JAKK Jakks Pacific Inc
XNAS
35.93
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
JAKK
$35.93
—
What changed
Recent filings, trades and movesKey stats
$35.93
- 52-Week Range
- $14.87 – $37.45
- YTD
- +108.65%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 7.5
- Straddle Price
- $3.60
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.69
- Market Cap
- $0.4B
- Open
- $36.53
- Day Range
- $35.12 – $36.63
- Volume
- 152,296
- Prev Close
- $36.12
Fair Value
MODEL: SHORT
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.88% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.14 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 11.17% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 11.21% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +40.0pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 17.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +30.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 9.4% |
| Book / Price | 63.7% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 32.1% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 5.7% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +1.2% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $28.28 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $32.22 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 31.4% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
Peers used for multiples: PLOW, Q, RAL, RRX, VIRT, WTTR
(filtered from 8 ETF-co-members; sector bias active)
60-Day Conviction
79%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 14, 2026
$36.01
α +0.2%
rank 96%
conviction
19%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 12, 2027
$35.04
α -2.5%
rank 96%
conviction
71%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Feb 10, 2027
$34.59
α -3.7%
rank 96%
conviction
79%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $160.02 | 21% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $21.27 | 17% | |
| Peer P/E | $113.19 | 6% | median 47.4× · 5 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $39.29 | 6% | median 11.6× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | $64.20 | 6% | median 2.8× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | $101.05 | 6% | median 1.8× · 6 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $28.28 | 36% | stability 85% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $35.85 | 0% | 5 strikes · skew -0.06 |
As of 2026-11-13 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- GAMES, TOYS & CHILDREN'S VEHICLES (NO DOLLS & BICYCLES) (3944) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.4B
- Employees
- 652
- List Date
- 1996-05-02
- CIK
- 0001009829
- Last Earnings
- Oct 22 after close · +3.3% vs ±16.1% expected
- Headquarters
- Santa Monica, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.jakks.com
Jakks Pacific Inc is a multi-product line, multi-brand toy company that designs, produces, markets, sells, and distributes toys and related kid-targeted consumer products, including kids' indoor and outdoor furniture, costumes, and various product lines in the sporting goods and home furnishings space. Its product offerings include Traditional toys and electronics such as Action figures, Toy vehicles, Dolls and accessories, Ride-on toys, Toys for pets, and others. The company's products have been divided into two segments: Toys/Consumer Products and Costumes. It generates the majority of its r…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 58.74% | -15.87% | 22.86% | -11.34% | 7.16% | 6.10% | 11.28% |
| Feb | -6.88% | 70.63% | -7.86% | 10.24% | -8.67% | 17.21% | 12.45% |
| Mar | -12.73% | -10.18% | -9.19% | -3.63% | -8.39% | -5.14% | -8.21% |
| Apr | 23.72% | -4.21% | 25.42% | -19.50% | -22.19% | 8.31% | 1.93% |
| May | -11.36% | -7.29% | -9.11% | 0.32% | 9.28% | -8.19% | -4.39% |
| Jun | 20.61% | 5.94% | -5.93% | -1.27% | 6.07% | 6.64% | 5.34% |
| Jul | 16.21% | 70.79% | 3.63% | 17.41% | -14.53% | 12.79% | 17.72% |
| Aug | 3.19% | 1.22% | -6.91% | 1.11% | 3.68% | -3.72% | -0.24% |
| Sep | -15.50% | -12.61% | -6.35% | 7.00% | 6.78% | 1.70% | -3.16% |
| Oct | -14.30% | -7.31% | -8.71% | 22.67% | -9.04% | 23.10% | 1.07% |
| Nov | -6.96% | -3.83% | 72.57% | -2.67% | -1.97% | 13.70%* | 11.81% |
| Dec | 3.99% | -5.87% | 18.66% | -4.61% | 2.80% | -- | 2.99% |
| Total | 43.36% | 53.77% | 86.17% | 8.65% | -29.86% | 93.37% | 42.58% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $32.59
SMA 50: $28.52
SMA 200: $23.84
Current: $35.93
EMA 12: $34.32
EMA 26: $32.12
MACD: 2.2029 | Signal: 0.2601
BULLISH
ADX (14): 50.22
STRONG TREND
+DI: 36.73
−DI: 14.67
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 73.17
OVERBOUGHT
Stoch %K: 82.23
Stoch %D: 89.42
Williams %R: -23.94
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $37.60
BB Lower: $27.59
NEUTRAL
OBV: 1,122,549
Vol SMA 20: 257,348
Vol ROC: -40.70%
ATR: $1.34
True Range: $1.51
HV 20: 41.9%
HV 30: 38.7%
HV 60: 34.1%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-15T00:00:00 – 2026-11-13T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Written before JAKK’s Oct 22 earnings report, so it doesn’t reflect the results.
