PVL Permianville Royalty Trust
XNYS 11.78 DelayedStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
PVL
$11.78
—
Key stats
$11.78
- 52-Week Range
- $1.58 – $2.01
- YTD
- +543.44%
- Straddle Price
- $15.85
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- Open
- $1.82
- Day Range
- $1.80 – $1.82
- Volume
- 7,262
- Prev Close
- $1.81
Fair Value
+50.0% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.15% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.51 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 7.71% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 7.73% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +222.6pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Quality Score | 0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $1.82 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $1.81 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 195.0% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.0B |
Peers used for multiples: BIL, JNK, MINT, SGOV, SPHY, USHY, VOC, VWOB
Blended Fair Value
$4.94
Deviation
+50.0%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $4.94 | 100% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $1.82 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-10-22 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- CRUDE PETROLEUM & NATURAL GAS (1311) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- List Date
- 2011-11-03
- CIK
- 0001520048
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-13 (After-Close)
- Headquarters
- Houston, TX
- Homepage
- https://www.permianvilleroyaltytrust.com
Permianville Royalty Trust is a statutory trust which holds net profits interests in the profits from the sale of oil and natural gas production from non-operated assets of both conventional properties in the States of Texas, Louisiana, and New Mexico as well as unconventional assets in the Permian and Haynesville basins.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 57.20% | 2.36% | -0.66% | 10.53% | 2.82% | -0.55% | 11.95% |
| Feb | 22.61% | 14.50% | -16.00% | -17.75% | 0.00% | -9.44% | -1.01% |
| Mar | 7.19% | -1.95% | -5.91% | -5.56% | 5.74% | 7.56% | 1.18% |
| Apr | 1.65% | 21.67% | 3.52% | 12.03% | -7.10% | 3.30% | 5.84% |
| May | 9.09% | 52.38% | -5.49% | -6.16% | 11.72% | 0.53% | 10.35% |
| Jun | 17.37% | -33.40% | 2.88% | -22.46% | 14.20% | -11.05% | -5.41% |
| Jul | -11.11% | 1.15% | 15.50% | 46.61% | -3.18% | 2.67% | 8.61% |
| Aug | 3.14% | -2.69% | -13.80% | 13.38% | 10.25% | 9.30% | 3.26% |
| Sep | 6.08% | 4.73% | -3.42% | -3.28% | -8.59% | 0.55% | -0.65% |
| Oct | 14.66% | 8.70% | -25.10% | -1.27% | 1.86% | -2.17%* | -0.55% |
| Nov | -3.24% | -5.95% | 6.99% | 1.27% | -1.10% | -- | -0.41% |
| Dec | 3.94% | -4.01% | -26.90% | -13.92% | -1.10% | -- | -8.40% |
| Total | 201.57% | 43.54% | -55.49% | -3.16% | 25.27% | -1.22% | 35.09% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $1.81
SMA 50: $1.82
SMA 200: $1.81
Current: $1.80
EMA 12: $1.80
EMA 26: $1.81
MACD: -0.0072 | Signal: -0.0003
BEARISH
ADX (14): 33.67
TREND
+DI: 11.47
−DI: 21.94
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 47.46
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 61.67
Stoch %D: 58.94
Williams %R: -40.00
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $1.84
BB Lower: $1.77
NEUTRAL
OBV: 2,215,025
Vol SMA 20: 58,445
Vol ROC: -68.46%
ATR: $0.04
True Range: $0.02
HV 20: 14.4%
HV 30: 14.6%
HV 60: 19.0%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-23T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level: 6/10) Key Drivers: + Bullish momentum signals from MACD + Neutral sentiment from RSI and Bollinger Bands Primary Risks: + High volatility based on IV premium vs HV30 Recent News Sentiment Impact: No significant impact from recent headlines
Technical Analysis Trend Direction: + Short-term: Bullish (1-4 weeks) + Medium-term: Neutral (1-3 months) + Long-term: Bearish (3-12 months) Support/Resistance Levels: + Upper Bollinger Band: $1.89 + Lower Bollinger Band: $1.80 Momentum Signals: + RSI: 56.88 (neutral) + MACD: Bullish crossover above signal line + Bollinger Bands: Neutral, not signaling any significant moves Volume Analysis: + Volume SMA 20: 64845.80 (moderate volume) + On-Balance Volume (OBV): 2443015.11 (strong upward trend)
News & Sentiment Analysis Recent Headlines Summary: + General market commentary, routine announcements (neutral sentiment) Sentiment Assessment: Neutral Catalyst Identification: No significant events or earnings announcements recently
Market Narrative: News headlines do not strongly contradict technical signals
Risk & Volatility Assessment Beta Interpretation: Stock moves opposite to market (-0.16 beta) Volatility Regime: High volatility based on IV premium vs HV30 (43.4%) Options Market Signals: + IV Rank: Medium + Put/Call Ratio: 1.25 (neutral sentiment) + Market Expectation: Options market pricing $8.12 move by expiration
Downside Protection: Support levels at $1.80 and $1.78 based on Bollinger Bands and moving averages
Market Context & Positioning Sector Performance: Energy sector has been performing well recently Institutional Activity: Institutional investors have been buying, as seen from OBV Correlation Analysis: Stock moves opposite to market (-0.07 correlation) Relative Valuation: Stock is trading near the lower end of its 1-year range
