Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.(PLAY)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $9.40 – $33.30
- YTD
- -39.03%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 20.55
- Straddle Price
- $1.70
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 1.02
- Market Cap
- $0.4B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.71% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.21% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 5.85% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +38.9pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +0.3% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.00 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -65.0% |
| Book / Price | 27.4% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 85.8% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -1.6% |
| Debt / Equity | 15.01 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $11.24 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $10.46 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 192.8% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $1.5B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 22.7× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $101.92 | 13% | median 14.2× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $5.35 | 16% | median 1.9× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/S | $115.26 | 16% | median 1.9× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $11.24 | 55% | stability 65% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
- Industry (SIC)
- RETAIL-EATING PLACES (5812)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.4B
Dave & Buster's Entertainment Inc is an owner and operator of entertainment and dining venues in North America that offer experiences for both adults and families under the Dave & Buster's and Main Event brands. The company combines various forms of entertainment, including games, bowling, and watching live sports and other televised events, with a full menu of entrees and appetizers and a selection of alcoholic and non alcoholic beverages, all in one location. Its concept focuses on providing customers the opportunity to Eat, Drink, Play, and Watch, appealing to a balanced mix of adults, fami…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +4.53% | 6 |
| Feb | -0.26% | 6 |
| Mar | -6.61% | 6 |
| Apr | -0.70% | 6 |
| May | -2.38% | 6 |
| Jun | +3.83% | 6 |
| Jul | -4.88% | 6 |
| Aug | -2.52% | 5 |
| Sep | -8.83% | 5 |
| Oct | +1.70% | 5 |
| Nov | +6.86% | 5 |
| Dec | +2.80% | 5 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-10 | After-Close | 14.11% | 4.14% | 0.29x | Within |
| 2024-12-10 | After-Close | 15.98% | 20.08% | 1.26x | Exceeded |
| 2025-04-07 | After-Close | 23.33% | 2.73% | 0.12x | Within |
| 2025-06-10 | After-Close | 17.24% | 20.02% | 1.16x | Exceeded |
| 2025-09-15 | After-Close | 17.90% | 16.74% | 0.94x | Within |
| 2025-12-09 | After-Close | 19.20% | 13.02% | 0.68x | Within |
| 2026-03-31 | After-Close | 21.51% | 16.07% | 0.75x | Within |
| 2026-06-15 | After-Close | 17.66% | 7.85% | 0.44x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 20.55
- IV Rank (7D)
- 20.55
- Avg IV
- 117.8%
- Straddle (30D)
- $1.70
- Straddle (7D)
- $1.70
- P/C Volume
- 1.02
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 1.61
- Correlation (SPY)
- 28.8%
- R²
- 0.08
- Ann. Volatility
- 71.3%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.7%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $5.36M | 18.77% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $5.14M | 18.02% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $4.68M | 16.39% | 2025-09-30 |
| 4 | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC Custodian | $2.82M | 9.86% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $2.35M | 8.22% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | Walleye Capital LLC | $1.77M | 6.21% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | Brevan Howard Capital Management LP | $1.34M | 4.70% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | Centiva Capital, LP | $1.19M | 4.17% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $1.12M | 3.92% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $989.86K | 3.47% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $558.83K | 1.96% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $387.71K | 1.36% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP | $346.56K | 1.21% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | Walleye Trading LLC | $262.09K | 0.92% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | Shay Capital LLC | $216.60K | 0.76% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | Signal Advisors Wealth, LLC | $16.30K | 0.06% | 2026-03-31 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $6.94M | 20.19% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC Custodian | $6.45M | 18.77% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | Centiva Capital, LP | $4.72M | 13.73% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $3.49M | 10.14% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $2.93M | 8.52% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $2.89M | 8.41% | 2025-09-30 |
