MWH SOLV Energy, Inc. Class A Common Stock
XNAS
23.25
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
MWH
$23.25
—
Key stats
$23.25
- 52-Week Range
- $22.53 – $48.40
- YTD
- -24.19%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 15.75
- Straddle Price
- $3.62
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.56
- Market Cap
- $4.6B
- Open
- $23.47
- Day Range
- $23.01 – $23.69
- Volume
- 2,515,809
- Prev Close
- $22.93
Fair Value
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.15% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.05 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.94% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 10.72% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +48.4pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Quality Score | 0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $26.23 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $24.76 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 64.0% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.0B |
Peers used for multiples: BE, CAT, GEV, POWL, PWR, SPXC, TEX, TKR
Blended Fair Value
—
Deviation
—
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 31.1× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 22.8× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | median 8.6× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 3.9× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $26.23 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $24.62 | 0% | 8 strikes · skew -0.24 |
As of 2026-10-22 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- HEAVY CONSTRUCTION OTHER THAN BLDG CONST - CONTRACTORS (1600) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $4.6B
- List Date
- 2026-02-11
- CIK
- 0002065636
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-12 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- $0.62 (8 est.)
- Headquarters
- San Diego, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.solvenergy.com
SOLV Energy Inc is a provider of infrastructure services to the power industry, including engineering, procurement, construction, testing, commissioning, operations, maintenance and repowering. It specializes in designing, building and maintaining utility-scale solar and battery storage projects and related T&D infrastructure. The company's projects include: The Eldorado Solar Project, Gravel Pit Solar Project, and Vikings Solar-plus-Storage Project. It operates in one reportable segment which derives revenue through providing EPC, O&M and Development services throughout the Unites Sates. The …
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -- |
| Feb | 2.77% | 2.77% |
| Mar | -4.76% | -4.76% |
| Apr | 34.41% | 34.41% |
| May | -12.60% | -12.60% |
| Jun | -1.67% | -1.67% |
| Jul | -9.82% | -9.82% |
| Aug | -12.33% | -12.33% |
| Sep | -3.07% | -3.07% |
| Oct | -5.60%* | -5.60% |
| Nov | -- | -- |
| Dec | -- | -- |
| Total | -18.21% | -18.21% |
* Only 1 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $24.76
SMA 50: $26.23
SMA 200: —
Current: $23.25
EMA 12: $24.32
EMA 26: $25.00
MACD: -0.6769 | Signal: -0.1717
BEARISH
ADX (14): 13.60
RANGE
+DI: 18.52
−DI: 29.53
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 37.36
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 14.25
Stoch %D: 16.75
Williams %R: -84.28
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $26.72
BB Lower: $22.79
NEUTRAL
OBV: -23,185,197
Vol SMA 20: 1,433,420
Vol ROC: 173.42%
ATR: $1.23
True Range: $0.76
HV 20: 44.2%
HV 30: 45.1%
HV 60: 58.5%
Data Summary
Data Points: 175
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2026-02-11T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis
MWH (SOLV Energy) - Comprehensive Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL with Confidence Level: 6/10
MWH presents a mixed technical and fundamental picture with conflicting signals that warrant cautious observation rather than conviction positioning. The stock is trading near-term support with neutral momentum, but faces headwinds from negative MACD divergence and elevated volatility. The positive news sentiment surrounding the energy sector and company-specific announcements provides some upside catalyst potential, but technical weakness and high beta risk (1.99) create meaningful downside exposure.
