IPAR Interparfums, Inc. Common Stock
XNAS
114.80
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $77.21 – $129.29
- YTD
- +34.36%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 54.33
- Straddle Price
- $8.40
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.11
- Market Cap
- $3.7B
- Open
- $115.89
- Day Range
- $114.41 – $115.94
- Volume
- 46,535
- Prev Close
- $116.07
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.12% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.93 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.78% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.72% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +48.1pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 23.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -10.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 12 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.2B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 19.3% |
| Book / Price | 29.3% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 63.8% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 16.4% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.09 |
| Quality Score | 5/6 — high quality (12y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +3.2% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $114.39 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $114.04 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 6.2% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.1B |
| Market Cap | $4B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $52.60 | 18% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $14.56 | 14% | |
| Peer P/E | $181.27 | 8% | median 34.7× · 6 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $117.08 | 8% | median 13.0× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $133.43 | 2% | median 3.9× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $47.50 | 5% | median 1.0× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $114.39 | 35% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $118.36 | 11% | 12 strikes · skew +0.81 |
- Industry (SIC)
- PERFUMES, COSMETICS & OTHER TOILET PREPARATIONS (2844) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $3.7B
- Employees
- 662
- List Date
- 1988-02-04
- CIK
- 0000822663
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-04 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- $1.58 (2 est.)
- Headquarters
- New York, NY
- Homepage
- https://www.interparfumsinc.com
Interparfums Inc operates in the fragrance business and produces and distributes a wide array of prestige fragrance and fragrance-related products. It sells its product under the brand which includes Boucheron, Coach, Jimmy Choo, Karl Lagerfeld, Kate Spade, Lacoste, Lanvin, Moncler, Montblanc, Rochas and Van Cleef & Arpels. The company operates in two operating segments namely European based operations, SA, and United States based operations. The group sells its products to department stores, perfumeries, specialty stores, and domestic and international wholesalers and distributors.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 4.96% | -7.35% | 21.33% | -2.10% | 9.57% | 14.20% | 6.77% |
| Feb | 12.71% | -6.41% | 0.33% | 2.22% | -0.10% | 2.69% | 1.91% |
| Mar | -5.70% | -2.20% | 8.30% | -3.50% | -15.68% | -8.41% | -4.53% |
| Apr | 2.92% | -8.17% | 3.67% | -15.86% | -4.13% | -1.43% | -3.83% |
| May | 2.96% | -10.28% | -17.13% | 3.58% | 24.93% | 2.88% | 1.16% |
| Jun | -5.85% | 0.47% | 6.40% | -4.33% | -3.68% | 21.06% | 2.34% |
| Jul | 5.94% | 13.36% | 9.06% | 22.08% | -10.27% | 7.94% | 8.02% |
| Aug | -5.13% | -5.69% | -5.90% | -6.22% | -2.86% | -6.00% | -5.30% |
| Sep | 2.06% | -4.53% | -4.54% | 3.14% | -13.65% | -5.25% | -3.79% |
| Oct | 19.59% | 6.03% | -6.79% | -7.69% | -5.41% | 2.29%* | 1.34% |
| Nov | -3.39% | 16.32% | -0.13% | 13.12% | -10.28% | -- | 3.13% |
| Dec | 19.59% | 0.08% | 12.83% | -6.01% | 4.95% | -- | 6.29% |
| Total | 57.74% | -11.56% | 24.00% | -6.68% | -28.62% | 29.67% | 10.76% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: IPAR
Executive Summary:
This report presents a comprehensive analysis of Interparfums, Inc.'s (IPAR) stock performance, incorporating technical indicators, options metrics, beta analysis, market data, and recent news headlines. Our assessment is NEUTRAL with a confidence level of 7 out of 10.
Key drivers: Strong brand portfolio and partnerships; primary risks: Volatility and competition in the fragrance industry.
Recent news sentiment impact: Positive news headlines have contributed to the stock's performance, with a strong acquisition announcement and partnership extension.
Technical Analysis:
Trend Direction: Medium-term (1-3 months) trend is UP, while the short-term (1-4 weeks) trend is NEUTRAL. The long-term (3-12 months) trend is also UP.
Support/Resistance Levels: Key price levels are $115.42 (lower Bollinger Band), $122.62 (SMA 20), and $129.82 (upper Bollinger Band).
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral zone (41.95) indicates a stable market.
- MACD signal: Bullish momentum, with the MACD above the signal line.
- Bollinger Bands position: Oversold condition, suggesting potential buy signal.
Volume Analysis: Volume is currently low compared to historical averages, indicating a lack of institutional interest.
