LGH vs ONOF
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF against Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
80%
409 shared positions
Fee gap
61 bp
ONOF is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.2 pts
ONOF is ahead
Larger fund
LGH
$599M
Side by side
| LGH | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | HCM Defender 500 Index ETF | Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF |
| Issuer | HCM | Global X |
| Category | Large Cap Blend | Tactical & Rotation |
| Expense ratio | 1.00% | 0.39% |
| Assets | $599M | $144M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $1.4M | $181K |
| Listed | Oct 9, 2019 | Jan 12, 2021 |
| FrenzyCap score | 32 | 52 |
| 1-month return | −0.4% | −0.1% |
| 3-month return | +6.6% | +5.2% |
| Year to date | +7.9% | +10.0% |
| 1-year return | +9.7% | +10.8% |
| 30-day volatility | 14.6% | 11.1% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −11.3% | −7.1% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 0.35% | 1.19% |
| Holdings | 419 | 505 |
| Top 10 weight | 53.3% | 37.5% |
| Look-through P/E | 25.8 | 26.2 |
| Holdings vs fair value | +1.3% | +1.8% |
| Holdings above 200-day average | 70% | 69% |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | −$3.3M thru Jun 2026 | −$5.9M thru May 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 14, 2026third-party data | as of Oct 21, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
80% of LGH · 95% of ONOF| Holding | LGH | ONOF |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 7.14% | 7.57% |
| AAPL | 7.04% | 7.21% |
| MSFT | 5.34% | 5.71% |
| AMZN | 3.39% | 3.70% |
| GOOGL | 2.68% | 2.87% |
| GOOG | 2.30% | 2.46% |
| AVGO | 2.18% | 2.31% |
| META | 2.11% | 2.24% |
| TSLA | 1.39% | 1.74% |
| LLY | 1.38% | 1.57% |
| MU | 1.34% | 1.51% |
| JPM | 1.22% | 1.32% |
| AMD | 1.08% | 1.31% |
| XOM | 1.03% | 1.08% |
| BRK.B | 0.97% | 1.10% |
| V | 0.87% | 0.99% |
| JNJ | 0.82% | 0.91% |
| WMT | 0.70% | 0.75% |
| MA | 0.63% | 0.72% |
| COST | 0.60% | 0.65% |
| ABBV | 0.60% | 0.74% |
| CSCO | 0.54% | 0.62% |
| INTC | 0.52% | 0.58% |
| CVX | 0.51% | 0.62% |
| PLTR | 0.48% | 0.63% |
Sector mix of the stock holdings
| Sector | LGH | ONOF | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | 40.2% | 45.9% | −5.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.4% | 10.3% | −1.9% |
| Industrials | 7.7% | 10.6% | −2.9% |
| Financials | 6.9% | 9.1% | −2.2% |
| Health Care | 6.6% | 8.7% | −2.1% |
| Energy | 2.6% | 3.1% | −0.5% |
| Consumer Staples | 2.5% | 3.2% | −0.7% |
| Utilities | 1.9% | 2.6% | −0.8% |
| Materials | 1.2% | 2.0% | −0.8% |
| Real Estate | 1.1% | 1.5% | −0.4% |
| Communication Services | 1.1% | 1.2% | −0.2% |
More: full overlap table · LGH holdings · ONOF holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.