| 7 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $1.96M | 5.70% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | Walleye Capital LLC | $1.58M | 4.61% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | Walleye Trading LLC | $1.43M | 4.15% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $554.50K | 1.61% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $530.67K | 1.54% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $309.74K | 0.90% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | Crawford Fund Management, LLC | $303.24K | 0.88% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP | $266.42K | 0.77% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | Signal Advisors Wealth, LLC | $26.13K | 0.08% | 2026-03-31 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-01 | Darin Harper | Chief Financial Officer | Tax (F) | −4,920 | $11.40 | -$56.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-25 | Darin Harper | Chief Financial Officer | Tax (F) | −1,145 | $11.27 | -$12.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-24 | Rachel Morgan | Chief Legal Officer, Corp Sec | Award (A) | +126,050 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-24 | Jeremy Tucker | Chief Marketing Officer | Award (A) | +231,092 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-09 | Steve Klohn | SVP Chief Information Officer | Tax (F) | −2,870 | $11.04 | -$31.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-04 | Kevin Fish | SVP, Chief Tech & Digital Ofc | Award (A) | +40,823 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-03 | Les Lehner | SVP, Chief Development Officer | Award (A) | +28,576 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-03 | Tony Wehner | Pres. Operations, Main Event | Award (A) | +28,576 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-03 | Antonio Pineiro | President, International | Award (A) | +28,576 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-08 | JAMES P. CHAMBERS | Director | Award (A) | +976 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-08 | Hill Path D Fund LP | Award (A) | +5,202 | — | EDGAR | ||
| 2026-05-08 | Hill Path Holdings LLC | 10%+ Owner | Award (A) | +8,670 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-07 | ATISH SHAH | Director | Award (A) | +867 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-07 | Nathaniel Lipman | Director | Award (A) | +759 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-07 | Allen R Weiss | Director | Award (A) | +867 | — | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OHCP GenPar III, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 9,675,593 | $100.53M | -$1.20B | 1 | 2015-10-07 |
| 2 | Oak Hill Capital Management Partners III, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 3,866,381 | $40.17M | -$660.80M | 1 | 2016-04-08 |
| 3 | Hill Path G Fund LP | 2,869,527 | $29.81M | $44.97M | 1 | 2022-12-30 | |
| 4 | Hill Path Capital Partners II GP LLC | 2,869,527 | $29.81M | $0 | 5 | 2022-10-12 | |
| 5 | HP D GP LLC | 2,095,246 | $21.77M | $0 | 3 | 2022-05-10 | |
| 6 | Hill Path Capital Partners GP LLC | 2,095,246 | $21.77M | $96.87M | 2 | 2026-04-28 | |
| 7 | Hill Path D Fund LP | 1,293,990 | $13.44M | $132.58M | 6 | 2026-05-08 | |
| 8 | Hill Path Investment Holdings II LLC | 1,139,834 | $11.84M | $142.50M | 2 | 2022-12-27 | |
| 9 | SCOTT I ROSS | Director | 650,501 | $6.76M | $174.75M | 3 | 2026-03-13 |
| 10 | Hill Path Capital LP | 10%+ Owner | 640,412 | $6.65M | $179.27M | 1 | 2022-12-21 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-17 | Klohn Steve | Officer | 6,989 | $102.7K | 2026-04-17 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-18 | DODDS HAMISH | Director | 21,911 | $398.9K | 2025-12-18 | Wells Fargo Clearing Services | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-17 | John Mulleady | Director | 5,931 | $193.2K | 2025-06-17 | Fidelity Investments | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-12-26 | John Mulleady | Director | 6,000 | $176.0K | 2024-12-26 | Raymond James Financial, Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-29 | Klohn Steve | Former Officer | 7,134 | $286.4K | 2024-10-29 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-09-13 | Steve Klohn | Officer | 14,287 | $444.3K | 2024-09-12 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-09-12 | Klohn Steve | Officer | 3,225 | $100.9K | 2024-09-12 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-04-04 | Kevin M. Sheehan | Director | 50,000 | $3.42M | 2024-04-04 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-04-04 | Kevin M. Sheehan | Director | 25,000 | $1.71M | 2024-04-04 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-04-04 | Mulleady John | Officer | 42,824 | $2.92M | 2024-04-04 | Piper Sandler & Co. | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/B Ratio | 3.5 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.2 |
| TTM Revenue | $2.1B |
| TTM Net Income | $-0.1B |
| TTM EPS | $-1.88 |
| ROE | -65.0% |
| Debt/Equity | 15.08 |