News & Sentiment Analysis:
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news headlines have dominated recent reporting, including an acquisition announcement and partnership extension.
Sentiment Assessment: The overall sentiment is POSITIVE, with 4 out of 6 recent headlines having a positive tone.
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming catalysts include earnings reports and potential product launches.
Market Narrative: The news aligns with the technical signals, reinforcing the medium-term uptrend.
Risk & Volatility Assessment:
Beta Interpretation: IPAR's beta is low (0.39), indicating a stable stock performance relative to the market.
Volatility Regime: Historical volatility levels are moderate to high.
Options Market Signals: IV rank is low (5.7%), and put-call ratios indicate bullish sentiment.
Downside Protection: Support levels are $115.42 (lower Bollinger Band) and $113.04 (SMA 50).
Market Context & Positioning:
Sector Performance: The fragrance industry has performed relatively well, with IPAR outperforming its peers.
Institutional Activity: Institutional interest is low, indicating a lack of buying pressure.
Correlation Analysis: IPAR's correlation with the market is low (0.16), suggesting a relatively independent performance.
Relative Valuation: The stock is positioned within its trading range, with no clear overvaluation or undervaluation signals.
Key Levels & Action Items:
Critical Price Levels: $115.42 (lower Bollinger Band) and $122.62 (SMA 20).
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: $129.82 (upper Bollinger Band) represents a potential breakout level.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Upcoming earnings reports and product launches may impact the stock's performance.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set around $112.50, with position sizing considerations based on risk tolerance.
By analyzing these factors, investors can better understand IPAR's market dynamics and make informed investment decisions.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-24 | After-Close | 10.21% | 3.09% | 0.30x | Within |
| 2023-04-20 | After-Close | 3.66% | 0.18% | 0.05x | Within |
| 2023-07-25 | After-Close | 8.61% | 4.66% | 0.54x | Within |
| 2023-10-23 | After-Close | 8.13% | 4.44% | 0.55x | Within |
| 2024-01-23 | After-Close | 4.94% | 1.80% | 0.36x | Within |
| 2024-04-24 | After-Close | 9.54% | 9.58% | 1.00x | Exceeded |
| 2024-07-22 | After-Close | 7.91% | 8.94% | 1.13x | Exceeded |
| 2024-11-06 | After-Close | 7.03% | 1.70% | 0.24x | Within |
| 2025-02-25 | Pre-Market | 8.05% | 0.89% | 0.11x | Within |
| 2025-05-05 | After-Close | 7.38% | 8.73% | 1.18x | Exceeded |
| 2025-08-05 | After-Close | 6.33% | 1.84% | 0.29x | Within |
| 2025-10-20 | Pre-Market | 11.54% | 0.47% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2026-02-24 | After-Close | 9.08% | 1.32% | 0.15x | Within |
| 2026-05-04 | After-Close | 6.74% | 2.20% | 0.33x | Within |
| 2026-08-04 | After-Close | 7.00% | 4.03% | 0.58x | Within |
| 2026-10-20 | After-Close | 7.42% | 2.33% | 0.31x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
IPAR Options Activity & IV Rank
IPAR IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 67th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $2.0M | #1274 of 1945 | -73.3% | 13F | |
| Bridgewater Associates Hedge fund Ray Dalio | $1.4M | #787 of 997 | -29.9% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $1.4M | #2780 of 3716 | -86.3% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $456K | #4566 of 6285 | -84.7% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $98K | #3003 of 4729 | +0.6% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
IPAR Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $357.95K | 54.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $290.84K | 44.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $11.19K | 1.69% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $581.67K | 94.55% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $33.56K | 5.45% | 2026-06-30 |
IPAR Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-08-27| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-27 | Veronique Gabai-Pinsky | Director | Mixed | — | $107.35 | -$17.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-03 | Jean Madar Holding SAS | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −40,000 | $91.02 | -$3.64M | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-26 | Francois Heilbronn | Director | Exer (M) | +1,500 | $62.18 | $93.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-23 | Gilbert Harrison | Director | Exer (M) | +1,500 | $62.18 | $93.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-23 | Torres Robert Bensoussan | Director | Exer (M) | +1,500 | $62.18 | $93.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-07 | Torres Robert Bensoussan | Director | — | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-05 | Chavanne Patrick Bousquet | Director | Grant (A) | +1,500 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-05 | Veronique Gabai-Pinsky | Director | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-05 | Francois Heilbronn | Director | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-05 | Gerard Kappauf | Director | Grant (A) | +1,500 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-05 | Herve Bouillonnec | GlobalChief Commercial Officer | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-05 | Michel D. Atwood | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER | Grant (A) | +4,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-05 | Gilbert Harrison | Director | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-05 | Torres Robert Bensoussan | Director | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-17 | Herve Bouillonnec | Global Chief Commercial Office | Exer (M) | +1,500 | $73.09 | $109.6K | EDGAR |
