CHKP Check Point Software Technologies Ltd
XNAS
144.80
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
CHKP
$144.80
—
What changed
Recent filings, trades and movesKey stats
$144.80
- 52-Week Range
- $112.23 – $206.43
- YTD
- -20.01%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 42.36
- Straddle Price
- $15.90
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.21
- Market Cap
- $14.7B
- Open
- $143.81
- Day Range
- $143.09 – $146.64
- Volume
- 542,758
- Prev Close
- $144.17
Fair Value
MODEL: SHORT
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.90% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.68 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 8.29% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.09% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +24.7pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 12.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $1.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 24.4% |
| Book / Price | 18.2% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.68 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | -3.5% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $138.80 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $145.87 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 23.1% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.2B |
| Market Cap | $16B |
Peers used for multiples: CRWD, FTNT, OKTA, PANW, QLYS, S, VRNS, ZS
60-Day Conviction
74%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 8, 2026
$144.49
α -0.7%
rank 59%
conviction
50%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 6, 2027
$143.58
α -1.3%
rank 59%
conviction
47%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Feb 4, 2027
$140.59
α -3.4%
rank 59%
conviction
74%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $193.12 | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 101.1× · 5 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 128.3× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | $326.72 | 5% | median 12.5× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 9.9× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $138.80 | 39% | stability 35% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $144.48 | 56% | 23 strikes · skew +0.33 |
As of 2026-11-09 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $14.7B
- Employees
- 6,825
- List Date
- 1996-06-28
- CIK
- 0001015922
- Homepage
- https://www.checkpoint.com
Check Point Software Technologies is a pure-play cybersecurity vendor. The company offers solutions for network, endpoint, cloud, and mobile security in addition to security management. Check Point, a software specialist, sells to enterprises, businesses, and consumers. Around 50% of revenue is generated in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, 40% from the Americas, and 10% from the Asia-Pacific region. The firm, based in Tel Aviv, Israel, was founded in 1993 and has about 5,000 employees.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -1.65% | 3.97% | 0.29% | 4.37% | 18.12% | -0.84% | 4.04% |
| Feb | -16.95% | 19.67% | -4.51% | -0.97% | 2.99% | -15.62% | -2.56% |
| Mar | -0.94% | -3.92% | 5.03% | 3.77% | 3.09% | -7.82% | -0.13% |
| Apr | 2.83% | -9.29% | -2.57% | -9.05% | -4.89% | -22.84% | -7.64% |
| May | -1.57% | -2.69% | 5.31% | 1.03% | 6.94% | 17.94% | 4.49% |
| Jun | 0.48% | -3.62% | 1.16% | 9.22% | -3.76% | -5.48% | -0.33% |
| Jul | 8.88% | 0.62% | 4.67% | 11.18% | -15.78% | -6.20% | 0.56% |
| Aug | -0.22% | 1.02% | 1.72% | 5.87% | 2.42% | 12.96% | 3.96% |
| Sep | -9.63% | -6.35% | 0.11% | 1.48% | 8.81% | -4.55% | -1.69% |
| Oct | 4.96% | 11.48% | 0.58% | -8.35% | -4.14% | 16.35% | 3.48% |
| Nov | -4.33% | 2.32% | 7.15% | 6.74% | -4.02% | 3.00%* | 1.81% |
| Dec | 5.82% | -6.20% | 4.77% | 2.48% | -0.80% | -- | 1.21% |
| Total | -14.15% | 3.58% | 25.65% | 28.90% | 5.16% | -19.59% | 4.92% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $146.40
SMA 50: $138.93
SMA 200: $139.95
Current: $145.00
EMA 12: $146.78
EMA 26: $144.24
MACD: 2.5436 | Signal: -1.1216
BULLISH
ADX (14): 24.07
WEAK TREND
+DI: 27.34
−DI: 20.97
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 51.27
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 35.00
Stoch %D: 38.27
Williams %R: -68.07
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $162.39
BB Lower: $130.42
NEUTRAL
OBV: 14,724,269
Vol SMA 20: 1,596,112
Vol ROC: -67.31%
ATR: $5.74
True Range: $3.54
HV 20: 44.7%
HV 30: 39.7%
HV 60: 38.8%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-08T00:00:00 – 2026-11-06T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
SYMBOL: CHKP CURRENT PRICE: $138.50
Executive Summary BULLISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers and Primary Risks:
- Technical signals pointing to a continued uptrend, with momentum indicators in neutral territory.
- Recent news headlines have been mixed, with no significant catalysts driving the stock's movement.
2-3 Sentence Investment Thesis: CHKP is poised for further growth, driven by its strong technical position and moderate volatility. As long as the stock remains above key support levels, it's likely to continue trending higher. However, investors should be cautious of potential dips, as the stock may consolidate before making another push upwards.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines have had a neutral impact on the stock, with no significant catalysts driving the movement. The negative sentiment from PANW and CrowdStrike's surges has been offset by the neutral sentiment from Varonis and Check Point Software Insider sales.
Technical Analysis
- Trend Direction: Short-term: Bullish (1-4 weeks), Medium-term: Neutral (1-3 months), Long-term: Bullish (3-12 months)
- Support/Resistance Levels: $133.07 (SMA 20) and $126.22 (Bollinger Bands Lower) are key support levels, while $139.93 (Bollinger Bands Upper) is a potential resistance level.
- Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (30-70)
- MACD signal: Bullish crossover
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze
- Volume Analysis: Volume trends and institutional interest signals indicate a moderate increase in trading activity.
News & Sentiment Analysis
- Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines have been mixed, with no significant catalysts driving the stock's movement.
- Sentiment Assessment: Neutral sentiment from Varonis and Check Point Software Insider sales offset by negative sentiment from PANW and CrowdStrike.
- Catalyst Identification: No significant upcoming events or earnings announcements that could impact the stock's price.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
- Beta Interpretation: Low risk relative to market (beta <0.8 = defensive).
- Volatility Regime: Moderate volatility, with an IV premium vs HV30 of 51.8%.
- Options Market Signals: Options market pricing a $12.80 move by expiration, indicating moderate volatility.
- Downside Protection: Support levels at $133.07 (SMA 20) and $126.22 (Bollinger Bands Lower).
Market Context & Positioning
- Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market indicates CHKP is outperforming the market.
- Institutional Activity: Moderate increase in trading activity, suggesting institutional interest.
- Correlation Analysis: CHKP moves less than the market (R-squared interpretation), indicating a low correlation.
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical Price Levels: Support levels at $133.07 (SMA 20) and $126.22 (Bollinger Bands Lower), with potential resistance at $139.93 (Bollinger Bands Upper).
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No significant technical levels that could trigger a breakout or breakdown.
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming events or earnings announcements that could impact the stock's price.
- Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set around $133.07 (SMA 20) and $126.22 (Bollinger Bands Lower), with position sizing considerations based on market conditions.
Final Analysis: CHKP is poised for further growth, driven by its strong technical position and moderate volatility. While the recent news headlines have been mixed, there are no significant catalysts driving the stock's movement. Investors should be cautious of potential dips, as the stock may consolidate before making another push upwards.
Generated
News
All CHKP news →
Subscription revenue grew 11% amid gradual recovery from product trough.
