BUG vs SPAM
Global X Cybersecurity ETF against Themes Cybersecurity ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
57%
16 shared positions
Fee gap
15 bp
SPAM is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.1 pts
SPAM is ahead
Larger fund
BUG
$2.3B
Side by side
| BUG | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Global X Cybersecurity ETF | Themes Cybersecurity ETF |
| Issuer | Global X | Themes |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Cybersecurity |
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Assets | $2.3B | $7.5M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $70M | $141K |
| Listed | Oct 25, 2019 | Dec 7, 2023 |
| FrenzyCap score | 70 | 42 |
| 1-month return | +23.2% | +16.0% |
| 3-month return | +26.3% | +18.2% |
| Year to date | +64.4% | +62.9% |
| 1-year return | +39.6% | +40.7% |
| 30-day volatility | 46.1% | 34.0% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −35.2% | −24.4% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 0.02% | 0.30% |
| Holdings | 35 | 36 |
| Top 10 weight | 64.8% | 54.2% |
| Look-through P/E | 552.9 | 115.1 |
| Holdings vs fair value | +1.6% | +2.5% |
| Holdings above 200-day average | 90% | 87% |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | −$6.3M thru May 2026 | +$1.6M thru Jun 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | 38.1% | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 9, 2026issuer data | as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
81% of BUG · 57% of SPAM
Sector mix of the stock holdings
| Sector | BUG | SPAM | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | 88.7% | 73.2% | +15.5% |
| Industrials | 4.9% | 6.8% | −1.9% |
More: full overlap table · BUG holdings · SPAM holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.