HCM Defender 500 Index ETF(LGH · ETF)
ETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF (LGH) ETF
- Exchange
- ARCX
- Inception
- 2019-10-09
- Has Options
- No
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-16 | 2025-12-22 | $0.2373 | CD |
| 2024-12-16 | 2024-12-23 | $0.2078 | CD |
| 2023-12-15 | 2023-12-26 | $0.2578 | CD |
| 2022-12-15 | 2022-12-21 | $0.2048 | CD |
| 2021-12-29 | 2022-01-04 | $0.0037 | CD |
| 2021-12-15 | 2021-12-21 | $0.0590 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPXL | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | 19.11% | Equity (common) | US |
| NVDA | NVIDIA Corp. | 7.58% | Equity (common) | US |
| AAPL | Apple Inc. | 6.80% | Equity (common) | US |
| MSFT | Microsoft Corp. | 6.15% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMZN | Amazon.com, Inc. | 3.80% | Equity (common) | US |
| AVGO | Broadcom Inc | 2.71% | Equity (common) | US |
| META | Meta Platforms Inc | 2.52% | Equity (common) | US |
| GOOG | