Mastech Digital, Inc.(MHH)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES (8742)
- Exchange
- XASE
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
Mastech Digital Inc is a provider of Digital Transformation IT Services. The Company offers data & analytics solutions & IT staffing services for both digital & mainstream technologies. The Group has two segments. Its Data & Analytics Services segment delivers specialized data management, data engineering, customer experience consulting, data analytics & cloud services to customers globally. The IT Staffing Services segment combines technical expertise with business process experience to deliver a broad range of services in digital & mainstream technologies. The company derives a majority of i…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +4.57% | 18 |
| Feb | +0.01% | 18 |
| Mar | +3.70% | 18 |
| Apr | -1.32% | 18 |
| May | +4.56% | 18 |
| Jun | -1.04% | 18 |
| Jul | +9.63% | 18 |
| Aug | -0.43% | 18 |
| Sep | -1.06% | 18 |
| Oct | +0.16% | 18 |
| Nov | +7.88% | 18 |
| Dec | -2.21% | 18 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: MHH
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Technical indicators suggest a range-bound market with potential for a breakout
- Recent news headlines are neutral, but there is no significant catalyst driving the stock price
Primary Risks:
- High volatility could lead to unexpected moves in either direction
- Earnings data not available, which may impact near-term price action
Investment Thesis: MHH's technical indicators suggest a consolidation phase with potential for a breakout. The recent news headlines are neutral, but there is no significant catalyst driving the stock price. A cautious approach would be advisable, as high volatility could lead to unexpected moves in either direction.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The neutral news headline from Benzinga has had no significant impact on the stock price.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Range-bound
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Consolidation phase
- Long-term (3-12 months): Uptrend
Support/Resistance Levels: The SMA 20 ($7.72) and EMA 12 ($7.83) provide support, while the upper Bollinger Band ($8.12) serves as resistance.
Momentum Signals:
- RSI: Neutral (51.53)
- MACD: Bullish (0.11 / Signal: -0.00 / Histogram: 0.11)
- Bollinger Bands: Neutral (price touching middle band)
Volume Analysis: The volume SMA 20 is trending downward, indicating a decrease in trading activity.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: A single neutral news headline from Benzinga has had no significant impact on the stock price.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral sentiment with no clear catalyst driving the stock price.
Catalyst Identification: No significant earnings data available, but potential for a breakout or breakdown based on technical indicators.
Market Narrative: The recent news headlines are neutral and do not contradict any technical signals. The market narrative is focused on the consolidation phase and potential for a breakout.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Interpretation: Low risk with beta (0.41) indicating less volatile than the broader market.
Volatility Regime: The stock has low volatility, moving less than the broader market.
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels at SMA 20 ($7.72) and EMA 12 ($7.83) provide a potential stop-loss level.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: MHH is performing relatively well within its sector, with an R-squared value of 0.59.
Institutional Activity: No significant institutional activity detected based on volume indicators.
Correlation Analysis: The stock has a low correlation (0.09) with the broader market, indicating less volatility.
Relative Valuation: MHH is trading within its historical range, providing some support for further consolidation or breakout.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Support at SMA 20 ($7.72) and EMA 12 ($7.83), resistance at upper Bollinger Band ($8.12).
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: A move above the upper Bollinger Band could trigger a breakout, while a move below the lower Bollinger Band could trigger a breakdown.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No significant earnings data available, but potential for a breakout or breakdown based on technical indicators.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels at SMA 20 ($7.72) and EMA 12 ($7.83), with position sizing considerations given the low volatility.
Note: This analysis provides an objective view of MHH's technical and news-driven trends, highlighting potential risks and catalysts for future price movements.
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 0.49
- Correlation (SPY)
- 11.2%
- R²
- 0.01
- Ann. Volatility
- 57.5%
- SPY Volatility
- 13.0%
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-24 | STEVEN A SHAW | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +5,000 | $7.47 | $37.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-12 | Kannan Sugantharaman | CFO and COO | Grant (A) | +20,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-27 | STEVEN A SHAW | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +1,000 | $7.04 | $7.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-16 | STEVEN A SHAW | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +3,000 | $6.84 | $20.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-13 | STEVEN A SHAW | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +6,000 | $6.10 | $36.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-08 | Kannan Sugantharaman | CFO and COO | Grant (A) | +150,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-03 | STEVEN A SHAW | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +4,880 | $6.97 | $34.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-03 | STEVEN A SHAW | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +5,042 | $6.01 | $30.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-02 | STEVEN A SHAW | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +4,880 | $6.97 | $34.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-11 | STEVEN A SHAW | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +4,073 | $7.23 | $29.4K | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-22 | STEVEN A SHAW | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +4,537 | $7.76 | $35.2K | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-02 | STEVEN A SHAW | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +3,500 | $8.00 | $28.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-22 | STEVEN A SHAW | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +4,800 | $7.78 | $37.3K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-17 | STEVEN A SHAW | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +3,868 | $7.91 | $30.6K | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-06 | Vladimir Rak | Director | Award (A) | +5,535 | — | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ASHOK TRIVEDI | Director | 2,550,170 | $18.74M | $3.00M | 1 | 2017-07-17 |
| 2 | STEVEN A SHAW | 10%+ Owner | 1,365,100 | $10.03M | $879.7K | 14 | 2026-08-24 |
| 3 | SUNIL WADHWANI | Director | 402,838 | $2.96M | -$10.82M | 3 | 2023-01-18 |
| 4 | Thomas B. Moran | CEO, President & Director | 175,000 | $1.29M | $0 | 2 | 2011-05-24 |
| 5 | Edward Meindl | VP-COO | 162,878 | $1.20M | $7.5K | 11 | 2012-07-23 |
| 6 | John Ausura | Director | 115,481 | $848.8K | $12.5K | 13 | 2024-03-28 |
| 7 | Scott Adam Aicher | see remarks | 81,068 | $595.8K | -$94.5K | 7 | 2015-03-10 |
| 8 | STEVEN SHANGOLD | Director, President & CEO | 66,302 | $487.3K | $76.2K | 6 | 2008-12-10 |
| 9 | BRENDA C GALILEE | Director | 56,056 | $412.0K | -$454.8K | 15 | 2024-03-28 |
| 10 | Gerhard Watzinger | Director | 48,731 | $358.2K | -$244.6K | 15 | 2024-03-28 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.