XSHQ Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
ETF 46.15 DelayedETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $40.02 – $50.36
- YTD
- +8.51%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 11.97
- Straddle Price
- $5.00
- Open
- $45.74
- Day Range
- $45.74 – $46.23
- Volume
- 24,986
- Prev Close
- $46.07
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- BATS
- Inception
- 2017-04-06
- Has Options
- Yes
- Homepage
- https://www.invesco.com/us/etfs
- Expense ratio
- 0.29% prospectus, filed Dec 18, 2025
- Assets
- $293M shares × price, Oct 21, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 1.20% paid quarterly
- Average daily volume
- $771K 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 117 top 10 are 22.7%
- Listed
- Apr 6, 2017 Cboe BZX
- Last fee change
- -1 bp filed Dec 19, 2023
- Tracking difference
- -0.32 pts vs index, after fees, FY 2025
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (61% of its variance, beta 1.08); Small caps over large (26% of its variance, beta 0.63). These factors explain 78% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (the Fund) seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index (the Underlying Index). (from the fund's prospectus)
All 117 holdingsFlow historySimilar fundsOverlap toolAll Quality ETFs
- May 2026
- −$13M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- −$18M −7.4% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- −$120M −50.7% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| May 2026 | −$13M |
| Apr 2026 | −$3.6M |
| Mar 2026 | −$1.2M |
| Feb 2026 | −$2.2M |
| Jan 2026 | −$9.7M |
| Dec 2025 | −$3.9M |
| Nov 2025 | −$22M |
| Oct 2025 | −$7.3M |
| Sep 2025 | +$3.0M |
| Aug 2025 | −$46M |
| Jul 2025 | −$10M |
| Jun 2025 | −$4.1M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 81 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RZGInvesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF | 29% | 0.35% | $120M | +13.9% | compare |
| SCOWPacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF | 27% | 0.59% | $1.5M | +14.5% | compare |
| VIOGVanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | 27% | 0.10% | $1.0B | +13.8% | compare |
| SLYGState Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 27% | 0.15% | $4.6B | +13.8% | compare |
| IJTiShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | 26% | 0.18% | $7.6B | +13.7% | compare |
Ranked by how much of the two portfolios is the same securities.
- Holdings vs fair value
- +17.8% 51% under, 14% over · 100% covered
- Price / earnings
- 13.2 1% loss-making · 100% covered
- Price / book · sales
- 3.0 · 1.8 revenue growth +9.2%
- Above 200-day average
- 56% 44% above 50-day · by weight
- Short interest
- 9.4% of float, weighted · 5.4 days to cover
- Insider buying
- 3% of weight had net insider buying, 90 days; 69% net selling
- 13F holders
- +1.3% change in shares held by institutions, latest quarter
- Reporting earnings
- 22.3% of weight in 7 days; 79.1% in 14
Each figure is the fund's holdings weighted by position size, using our data on those stocks, and covers only the share of the stock holdings stated. Positive fair value means the holdings trade below our estimate.
| Action | Holding | Weight before | Weight after | Shares vs flows |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exit | IDCCInterDigital, Inc. | 3.40% | — | — |
| Exit | VICRVicor Corp. | 0.99% | — | — |
| Exit | TPHTri Pointe Homes, Inc. | 0.91% | — | — |
| Exit | INTWFCSG Systems International, Inc. | 0.55% | — | — |
| Exit | GDENGolden Entertainment, Inc. | 0.14% | — | — |
0 new, 0 exited, 0 increased and 0 decreased between the fund's two latest holdings reports; turnover 0.7%. Full holdings and history
- Authorized participants
- 8 active of 41 with agreements; top 3 did 80%
- Created · redeemed
- $219M · $237M over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 100% creations 100% in kind
- Creation unit
- 10,000 shares
- Securities lending
- 20.53% of assets on loan on average; earned 2.6 bp
- Return vs index
- -0.32 pts after fees; -0.00 before; daily s.d. 0.17
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-25 | $0.1232 | CD |
| 2026-06-22 | 2026-06-26 | $0.0306 | CD |
| 2026-03-23 | 2026-03-27 | $0.1605 | CD |
| 2025-12-22 | 2025-12-26 | $0.2403 | CD |
| 2025-09-22 | 2025-09-26 | $0.1358 | CD |
| 2025-06-23 | 2025-06-27 | $0.0955 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAYC | Paycom Software Inc | 4.45% | Equity (US) | US |
| DAVE | Dave Inc | 2.32% | Equity (US) | US |
| AWI | Armstrong World Industries Inc | 2.30% | Equity (US) | US |