Key Levels & Action Items Critical Price Levels: + Support at $1.80 and $1.78 based on Bollinger Bands and moving averages Breakout/Breakdown Levels: + Breakout above $1.89 could trigger a strong upward move + Breakdown below $1.80 could lead to further declines Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No significant events or earnings announcements recently
Risk Management: Consider stop-loss levels at $1.75 and $1.85 based on technical support and resistance
Generated
News
All PVL news →
Earnings History
20 of 20 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
112.36%
Avg Actual Move
4.22%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-18 | After-Close | 84.72% | 0.69% | 0.01x | Within |
| 2021-05-17 | After-Close | 78.79% | 4.24% | 0.05x | Within |
| 2022-01-18 | After-Close | 11.92% | 4.30% | 0.36x | Within |
| 2022-03-18 | After-Close | 14.73% | 6.45% | 0.44x | Within |
| 2022-05-16 | After-Close | 42.94% | 0.83% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2022-07-18 | After-Close | 27.32% | 10.38% | 0.38x | Within |
| 2023-05-15 | After-Close | 7.17% | 1.99% | 0.28x | Within |
| 2023-07-17 | After-Close | 8.27% | 5.12% | 0.62x | Within |
| 2023-09-18 | After-Close | 10.28% | 0.79% | 0.08x | Within |
| 2023-11-17 | After-Close | 16.74% | 7.44% | 0.44x | Within |
| 2024-01-19 | After-Close | 69.59% | 3.38% | 0.05x | Within |
| 2024-08-16 | After-Close | 136.90% | 15.57% | 0.11x | Within |
| 2024-10-18 | After-Close | 67.40% | 1.57% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2024-12-16 | After-Close | 401.67% | 4.00% | 0.01x | Within |
| 2025-05-19 | After-Close | 172.87% | 4.67% | 0.03x | Within |
| 2025-08-18 | After-Close | 318.06% | 8.89% | 0.03x | Within |
| 2025-12-19 | Pre-Market | 133.47% | 1.14% | 0.01x | Within |
| 2026-03-18 | Pre-Market | 57.17% | 2.13% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2026-06-18 | After-Close | 454.17% | 0.56% | 0.00x | Within |
| 2026-10-19 | After-Close | 133.05% | 0.28% | 0.00x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
PVL Options Activity & IV Rank
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: —
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $15.85
7-DTE Move: $15.85
Days to Exp: 29 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 0
Put Volume: 0
P/C Volume: —
Call OI: 0
Put OI: 0
P/C OI: —
Total OI: 0
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $10.00
ATM Put: $5.85
Call %: 84.9%
Put %: 49.7%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 127
Chain OI: 186
Last Updated: 10/22/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM 80.5% / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$15.85Oct 22
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: -0.1588
Alpha: 4.53%
Correlation: -0.0718
R-Squared: 0.5%
Stock Volatility: 28.2%
Market Volatility: 12.8%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own PVL
1 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $41K | #6048 of 6285 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
PVL Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
1 filers$124.38K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $124.38K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
PVL Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2023-08-17Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-17 | PERMIANVILLE HOLDINGS LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −400 | $2.97 | -$1.2K | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-14 | PERMIANVILLE HOLDINGS LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −20,582 | $2.97 | -$61.1K | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-08 | PERMIANVILLE HOLDINGS LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −6,966 | $2.98 | -$20.7K | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-02 | PERMIANVILLE HOLDINGS LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −12,319 | $2.97 | -$36.6K | EDGAR |
| 2023-07-28 | PERMIANVILLE HOLDINGS LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −57,182 | $2.98 | -$170.2K | EDGAR |
| 2023-07-25 | PERMIANVILLE HOLDINGS LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −56,532 | $3.02 | -$170.5K | EDGAR |
| 2023-02-22 | PERMIANVILLE HOLDINGS LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −977 | $3.00 | -$2.9K | EDGAR |
| 2023-02-16 | PERMIANVILLE HOLDINGS LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −12,347 | $3.00 | -$37.0K | EDGAR |
| 2023-02-13 | PERMIANVILLE HOLDINGS LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −12,508 | $3.00 | -$37.5K | EDGAR |
| 2023-02-08 | PERMIANVILLE HOLDINGS LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −46,924 | $3.01 | -$141.3K | EDGAR |
| 2023-02-02 | PERMIANVILLE HOLDINGS LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −84,222 | $3.01 | -$253.5K | EDGAR |
| 2023-01-30 | PERMIANVILLE HOLDINGS LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −121,000 | $3.04 | -$368.1K | EDGAR |
| 2023-01-25 | PERMIANVILLE HOLDINGS LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −124,000 | $3.05 | -$377.8K | EDGAR |
| 2023-01-20 | PERMIANVILLE HOLDINGS LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −58,614 | $3.02 | -$176.8K | EDGAR |
| 2023-01-17 | PERMIANVILLE HOLDINGS LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −71,400 | $3.05 | -$217.5K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
PVL Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Aug 17, 2023The company's insiders have not filed since Aug 17, 2023; this reflects that date.