LLM Stock Analysis Report: JAKK
Executive Summary
Confidence Level: 7/10 (BULLISH)
Key Drivers: Positive news sentiment, technical momentum signals, and historical volatility.
Primary Risks: High volatility, negative earnings surprise, and regulatory changes.
Investment Thesis: JAKK's strong technical momentum and positive news sentiment justify a bullish stance. However, the stock's high volatility and potential for negative earnings surprises require careful risk management.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines have had a significant impact on JAKK's price, driving it higher. The positive news sentiment has been driven by partnerships and product launches, which have boosted investor confidence.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bullish Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish Long-term (3-12 months): Neutral
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower band: $20.86
- Middle band: $22.37
- Upper band: $23.87
- Key resistance level: $24.00
Momentum Signals:
- RSI: 58.57 (neutral)
- MACD: 0.16 / Signal: 0.04 / Histogram: 0.12 (bullish)
- Bollinger Bands: Price touching upper band = overbought
Volume Analysis: Volume trends suggest institutional interest, with a volume rate of change of -12.98%.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news headlines have driven JAKK's price higher, focusing on partnerships and product launches.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is positive (4/5), with most recent headlines highlighting the company's growth potential.
Catalyst Identification: Earnings date not available; however, upcoming product launches and partnerships may continue to drive investor interest.
Market Narrative: The market narrative is bullish, with JAKK's strong technical momentum driving price higher. News sentiment has aligned with this narrative, providing a tailwind for the stock.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk (beta >1.5), reflecting the stock's high volatility relative to the market.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is higher than historical levels, indicating a regime of increased uncertainty and risk.
Options Market Signals: IV rank is 15.7% (low), suggesting that options market is pricing in lower volatility. Put/call ratios indicate bearish sentiment.
Downside Protection: Support levels are available at $20.86, providing some downside protection.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: JAKK's sector has performed strongly, with a relative strength index of 72.2%.
Institutional Activity: Institutional interest is high, with a volume rate of change of -12.98%, suggesting that institutions are buying into the stock.
Correlation Analysis: JAKK's correlation with the market is relatively low (R-squared = 0.39), indicating that it may be less influenced by broader market trends.
Relative Valuation: JAKK is trading above its historical mean, but still within a reasonable valuation range.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support level: $20.86
- Resistance level: $24.00
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: A move below $20.86 could trigger a significant breakdown, while a move above $24.00 could trigger a bullish breakout.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings date not available; however, upcoming product launches and partnerships may continue to drive investor interest.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set at $21.50, with position sizing considerations taken into account based on the stock's high volatility.
Generated
News
All JAKK news →
Operational discipline and proportional margin growth are funding both shareholder returns and long-term entertainment partnerships.
North American toys surged 28% as Disney and Nintendo properties drove growth.
Earnings History
12 of 14 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
15.02%
Avg Actual Move
7.22%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | After-Close | 7.29% | 2.02% | 0.28x | Within |
| 2023-07-28 | After-Close | 12.10% | 12.10% | 1.00x | Within |
| 2023-11-03 | After-Close | 6.62% | 8.34% | 1.26x | Exceeded |
| 2024-03-01 | After-Close | 15.92% | 8.19% | 0.51x | Within |
| 2024-04-25 | After-Close | 18.50% | 3.29% | 0.18x | Within |
| 2024-08-01 | After-Close | 14.46% | 8.04% | 0.56x | Within |
| 2024-10-31 | After-Close | 14.74% | 5.13% | 0.35x | Within |
| 2025-04-29 | After-Close | 21.45% | 0.87% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2025-07-25 | After-Close | 13.76% | 7.39% | 0.54x | Within |
| 2025-10-31 | Pre-Market | 17.16% | 5.13% | 0.30x | Within |
| 2026-02-20 | Pre-Market | 12.11% | 23.73% | 1.96x | Exceeded |
| 2026-04-30 | After-Close | 19.99% | 10.57% | 0.53x | Within |
| 2026-07-23 | After-Close | 20.05% | 2.90% | 0.14x | Within |
| 2026-10-22 | After-Close | 16.08% | 3.32% | 0.21x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
JAKK Options Activity & IV Rank
JAKK IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 40.2%
7-DTE IV: 47.7%
Expected Move: $3.60
7-DTE Move: $1.95
Days to Exp: 35 (2026-12-18)
Options Flow · All expiries
Call Volume: 190
Put Volume: 131
P/C Volume: 0.689
BULLISH
Call OI: 1,285
Put OI: 146
P/C OI: 0.114
Total OI: 1,431
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $2.35
ATM Put: $1.25
Call %: 6.5%
Put %: 3.5%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 321
Chain OI: 1,431
Last Updated: 11/13/2026
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Dealer Positioning
HIGH γ vs HISTORY
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 99th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the high end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
99%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.96
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.46
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.53
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.46: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.53: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 3 ATM contracts, 1k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Put vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Call vs ATM
IV(call wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsThe same measure on the upside: how the OTM call is priced against the at-the-money strike.
