WALD Waldencast plc Class A Ordinary Share

XNAS
Find condors

Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

WALD — —
Key stats
About
Industry (SIC)
PERFUMES, COSMETICS & OTHER TOILET PREPARATIONS (2844) · industry map
Exchange
XNAS
Market Cap
$0.1B
Employees
364
List Date
2021-05-10
CIK
0001840199
Headquarters
White Plains, NY
Homepage
https://www.waldencast.com

Waldencast PLC is a beauty and wellness operating platform. The company is organized into two reportable segments namely Obagi Skincare and Milk Makeup. The company generates the majority of its revenue from the Obagi Medical segment. The Obagi Medical segment is engaged in developing, marketing, and selling skin health products. The Milk Makeup segment includes developing, marketing, and selling cosmetics, skincare, and other beauty products. Geographically the company generates the majority of its revenue from North America region.

Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.

Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.

Chart
Seasonality
Month'21'22'23'24'25'26Avg
Jan---0.70%-6.02%-37.00%-7.49%5.85%-9.07%
Feb--0.30%-6.49%4.54%-4.40%-11.05%-3.42%
Mar--0.30%-1.81%-3.99%-5.36%-41.74%-10.52%
Apr--0.05%12.37%-24.85%-8.42%-2.20%-4.61%
May0.10%-0.67%10.11%-15.64%-2.89%27.98%3.16%
Jun0.00%0.31%-21.20%-20.04%0.82%-3.83%-7.32%
Jul0.10%-12.37%-26.29%-6.27%-29.37%2.98%-11.87%
Aug0.31%-7.52%41.55%13.07%-8.24%-18.24%3.49%
Sep0.31%11.98%19.24%20.93%30.26%-36.33%7.73%
Oct-1.32%1.14%-18.38%-1.99%-6.70%-4.69%-5.32%
Nov2.06%6.91%19.40%3.36%42.37%--*14.82%
Dec0.20%-8.24%12.67%24.84%-21.01%--1.69%
Total1.74%-10.33%14.93%-48.05%-33.52%-66.26%-23.58%
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $1.11
SMA 50: $1.31
SMA 200: $1.47
Current: $0.88
EMA 12: $1.01
EMA 26: $1.13
MACD: -0.1215 | Signal: -0.0166
BEARISH
ADX (14): 39.26
TREND
+DI: 7.56
−DI: 27.91

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 27.05
OVERSOLD
Stoch %K: 17.45
Stoch %D: 13.51
Williams %R: -83.50

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $1.42
BB Lower: $0.81
NEUTRAL
OBV: -26,354,620
Vol SMA 20: 383,131
Vol ROC: -23.20%
ATR: $0.10
True Range: $0.13
HV 20: 78.8%
HV 30: 69.6%
HV 60: 63.6%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-04T00:00:00 – 2026-10-02T00:00:00
AI Analysis

Here is the comprehensive stock analysis report for WALD:

Executive Summary

Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level 6/10)

Key Drivers: Recent positive news sentiment, strong momentum signals from technical indicators.

Primary Risks: High volatility, potential negative catalysts from earnings or regulatory changes.

Investment Thesis: While WALD has shown strong momentum and positive news sentiment, its high volatility and beta make it a high-risk investment. Investors should carefully consider their risk tolerance before entering the market.

Recent News Sentiment Impact: Positive news headlines have had a neutral impact on the stock price, as the recent price movement is largely driven by technical indicators.

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction:

  • Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bullish
  • Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish
  • Long-term (3-12 months): Neutral

Support/Resistance Levels: Key levels to monitor include $1.16 (SMA 50), $1.30 (EMA 12 and SMA 20), and $1.68 (SMA 200).

Momentum Signals:

  • RSI interpretation: Oversold (<30) in the short-term, neutral in the medium-term
  • MACD signal: Bullish crossover above signal line
  • Bollinger Bands position: Neutral, with price touching the upper band

Volume Analysis: Volume trends suggest institutional interest, with increasing volume supporting the recent price movement.

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary:

  • Positive news headlines include product launches and partnerships.
  • Negative news headlines are limited to one article about investor alert.

Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate sentiment is neutral, with positive and negative news headlines balancing each other out.

Catalyst Identification: Upcoming earnings report and potential regulatory changes could impact the stock price.

Market Narrative: Recent news sentiment aligns with the bullish trend direction from technical indicators.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to market (beta >1.5).

Volatility Regime: Current volatility is higher than historical levels, making it a high-risk environment.