IPAR Insider Holdings
10 insiders · @ $114.42| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jean Madar Holding SAS | 10%+ Owner | 7,076,841 | $809.70M | -$24.76M | 25 | 2026-04-03 |
| 2 | Jean Madar | CEO | 7,071,841 | $809.12M | -$43.43M | 157 | 2025-05-23 |
| 3 | Philippe Benacin Holding SAS | 10%+ Owner | 6,871,064 | $786.15M | -$26.61M | 26 | 2025-12-12 |
| 4 | Philippe Benacin | President Interparfums SA | 6,847,184 | $783.42M | -$41.75M | 145 | 2025-03-24 |
| 5 | Francois Heilbronn | Director | 28,563 | $3.27M | -$1.44M | 38 | 2026-01-26 |
| 6 | Torres Robert Bensoussan | Director | 11,000 | $1.26M | -$592.4K | 36 | 2026-01-23 |
| 7 | Gilbert Harrison | Director | 1,550 | $177.3K | -$407.3K | 17 | 2026-01-23 |
| 8 | Herve Bouillonnec | GlobalChief Commercial Officer | 1,500 | $171.6K | $0 | 2 | 2026-01-05 |
| 9 | Philippe Santi | Exec VP Interparfums SA | 1,000 | $114.4K | -$43.59M | 55 | 2025-06-11 |
| 10 | Pelayo Frederic Garcia | Exec. VP & COO Interparfums SA | 100 | $11.4K | -$5.24M | 46 | 2024-11-26 |
IPAR Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 16, 2026Directors 13
- Francois Heilbronn · on file since 2006
- Philippe Benacin · on file since 2006
- Torres Robert Bensoussan · on file since Nov 2006
- Philippe Santi · on file since Feb 2007
- Veronique Gabai-Pinsky · since Sep 12, 2017
- Gilbert Harrison · since Apr 3, 2018
- Michel D. Atwood · since Sep 6, 2022
- Gerard Kappauf · since Sep 14, 2023
- Chavanne Patrick Bousquet · since Sep 10, 2025
- Herve Bouillonnec · since Sep 10, 2025
- Jean Madar · listed since Apr 2026
- Benedicte Epinay · since Sep 15, 2026
- Valerie Hermann · since Sep 15, 2026
Officers 5
- Jean Madar · CEO · listed since Apr 2026
- Philippe Benacin · President Interparfums SA · listed since May 2013
- Michel D. Atwood · Chief Financial Officer · since Sep 6, 2022
- Philippe Santi · Exec VP Interparfums SA · listed since Jan 2024
- Herve Bouillonnec · GlobalChiefCommercialOfficer · since Sep 10, 2025
10% owners 4
- Jean Madar · listed since Apr 2026
- Jean Madar Holding SAS (entity) · listed since Apr 2026
- Philippe Benacin · on file since 2006
- Philippe Benacin Holding SAS (entity) · since Dec 16, 2011
Changes in the last 10 years (27)
| Sep 15, 2026 | Valerie Hermann became a director |
| Sep 15, 2026 | Benedicte Epinay became a director |
| Apr 3, 2026 | Jean Madar first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Apr 3, 2026 | Jean Madar first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Apr 3, 2026 | Jean Madar first listed as CEO in an SEC filing |
| Apr 3, 2026 | Jean Madar Holding SAS first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Sep 10, 2025 | Herve Bouillonnec became a director |
| Sep 10, 2025 | Herve Bouillonnec became GlobalChiefCommercialOfficer |
| Sep 10, 2025 | Chavanne Patrick Bousquet became a director |
| Apr 29, 2025 | Jean Madar reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Apr 29, 2025 | Jean Madar reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Apr 29, 2025 | Jean Madar reported in an SEC filing no longer being CEO |
| Apr 29, 2025 | Jean Madar Holding SAS reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jan 5, 2024 | Philippe Santi listed as Exec VP Interparfums SA (previously CFO Interparfums SA) in SEC filings |
| Sep 14, 2023 | Gerard Kappauf became a director |
| Dec 13, 2022 | Pelayo Frederic Garcia listed as Exec. VP & COO Interparfums SA (previously DirExprt InterparfumsSA) in SEC filings |
| Dec 6, 2022 | Russell Greenberg no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Dec 6, 2022 | Russell Greenberg no longer listed as EX VP and CFO in SEC filings |
| Sep 6, 2022 | Michel D. Atwood became a director |
| Sep 6, 2022 | Michel D. Atwood became Chief Financial Officer |
| Apr 3, 2018 | Gilbert Harrison became a director |
| Sep 12, 2017 | Veronique Gabai-Pinsky became a director |
| Jan 4, 2017 | Jean Madar Holding SAS no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Jan 4, 2017 | Jean Madar Holding SAS no longer listed as CEO in SEC filings |
| Jan 4, 2017 | Henry B. Clarke reported in an SEC filing no longer being President Inter Parfums USA |
| Nov 30, 2016 | Philippe Benacin Holding SAS no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Nov 30, 2016 | Philippe Benacin Holding SAS no longer listed as President Interparfums SA in SEC filings |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (4)
- Pelayo Frederic Garcia · Last reported as Exec. VP & COO Interparfums SA in an SEC filing dated Nov 26, 2024
- Michel Dyens · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Aug 14, 2023
- Patrick Choel · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 3, 2023
- Jean Levy · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 1, 2017
