MHK Mohawk Industries, Inc.
XNYS 128.70 DelayedStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $92.99 – $140.30
- YTD
- +17.52%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 100.0
- Straddle Price
- $15.45
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 10.99
- Market Cap
- $8.0B
- Open
- $116.68
- Day Range
- $116.68 – $128.97
- Volume
- 1,632,594
- Prev Close
- $118.04
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.12% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.13 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 11.34% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 10.60% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +27.0pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 16.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +8.5% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.08 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.8B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 5.4% |
| Book / Price | 107.4% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 24.3% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 7.3% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.14 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | -1.3% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $126.55 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $122.04 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 9.7% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.3B |
| Market Cap | $8B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $227.68 | 19% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $110.70 | 6% | median 13.5× · 4 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $251.40 | 6% | median 11.4× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/B | $226.66 | 6% | median 1.6× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/S | $243.17 | 6% | median 1.2× · 4 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $126.55 | 38% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $129.47 | 19% | 22 strikes · skew +0.11 |
- Industry (SIC)
- CARPETS & RUGS (2273) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $8.0B
- Employees
- 40,500
- List Date
- 1992-04-01
- CIK
- 0000851968
- Next Earnings
- 2026-10-29 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- $2.57 (4 est.)
- Headquarters
- Calhoun, GA
- Homepage
- https://www.mohawkind.com
Mohawk Industries Inc manufactures a wide range of flooring products, including carpets, rugs, ceramic tile, laminate, wood, luxury vinyl tile, and vinyl flooring. Its operating segments include Global Ceramic, Flooring North America, and Flooring Rest of the World. The company generates maximum revenue from the Global Ceramic segment. Global Ceramic designs, manufactures, sources, distributes and markets a broad line of ceramic, porcelain and natural stone tile products used for floor and wall applications in residential and commercial channels for both remodeling and new construction. Geogra…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 5.50% | -14.19% | 12.35% | -0.98% | 5.50% | 8.10% | 2.71% |
| Feb | 19.98% | -11.24% | -16.71% | 7.82% | -1.22% | 3.78% | 0.40% |
| Mar | 6.98% | -9.38% | -0.97% | 7.81% | -1.82% | -17.41% | -2.47% |
| Apr | 3.64% | 13.54% | 6.76% | -10.24% | -7.53% | 6.14% | 2.05% |
| May | -4.67% | -2.94% | -10.92% | 6.15% | -5.49% | 7.50% | -1.73% |
| Jun | -6.09% | -11.12% | 11.62% | -6.21% | 6.46% | 14.85% | 1.58% |
| Jul | -1.22% | -0.38% | 3.02% | 46.56% | 4.66% | 2.64% | 9.21% |
| Aug | 1.62% | -12.25% | -6.03% | -0.86% | 13.72% | -3.56% | -1.23% |
| Sep | -9.49% | -15.61% | -15.69% | 6.52% | -1.23% | -0.26% | -5.96% |
| Oct | -1.13% | 1.15% | -4.81% | -15.81% | -11.85% | 2.86%* | -4.93% |
| Nov | -8.55% | 6.56% | 8.48% | 3.39% | 4.23% | -- | 2.82% |
| Dec | 10.21% | -0.66% | 12.59% | -12.62% | -5.33% | -- | 0.84% |
| Total | 13.75% | -46.60% | -6.65% | 21.08% | -2.66% | 23.30% | 0.37% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES (MHK) - COMPREHENSIVE STOCK ANALYSIS
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH | Confidence Level: 6.5/10
Mohawk Industries presents a conflicted technical picture with deteriorating short-term momentum offset by modest positive news sentiment and value positioning. The stock is trading below its 20-day and 50-day moving averages while maintaining support above the 200-day MA, indicating a downtrend in progress with potential for stabilization. High beta (1.43) and elevated volatility (40%) amplify risk in both directions, while negative volume dynamics and bearish MACD signals suggest institutional distribution.
