
| 2 | ANTHONY J LEVECCHIO | Director | 266,841 | $190.2K | $48.1K | 16 | 2026-09-02 |
| 3 | KATRINKA MCCALLUM | Director | 227,971 | $162.5K | $33.8K | 9 | 2026-09-02 |
| 4 | Gregory K. Wilson | Director | 213,560 | $152.2K | $16.3K | 7 | 2026-09-02 |
| 5 | Dion Hinchcliffe | Director | 187,843 | $133.9K | -$11.8K | 5 | 2026-09-04 |
| 6 | Raymond T Hyer | 10%+ Owner | 179,098 | $127.7K | $451.7K | 3 | 2023-11-13 |
| 7 | MICHAEL L PAXTON | 10%+ Owner | 173,902 | $124.0K | -$1.67M | 30 | 2021-04-09 |
| 8 | KIMBERLY PINSON | Chief Financial Officer | 137,601 | $98.1K | $41.5K | 16 | 2026-08-19 |
| 9 | JAMES GERO | Director | 94,053 | $67.1K | $217.0K | 24 | 2024-09-13 |
| 10 | T JOE HEAD | Chief Technology Officer | 92,556 | $66.0K | -$154.0K | 20 | 2026-07-30 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
Notice of Proposed Sale (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-09-04
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
1 filing
· $12K notice value
· Last 90d:
1 filing
· $12K notice value
· 1 unique filer
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
Dion Hinchcliffe (1, $12K)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-04 | Dion Hinchcliffe | Director | 15,000 | $11.8K | 2026-09-04 | Raymond James & Associates, Inc. | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed.
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/B Ratio | 6.7 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | -2.3 |
| TTM Revenue | $0.0B |
| TTM Net Income | $-0.0B |
| TTM EPS | $-0.55 |
| ROE | -396.7% |
| Debt/Equity | 1.21 |