CHKP Options Activity & IV Rank
CHKP IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 42.7%
7-DTE IV: 46.3%
Expected Move: $15.90
7-DTE Move: $9.35
Days to Exp: 39 (2026-12-18)
Options Flow · All expiries
Call Volume: 5,592
Put Volume: 1,184
P/C Volume: 0.212
BULLISH
Call OI: 46,246
Put OI: 26,838
P/C OI: 0.58
Total OI: 73,084
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $8.05
ATM Put: $7.85
Call %: 5.6%
Put %: 5.4%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 6,776
Chain OI: 73,084
Last Updated: 11/9/2026
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 75th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
75%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.35
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.31
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.71
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.31: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.71: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 51 ATM contracts, 40k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)51.8MediumNov 9
IV Rank (30 DTE)42.4MediumNov 9
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$15.90Nov 9
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 0.0541
Alpha: -23.91%
Correlation: 0.0182
R-Squared: 0.0%
Stock Volatility: 40.9%
Market Volatility: 13.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
CHKP Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 286 already for 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 142,769,498 (as of 2020-12-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
21 filers$540.21M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $161.47M | 29.89% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | HSBC Holdings plc Custodian | $104.32M | 19.31% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Oribel Capital Management, LP | $54.62M | 10.11% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $54.07M | 10.01% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $33.78M | 6.25% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Caption Management, LLC | $26.29M | 4.87% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $23.67M | 4.38% | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $19.85M | 3.67% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $16.14M | 2.99% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Walleye Trading LLC | $15.32M | 2.84% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $8.39M | 1.55% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $8.12M | 1.50% | 2026-09-30 |
| 13 | Daiwa Securities Group Inc. | $5.78M | 1.07% | 2026-09-30 |
| 14 | BOOTHBAY FUND MANAGEMENT, LLC | $5.57M | 1.03% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $998.87K | 0.18% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | STG SECURITIES, LLC | $473.15K | 0.09% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | Two Sigma Investments, LP Custodian | $420.58K | 0.08% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | MIZUHO MARKETS AMERICAS LLC | $404.77K | 0.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | Walleye Capital LLC | $341.72K | 0.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | Tidal Investments LLC | $157.72K | 0.03% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | CSS LLC/IL | $26.29K | <0.01% | 2026-06-30 |
19 filers$315.69M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $56.25M | 17.82% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $51.05M | 16.17% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $48.84M | 15.47% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Daiwa Securities Group Inc. | $25.67M | 8.13% | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $24.13M | 7.64% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Bank of Montreal Custodian | $23.66M | 7.49% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $19.05M | 6.03% | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | Walleye Trading LLC | $18.85M | 5.97% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $13.75M | 4.35% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $8.40M | 2.66% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $7.17M | 2.27% | 2026-09-30 |
| 12 | Royal Bank of Canada Custodian | $6.57M | 2.08% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | HSBC Holdings plc Custodian | $5.40M | 1.71% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | PEAK6 LLC | $4.21M | 1.33% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | SIG BROKERAGE, LP | $1.39M | 0.44% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $920.01K | 0.29% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | Walleye Capital LLC | $236.57K | 0.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | WOLVERINE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | $154.02K | 0.05% | 2026-09-30 |
| 19 | Altshuler Shaham Ltd | $105 | 0.00% | 2026-06-30 |