Key Drivers:
- Primary risk: Technical breakdown with price 2.9% below SMA20 and 7.6% below SMA50
- Primary catalyst: Q3 earnings conference call scheduled for 2026-10-29 (28 days out)
- Secondary support: Value narrative (Zacks positive rating) and placement above 200-day MA ($115.65)
Investment Thesis: MHK is in a near-term downtrend with weakening momentum, but remains above key technical support. The upcoming earnings call represents the most significant near-term catalyst, with options markets pricing a $12.90 move. Current valuation appears attractive to value investors, but deteriorating technical conditions suggest waiting for clearer stabilization signals before initiation.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: Mixed. Q2 earnings (late August) received positive multilingual coverage, but insider selling (Sept 2) and neutral earnings call invitation suggest institutional caution. Positive sentiment from Zacks aligns with value thesis but lacks conviction given technical weakness.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
Short-term (1-4 weeks): DOWNTREND
- Price $118.69 sits 2.9% below SMA20 ($122.30) and 7.6% below SMA50 ($128.28)
- Both the 20-day and 50-day moving averages are in downward configuration
- EMA 12 ($121.00) above EMA 26 ($123.17) shows slight bearish crossover signal
- ADX (14) at 24.27 indicates weak trend strength (not a strong directional conviction yet)
Medium-term (1-3 months): DOWNTREND WITH SUPPORT
- Price remains 2.6% above SMA200 ($115.65), maintaining long-term support
- The 50-day MA ($128.28) sits above the 200-day MA, though gap is narrowing
- Downtrend appears contained rather than cascading
Long-term (3-12 months): NEUTRAL TO SLIGHTLY BULLISH
- Price well-supported above 200-day moving average
- Suggests intermediate-term uptrend structure remains intact despite recent weakness
- Risk of long-term support breakdown if price penetrates $115.30 (Bollinger lower band)
Support/Resistance Levels
| Level | Type | Distance | Significance | |-------|------|----------|---------------| | $129.30 | Resistance (BB Upper) | +8.9% | Bollinger Band upper boundary; recent consolidation top | | $128.28 | Resistance (SMA50) | +8.1% | Intermediate moving average; key uptrend barrier | | $122.30 | Resistance (SMA20) | +3.1% | Short-term moving average; current overhead | | $118.69 | Current Price | — | Trading near Bollinger midline | | $115.65 | Support (SMA200) | -2.6% | Long-term moving average; primary support | | $115.30 | Support (BB Lower) | -2.8% | Bollinger Band lower boundary; technical floor | | $111.46 | Support (Technical) | -6.1% | Round level; previous consolidation base |
Critical Observation: The 200-day MA ($115.65) represents the critical support holding the long-term trend. A breach below this level would signal a longer-term deterioration and could accelerate selling.
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 40.82 — NEUTRAL, Trending Bearish
- Reading is squarely in neutral zone (30-70)
- However, positioned in lower half of neutral range, suggesting momentum loss
- Not yet oversold (<30), indicating further downside possible without panic-level selling
- Lack of divergence between price and RSI suggests downtrend has not reached exhaustion
Stochastic Oscillators: DEEPLY OVERSOLD
- Stochastic %K: 20.82 (significantly below 50 midpoint)
- Stochastic %D: 19.81 (confirming oversold condition)
- Williams %R: -77.87 (extreme reading near -100 maximum)
- Signal: Technical oversold conditions suggest potential mean reversion or bounce, but does not guarantee immediate reversal in downtrend
MACD: BEARISH CONFIGURATION
- MACD Line: -2.16 (negative territory)
- Signal Line: -0.46 (also negative)
- Histogram: -1.71 (widening negative histogram indicates accelerating bearish momentum)
- Critical Signal: MACD remains below signal line and both are negative, representing a bearish crossover. This is the most concerning momentum indicator in the dataset.
- The widening histogram shows the pace of bearish momentum is increasing rather than stabilizing
Combined Momentum Assessment: Multiple momentum indicators signal weakness, with MACD showing accelerating bearish momentum being the most concerning. Stochastic oversold conditions provide a potential bounce target, but do not indicate trend reversal.
