IVDAW Iveda Solutions, Inc. Warrant
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Employees
- 32
- List Date
- 2022-04-01
- CIK
- 0001397183
- Headquarters
- Mesa, AZ
- Homepage
- https://www.iveda.com
Iveda Solutions Inc offers smart city technologies globally, offering AI-driven video surveillance solutions and a robust suite of Internet of Things (IoT) platforms that power digital transformation for cities and commercial clients. The company offers AI-intelligent video search, smart utility, smart sensors, gateways, and trackers, and IoT platforms (Products). Geographically, the company operates in USA and Taiwan, majority of its revenue is generated from Taiwan.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 91.78% | 30.00% | -31.94% | -5.50% | 21.09% |
| Feb | -- | -40.76% | -5.78% | 25.76% | 17.71% | -0.77% |
| Mar | -- | 86.83% | -47.05% | -9.25% | -65.55% | -8.75% |
| Apr | -60.00% | 19.66% | 86.53% | 9.59% | 19.00% | 14.96% |
| May | -36.82% | -31.32% | -41.85% | 8.46% | -52.19% | -30.74% |
| Jun | -30.57% | 10.69% | -35.71% | 0.00% | -23.24% | -15.77% |
| Jul | -34.77% | -8.45% | 76.94% | 9.92% | 15.70% | 11.87% |
| Aug | -61.54% | 10.00% | 20.00% | -15.42% | 31.33% | -3.13% |
| Sep | -22.00% | 10.89% | -77.56% | 9.19% | -35.28% | -22.95% |
| Oct | 35.00% | -31.82% | 70.94% | -0.46% | -9.43%* | 12.85% |
| Nov | 16.67% | -25.00% | 140.85% | -15.28% | -- | 29.31% |
| Dec | 17.65% | 9.79% | 259.10% | -35.79% | -- | 62.69% |
| Total | -93.64% | 21.05% | 218.59% | -49.25% | -85.09% | 2.33% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: IVDAW
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: BEARISH (Confidence level: 7/10)
Key drivers:
- Bearish technical signals from MACD, Stochastic %K, and Williams %R
- High volatility and beta indicating increased risk
Primary risks:
- Technical breakdown below $0.09 support level
- Increased market volatility affecting stock performance
2-3 sentence investment thesis:
IVDAW is a high-risk stock with bearish technical signals, potentially leading to a further decline in price. The company's high volatility and beta indicate that the stock is more susceptible to market fluctuations. A risk-aware investor may consider avoiding this stock or using stop-loss strategies to mitigate potential losses.
Recent news sentiment impact:
No recent news available; therefore, no impact on analysis.
Technical Analysis
Trend direction: BEARISH (Short-term), BEARISH (Medium-term), NEUTRAL (Long-term)
Support/resistance levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band ($0.09) and SMA 200 ($0.14) serve as strong support
- Upper Bollinger Band ($0.20) and SMA 50 ($0.16) represent resistance
Momentum signals:
- MACD signal line is below the zero line, indicating bearish momentum
- RSI (14) is at 46.57, indicating a neutral reading with no clear buy or sell signal
- Stochastic %K and %D are both below their respective levels, confirming the bearish trend
Volume analysis:
- Volume SMA 20 is increasing, indicating growing interest from institutions
- On-Balance Volume (OBV) is also rising, suggesting accumulation by market participants
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent headlines summary: No recent news available.
Sentiment assessment: NEUTRAL (No clear sentiment due to lack of recent news)
Catalyst identification: None
Market narrative: The absence of recent news means that the technical signals remain the primary driver of this analysis.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk interpretation:
- Beta is high at 3.21, indicating increased risk relative to the market
- Alpha is 4.74, suggesting a higher return potential but also greater volatility
Volatility regime: HIGH VOLATILITY (Stock moves more than market)
Options market signals:
- IV rank: N/A (No options data available)
- Put/call ratios: N/A (No options data available)
- Unusual activity: N/A (No options data available)
Downside protection:
- Support levels are at $0.09, and risk management considerations include setting stop-loss levels below this price
Market Context & Positioning
Sector performance: IVDAW is underperforming the broader market.
Institutional activity: Volume patterns suggest growing institutional interest.
Correlation analysis: IVDAW has a high correlation with the overall market (R-squared interpretation).
Relative valuation: The stock is trading within its recent range, with no clear overvaluation or undervaluation.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical price levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band ($0.09) and SMA 200 ($0.14) serve as strong support
- Upper Bollinger Band ($0.20) and SMA 50 ($0.16) represent resistance
Breakout/breakdown levels: None identified due to the lack of recent news.
Time-sensitive catalysts: No imminent catalysts available.
Risk management: Consider setting stop-loss levels below $0.09 to limit potential losses.
Note that this analysis is based on limited data and should be treated as a starting point for further research.
IVDAW Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 163
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
IVDAW Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
IVDAW Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-02-25| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-25 | Alejandro Franco | Director | Mixed | +50,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-25 | David H. Ly | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +350,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-25 | Robert J Brilon | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | +250,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-25 | Joseph A. Farnsworth | Director | Mixed | +200,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-25 | Robert Gillen | Director | Mixed | +200,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-31 | Alejandro Franco | Director | Grant (A) | +25,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-31 | Robert J Brilon | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +125,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-31 | David H. Ly | Chief Executive Officer | Grant (A) | +175,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-31 | Robert Gillen | Director | Grant (A) | +100,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-31 | Joseph A. Farnsworth | Director | Grant (A) | +100,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-23 | Robert Gillen | Director | Disp (D) | −20,331 | $1.28 | -$26.0K | EDGAR |
| 2024-12-09 | Robert Gillen | Director | Grant (A) | +15,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-12-09 | Robert J Brilon | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +15,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-12-09 | David H. Ly | Chief Executive Officer | Grant (A) | +15,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-12-09 | Alejandro Franco | Director | Grant (A) | +15,000 opt | — | EDGAR |
IVDAW Insider Holdings
1 insider · @ $0.02| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joseph A. Farnsworth | Director | 700,342 | $13.4K | $2.5K | 7 | 2026-02-25 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.