Key Drivers:
- Positive sector tailwinds (Energy IPO boom narrative)
- Recent capital raise success (upsized offering)
- High volatility regime creating both opportunity and risk
Primary Risks:
- Bearish MACD with widening negative histogram (-0.63)
- Negative alpha (-0.45) suggesting underperformance vs risk taken
- Extreme beta (1.99) amplifies market downturns
- Low IV Rank (5.8%) limits options-based hedging value
Investment Thesis: MWH is a high-risk growth play benefiting from favorable energy sector sentiment, but technical momentum has deteriorated despite positive headlines. The stock's extreme volatility and negative alpha suggest investors are being compensated poorly for the risk taken. Position sizing should be conservative pending clearer technical confirmation.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: Moderately Positive (+) — The three recent headlines paint an optimistic picture of company execution (O&M scale, major contracts, successful capital raise), and the IPO boom narrative provides sector-level tailwinds. However, this positive sentiment has NOT yet translated into technical strength, suggesting news may be priced in or momentum is waning.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
Short-term (1-4 weeks): BEARISH/WEAKENING
- Price ($25.75) trading above SMA 20 ($25.40) but below SMA 50 ($26.95)
- This "mixed" moving average picture suggests the uptrend has stalled
- EMA 12 ($25.35) just crossed below EMA 26 ($25.77) — early bearish signal
- ADX at 13.73 indicates a range-bound regime with weak directional conviction
Medium-term (1-3 months): NEUTRAL/CONSOLIDATING
- SMA 200 data is unavailable (flagged data quality issue)
- Current price action suggests consolidation between support ($23.71 lower Bollinger Band) and resistance ($27.09 upper BB)
- The 1.54-point spread from SMA 20 to SMA 50 indicates lack of strong directional bias
Long-term (3-12 months): INDETERMINATE
- Insufficient data (missing SMA 200) prevents long-term trend assessment
- High historical volatility (HV60: 64.5%) suggests structural uncertainty
Support & Resistance Levels
| Level | Type | Significance | |-------|------|--------------| | $27.09 | Resistance | Upper Bollinger Band; psychological zone | | $26.95 | Resistance | SMA 50 (intermediate-term average) | | $25.40 | Dynamic Support | SMA 20 + Bollinger Band Middle; current pivot | | $25.35 | Micro Support | EMA 12 (just tested) | | $23.71 | Support | Lower Bollinger Band; structural floor | | $22.38 | Potential Support | 1 ATR below current price ($25.75 - $1.33) |
Critical Observation: The price is consolidating in a tight $3.38 range (Bollinger Band width of 13.31% of price). A breakdown below $23.71 would signal a 7.9% decline and likely trigger accelerated selling. Conversely, a breakout above $27.09 would face resistance at the SMA 50.
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 49.62 — NEUTRAL
- Reading is perfectly centered in the neutral zone (30-70)
- Indicates no overbought or oversold condition
- Market is in equilibrium; lacks momentum conviction in either direction
- This neutrality, combined with weak ADX, suggests "waiting mode" — neither buyers nor sellers dominating
MACD: -0.42 / Signal: 0.21 / Histogram: -0.63 — BEARISH DIVERGENCE
- Critical Red Flag: MACD line (-0.42) is below signal line (0.21)
- Histogram is deeply negative (-0.63) and widening, indicating accelerating bearish momentum
- This is the strongest bearish signal in the technical setup
- Pattern suggests recent buyers are capitulating; momentum shifting to sellers
- Interpretation: Even though price remains above SMA 20, the selling pressure is building underneath
Stochastic Oscillator (%K: 59.62 / %D: 51.73) — BULLISH DIVERGENCE
- %K (59.62) is above %D (51.73) and in neutral-to-bullish zone (<70)
- This conflicts with MACD weakness — a red flag for mixed signal reliability
- The near-term momentum (stochastic) hasn't rolled over, but the MACD (intermediate momentum) has
- Suggests momentum peak may have already occurred
Williams %R: -41.28 — NEUTRAL
- Reading is in neutral zone (not near -20 or -80 extremes)
- Confirms lack of extreme momentum in either direction
- Supports "consolidation" thesis
Volume Analysis
Critical Finding: Negative Divergence Between Price and Volume
-
On-Balance Volume (OBV): -22,413,517 — DEEPLY NEGATIVE
- OBV measures cumulative buying vs selling pressure
- This extreme negative reading indicates sellers have dominated despite price holding above support
- Suggests underlying weakness not yet reflected in price
- Red Flag: This often precedes price declines
-
Volume Rate of Change: +27.90% — Mixed Signal
- Volume is increasing (+27.90% vs 20-day average of 1,358,718)
- Increased volume with negative OBV = aggressive selling, not healthy accumulation
- Institutional buyers appear to be stepping aside
-
Volume SMA 20: 1,358,718.50
- Current activity is 27.90% above this level
- This elevated volume on a day when MACD is bearish and OBV is negative = distribution pattern
- Classic "weak hands" selling into rallies
