OneSpan Inc. Common Stock(OSPN)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
OSPN
$14.75
—
Snapshot
$14.75
- 52-Week Range
- $10.07 – $16.44
- YTD
- +20.02%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 56.45
- Straddle Price
- $2.12
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.30
- Market Cap
- $0.6B
Fair Value
MODEL: SHORT
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.60% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.10% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 10.02% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +111.6pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +10.2% |
| DCF Horizon | 12 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 25.7% |
| Book / Price | 46.4% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 73.6% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 19.5% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 |
| Quality Score | 5/6 — high quality (12y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | -0.5% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $14.09 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $14.86 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 111.0% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $1B |
Peers used for multiples: CACI, IONQ, JKHY, LDOS, OTEX, PSN, SAIC
(SIC-code peers; ETF co-membership was sector-incoherent)
Model Conviction
27%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Aug 21, 2026
$14.51
α -1.6%
rank 80%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Sep 21, 2026
$15.01
α +1.7%
rank 80%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Oct 20, 2026
$14.28
α -3.2%
rank 80%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $28.35 | 23% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $10.29 | 18% | |
| Peer P/E | $35.92 | 10% | median 18.1× · 7 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $19.39 | 10% | median 11.0× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | $18.49 | 2% | median 2.6× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/S | $7.41 | 7% | median 1.1× · 7 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $14.09 | 30% | stability 66% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-07-23 · updated
Info
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-COMPUTER INTEGRATED SYSTEMS DESIGN (7373)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.6B
OneSpan Inc is a provider of information technology security solutions for banking and financial services and application security markets. The company build secure, seamless, and trusted digital experiences through two solution portfolios: Cybersecurity solutions engaged in protecting identities, securing mobile apps, and safeguarding access through high-assurance authentication, threat intelligence, fraud prevention, and robust mobile app protection, defending users, devices, and applications against sophisticated attacks, while Digital agreement solutions focuses on streamlining workflows w…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +0.94% | 6 |
| Feb | -8.44% | 6 |
| Mar | +7.18% | 6 |
| Apr | -2.29% | 6 |
| May | +7.67% | 6 |
| Jun | -2.11% | 6 |
| Jul | -2.01% | 6 |
| Aug | -0.25% | 5 |
| Sep | -5.86% | 5 |
| Oct | -3.23% | 5 |
| Nov | +6.21% | 5 |
| Dec | +1.74% | 5 |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $14.92
SMA 50: $14.15
SMA 200: $12.69
Current: $14.75
EMA 12: $15.12
EMA 26: $14.76
MACD: 0.3586 | Signal: -0.0629
BULLISH
ADX (14): 23.10
WEAK TREND
+DI: 21.65
−DI: 20.87
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 50.29
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 48.63
Stoch %D: 62.03
Williams %R: -72.35
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $15.98
BB Lower: $13.86
NEUTRAL
OBV: 13,604,626
Vol SMA 20: 387,545
Vol ROC: -9.82%
ATR: $0.52
True Range: $0.54
HV 20: 33.2%
HV 30: 31.1%
HV 60: 36.4%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-07-25T00:00:00 – 2026-07-23T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
News
Earnings History
5 of 5 under expected move
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-01 | After-Close | 14.65% | 5.20% | 0.35x | Within |
| 2024-10-30 | After-Close | 14.47% | 12.60% | 0.87x | Within |
| 2025-02-27 | After-Close | 18.05% | 1.68% | 0.09x | Within |
| 2025-05-01 | After-Close | 15.17% | 3.07% | 0.20x | Within |
| 2025-08-05 | After-Close | 10.65% | 3.00% | 0.28x | Within |
Options Activity
- IV Rank (30D)
- 56.45
- IV Rank (7D)
- 56.45
- Avg IV
- 159.2%
- Straddle (30D)
- $2.12
- Straddle (7D)
- $2.12
- P/C Volume
- 0.30
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 1.15
- Correlation (SPY)
- 32.2%
- R²
- 0.10
- Ann. Volatility
- 45.5%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.7%