Bollinger Bands Position
Configuration: NEUTRAL, Price Near Midline
- Upper Band: $129.30
- Middle (SMA20): $122.30
- Lower Band: $115.30
- Width: 11.44 (relatively moderate, not squeezed)
Interpretation:
- Price at $118.69 sits 0.56% below the middle band, indicating symmetrical positioning
- Distance from lower band: 2.9% (not at extremes, room to fall)
- Band width suggests volatility is neither contracting (squeeze setup) nor expanding dramatically
- Pattern Signal: Neutral positioning suggests lack of strong mean-reversion signal; could move either direction with equal probability
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary (Last 10 Articles)
| Date | Headline | Sentiment | Relevance | |------|----------|-----------|-----------| | 2026-10-01 | Q3 Earnings Conference Call Invitation | NEUTRAL | Administrative; confirms Oct 29 earnings date | | 2026-09-30 | Zacks: MHK is Top-Ranked Value Stock | POSITIVE | Valuation thesis; bullish analyst rating | | 2026-09-02 | Insider Sells 1,000 Shares @ $139.48 | NEUTRAL | Insider activity; mixed signal (disposal but price >$139) | | 2026-08-01 | Q2 2026 Results (Multiple Languages) | POSITIVE | Earnings beat/inline results; issued in 4 languages | | Earlier | Q1 & Q4 2025 Results | (Historical) | Not detailed in provided headlines |
Sentiment Assessment: MIXED-POSITIVE (Aggregate: +2.0/+5.0)
Positive Signals:
- Zacks value stock rating provides institutional validation
- Q2 earnings coverage in Italian, Dutch, and Spanish suggests international investor outreach
- Positive sentiment tags on Q2 earnings indicate inline or better performance
Negative/Caution Signals:
- Insider selling on Sept 2 at $139.48 suggests insiders viewed that price level unfavorably
- Current price $118.69 represents 15.0% decline from insider sale price, validating insider pessimism
- Neutral sentiment on earnings call invitation suggests lack of excitement or guidance changes
- No positive fundamental catalysts mentioned (no major contracts, product launches, or analyst upgrades beyond value positioning)
Sentiment-Technical Conflict: News sentiment is neutral-to-positive, but technical indicators show clear deterioration. This divergence suggests the positive value narrative has NOT translated into buying support, indicating sentiment may be lagging reality.
Catalyst Identification
Immediate (1-7 days): None identified
Near-term (1-4 weeks):
- Q3 2026 Earnings Conference Call: October 29, 2026 (28 days away)
- Options market expects $12.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-11 | After-Close | 9.71% | 5.99% | 0.62x | Within |
| 2021-04-29 | After-Close | 8.66% | 3.51% | 0.41x | Within |
| 2021-10-28 | After-Close | 9.42% | 10.98% | 1.17x | Exceeded |
| 2022-02-10 | After-Close | 8.34% | 5.21% | 0.62x | Within |
| 2022-04-28 | After-Close | 10.93% | 7.86% | 0.72x | Within |
| 2022-07-28 | After-Close | 10.28% | 5.82% | 0.57x | Within |
| 2022-10-27 | After-Close | 11.60% | 1.56% | 0.13x | Within |
| 2023-01-17 | After-Close | 2.70% | 1.30% | 0.48x | Within |
| 2023-04-27 | After-Close | 10.18% | 7.21% | 0.71x | Within |
| 2023-07-27 | After-Close | 8.69% | 6.91% | 0.80x | Within |
| 2023-10-26 | After-Close | 11.14% | 2.50% | 0.22x | Within |
| 2024-02-08 | After-Close | 7.25% | 0.36% | 0.05x | Within |
| 2024-04-25 | After-Close | 8.66% | 4.70% | 0.54x | Within |
| 2024-07-25 | After-Close | 10.48% | 19.49% | 1.86x | Exceeded |
| 2024-10-24 | After-Close | 13.63% | 13.82% | 1.01x | Exceeded |
| 2025-02-06 | After-Close | 11.93% | 1.34% | 0.11x | Within |
| 2025-05-01 | After-Close | 10.94% | 1.65% | 0.15x | Within |
| 2025-07-24 | After-Close | 9.31% | 4.22% | 0.45x | Within |
| 2025-10-23 | After-Close | 10.86% | 6.98% | 0.64x | Within |
| 2026-02-12 | After-Close | 7.79% | 0.66% | 0.08x | Within |
| 2026-04-30 | After-Close | 9.00% | 5.33% | 0.59x | Within |
| 2026-07-30 | After-Close | 10.25% | 2.96% | 0.29x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
MHK Options Activity & IV Rank
MHK IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 44th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
MHK Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Union Square Park Capital Management, LLC | $6.07M | 27.36% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | CastleKnight Management LP | $4.85M | 21.88% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $3.64M | 16.41% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $2.64M | 11.93% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $2.58M | 11.65% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $1.20M | 5.42% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $858.34K | 3.87% | 2025-09-30 |
| 8 | Walleye Trading LLC | $266.93K | 1.20% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Walleye Capital LLC | $60.66K | 0.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $3.64M | 30.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $2.73M | 22.70% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $2.39M | 19.88% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $1.93M | 16.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $717.42K | 5.97% | 2025-09-30 |
