TSEP FT Vest Emerging Market Buffer ETF - September

ETF

ETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

TSEP — —
Key stats
About

FT Vest Emerging Market Buffer ETF - September (TSEP) ETF

No description available.

Exchange
BATS
Inception
2024-09-20
Has Options
No
Fund profile
holdings as of Oct 20, 2026issuer datathrough May 2026flows, SEC filings
Defined-outcome fund. The stated cap and buffer apply only from the first day of the outcome period to its last; buying in between gives different terms. See what is left in the ETF lab.
Expense ratio
0.95%
prospectus, filed Sep 29, 2025
Assets
$18M
issuer-reported, Oct 20, 2026
Trailing yield
—
Average daily volume
$309K
30 sessions
Holdings
5
top 10 are 105.6%
Listed
Sep 20, 2024
Cboe BZX
Net asset value
$25.97
issuer, Oct 20, 2026
Closure risk, 12 months
4.6%
low: trading volume, age · model
FrenzyCap ETF score
6
how it is built
Cost3
Liquidity16
Scale4
Diversification0
Outcome period, decoded from the options in the fund's Oct 20, 2026 holdings (issuer data)
Reference asset
EEM
period ends Sep 17, 2027 (330 days)
Cap, full period
27.7%
before fees
Buffer, full period
10.0%
first losses absorbed
Reference since start
−5.2%
$63.57 on Oct 21, 2026
Upside left to the cap
34.7%
for a buyer today
Drop before the buffer starts
0.0%
unprotected from here

Moves with. US large-cap stocks (44% of its variance, beta 0.46); Emerging markets over US (34% of its variance, beta 0.28). These factors explain 85% of its daily moves over the last year.

Stated objective. The investment objective of the FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF September (the Fund ) is to seek to provide investors with returns (before fees and expenses) that match the price return of the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (the Underlying ETF ), up to a predetermined upside cap of 17.19% while providing a buffer (before fees and expenses) against the first 10% of Underlying ETF losses, over the period from September 22, 2025 through September 18, 2026. (from the fund's prospectus)

All 5 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Buffer ETFs

Fund flows
through May 2026SEC filings
May 2026
$0
latest reported month
Latest 3 months
+$2.4M
+14.3% of assets
Latest 12 months
+$13M
+75.6% of assets
Jun 2025: $0Jul 2025: $0JulAug 2025: $0Sep 2025: +$1.2MSepOct 2025: +$2.3MNov 2025: +$9.3M+$9.3MNovDec 2025: −$372Jan 2026: −$2.5M−$2.5MJanFeb 2026: −$29KMar 2026: +$2.4MMarApr 2026: $0May 2026: $0May
View as a table
Net flows of TSEP by month, Jun 2025 to May 2026
MonthNet flow
May 2026$0
Apr 2026$0
Mar 2026+$2.4M
Feb 2026−$29K
Jan 2026−$2.5M
Dec 2025−$372
Nov 2025+$9.3M
Oct 2025+$2.3M
Sep 2025+$1.2M
Aug 2025$0
Jul 2025$0
Jun 2025$0

Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 21 months ago

Similar funds
FundOverlapFeeAssets1Y
BUFRFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF—0.95%$10.9B+12.7%compare
BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF—0.69%$3.2B+6.7%compare
BUFDFT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF—0.95%$2.2B+10.4%compare
BUFQFT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF—1.00%$1.7B+14.8%compare
FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January—0.85%$1.5B+13.4%compare

The largest other funds in the Buffer category.

Under the hood
fiscal year to May 31, 2026SEC census
Authorized participants
2 active
of 23 with agreements; top 3 did 100%
Created · redeemed
$26M · $13M
over the fiscal year
Redemptions in kind
0%
creations 0% in kind
Creation unit
50,000
shares
Securities lending
authorized, none lent
Diversification status
Non-diversified
may concentrate in fewer issuers

From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.

ETF Profile
holdings as of 2026-10-20
Holdings
5
AUM
$18.2M
Provider
First Trust
Inception
2024-09-20
Exchange
BATS
Data As Of
2026-10-20
Expense Ratio
0.95%
Dividend Yield
—
Distribution
—
Asset Allocation
Top Holdings
top 5 of 5 holdings
Symbol Name Weight % Asset Class Country
— 2027-09-17 iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF C 0.67 95.23% Derivative —
— 2027-09-17 iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF P 67.03 10.34% Derivative —
— US Dollar 1.35% Cash/Money Market —
— 2027-09-17 iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF C 85.62 -1.16% Derivative —
— 2027-09-17 iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF P 60.33 -5.77% Derivative —
Non-Equity Breakdown
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - September · NPORT-P period 2026-05-31 (filed 2026-07-23)
Net assets: $17M · 15 total positions · equity 0.00% · non-equity 100.08%
Non-equity holdings — 15 positions, 100.08% of NAV
Category Weight Value Positions
Derivative (equity) 99.44% $16.7M 14
Short-term investment 0.63% $106644 1
Chart
Seasonality
Month'24'25'26Avg
Jan--1.43%2.49%1.96%
Feb--1.22%1.61%1.42%
Mar--1.47%-3.79%-1.16%
Apr---0.09%5.61%2.76%
May--2.55%1.21%1.88%
Jun--4.57%0.19%2.38%
Jul--0.71%0.42%0.56%
Aug--3.15%2.64%2.90%
Sep1.88%2.57%0.07%1.51%
Oct-2.00%1.12%-3.06%*-1.31%
Nov-1.34%-1.32%---1.33%
Dec-0.83%1.81%--0.49%
Total-2.31%20.82%7.28%8.60%
* Only 3 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $26.62
SMA 50: $26.73
SMA 200: $25.62
Current: $26.00
EMA 12: $26.28
EMA 26: $26.53
MACD: -0.2470 | Signal: -0.1185
BEARISH
ADX (14): 25.39
TREND
+DI: 25.25
−DI: 48.76