Interpretation: The negative OBV combined with elevated volume and bearish MACD suggests institutional or informed selling. This is particularly concerning because it contradicts the positive news headlines — suggesting news may not be resonating with volume drivers or is being used as exit opportunity.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary
All three recent headlines are positive in tone and content:
-
"Energy IPO Boom" narrative (Motley Fool, 7/31/26) — Bullish sector thesis
- Positions MWH within broader renewable energy/energy infrastructure uptrend
- Suggests favorable macroeconomic environment for capital raises
-
"Upsized Public Offering" (GlobeNewswire, 5/29/26) — Capital strength signal
- Company raised MORE capital than originally planned
- Indicates strong investor demand and validates business model to market
- Provides war chest for growth initiatives
-
"Industry-Leading O&M Scale & Largest Single-Site Agreement" (GlobeNewswire, 4/1/26) — Operational excellence
- Demonstrates competitive moat through operational efficiency
- Largest contract signals major customer validation
- AMNA 2026 conference presentation = investor communication effort
Sentiment Assessment
Aggregate News Sentiment: POSITIVE (70% confidence)
- 3/3 headlines are positive or neutral-to-positive
- No negative news regarding guidance, regulatory issues, or management changes
- Sector tailwinds appear genuine (Energy IPO boom is real)
- Critical Caveat: Positive news has NOT translated to positive price action or volume dynamics
Sentiment-Price Divergence: MAJOR RED FLAG
The Disconnect:
- News is positive, but technical indicators are weakening
- MACD is rolling over and OBV is deeply negative
- This suggests one of three scenarios:
- News is already priced in — previous rallies already
Generated
News
All MWH news →
Earnings History
1 of 1 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
10.77%
Avg Actual Move
2.23%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-13 | After-Close | 10.77% | 2.23% | 0.21x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
MWH Options Activity & IV Rank
MWH IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 67.4%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $3.62
7-DTE Move: $3.62
Days to Exp: 30 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 120
Put Volume: 67
P/C Volume: 0.558
BULLISH
Call OI: 1,746
Put OI: 200
P/C OI: 0.115
Total OI: 1,946
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $2.20
ATM Put: $1.43
Call %: 9.5%
Put %: 6.1%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 475
Chain OI: 6,637
Last Updated: 10/21/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 67th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
67%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.37
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.28
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.62
δ-decay vs time
Charm tilt -0.62: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 10 ATM contracts, 3k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 21 · No data
30 DTE / 10d
43%
+6.3
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 21 · ATM 67.5% / Wing 73.8%
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)15.8LowOct 21
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$3.62Oct 21
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 1.9897
Alpha: -55.42%
Correlation: 0.4296
R-Squared: 18.5%
Stock Volatility: 60.9%
Market Volatility: 13.1%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 174
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 174
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own MWH
7 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $23.7M | #1028 of 3716 | -36.1% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $20.1M | #583 of 1945 | -70.1% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $19.1M | #716 of 3138 | new | 13F | |
| Soros Fund Management Family office George Soros, Robert Soros, Jonathan Soros | $14.9M | #115 of 251 | +210.8% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $7.0M | #1846 of 6285 | -60.2% | 13F | |
| Bridgewater Associates Hedge fund Ray Dalio | $2.9M | #608 of 997 | -16.6% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $29K | #3608 of 4729 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
MWH Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
MWH Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-08-28Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-28 | Laura Ellen Stern | Director | Award (A) | +1,776 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-28 | Nancy Stefanowicz | Director | Award (A) | +1,776 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-28 | Steven J. Lerner | Director | Award (A) | +1,776 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-28 | Daniel P McQuade | Director | Award (A) | +1,776 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-28 | J Adam Abram | Director | Award (A) | +1,776 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-28 | William C Jackson | Director | Award (A) | +1,776 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-21 | Chad Plotkin | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −55,935 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-21 | George William Hershman | Chief Executive Officer | Sell (S) | −233,048 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-21 | Brandi Michelle Pearson | Chief People Officer | Sell (S) | −25,555 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-21 | SOLV Energy Management Holdings LP | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-21 | Kevin J. Deters | Chief Operating Officer | Sell (S) | −70,176 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-21 | Ronald B Stark | EVP and CAO | Sell (S) | −4,733 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-21 | Adam S Forman | CLO & Secretary | Sell (S) | −11,480 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-21 | Eric John Valleton | Chief Technology Officer | Sell (S) | −33,156 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-21 | Helena Elisabeth Kimball | Chief Revenue Officer | Sell (S) | −11,342 RSU | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
MWH Insider Holdings
11 insiders · @ $23.25
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ASP Endeavor Investco LP | 10%+ Owner | 85,989,594 | $2.00B | $0 | 1 | 2026-08-21 |
| 2 | ASP VIII Alternative Investments Solstice LP | 10%+ Owner | 85,989,594 | $2.00B | $0 | 1 | 2026-08-21 |
| 3 | ASP SOLV Aggregator LP | 10%+ Owner | 84,075,161 | $1.95B | $0 | 1 | 2026-06-03 |
| 4 | AMERICAN SECURITIES LLC | 10%+ Owner | 82,920,401 | $1.93B | $0 | 2 | 2026-06-05 |
| 5 | ASP VIII SOLV Holdings LP | 10%+ Owner | 82,920,401 | $1.93B | $0 | 1 | 2026-06-05 |
| 6 | J Adam Abram | Director | 1,776 | $41.3K | $0 | 3 | 2026-08-28 |
| 7 | William C Jackson | Director | 1,776 | $41.3K | $0 | 3 | 2026-08-28 |
| 8 | Steven J. Lerner | Director | 1,776 | $41.3K | $0 | 3 | 2026-08-28 |
| 9 | Daniel P McQuade | Director | 1,776 | $41.3K | $0 | 3 | 2026-08-28 |
| 10 | Nancy Stefanowicz | Director | 1,776 | $41.3K | $0 | 3 | 2026-08-28 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
MWH Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Aug 28, 2026Directors 10
- Daniel P McQuade · since Feb 11, 2026
- David Isaac Portnoy · since Feb 11, 2026
- George William Hershman · since Feb 11, 2026
- J Adam Abram · since Feb 11, 2026
- Kevin S. Penn · since Feb 11, 2026
- Laura Ellen Stern · since Feb 11, 2026
- Michael E. Sand · since Feb 11, 2026
- Nancy Stefanowicz · since Feb 11, 2026
- Steven J. Lerner · since Feb 11, 2026
- William C Jackson · since Feb 11, 2026
Officers 9
- George William Hershman · Chief Executive Officer · since Feb 11, 2026
- Chad Plotkin · Chief Financial Officer · since Feb 11, 2026
- Kevin J. Deters · Chief Operating Officer · since Feb 11, 2026
- Brandi Michelle Pearson · Chief People Officer · since Feb 11, 2026
- David Harold Grubb Jr. · Chief Commercial Officer · since Feb 11, 2026
- Eric John Valleton · Chief Technology Officer · since Feb 11, 2026
- Helena Elisabeth Kimball · Chief Revenue Officer · since Feb 11, 2026
- Adam S Forman · CLO & Secretary · since Feb 11, 2026
- Ronald B Stark · SVP, Controller and PAO · since Feb 11, 2026
10% owners 12
- AS/ASP VIII Co-Investor, LLC (entity) · since Feb 11, 2026
- ASP Endeavor Investco LP (entity) · since Feb 11, 2026
- ASP Manager Corp. (entity) · since Feb 11, 2026
- ASP SOLV Aggregator LP (entity) · since Feb 11, 2026
- ASP VIII Alternative Investments Solstice LP (entity) · since Feb 11, 2026
- ASP VIII Alternative Investments, L.P. (entity) · since Feb 11, 2026
- ASP VIII CSE Holdings LP (entity) · since Feb 11, 2026
- ASP VIII SOLV Holdings LP (entity) · since Feb 11, 2026
- American Securities Associates VIII, LLC (entity) · since Feb 11, 2026
- American Securities LLC (entity) · since Feb 11, 2026
- American Securities Partners VIII(B), L.P. (entity) · since Feb 11, 2026
- SOLV Energy Management Holdings LP (entity) · since Feb 11, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (33)
| May 12, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Erik Theodore Johnson as Chief Strategy Officer in an SEC filing |
| Feb 11, 2026 | William C Jackson became a director |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Steven J. Lerner became a director |
| Feb 11, 2026 | SOLV Energy Management Holdings LP became a 10% owner |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Ronald B Stark became SVP, Controller and PAO |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Nancy Stefanowicz became a director |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Michael E. Sand became a director |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Laura Ellen Stern became a director |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Kevin S. Penn became a director |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Kevin J. Deters became Chief Operating Officer |
| Feb 11, 2026 | J Adam Abram became a director |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Helena Elisabeth Kimball became Chief Revenue Officer |
| Feb 11, 2026 | George William Hershman became a director |
| Feb 11, 2026 | George William Hershman became Chief Executive Officer |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Erik Theodore Johnson became Chief Strategy Officer |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Eric John Valleton became Chief Technology Officer |
| Feb 11, 2026 | David Isaac Portnoy became a director |