CHKP Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-26Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-26 | Nataly Kremer | Chief Product Officer | Sell (S) | −3,185 | $150.08 | -$478.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-09 | Gil Shwed | Director | Gift (G) | −9,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-03 | Tzipi Ozer-Armon | Director | Award (A) | +1,120 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-03 | Jerry T Ungerman | Director | Award (A) | +1,120 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-03 | Nadiv Zafrir | CEO | Award (A) | +44,812 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-03 | Yoav Chelouche | Director | Award (A) | +1,120 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-03 | Shenhav Tal Shavit | Director | Award (A) | +1,120 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-03 | Gil Shwed | Director | Grant (A) | +170,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-03 | Dafna Gruber | Director | Award (A) | +1,120 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-03 | Jill D. Smith | Director | Award (A) | +1,120 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-06 | Sherif Seddik | Chief Revenue Officer | Sell (S) | −10,272 | $123.59 | -$1.27M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-04 | Roei Golan | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed Sell −9,860 · Other +409 |
−9,451 | $123.12 | -$1.18M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-04 | Nataly Kremer | Chief Product Officer | Mixed Other +665 · Sell −665 |
— | $115.85 | -$10.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-03 | Sherif Seddik | Chief Revenue Officer | Other (J) | +801 | $108.06 | $86.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-03 | Nadiv Zafrir | CEO | Other (J) | +956 | $108.06 | $103.3K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
CHKP Insider Holdings
11 insiders · @ $145.00
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gil Shwed | Director | 24,858,425 | $3.60B | $0 | 4 | 2026-10-09 |
| 2 | Nadiv Zafrir | CEO | 101,679 | $14.74M | $0 | 2 | 2026-09-03 |
| 3 | Roei Golan | Chief Financial Officer | 30,387 | $4.41M | -$1.22M | 3 | 2026-08-04 |
| 4 | Sherif Seddik | Chief Revenue Officer | 24,675 | $3.58M | -$1.27M | 3 | 2026-08-06 |
| 5 | Nataly Kremer | Chief Product Officer | 19,347 | $2.81M | -$560.2K | 3 | 2026-10-26 |
| 6 | Jerry T Ungerman | Director | 17,287 | $2.51M | -$3.06M | 2 | 2026-09-03 |
| 7 | Tzipi Ozer-Armon | Director | 5,490 | $796.0K | $0 | 1 | 2026-09-03 |
| 8 | Yoav Chelouche | Director | 5,128 | $743.5K | -$3.51M | 2 | 2026-09-03 |
| 9 | Shenhav Tal Shavit | Director | 5,128 | $743.5K | -$3.08M | 2 | 2026-09-03 |
| 10 | Jill D. Smith | Director | 4,236 | $614.2K | $0 | 1 | 2026-09-03 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
CHKP Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 26, 2026Directors 10
- Dafna Gruber · since Mar 18, 2026
- Gil Shwed · since Mar 18, 2026
- Jerry T Ungerman · since Mar 18, 2026
- Jill D. Smith · since Mar 18, 2026
- Nadiv Zafrir · since Mar 18, 2026
- Ray A. Rothrock · since Mar 18, 2026
- Shenhav Tal Shavit · since Mar 18, 2026
- Tzipi Ozer-Armon · since Mar 18, 2026
- Yoav Chelouche · since Mar 18, 2026
- Yoram Tietz · since Sep 2, 2026
Officers 5
- Nadiv Zafrir · CEO · since Mar 18, 2026
- Roei Golan · Chief Financial Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Itay Greenberg · Chief Revenue Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Nataly Kremer · Chief Product Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Sherif Seddik · Chief Revenue Officer · since May 1, 2026
10% owners 1
- Gil Shwed · since Mar 18, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (16)
| Sep 2, 2026 | Yoram Tietz became a director |
| May 1, 2026 | Sherif Seddik became Chief Revenue Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Yoav Chelouche became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Tzipi Ozer-Armon became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Shenhav Tal Shavit became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Roei Golan became Chief Financial Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Ray A. Rothrock became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Nataly Kremer became Chief Product Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Nadiv Zafrir became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Nadiv Zafrir became CEO |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Jill D. Smith became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Jerry T Ungerman became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Itay Greenberg became Chief Revenue Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Gil Shwed became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Gil Shwed became a 10% owner |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Dafna Gruber became a director |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
CHKP Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-10-22
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
1 filing
· $457K notice value
· Last 90d:
2 filings
· $1.2M notice value
· 2 unique filers
· 100% under 10b5-1 plans
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