- Negative (typical) — calls trade below ATM for most stocks and indices, so the sign alone says little.
- Percentile vs own history: high = upside calls unusually rich for this name (squeezes, takeover talk, commodity supply scares); low = calls cheaper than usual.
Reading them together
Put or call vs ATM tells you how expensive that tail is. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d put
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Nov 13 · No data
30 DTE / 10d put
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Nov 13 · ATM 39.9% / Put —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)4.9LowNov 13
IV Rank (30 DTE)7.5LowNov 13
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$3.60Nov 13
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 0.9628
Alpha: 71.72%
Correlation: 0.3174
R-Squared: 10.1%
Stock Volatility: 41.4%
Market Volatility: 13.6%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Moderate volatility - stock generally follows market
Moderate volatility - stock generally follows market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own JAKK
2 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $2.4M | #1857 of 3138 | -15.6% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $263K | #2449 of 4729 | 0.0% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
JAKK Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 38 already for 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 11,904,000 (as of 2026-09-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
1 filers$235.13K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $235.13K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
2 filers$1.01M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $530.78K | 52.53% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $479.57K | 47.47% | 2026-06-30 |
JAKK Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-27Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-27 | Stephen G Berman | CEO, President and Secretary | Mixed Exer +91,874 · Tax −49,475 |
+42,399 | $30.52 | $1.29M | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-27 | John Louis Kimble | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed Tax −11,306 · Exer +20,994 |
+9,688 | $30.52 | $295.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-11 | Neilwantie Mahabir-Somai | Director | Exer (M) | +4,827 | $24.44 | $118.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-11 | Lori MacPherson | Director | Mixed Exer +4,827 · Tax −2,042 |
+2,785 | $24.44 | $68.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-11 | Alexander Shoghi | Director | Exer (M) | +4,827 | $24.44 | $118.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-11 | Jonathan Roy Liebman | Director | Exer (M) | +4,827 | $24.44 | $118.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-11 | Jordan Scott Moelis | Director | Exer (M) | +4,827 | $24.44 | $118.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-02 | John Louis Kimble | Chief Financial Officer | Exer (M) | +35,111 | $16.88 | $592.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-02 | Stephen G Berman | CEO, President and Secretary | Mixed Tax −74,652 · Exer +140,971 |
+66,319 | $16.88 | $1.12M | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-30 | John Louis Kimble | Chief Financial Officer | Exer (M) | +20,994 | $19.34 | $406.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-30 | Stephen G Berman | Chairman, CEO, and Secretary | Mixed Tax −48,280 · Exer +91,874 |
+43,594 | $19.34 | $843.1K | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-23 | Jonathan Roy Liebman | Director | Grant (A) | +4,827 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-09-12 | Alexander Shoghi | Director | Grant (A) | +4,827 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-09-12 | Jordan Scott Moelis | Director | Grant (A) | +4,827 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-09-12 | Lori MacPherson | Director | Grant (A) | +4,827 RSU | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
JAKK Insider Holdings
8 insiders · @ $35.93
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lawrence I Rosen | 10%+ Owner | 1,885,831 | $67.76M | $16.76M | 13 | 2025-03-24 |
| 2 | Stephen G Berman | CEO, President and Secretary | 342,851 | $12.32M | -$3.63M | 15 | 2026-10-27 |
| 3 | John Louis Kimble | Chief Financial Officer | 192,271 | $6.91M | -$1.33M | 15 | 2026-10-27 |
| 4 | Alexander Shoghi | Director | 17,391 | $624.9K | $0 | 2 | 2026-09-11 |
| 5 | Jordan Scott Moelis | Director | 4,827 | $173.4K | $0 | 2 | 2026-09-11 |
| 6 | Neilwantie Mahabir-Somai | Director | 4,827 | $173.4K | $0 | 2 | 2026-09-11 |
| 7 | Jonathan Roy Liebman | Director | 4,827 | $173.4K | $0 | 2 | 2026-09-11 |