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 38,682,000 (as of 2026-03-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
3 filers$131.62K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $115.83K | 88.00% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $12.64K | 9.60% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $3.16K | 2.40% | 2026-03-31 |
3 filers$353.81K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $194.81K | 55.06% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $132.68K | 37.50% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $26.32K | 7.44% | 2026-03-31 |
Insider Activity
Latest: 2026-06-16
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-16 | Jorge Garcia Martell | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −20,000 | $14.45 | -$289.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | Ashish Jain | Chief Technology Officer | Mixed | +3,038 | $14.26 | -$24.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-14 | Lara Mataac | General Counsel | Mixed | +800 | $12.18 | -$4.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-14 | Jorge Garcia Martell | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | +800 | $12.18 | -$4.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-01 | Lara Mataac | General Counsel | Buy (P) | +22,739 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-01 | Ashish Jain | CTO | Grant (A) | +43,019 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-01 | Victor Limongelli | CEO and President | Grant (A) | +93,412 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-01 | Jorge Garcia Martell | CFO | Grant (A) | +27,041 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-17 | Jorge Garcia Martell | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −15,000 | $10.33 | -$155.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-06 | Jorge Garcia Martell | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | +2,166 | $10.89 | -$9.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-04 | Lara Mataac | General Counsel | Mixed | +3,322 | $10.53 | -$18.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-04 | Ashish Jain | Chief Technology Officer | Mixed | +6,303 | $10.47 | -$45.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-04 | Jorge Garcia Martell | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | +4,930 | $10.53 | -$27.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-04 | Victor Limongelli | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +17,184 | $10.53 | -$100.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-04 | Marc Zenner | Director | Buy (P) | +3,300 | $10.54 | $34.8K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
Insider Holdings
22 insiders · @ $14.75
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T KENDALL HUNT | 10%+ Owner | 4,066,444 | $59.98M | -$86.86M | 46 | 2021-12-21 |
| 2 | MICHAEL P CULLINANE | Director | 203,141 | $3.00M | $0 | 9 | 2021-06-09 |
| 3 | Matthew Moynahan | Chief Executive Officer | 180,487 | $2.66M | $0 | 7 | 2024-01-02 |
| 4 | Scott Clements | President and CEO | 180,247 | $2.66M | $248.5K | 29 | 2021-07-19 |
| 5 | JEAN K HOLLEY | Director | 134,474 | $1.98M | $0 | 11 | 2022-06-10 |
| 6 | John nelson JR fox | Director | 116,808 | $1.72M | $0 | 9 | 2021-04-02 |
| 7 | Mark Stephen Hoyt | Chief Financial Officer | 105,184 | $1.55M | $0 | 20 | 2021-03-17 |
| 8 | Victor Limongelli | CEO and President | 103,432 | $1.53M | $0 | 7 | 2026-04-01 |
| 9 | Jorge Garcia Martell | Chief Financial Officer | 91,018 | $1.34M | -$624.1K | 30 | 2026-06-16 |
| 10 | Michael J McConnell | Director | 90,398 | $1.33M | $226.2K | 16 | 2026-01-05 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
Notice of Proposed Sale (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-06-15
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
1 filing
· $288K notice value
· 1 unique filer
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
JORGE A GARCIA MARTELL (1, $288K)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-15 | JORGE A GARCIA MARTELL | Officer | 20,000 | $288.0K | 2026-06-15 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-16 | Jorge A Garcia Martell | Officer | 15,000 | $156.0K | 2026-03-16 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-17 | Jorge Garcia Martell | Officer | 10,000 | $129.7K | 2025-12-12 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed.
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 8.2 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.1 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.9 |
| TTM Revenue | $0.2B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.1B |
| TTM EPS | $1.8 |
| ROE | 25.7% |
| Dividend Yield | 3.36% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.02 |