| 6 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $582.38K | 4.84% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Walleye Capital LLC | $36.40K | 0.30% | 2026-06-30 |
MHK Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-01| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | Paul F De Cock | CEO | Award (A) | +30,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-18 | Suzanne L Helen | Sell (S) | −800 | $125.62 | -$100.5K | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-17 | Jeffrey S Lorberbaum | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | Sell (S) | −22,875 | $128.59 | -$2.94M | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-15 | Jeffrey S Lorberbaum | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | Sell (S) | −68,625 | $127.07 | -$8.72M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-18 | Suzanne L Helen | Sell (S) | −1,000 | $139.48 | -$139.5K | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-11 | Claudio Coni | Chief Information Officer | Tax (F) | −123 | $135.65 | -$16.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-06 | Bernard Thiers | Director | Sell (S) | −13,393 | $134.98 | -$1.81M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-06 | Bernard Thiers | Director | Sell (S) | −13,393 | $134.98 | -$1.81M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-05 | Suzanne L Helen | Sell (S) | −7,000 | $131.52 | -$920.6K | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-05 | Jeffrey S Lorberbaum | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | Sell (S) | −59,078 | $131.59 | -$7.77M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-04 | David Lee Repp | SVP-CAO & CORPORATE CONTROLLER | Sell (S) | −225 | $130.59 | -$29.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-29 | Paul F De Cock | PRESIDENT AND COO | Tax (F) | −1,565 | $117.14 | -$183.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-18 | Suzanne L Helen | Sell (S) | −21,600 | $112.73 | -$2.43M | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-16 | Suzanne L Helen | Sell (S) | −5,742 | $111.10 | -$638.0K | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-16 | Jeffrey S Lorberbaum | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | Sell (S) | −5,000 | $111.87 | -$559.4K | EDGAR |
MHK Insider Holdings
21 insiders · @ $128.70| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bruce Bruckmann | Director | 554,196 | $71.33M | $412.6K | 40 | 2026-01-05 |
| 2 | Jeffrey S Lorberbaum | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | 461,104 | $59.34M | -$181.49M | 83 | 2026-09-17 |
| 3 | Suzanne L Helen | 245,346 | $31.58M | -$70.88M | 66 | 2026-09-18 | |
| 4 | Chistopher Wellborn | Director | 212,358 | $27.33M | -$28.28M | 72 | 2026-03-03 |
| 5 | Bernard Thiers | Director | 201,201 | $25.89M | -$30.80M | 43 | 2026-08-06 |
| 6 | Paul F De Cock | CEO | 119,457 | $15.37M | -$1.17M | 29 | 2026-10-01 |
| 7 | Mauro Vandini | President of Global Ceramic | 37,573 | $4.84M | -$528.5K | 3 | 2026-03-03 |
| 8 | James Brunk | Chief Financial Officer | 33,582 | $4.32M | -$2.61M | 49 | 2026-04-02 |
| 9 | Joseph A. Onorato | Director | 28,781 | $3.70M | $42.0K | 21 | 2026-01-05 |
| 10 | Kenneth Walma | PRESIDENT FLOORING NA | 27,936 | $3.60M | $0 | 2 | 2026-03-03 |
MHK Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 1, 2026Directors 9
- Bruce Bruckmann · on file since 2006
- Chistopher Wellborn · on file since 2006
- Jeffrey S Lorberbaum · on file since 2006
- Joseph A. Onorato · since Feb 20, 2008
- Karen A Smith-Bogart · since May 11, 2011
- William Henry Runge III · since Jul 24, 2014
- John Engquist · since Feb 25, 2020
- Jerry W Burris · since Feb 17, 2022
- Bernard Thiers · listed since Feb 2024
Officers 9
- Jeffrey S Lorberbaum · Chief Executive Officer · listed since Mar 2021
- Mauro Vandini · President of Global Ceramic · since Sep 15, 2024
- Kenneth Walma · President Flooring Na · since Feb 1, 2025
- Paul F De Cock · President and COO · listed since Feb 2025
- Nicholas P. Manthey · Chief Financial Officer · since Apr 1, 2026
- Claudio Coni · Chief Information Officer · since Feb 1, 2024
- Malisa Maynard · Chief Sustainability Officer · since Feb 1, 2024
- Rodney David Patton · VP Business Strategy · listed since Mar 2021
- David Lee Repp · Svp-Cao & Corporate Controller · since Mar 31, 2025
10% owners 1
- Jeffrey S Lorberbaum · listed since Feb 2014
Changes in the last 10 years (30)
| Apr 1, 2026 | Nicholas P. Manthey became Chief Financial Officer |
| Feb 5, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Wim Messiaen as President Flooring ROW in an SEC filing |
| Nov 5, 2025 | The company announced the departure of James Brunk as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Mar 31, 2025 | David Lee Repp became Svp-Cao & Corporate Controller |
| Feb 25, 2025 | The company announced the departure of William Wayne Harkins II as CAO and Corporate Controller in an SEC filing |
| Feb 24, 2025 | Paul F De Cock listed as President and COO (previously President-Flooring NA) in SEC filings |
| Feb 24, 2025 | James Brunk listed as Chief Financial Officer (previously CFO - VP Finance) in SEC filings |