| 8 | Lori MacPherson | Director | 2,785 | $100.1K | $0 | 2 | 2026-09-11 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
JAKK Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 27, 2026Directors 6
- Stephen G Berman · listed since Feb 2006
- Alexander Shoghi · since Dec 18, 2015
- Lori MacPherson · since Sep 27, 2021
- Neilwantie Mahabir-Somai · since Dec 6, 2024
- Jonathan Roy Liebman · since Jun 20, 2025
- Jordan Scott Moelis · since Jun 20, 2025
Officers 2
- Stephen G Berman · CEO, President and Secretary · listed since Jan 2026
- John Louis Kimble · Chief Financial Officer · since Nov 20, 2019
Changes in the last 10 years (26)
| Jan 2, 2026 | Stephen G Berman listed as CEO, President and Secretary (previously Chairman, CEO, and Secretary) in SEC filings |
| Jun 20, 2025 | Jordan Scott Moelis became a director |
| Jun 20, 2025 | Jonathan Roy Liebman became a director |
| Feb 20, 2025 | Stephen G Berman listed as Chairman, CEO, and Secretary (previously CEO, President and Secretary) in SEC filings |
| Dec 6, 2024 | Neilwantie Mahabir-Somai became a director |
| Aug 3, 2022 | Thomas Gahan reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 3, 2022 | Benefit Street Partners LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Oct 27, 2021 | Stephen G Berman no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Oct 21, 2021 | Lawrence I Rosen became a 10% owner |
| Sep 27, 2021 | Lori MacPherson became a director |
| Jul 21, 2021 | Thomas Gahan became a 10% owner |
| Jul 21, 2021 | Benefit Street Partners LLC became a 10% owner |
| Nov 20, 2019 | John Louis Kimble became Chief Financial Officer |
| Sep 27, 2019 | Carole Levine became a director |
| Aug 13, 2019 | Murray L Skala reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Aug 13, 2019 | Michael S Sitrick reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Aug 13, 2019 | Michael Jonathan Gross reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Aug 9, 2019 | Matthew T. Winkler became a director |
| Jul 8, 2019 | Stephen G Berman first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Apr 1, 2018 | Brent T Novak became Chief Financial Officer |
| Nov 8, 2017 | Seth Fischer reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Nov 8, 2017 | Oasis Management Co Ltd. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Nov 8, 2017 | Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Apr 27, 2017 | Xiaoqiang Zhao became a director |
| Apr 27, 2017 | Meisheng Cultural & Creative Corp., Ltd. became a 10% owner |
| Apr 27, 2017 | Hong Kong Meisheng Cultural Co Ltd became a 10% owner |
Not reported recently (13)
- Lawrence I Rosen · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Mar 24, 2025
- John Joseph McGrath · Last reported as Chief Operating Officer in an SEC filing dated Jan 3, 2024
- Matthew T. Winkler · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 15, 2023
- Carole Levine · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 16, 2022
- Rex H Poulsen · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Sep 18, 2019
- Brent T Novak · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Apr 3, 2019
- Xiaoqiang Zhao · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 3, 2019
- Hong Kong Meisheng Cultural Co Ltd · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated May 12, 2017
- Meisheng Cultural & Creative Corp., Ltd. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated May 12, 2017
- Brian Taylor · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jan 31, 2017
- Pine River Capital Management LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jan 31, 2017
- Pine River Capital Management L.P. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jan 31, 2017
- Pine River MASTER FUND LTD. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jan 31, 2017
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
JAKK Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2025-05-12
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
0 filings
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-12 | BERMAN STEPHEN G | Officer, Director | 115,000 | $2.40M | 2025-05-12 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-21 | Kimble John Louis | Officer | 48,253 | $1.38M | 2024-11-21 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-10-27
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
ETF Holders
35 ETFs hold JAKK
25 shown · $54.63M total exposure · 0.01% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $9.0M | $76.8B | 2026-11-12 |
| 2 | DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.03% | $8.1M | — | 2026-11-12 |
| 3 | AVUV Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | Avantis | 0.02% | $7.1M | $32.8B | 2026-11-12 |
