IWL vs OALC
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF against OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
66%
134 shared positions
Fee gap
34 bp
IWL is cheaper
1-year return gap
4.2 pts
OALC is ahead
Larger fund
IWL
$2.3B
Side by side
| IWL | OALC | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF |
| Issuer | iShares | OneAscent |
| Category | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.49% |
| Assets | $2.3B | $271M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $9.3M | $920K |
| Listed | Sep 22, 2009 | Nov 15, 2021 |
| FrenzyCap score | 74 | 49 |
| 1-month return | +3.1% | +2.8% |
| 3-month return | +4.7% | +4.0% |
| Year to date | +13.7% | +18.6% |
| 1-year return | +15.6% | +19.8% |
| 30-day volatility | 10.6% | 10.4% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −10.0% | −8.4% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 0.82% | 0.51% |
| Holdings | 205 | 206 |
| Top 10 weight | 44.6% | 34.0% |
| Look-through P/E | 27.2 | 26.3 |
| Holdings vs fair value | −0.5% | +2.4% |
| Holdings above 200-day average | 77% | 71% |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | −$17M thru Jun 2026 | +$12M thru May 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | 12.6% | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 8, 2026issuer data | as of May 31, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
71% of IWL · 85% of OALC| Holding | IWL | OALC |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 9.28% | 7.61% |
| MSFT | 6.70% | 5.25% |
| AMZN | 4.25% | 4.22% |
| GOOGL | 3.50% | 3.52% |
| AVGO | 2.89% | 3.07% |
| GOOG | 2.83% | 2.87% |
| MU | 2.02% | 2.22% |
| LLY | 1.61% | 1.60% |
| JPM | 1.53% | 1.48% |
| AMD | 1.74% | 1.42% |
| XOM | 1.20% | 1.13% |
| V | 1.10% | 1.09% |
| INTC | 0.84% | 1.05% |
| WMT | 0.84% | 1.19% |
| MA | 0.80% | 0.82% |
| CSCO | 0.78% | 2.15% |
| AMAT | 0.70% | 0.89% |
| LRCX | 0.69% | 1.07% |
| CAT | 0.62% | 0.95% |
| MRK | 0.61% | 0.88% |
| PG | 0.61% | 0.67% |
| BAC | 0.60% | 0.76% |
| CVX | 0.68% | 0.59% |
| KO | 0.59% | 0.87% |
| PLTR | 0.76% | 0.56% |
Sector mix of the stock holdings
| Sector | IWL | OALC | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | 51.9% | 47.1% | +4.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.7% | 12.0% | −1.3% |
| Industrials | 9.4% | 12.9% | −3.5% |
| Financials | 7.4% | 9.1% | −1.7% |
| Health Care | 8.0% | 6.1% | +1.8% |
| Consumer Staples | 2.9% | 2.8% | +0.1% |
| Energy | 2.6% | 2.1% | +0.6% |
| Communication Services | 1.6% | 2.7% | −1.1% |
| Utilities | 1.4% | 2.3% | −0.9% |
| Materials | 1.4% | 2.0% | −0.6% |
| Real Estate | 0.9% | 0.6% | +0.3% |
More: full overlap table · IWL holdings · OALC holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.