| Feb 1, 2025 | Kenneth Walma became President Flooring Na |
| Nov 6, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Chistopher Wellborn as President and COO in an SEC filing |
| Sep 15, 2024 | Mauro Vandini became President of Global Ceramic |
| Feb 26, 2024 | Bernard Thiers first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Feb 15, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Bernard Thiers as President-Flooring ROW in an SEC filing |
| Feb 1, 2024 | Wim Messiaen became President Flooring ROW |
| Feb 1, 2024 | Malisa Maynard became Chief Sustainability Officer |
| Feb 1, 2024 | Claudio Coni became Chief Information Officer |
| Aug 1, 2022 | William Wayne Harkins II became CAO and Corporate Controller |
| Mar 11, 2022 | Clifford Charles Suing became CAO and Corporate Controller |
| Feb 17, 2022 | Jerry W Burris became a director |
| Apr 2, 2021 | James Brunk listed as CFO - VP Finance (previously Corporate Controller and CAO) in SEC filings |
| Apr 1, 2021 | Steven Hyosig Lee became CAO and Corporate Controller |
| Mar 8, 2021 | Rodney David Patton listed as VP Business Strategy (previously VP-Business Strategy and GC) in SEC filings |
| Mar 8, 2021 | Jeffrey S Lorberbaum listed as Chief Executive Officer (previously Chairman and CEO) in SEC filings |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Frank H Boykin no longer listed as CFO in SEC filings |
| Feb 25, 2020 | John Engquist became a director |
| Apr 3, 2019 | Glenn R Landau no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Apr 3, 2019 | Glenn R Landau listed as Executive V.P. & CFO (previously Executive Vice President) in SEC filings |
| Apr 1, 2019 | Glenn R Landau became a director |
| Apr 1, 2019 | Glenn R Landau became Executive Vice President |
| Mar 5, 2019 | Bernard Thiers listed as President-Flooring ROW (previously President-Flooring Eur and ROW) in SEC filings |
| Nov 12, 2018 | Paul F De Cock became President-Flooring NA |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (8)
- Clifford Charles Suing · Last reported as CAO and Corporate Controller in an SEC filing dated Mar 21, 2022
- Steven Hyosig Lee · Last reported as CAO and Corporate Controller in an SEC filing dated Mar 8, 2022
- Filip Balcaen · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 5, 2021
- Glenn R Landau · Last reported as Executive V.P. & CFO in an SEC filing dated Mar 6, 2020
- Richard C Ill · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 3, 2020
- Brian Carson · Last reported as President-Flooring NA in an SEC filing dated Oct 30, 2018
- John C Turner JR · Last reported as President-Ceramic NA in an SEC filing dated Mar 14, 2018
- Frans Georges De Cock · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 7, 2018
MHK Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-09-18What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-18 | HELEN SUZANNE L | Affiliate | 800 | $100.5K | 2026-09-18 | TD SECURITES (USA) LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-16 | LORBERBAUM JEFFREY S | Affiliate | 9,525 | $1.22M | 2026-09-16 | TD SECURITIES (USA) LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-16 | LORBERBAUM JEFFREY S | Affiliate | 1,875 | $240.4K | 2026-09-16 | TD SECURITIES (USA) LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-15 | LORBERBAUM JEFFREY S | Affiliate | 9,600 | $1.24M | 2026-09-15 | TD SECURITIES (USA) LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-15 | LORBERBAUM JEFFREY S | Affiliate | 1,875 | $241.8K | 2026-09-15 | TD SECURITIES (USA) LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-14 | LORBERBAUM JEFFREY S | Affiliate | 38,250 | $4.86M | 2026-09-14 | TD SECURITIES (USA) LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-14 | LORBERBAUM JEFFREY S | Affiliate | 7,500 | $953.9K | 2026-09-14 | TD SECURITIES (USA) LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-11 | LORBERBAUM JEFFREY S | Affiliate | 19,125 | $2.43M | 2026-09-11 | TD SECURITIES (USA) LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-11 | LORBERBAUM JEFFREY S | Affiliate | 316 | $40.1K | 2026-09-11 | TD SECURITIES (USA) LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-11 | LORBERBAUM JEFFREY S | Affiliate | 3,434 | $435.6K | 2026-09-11 | TD SECURITIES (USA) LLC | — | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-21 | 0001104659-26-065151 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-13 | 0001104659-26-060295 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-30 | 0000851968-26-000015 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-12 | 0000851968-26-000005 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-06 | 0000851968-26-000002 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-05 | 0000851968-25-000135 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-23 | 0000851968-25-000131 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-24 | 0000851968-25-000112 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-23 | 0000851968-25-000104 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-01 | 0000851968-25-000095 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-24 | 0000851968-26-000011 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-20 | 0000851968-25-000023 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-23 | 0000851968-24-000027 | EDGAR |