| 4 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $6.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | DFAT Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.02% | $5.6M | — | 2026-11-12 |
| 6 | IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $3.2M | $13.9B | 2026-11-12 |
| 7 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.01% | $2.8M | — | 2026-11-12 |
| 8 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $2.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 9 | BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | Nport | 0.07% | $1.6M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $1.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 11 | DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.02% | $1.2M | — | 2026-11-12 |
| 12 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.08% | $1.0M | $1.2B | 2026-11-12 |
| 13 | VFMF Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF | Vanguard | 0.06% | $779,397 | — | 2026-11-12 |
| 14 | AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.02% | $668,617 | $3.3B | 2026-11-12 |
| 15 | GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Goldman | 0.06% | $597,569 | $1.1B | 2026-11-12 |
| 16 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $564,700 | — | 2026-11-12 |
| 17 | PRFZ Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | Nport | 0.02% | $422,175 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 18 | DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $263,965 | — | 2026-11-12 |
| 19 | VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $213,278 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 20 | AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.00% | $199,671 | $14.8B | 2026-11-12 |
| 21 | RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | Global X | 0.01% | $159,817 | — | 2026-11-13 |
| 22 | IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $131,513 | $20.4B | 2026-11-12 |
| 23 | KDVD Keeley Dividend ETF | Nport | 1.49% | $125,828 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $71,518 | $12.9B | 2026-11-12 |
| 25 | DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $57,467 | — | 2026-11-12 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
16.56
TTM Diluted EPS
$2.17
TTM Revenue
$627.25M
TTM Net Income
$26.16M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$50.67M
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 '26 | 2026-09-30 | $254.22M | $29.90M | $2.48 | $-8.72M |
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $139.24M | $5.86M | $0.49 | $4.35M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $106.68M | $-4.28M | $-0.37 | $21.80M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $127.11M | $-5.32M | $-0.43 | $33.24M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $211.21M | $19.89M | $1.74 | $-8.82M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $119.09M | $-2.32M | $-0.21 | $-14.23M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $113.25M | $-2.38M | $-0.21 | $-1.70M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $130.74M | $-9.11M | $-0.85 | $54.13M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $321.61M | $52.27M | $4.64 | $12.48M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $148.62M | $5.27M | $0.47 | $-14.80M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $90.08M | $-13.18M | $-1.27 | $-12.86M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $127.40M | $-11.25M | $-1.10 | $-21.27M |
Q3 2026 • period ending 2026-09-30 • filed 2026-10-27
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
16.56
P/B
1.70
P/S
0.72
EV/EBITDA
13.67
EV/Sales
0.62
ROE
6.5%
ROA
3.6%
Div Yield
2.74%
FCF Yield
11.98%
Debt/Equity
0.00
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$422.07M
as of 2026-11-13
JAKK vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q Qnity Electronics, Inc. | $25.6B | 44.7 | — | +39.3% | 15 |
| RRX Regal Rexnord Corporation | $12.0B | 51.0 | +4.7% | +20.7% | 40 |
| SOLS Solstice Advanced Materials Inc. Common | $10.5B | — | — | +34.2% | 12 |
| RAL Ralliant Corporation | $7.8B | — | +10.4% | +34.2% | 50 |
| CON Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. | $5.4B | 25.0 | +11.8% | +119.2% | 24 |
| VIRT Virtu Financial, Inc. Class A | $5.3B | 9.9 | +1.0% | +82.0% | 5 |
| WTTR Select Water Solutions, Inc. | $2.2B | 40.1 | +7.8% | +48.2% | 42 |
| PLOW DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC. | $866M | 13.7 | +22.8% | +13.5% | 44 |
| JAKK Jakks Pacific Inc | $416M | 16.6 | +9.2% | +108.7% | 8 |
| Peer median | $6.6B | 32.5 | +9.1% | +36.7% | 32 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
329.85K
SI % of Float
3.64%
Days to Cover
1.22
Short Vol Ratio
78.2%
Free Float
9.06M
Float %
79.2%
Short interest 2026-10-30 • Short volume 2026-11-13 • Float 2026-08-14