| LYFT | Lyft Inc | 2.30% | Equity (US) | US |
| MKTX | MarketAxess Holdings Inc | 2.08% | Equity (US) | US |
| YOU | Clear Secure Inc | 2.07% | Equity (US) | US |
| AGX | Argan Inc | 1.96% | Equity (US) | US |
| FTDR | Frontdoor Inc | 1.86% | Equity (US) | US |
| ZWS | Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp | 1.73% | Equity (US) | US |
| MC | Moelis & Co | 1.67% | Equity (US) | US |
| PJT | PJT Partners Inc | 1.65% | Equity (US) | US |
| LNC | Lincoln National Corp | 1.53% | Equity (US) | US |
| ECG | Everus Construction Group Inc | 1.50% | Equity (US) | US |
| MATX | Matson Inc | 1.49% | Equity (US) | US |
| MYRG | MYR Group Inc | 1.47% | Equity (US) | US |
| APAM | Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc | 1.45% | Equity (US) | US |
| POWL | Powell Industries Inc | 1.45% | Equity (US) | US |
| TDC | Teradata Corp | 1.42% | Equity (US) | US |
| CARG | Cargurus Inc | 1.38% | Equity (US) | US |
| PLXS | Plexus Corp | 1.37% | Equity (US) | US |
| TGTX | TG Therapeutics Inc | 1.37% | Equity (US) | US |
| PIPR | Piper Sandler Cos | 1.27% | Equity (US) | US |
| SEZL | Sezzle Inc | 1.27% | Equity (US) | US |
| IBP | Installed Building Products Inc | 1.26% | Equity (US) | US |
| ACIW | ACI Worldwide Inc | 1.23% | Equity (US) | US |
| PRIM | Primoris Services Corp | 1.21% | Equity (US) | US |
| BCPC | Balchem Corp | 1.15% | Equity (US) | US |
| PARR | Par Pacific Holdings Inc | 1.13% | Equity (US) | US |
| SIG | Signet Jewelers Ltd | 1.12% | Equity (US) | US |
| AZZ | AZZ Inc | 1.10% | Equity (US) | US |
| KLIC | Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc | 1.10% | Equity (US) | US |
| FBP | First BanCorp/Puerto Rico | 1.08% | Equity (US) | US |
| MGY | Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp | 1.07% | Equity (US) | US |
| RELY | Remitly Global Inc | 1.07% | Equity (US) | US |
| QTWO | Q2 Holdings Inc | 1.06% | Equity (US) | US |
| OII | Oceaneering International Inc | 1.05% | Equity (US) | US |
| INSW | International Seaways Inc | 1.05% | Equity (US) | US |
| RDN | Radian Group Inc | 1.01% | Equity (US) | US |
| RUSHA | Rush Enterprises Inc | 1.01% | Equity (US) | US |
| ATMU | Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc | 0.99% | Equity (US) | US |
| SKY | Champion Homes Inc | 0.96% | Equity (US) | US |
| PLMR | Palomar Holdings Inc | 0.95% | Equity (US) | US |
| MCY | Mercury General Corp | 0.95% | Equity (US) | US |
| CVSA | Covista Inc | 0.94% | Equity (US) | US |
| TDS | Telephone and Data Systems Inc | 0.94% | Equity (US) | US |
| CVCO | Cavco Industries Inc | 0.93% | Equity (US) | US |
| TDW | Tidewater Inc | 0.93% | Equity (US) | US |
| AAMI | Acadian Asset Management Inc | 0.90% | Equity (US) | US |
| CATY | Cathay General Bancorp | 0.88% | Equity (US) | US |
| KFY | Korn Ferry | 0.81% | Equity (US) | US |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Short-term investment | 22.69% | $53.9M | 3 |
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 5.75% | -6.33% | 9.17% | -1.51% | 2.51% | 2.07% | 1.94% |
| Feb | 3.42% | -1.25% | -1.73% | 2.25% | -4.90% | 0.57% | -0.27% |
| Mar | 0.04% | 0.39% | -4.77% | 1.53% | -0.33% | -4.77% | -1.32% |
| Apr | -1.43% | -8.32% | -4.09% | -4.07% | -4.70% | 7.44% | -2.53% |
| May | -0.93% | 0.10% | -0.17% | 4.15% | 4.97% | 0.20% | 1.39% |
| Jun | -1.17% | -7.16% | 9.94% | -3.42% | 2.34% | 5.85% | 1.06% |
| Jul | -1.28% | 11.38% | 5.36% | 12.30% | -0.48% | -0.57% | 4.45% |
| Aug | 2.88% | -5.56% | -2.42% | 0.45% | 8.62% | -2.25% | 0.29% |
| Sep | -2.25% | -7.18% | -4.98% | 5.43% | -1.53% | -4.94% | -2.58% |
| Oct | 1.60% | 10.81% | -3.78% | -0.75% | -3.39% | 1.55%* | 1.01% |
| Nov | -1.71% | 3.43% | 6.87% | 10.72% | 2.56% | -- | 4.37% |
| Dec | 3.90% | -8.35% | 6.97% | -10.20% | -0.41% | -- | -1.62% |
| Total | 8.77% | -18.86% | 15.56% | 15.79% | 4.49% | 4.51% | 5.04% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Consolidation phase following a recent uptrend
- Strong technical momentum indicators, but neutral RSI reading
- Moderate volatility, with beta close to market average
Primary Risks:
- Failure to break above the upper Bollinger Band could indicate a topping pattern
- High IV rank suggests heightened volatility, which may impact options trading strategies
Investment Thesis:
XSHQ is in a consolidation phase after a recent uptrend. The stock's technical momentum indicators are strong, but the RSI reading is neutral, indicating no clear trend. With moderate volatility and beta close to market average, this ETF is not excessively risk-prone. However, the high IV rank suggests that options traders should be cautious of potential price swings.