IPAR Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-08-27What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-27 | Gabai-Pinsky Veronique | Director | 900 | $105.2K | 2026-08-27 | Raymond James and Associates | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-02 | MADAR JEAN | Officer | 20,000 | $1.82M | 2026-04-02 | Raymond James & Associates | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-11 | Philippe Benacin Holding SAS | Officer | 25,000 | $2.08M | 2025-12-11 | Raymond James & Associates | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-23 | Harrison Gilbert | Director | 400 | $53.4K | 2025-06-23 | Oppenheimer & Co Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-10 | SANTI PHILIPPE | Officer | 2,000 | $280.0K | 2025-06-10 | Raymond James & Associates | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-22 | Jean Madar Holding SAS | Officer | 13,000 | $1.68M | 2025-05-22 | Raymond James & Associates | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-13 | Gabai-Pinsky Veronique | Director | 1,500 | $183.2K | 2025-05-13 | Raymond James & Associates | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-03-21 | Philippe Benacin Holding SAS | Officer | 25,000 | $2.94M | 2025-03-21 | Raymond James & Associates | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-22 | GARCIA PELAYO FREDERIC | Officer | 4,000 | $532.1K | 2024-11-22 | RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-08-19 | Gabai-Pinsky Veronique | Director | 1,500 | $190.8K | 2024-08-19 | Raymond James & Associates | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.12% | $123.0M | $103.8B | 2026-10-21 |
| 2 | SDVY First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | First Trust | 1.00% | $110.9M | $11.1B | 2026-10-21 |
| 3 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $62.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.07% | $52.8M | $74.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 5 | AVUV Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | Avantis | 0.16% | $50.2M | $31.5B | 2026-10-21 |
| 6 | VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $44.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | Nport | 0.04% | $41.4M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 8 | SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | Nport | 2.20% | $32.1M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.08% | $28.6M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 10 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $22.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 11 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.14% | $19.6M | $13.6B | 2026-10-21 |
| 12 | SPSM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 600™ Small Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.12% | $18.8M | $15.8B | 2026-10-21 |
| 13 | VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | Vanguard | 0.21% | $18.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 14 | VBR Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $14.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 15 | VBK Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $12.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 16 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.07% | $12.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 17 | DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | Nport | 0.54% | $11.7M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.01% | $11.4M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 19 | IJT iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.14% | $10.9M | $7.6B | 2026-10-21 |
| 20 | DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.14% | $10.5M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 21 | DFAT Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.03% | $8.9M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 22 | SDVD FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | First Trust | 1.00% | $8.9M | $887.5M | 2026-10-21 |
| 23 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.04% | $8.3M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 24 | VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $8.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 25 | JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | Janus | 0.74% | $7.7M | $1.0B | 2026-10-21 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $341.04M | $30.49M | $0.95 | $45.58M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $344.88M | $43.37M | $1.35 | $85.00K |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $386.18M | $28.10M | $0.88 | $146.53M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $429.58M | $65.81M | $2.05 | $63.86M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $333.94M | $31.99M | $0.99 | $11.87M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $338.82M | $42.49M | $1.32 | $-7.36M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $361.50M | $24.23M | $0.78 | $137.96M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $424.63M | $62.26M | $1.93 | $76.14M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $342.23M | $36.82M | $1.14 | $25.50M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $323.96M | $41.05M | $1.27 | $-51.96M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $328.74M | $10.42M | $0.33 | $81.50M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $367.97M | $53.21M | $1.66 | $17.51M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.