Roi Karo (1, $772K) · Nataly Kremer (1, $457K)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-22 | Nataly Kremer | Officer | 3,185 | $456.8K | 2026-10-22 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-08 | Roi Karo | Officer | 5,636 | $772.4K | 2026-09-08 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-04 | Schusheim Sharon | Officer | 428 | $54.4K | 2026-08-03 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-04 | Karo Roi | Officer | 416 | $52.9K | 2026-08-03 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-04 | Golan Roei | Officer | 409 | $52.0K | 2026-08-03 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-04 | Kremer Nataly | Officer | 665 | $84.5K | 2026-08-03 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-04 | Greenberg Itay | Officer | 701 | $89.1K | 2026-08-03 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-04 | Messing Gil | Officer | 317 | $40.3K | 2026-08-03 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-04 | SHERIF SEDDIK | Officer | 10,272 | $1.27M | 2026-08-04 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-03 | Golan Roei | Officer | 9,451 | $1.20M | 2026-08-03 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
68 ETFs hold CHKP
25 shown · $969.65M total exposure · 0.17% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CIBR First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF | First Trust | 2.21% | $347.7M | $15.7B | 2026-11-06 |
| 2 | HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF | Amplify | 4.29% | $136.2M | $3.2B | 2026-11-06 |
| 3 | IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.05% | $89.1M | $187.1B | 2026-11-06 |
| 4 | BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | Global X | 3.57% | $70.8M | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 5 | THRO iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.73% | $52.0M | $7.1B | 2026-11-06 |
| 6 | IHAK iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 3.69% | $42.3M | $1.1B | 2026-11-06 |
| 7 | EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.06% | $42.3M | $75.5B | 2026-11-06 |
| 8 | EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 3.00% | $24.1M | $808.1M | 2026-11-06 |
| 9 | SPDW State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.06% | $22.9M | $41.0B | 2026-11-05 |
| 10 | IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.14% | $18.7M | $13.5B | 2026-11-06 |
| 11 | IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $16.3M | $56.4B | 2026-11-06 |
| 12 | EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.11% | $16.3M | $14.8B | 2026-11-06 |
| 13 | IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $14.3M | $33.4B | 2026-11-06 |
| 14 | EFAV iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.21% | $11.7M | $5.5B | 2026-11-06 |
| 15 | QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | Invesco | 0.79% | $9.0M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 16 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $8.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 17 | ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.22% | $7.5M | $3.4B | 2026-11-06 |
| 18 | IVLU iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.15% | $6.8M | $4.5B | 2026-11-06 |
| 19 | BFLX iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.31% | $6.4M | $2.1B | 2026-11-06 |
| 20 | ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $6.1M | $17.5B | 2026-11-06 |
| 21 | LGLV State Street® SPDR® US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.37% | $4.5M | $1.2B | 2026-11-05 |
| 22 | ITEQ Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | Amplify | 4.32% | $4.1M | $95.4M | 2026-11-06 |
| 23 | KOMP State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.17% | $3.9M | $2.3B | 2026-11-05 |
| 24 | ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $3.9M | $31.5B | 2026-11-06 |
| 25 | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.04% | $3.7M | $10.0B | 2026-11-05 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '22 | 2022-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '21 | 2021-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '20 | 2020-12-31 | $563.80M | $270.80M | $1.97 | $302.00M |
| Q3 '20 | 2020-09-30 | $509.00M | $200.70M | $1.42 | $247.60M |
| Q2 '20 | 2020-06-30 | $505.60M | $196.40M | $1.38 | $252.40M |
| Q1 '20 | 2020-03-31 | $486.50M | $178.70M | $1.23 | $359.00M |
| Q4 '19 | 2019-12-31 | $544.00M | $272.40M | $1.82 | $248.40M |
| Q3 '19 | 2019-09-30 | $490.90M | $187.80M | $1.25 | $244.40M |
| Q2 '19 | 2019-06-30 | $488.10M | $185.50M | $1.21 | $232.80M |
Q4 2025 • period ending 2025-12-31 • filed 2026-03-31
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
24.29
P/B
6.00
P/S
10.08
EV/EBITDA
22.24
EV/Sales
9.95
ROE
24.4%
ROA
14.5%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
5.58%
Debt/Equity
0.00
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$20.81B
as of 2026-11-09
CHKP vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Common Stock | $256.9B | 269.4 | +19.5% | +83.2% | 78 |
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. Class A Commo | $222.1B | 3763.3 | +24.3% | +99.1% | 73 |
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | $87.3B | 39.7 | +20.2% | +57.0% | 18 |
| ZS Zscaler, Inc. Common Stock | $32.2B | — | +25.4% | −9.0% | 88 |
| OKTA Okta, Inc. Class A Common Stock | $29.5B | 106.0 | +11.2% | +111.6% | 85 |
| CHKP Check Point Software Technologies Ltd | $14.7B | — | — | −19.9% | 42 |
| S SentinelOne, Inc. | $7.6B | — | +21.1% | +59.8% | 76 |
| QLYS Qualys, Inc. Common Stock | $6.6B | 34.9 | +10.4% | +53.8% | 96 |
| VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. | $5.6B | — | +15.2% | +52.7% | 1 |
| Peer median | $30.9B | 106.0 | +19.9% | +58.4% | 77 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
5.47M
SI % of Float
7.10%
Days to Cover
6.87
Short Vol Ratio
60.3%
Free Float
77.02M
Float %
75.4%
Short interest 2026-10-15 • Short volume 2026-11-06 • Float 2026-10-15