Recent News Sentiment Impact:
The recent news headlines have been neutral, with no significant market-moving events or sentiment-altering news articles affecting XSHQ's stock price. The absence of major news catalysts has allowed the ETF to trade within a narrow range.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: NEUTRAL (Short-term: Consolidation, Medium-term: Uptrend, Long-term: Bullish)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $45.18
- Middle Line: $46.27
- Upper Bollinger Band: $47.36
Momentum Signals:
- RSI: 56.83 (neutral)
- MACD: Bullish signal line crossover above the signal line
- Stochastic %K and %D: Oversold signals not triggered yet
- Williams %R: -38.70 (oversold)
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 42496.15
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): -3049065.47
- Volume Rate of Change: -76.03%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
The recent news headlines have been neutral, with no significant market-moving events or sentiment-altering news articles affecting XSHQ's stock price.
Sentiment Assessment:
Aggregate news sentiment is NEUTRAL, indicating no clear directional bias in the news.
Catalyst Identification:
No imminent catalysts are identified. The ETF is currently trading within a narrow range, awaiting potential breakout or breakdown from this consolidation phase.
Market Narrative:
The neutral news headlines and absence of significant market-moving events have allowed XSHQ to trade within a narrow range, with no clear directional bias evident in the markets.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation:
XSHQ's beta is 0.97, indicating moderate volatility relative to the broader market.
Volatility Regime:
The ETF is experiencing moderate volatility, with an average true range (ATR) of $0.67 and a historical volatility of HV20 14.4%.
Options Market Signals:
IV Rank: 76.7% (High - shows if volatility is historically high/low) Current IV: 61.8% Expected Move: $2.62 (24 DTE), 7-DTE: $2.62 Volume Flow: 0 calls vs 1 puts Open Interest: 0 calls vs 1 puts Put/Call Volume Ratio: 0.00 (Neutral sentiment) Put/Call OI Ratio: 0.00
Downside Protection:
Support levels and risk management considerations are critical in this consolidation phase, as a breakdown below the lower Bollinger Band could indicate a topping pattern.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance:
XSHQ is trading within its sector's range, with no clear directional bias evident.
Institutional Activity:
Volume patterns suggest institutional interest in XSHQ, with moderate volume flows and open interest levels.
Correlation Analysis:
The ETF's correlation with the broader market (R-squared) is 0.69, indicating a moderate relationship between the two.
Relative Valuation:
XSHQ is trading within its historical range, with no clear directional bias evident in relative valuation metrics.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $45.18
- Middle Line: $46.27
- Upper Bollinger Band: $47.36
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Resistance: $47.36 (upper Bollinger Band)
- Support: $45.18 (lower Bollinger Band)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
No imminent catalysts are identified.
Risk Management:
Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations are critical in this consolidation phase, as a breakdown below the lower Bollinger Band could indicate a topping pattern.
Conclusion
XSHQ is trading within a consolidation phase after a recent uptrend. The ETF's technical momentum indicators are strong, but the RSI reading is neutral, indicating no clear trend. With moderate volatility and beta close to market average, this ETF is not excessively risk-prone. However, the high IV rank suggests that options traders should be cautious of potential price swings. As the ETF continues to trade within its sector's range, investors may consider waiting for a breakout or breakdown from this consolidation phase before making investment decisions.
XSHQ Options Activity & IV Rank
XSHQ IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Moderate volatility - stock generally follows market
XSHQ Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|