DARP vs FFOG

Grizzle Growth ETF against Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
40%
10 shared positions
Fee gap
34 bp
FFOG is cheaper
1-year return gap
26.1 pts
DARP is ahead
Larger fund
FFOG
$376M

Side by side

DARPFFOG
FundGrizzle Growth ETFFranklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
IssuerGrizzleFranklin Templeton
CategoryLarge Cap GrowthMulti-Factor
Expense ratio0.75%0.41%
Assets$33M$376M
Average daily dollar volume$402K$1.8M
ListedDec 15, 2021Apr 12, 2016
FrenzyCap score2447
1-month return−4.7%−4.7%
3-month return+0.3%+3.5%
Year to date+24.2%+6.5%
1-year return+31.3%+5.2%
30-day volatility22.1%21.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−15.8%−21.9%
Trailing 12-month yield0.35%—
Holdings4441
Top 10 weight59.7%58.8%
Look-through P/E23.034.0
Holdings vs fair value+12.5%+0.3%
Holdings above 200-day average58%73%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$3.8M thru Jul 2026+$50M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

47% of DARP · 54% of FFOG
HoldingDARPFFOG
GOOGL13.14%9.76%
AMZN8.65%9.53%
NVDA8.37%9.99%
AAPL3.06%6.01%
TSM2.98%4.14%
MSFT2.25%4.31%
META1.58%5.10%
GEV5.08%1.31%
ANET1.30%1.38%
LLY0.79%2.42%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorDARPFFOGGap
Technology62.2%64.2%−2.0%
Industrials8.1%13.2%−5.1%
Consumer Discretionary8.6%11.4%−2.7%
Health Care1.4%7.9%−6.5%
Utilities5.3%0.0%+5.3%
Energy2.8%0.0%+2.8%
Materials1.4%0.0%+1.4%
Financials0.9%0.0%+0.9%

More: full overlap table · DARP holdings · FFOG holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.