| Feb 11, 2026 | David Harold Grubb Jr. became Chief Commercial Officer |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Daniel P McQuade became a director |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Chad Plotkin became Chief Financial Officer |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Brandi Michelle Pearson became Chief People Officer |
| Feb 11, 2026 | American Securities Partners VIII(B), L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Feb 11, 2026 | American Securities LLC became a 10% owner |
| Feb 11, 2026 | American Securities Associates VIII, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Adam S Forman became CLO & Secretary |
| Feb 11, 2026 | ASP VIII SOLV Holdings LP became a 10% owner |
| Feb 11, 2026 | ASP VIII CSE Holdings LP became a 10% owner |
| Feb 11, 2026 | ASP VIII Alternative Investments, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Feb 11, 2026 | ASP VIII Alternative Investments Solstice LP became a 10% owner |
| Feb 11, 2026 | ASP SOLV Aggregator LP became a 10% owner |
| Feb 11, 2026 | ASP Manager Corp. became a 10% owner |
| Feb 11, 2026 | ASP Endeavor Investco LP became a 10% owner |
| Feb 11, 2026 | AS/ASP VIII Co-Investor, LLC became a 10% owner |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
MWH Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-08-19
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
4 filings
· $257.4M notice value
· 4 unique filers
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
ASP VIII Alternative Investments Solstice, L.P. (1, $134.9M) · ASP SOLV Aggregator LP (1, $63.4M) · SOLV Energy Management Holdings LP (1, $36.9M) · ASP Endeavor Investco LP (1, $22.2M)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-19 | SOLV Energy Management Holdings LP | 10% Stockholder | 1,329,803 | $36.93M | 2026-08-19 | Citadel Securities, LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-19 | ASP SOLV Aggregator LP | 10% Stockholder | 2,281,394 | $63.35M | 2026-08-19 | Citadel Securities, LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-19 | ASP VIII Alternative Investments Solstice, L.P. | 10% Stockholder | 4,859,347 | $134.94M | 2026-08-19 | Citadel Securities, LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-19 | ASP Endeavor Investco LP | 10% Stockholder | 798,412 | $22.17M | 2026-08-19 | Citadel Securities, LLC | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
48 ETFs hold MWH
25 shown · $219.93M total exposure · 0.02% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance® ETF | First Trust | 0.68% | $57.8M | $8.5B | 2026-10-20 |
| 2 | PAVE Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF | Global X | 0.25% | $34.7M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 3 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $33.5M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $23.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | VBK Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $13.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $10.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | Nport | 1.38% | $5.8M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 8 | QCLN First Trust NASDAQ® Clean Edge® Green Energy Index Fund | First Trust | 1.05% | $5.1M | $484.9M | 2026-10-20 |
| 9 | IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $5.0M | $19.3B | 2026-10-20 |
| 10 | IWR iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $3.7M | $57.3B | 2026-10-20 |
| 11 | VOLT Tema Electrification ETF | Nport | 0.50% | $3.6M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 12 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.02% | $3.6M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 13 | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $3.3M | $126.1B | 2026-10-20 |
| 14 | FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX® Fund | First Trust | 0.72% | $2.8M | $392.9M | 2026-10-20 |
| 15 | RSHO Tema U.S. Manufacturing & Reshoring ETF | Nport | 0.92% | $2.5M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 16 | ALAI Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF | Nport | 0.48% | $2.2M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | ATFV Alger 35 ETF | Nport | 1.04% | $2.1M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $1.5M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 19 | FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF | Fidelity | 1.30% | $1.1M | $84.5M | 2026-10-20 |
| 20 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $1.1M | $97.4B | 2026-10-20 |
| 21 | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.01% | $849,855 | $10.9B | 2026-10-20 |
| 22 | CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF | Nport | 0.78% | $710,726 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | IYE iShares U.S. Energy ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $632,547 | $1.8B | 2026-10-20 |
| 24 | IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | Nport | 0.35% | $631,662 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $609,915 | $49.2B | 2026-10-20 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
7.33M
SI % of Float
22.60%
Days to Cover
5.72
Short Vol Ratio
35.5%
Free Float
32.42M
Float %
28.1%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-21 • Float 2026-08-26