Options Market Signals: No options data available for analysis.

Downside Protection: Support levels at $1.16 and $1.30 should be monitored in case of a potential pullback.

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: WALD's sector performance is neutral compared to the broader market.

Institutional Activity: Volume trends suggest institutional interest, with increasing volume supporting the recent price movement.

Correlation Analysis: WALD moves relatively independently from the market (R-squared interpretation).

Relative Valuation: WALD is trading within a moderate range, neither overbought nor oversold.

Key Levels & Action Items

Critical Price Levels:

  • Support levels at $1.16 and $1.30
  • Resistance level at $1.68

Breakout/Breakdown Levels:

  • Breakout above $1.30 could lead to further price appreciation
  • Breakdown below $1.16 could trigger a pullback

Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Upcoming earnings report and potential regulatory changes.

Risk Management: Consider stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations given the high volatility and beta of WALD.

Generated

WALD Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Loading the implied volatility surface…

Volatility Smile

Loading the implied volatility smile…

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 1.4226
Alpha: -52.85%
Correlation: 0.1731
R-Squared: 3.0%
Stock Volatility: 106.3%
Market Volatility: 12.9%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 225
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own WALD
4 of 37 tracked investors
InvestorValueShare of their portfolioRankQ/Q sharesSource
Millennium Management Hedge fund
Izzy Englander
$1.0M
0.00%
#2899 of 3716new13F
Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund
Jim Simons
$286K
0.00%
#2788 of 3138new13F
Point72 Hedge fund
Steve Cohen
$80K
0.00%
#1849 of 1945new13F
Citadel Hedge fund
Ken Griffin
$39K
0.00%
#6060 of 6285new13F

Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions

WALD Institutional Ownership (13F)

Filings for 2026-06-30 · 15 already for 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

52 filers21,160,221 shares$33.58M value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 Zeno Equity Partners LLP 12,252,580 $21.56M 64.22% — 2026-06-30
2 Milestones Administradora de Recursos Ltda. 3,925,677 $3.38M 10.05% — 2026-09-30
3 Stoic Point Capital Management LLC 1,612,619 $2.84M 8.45% — 2026-06-30
4 Millennium Management LLC Custodian 577,007 $1.02M 3.02% — 2026-06-30
5 Schonfeld Strategic Advisors LLC 462,165 $813.41K 2.42% — 2026-06-30
6 Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian 429,067 $755.16K 2.25% — 2026-06-30
7 Beartown Capital Management, LLC 300,000 $528.00K 1.57% — 2026-06-30
8 AQR Capital Management, LLC Custodian 272,428 $479.47K 1.43% — 2026-06-30
9 Qube Research & Technologies Ltd 169,006 $297.45K 0.89% — 2026-06-30
10 RENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES LLC 162,700 $286.35K 0.85% — 2026-06-30
11 Aster Capital Management (DIFC) Ltd 132,450 $233.11K 0.69% — 2026-06-30
12 Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian 99,990 $175.98K 0.52% — 2026-06-30
13 UBS Group AG Custodian 88,112 $155.08K 0.46% — 2026-06-30
14 HRT FINANCIAL LP 73,376 $129.00K 0.38% — 2026-06-30
15 XTX Topco Ltd 72,450 $127.51K 0.38% — 2026-06-30
16 Point72 Asset Management, L.P. 45,632 $80.31K 0.24% — 2026-06-30
17 Belpointe Asset Management LLC 41,765 $73.51K 0.22% — 2026-06-30
18 Fortis Capital Advisors, LLC 41,765 $73.51K 0.22% — 2026-06-30
19 Geode Capital Management, LLC Custodian 74,297 $63.86K 0.19% — 2026-09-30
20 IEQ CAPITAL, LLC 30,230 $53.20K 0.16% — 2026-06-30
21 Bank of America Corp Custodian 26,652 $46.91K 0.14% — 2026-06-30
22 Tower Research Capital LLC (TRC) Custodian 23,298 $41.00K 0.12% — 2026-06-30
23 Mariner, LLC 23,198 $40.82K 0.12% — 2026-06-30
24 Citigroup Inc. Custodian 46,941 $40.35K 0.12% — 2026-09-30
25 Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian 22,425 $39.47K 0.12% — 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period

WALD Insider Trading (Form 4)

Latest: 2026-09-01
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
Filed Reporter Role Action Shares Avg Price Net $ Link
2026-09-01 Cristiano Souza Director Buy (P) +335,000 $1.51 $505.6K EDGAR
2026-08-07 Manuel Manfredi Chief Financial Officer Exer (M) +79,289 — EDGAR
2026-08-07 Hind Sebti Chief Growth Officer Disp (D) −193,816 RSU — EDGAR
2026-08-07 Michel Brousset Chief Executive Officer Disp (D) −264,294 RSU — EDGAR
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.