| 2023-02-22 | 0000851968-23-000033 | EDGAR |
| 2022-02-23 | 0000851968-22-000026 | EDGAR |
| 2021-02-24 | 0000851968-21-000019 | EDGAR |
| 2020-02-28 | 0000851968-20-000020 | EDGAR |
| 2019-02-28 | 0000851968-19-000020 | EDGAR |
| 2018-02-28 | 0000851968-18-000038 | EDGAR |
| 2017-02-27 | 0000851968-17-000020 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-01 | 0000851968-26-000018 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-24 | 0000851968-25-000133 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-25 | 0000851968-25-000114 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-02 | 0000851968-25-000097 | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-25 | 0000851968-24-000125 | EDGAR |
| 2024-07-26 | 0000851968-24-000106 | EDGAR |
| 2024-04-26 | 0000851968-24-000082 | EDGAR |
| 2023-10-27 | 0000851968-23-000097 | EDGAR |
| 2023-07-28 | 0000851968-23-000086 | EDGAR |
| 2023-04-28 | 0000851968-23-000065 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.35% | $356.9M | $103.8B | 2026-10-21 |
| 2 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $203.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.08% | $144.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.49% | $132.2M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 5 | AVUV Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | Avantis | 0.36% | $113.1M | $31.5B | 2026-10-21 |
| 6 | DFAT Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.32% | $99.1M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 7 | VBR Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF | Vanguard | 0.15% | $93.9M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.08% | $71.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 9 | SPSM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 600™ Small Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.35% | $54.5M | $15.8B | 2026-10-21 |
| 10 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.15% | $51.8M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 11 | IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.66% | $49.7M | $7.7B | 2026-10-21 |
| 12 | SLYV State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Small Cap Value ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.66% | $31.3M | $4.7B | 2026-10-21 |
| 13 | ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 1.37% | $30.7M | $2.4B | 2026-10-21 |
| 14 | IWR iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.05% | $27.5M | $57.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 15 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.03% | $25.8M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 16 | CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | Nport | 0.72% | $24.8M | — | 2026-04-30 |
| 17 | VIOO Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF | Vanguard | 0.37% | $22.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 18 | AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | Avantis | 0.08% | $18.0M | $22.3B | 2026-10-21 |
| 19 | SCHM Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.10% | $15.1M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 20 | IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $14.6M | $84.8B | 2026-10-21 |
| 21 | RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | Invesco | 0.66% | $13.2M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 22 | VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | Vanguard | 0.71% | $13.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 23 | VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | Vanguard | 0.19% | $11.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 24 | FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | Nport | 0.04% | $10.5M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 25 | IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.06% | $10.0M | $15.7B | 2026-10-21 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-07-04 | $2.99B | $196.10M | $3.22 | $316.50M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-04-04 | $2.73B | $117.10M | $1.90 | $110.10M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $2.70B | $42.00M | $0.69 | $459.60M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-27 | $2.76B | $108.80M | $1.75 | $386.60M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-28 | $2.80B | $146.50M | $2.34 | $206.30M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-29 | $2.53B | $72.60M | $1.15 | $3.70M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $2.64B | $90.20M | $1.43 | $397.00M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-28 | $2.72B | $162.00M | $2.55 | $319.60M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-29 | $2.80B | $157.40M | $2.46 | $233.60M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-30 | $2.68B | $105.00M | $1.64 | $183.70M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $2.61B | $139.50M | $2.20 | $296.30M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $2.77B | $-760.40M | $-11.94 | $512.00M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.