10% owners 29
- Carlyle Group L.P. (entity) · since May 2, 2012
- Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. (entity) · since May 2, 2012
- Carlyle Holdings I GP Inc. (entity) · since May 2, 2012
- Carlyle Holdings I GP Sub L.L.C. (entity) · since May 2, 2012
- Carlyle Holdings I L.P. (entity) · since May 2, 2012
- Cross Ocean Partners Management GP, LLC (entity) · since Aug 31, 2018
- Cross Ocean Partners Management LP (entity) · since Aug 31, 2018
- Cross Ocean USSS Fund I (A) (Cayman) LP (entity) · since Aug 31, 2018
- Cross Ocean USSS Fund I (A) Del Feeder LP (entity) · since Aug 31, 2018
- Cross Ocean USSS GP LP (entity) · since Aug 31, 2018
- Cross Ocean USSS GP Ltd (entity) · since Aug 31, 2018
- Cross Ocean USSS SIF I LP (entity) · since Aug 31, 2018
- Enduro Resource Holdings LLC (entity) · since Nov 8, 2011
- Enduro Resource Partners LLC (entity) · since Nov 8, 2011
- GG Managers LLC (entity) · since Aug 31, 2018
- Graham C Goldsmith · since Aug 31, 2018
- Permianville Holdings LLC (entity) · since Aug 31, 2018
- Permianville Intermediary LLC - Series 1 (entity) · since Aug 31, 2018
- Permianville Intermediary LLC - Series 2 (entity) · since Aug 31, 2018
- Permianville Intermediary LLC - Series 3 (entity) · since Aug 31, 2018
- R/C Energy GP IV, LLC (entity) · since Nov 8, 2011
- R/C IV Enduro Holdings, L.P. (entity) · since Nov 8, 2011
- Riverstone/Carlyle Energy Partners IV, L.P. (entity) · since Nov 8, 2011
- T-Vi Co Es Gp LLC (entity) · since Aug 31, 2018
- T-Vi Co Es LP (entity) · since Aug 31, 2018
- TC Group Sub L.P. (entity) · since May 2, 2012
- TC Group, LLC (entity) · since May 2, 2012
- Trident Capital VI, L.P. (entity) · since Aug 31, 2018
- Trident VI, L.P. (entity) · since Aug 31, 2018
Changes in the last 10 years (17)
| Aug 31, 2018 | Trident VI, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Aug 31, 2018 | Trident Capital VI, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Aug 31, 2018 | T-Vi Co Es LP became a 10% owner |
| Aug 31, 2018 | T-Vi Co Es Gp LLC became a 10% owner |
| Aug 31, 2018 | Permianville Intermediary LLC - Series 3 became a 10% owner |
| Aug 31, 2018 | Permianville Intermediary LLC - Series 2 became a 10% owner |
| Aug 31, 2018 | Permianville Intermediary LLC - Series 1 became a 10% owner |
| Aug 31, 2018 | Permianville Holdings LLC became a 10% owner |
| Aug 31, 2018 | Graham C Goldsmith became a 10% owner |
| Aug 31, 2018 | GG Managers LLC became a 10% owner |
| Aug 31, 2018 | Cross Ocean USSS SIF I LP became a 10% owner |
| Aug 31, 2018 | Cross Ocean USSS GP Ltd became a 10% owner |
| Aug 31, 2018 | Cross Ocean USSS GP LP became a 10% owner |
| Aug 31, 2018 | Cross Ocean USSS Fund I (A) Del Feeder LP became a 10% owner |
| Aug 31, 2018 | Cross Ocean USSS Fund I (A) (Cayman) LP became a 10% owner |
| Aug 31, 2018 | Cross Ocean Partners Management LP became a 10% owner |
| Aug 31, 2018 | Cross Ocean Partners Management GP, LLC became a 10% owner |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
1 ETF hold PVL
1 shown · $79.15K total exposure
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | THRV Prospera Income ETF | Nport | 1.14% | $79,148 | — | 2026-06-30 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
63.31K
SI % of Float
0.19%
Days to Cover
1.30
Short Vol Ratio
7.1%
Free Float
—
Float %
—
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-21