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 36.93
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 10.86
Stoch %D: 8.03
Williams %R: -83.80

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $27.57
BB Lower: $25.68
NEUTRAL
OBV: -233,034
Vol SMA 20: 10,671
Vol ROC: 14056.36%
ATR: $0.22
True Range: $0.23
HV 20: 12.2%
HV 30: 11.7%
HV 60: 9.5%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-23T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis

Here is a comprehensive stock analysis report for TSEP based on the provided data:

Executive Summary

Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level 6/10) Key Drivers: Range-bound price action, neutral momentum signals, and low volatility. Primary Risks: Potential breakout above resistance or breakdown below support could lead to significant moves. Recent News Sentiment Impact: No recent news available.

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction

Short-term: NEUTRAL (price range-bound within Bollinger Bands) Medium-term: RANGE-BOUND (SMA 50 and SMA 200 show neutral momentum) Long-term: BEARISH (long-term trend declining since March)

Support/Resistance Levels

Support: $25.46 (lower Bollinger Band) and $24.07 (SMA 200) Resistance: $26.00 (upper Bollinger Band) and $25.73 (SMA 20)

Momentum Signals

  • RSI interpretation: NEUTRAL (RSI 57.54, not overbought or oversold)
  • MACD signal: BULLISH (MACD above signal line)
  • Bollinger Bands position: NEUTRAL (price within range)

Volume Analysis

Volume trends: RANGE-BOUND (volume has been consolidating around SMA 20) Institutional interest signals: N/A (no options or trading volume data available)

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary

No recent news available.

Sentiment Assessment

Neutral sentiment due to lack of recent news.

Catalyst Identification

None identified based on current data.

Market Narrative

The market narrative is neutral, as the stock's price action is range-bound within Bollinger Bands. There are no significant catalysts or news events that could drive a major move in the near term.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Beta Interpretation

Low risk (beta 0.68) relative to the market (SPY).

Volatility Regime

Low volatility (historical volatility 7.7%, current volatility 0.10%).

Options Market Signals

No options data available for analysis.

Downside Protection

Support levels: $25.46 (lower Bollinger Band) and $24.07 (SMA 200).

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance

TSEP's sector (Technology) has been performing relatively well, but the stock is not keeping pace.

Institutional Activity

No institutional activity data available.

Correlation Analysis

The stock has a low correlation with the market (R-squared 0.78), indicating it may not be heavily influenced by broader market trends.

Relative Valuation

TSEP's relative valuation is neutral, as it is trading within a range-bound price action.

Key Levels & Action Items

  • Critical Price Levels: $25.46 (lower Bollinger Band) and $26.00 (upper Bollinger Band)
  • Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None identified
  • Time-Sensitive Catalysts: None identified
  • Risk Management: Monitor for potential breakouts above resistance or breakdowns below support.

Overall, the analysis suggests that TSEP is range-bound within its Bollinger Bands, with a neutral momentum signal and low volatility. There are no significant catalysts or news events driving the stock's price action, and institutional activity data is not available. The risk assessment indicates a low risk profile due to the stock's beta and historical volatility.

Generated

TSEP Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 0.6440
Alpha: 1.17%
Correlation: 0.7871
R-Squared: 61.9%
Stock Volatility: 10.4%
Market Volatility: 12.7%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 250
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time

TSEP Institutional Ownership (13F)

Latest filings — 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

13 filers290,577 shares$7.56M value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 HFG Wealth Management, LLC 192,561 $5.01M 66.23% — 2026-09-30
2 OLD MISSION CAPITAL LLC 29,993 $779.82K 10.32% — 2026-06-30
3 Ignite Planners, LLC 25,538 $684.93K 9.06% — 2026-09-30
4 Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian 9,311 $242.09K 3.20% — 2026-06-30
5 Cetera Investment Advisers Custodian 9,204 $239.30K 3.17% — 2026-06-30
6 HARBOUR INVESTMENTS, INC. 8,515 $221.39K 2.93% — 2026-06-30
7 Anfield Capital Management, LLC 8,415 $202.52K 2.68% — 2026-03-31
8 Regatta Research & Money Management 2,476 $64.38K 0.85% — 2026-06-30
9 Capital Investment Advisory Services, LLC 2,315 $60.19K 0.80% — 2026-06-30
10 Integrity Financial Corp /WA 1,465 $38.09K 0.50% — 2026-06-30
11 BLUE BELL PRIVATE WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC 600 $15.60K 0.21% — 2026-06-30
12 IFP Advisors, Inc Custodian 184 $4.93K 0.07% — 2026-09-30
13 OSAIC HOLDINGS, INC. Custodian 0 $4 <0.01% — 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
Constituent Performance

Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.

Constituents
Symbol Name Weight % Price 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month