CMAG vs MAGS
Corgi Mag 7 ETF against Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
23%
7 shared positions
Fee gap
10 bp
CMAG is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
MAGS
$5.7B
Side by side
| CMAG | MAGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Corgi Mag 7 ETF | Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF |
| Issuer | Corgi | Roundhill |
| Category | Internet & Innovation | Internet & Innovation |
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.30% |
| Assets | $8.8M | $5.7B |
| Average daily dollar volume | $590K | $280M |
| Listed | May 5, 2026 | Apr 10, 2023 |
| FrenzyCap score | 41 | 78 |
| 1-month return | +5.3% | +6.6% |
| 3-month return | +9.4% | +10.1% |
| Year to date | — | +11.8% |
| 1-year return | — | +13.2% |
| 30-day volatility | 15.3% | 17.8% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −13.4% | −19.8% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | — | 1.32% |
| Holdings | 15 | 24 |
| Top 10 weight | 49.3% | 87.4% |
| Look-through P/E | 27.1 | 29.9 |
| Holdings vs fair value | −3.0% | −4.5% |
| Holdings above 200-day average | 93% | 85% |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$9.0M thru Jun 2026 | −$372M thru Jun 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | 21.9% |
| Holdings as of | as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing | as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
49% of CMAG · 23% of MAGSSector mix of the stock holdings
| Sector | CMAG | MAGS | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | 40.1% | 15.6% | +24.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.0% | 6.9% | +2.1% |
More: full overlap table · CMAG holdings · MAGS holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.