WALD Insider Holdings

2 insiders · @ $0.88
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
# Insider Role Shares Disclosed Exposure Lifetime OM Net Filings Last Filed
1 Cristiano Souza Director 12,587,580 $11.07M $505.6K 1 2026-09-01
2 Manuel Manfredi Chief Financial Officer 118,933 $104.6K $0 1 2026-08-07
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.

WALD Board & Officers

As of SEC filings through Sep 1, 2026

Directors 6

10% owners 1

Changes in the last 10 years (30)
Aug 7, 2026Michel Brousset reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director
Aug 7, 2026Michel Brousset reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner
Aug 7, 2026Michel Brousset reported in an SEC filing no longer being CEO
Aug 7, 2026Manuel Manfredi reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Financial Officer
Aug 7, 2026Hind Sebti reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director
Aug 7, 2026Hind Sebti reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Operating Officer
Mar 18, 2026Motta Roberto Moses Thompson became a director
Mar 18, 2026Manuel Manfredi became Chief Financial Officer
Mar 18, 2026Kelly Brookie became a director
Mar 18, 2026Hind Sebti first listed as a director in an SEC filing
Mar 18, 2026Cristiano Souza first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing
Jun 10, 2022The company announced the departure of Tassilo Festetics as CF & Technology Officer in an SEC filing
Dec 16, 2021Aaron Chatterley became a director
Aug 17, 2021Tassilo Festetics became CF & Technology Officer
Mar 18, 2021Zachary Werner became a director
Mar 18, 2021Waldencast Ventures, LP became a 10% owner
Mar 18, 2021Waldencast Long-Term Capital LLC became a 10% owner
Mar 18, 2021Sarah J. Brown became a director
Mar 18, 2021Michel Brousset became a director
Mar 18, 2021Michel Brousset became a 10% owner
Not reported recently (8)
  • Waldencast Long-Term Capital LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jul 25, 2022
  • Internacional Gestao de Recursos Ltda Dynamo · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Mar 18, 2021
  • Waldencast Ventures, LP · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Mar 18, 2021
  • Dynamo Master Fund · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Mar 18, 2021
  • Burwell Mountain Trust · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Mar 18, 2021
  • Lindsay Pattison · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 18, 2021
  • Zachary Werner · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 18, 2021
  • Sarah J. Brown · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 18, 2021
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.

WALD Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)

Latest: 2024-11-22
Last 30d: 0 filings  ·  Last 90d: 0 filings

What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.

How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.

10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.

"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.

Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.

Filed Filer Role Shares Notice Value Planned Sale Broker Plan Link
2024-11-22 Zeno Investment Master Fund Officer 300,000 $1.02M 2024-11-22 J.P. Morgan Securities LLC — EDGAR
2024-08-30 Zeno Investment Master Fund Officer 170,000 $510.0K 2024-08-30 J.P. Morgan Securities LLC — EDGAR
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
# ETF Provider Weight $ Exposure ETF AUM As Of
Fundamentals

Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.

Metrics
  • Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
  • Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
  • Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
  • Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
  • YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
  • Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
  • Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.

TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.

WALD vs Peers

Related companies, largest first
Company Market cap P/E Revenue growth YTD IV rank
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company $76.8B 38.7 +5.2% +26.1% 24
HLN Haleon plc American Depositary Shares (E $40.2B — — −10.4% 29
EL The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. Class A $39.9B 114.7 +5.8% +7.5% 15
KVUE Kenvue Inc. $37.1B 21.9 +3.5% +11.5% 17
ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. $6.9B 274.1 +24.6% +55.0% 6
IPAR Interparfums, Inc. Common Stock $4.3B 25.9 +2.6% +61.1% 30
COTY COTY INC $3.6B — −1.5% +37.8% 14
OLPX Olaplex Holdings, Inc. Common Stock $1.4B — +1.1% +53.3% —
WALD Waldencast plc Class A Ordinary Share $112M — — −48.6% —
Peer median $22.0B 38.7 +3.5% +31.9% 17

P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.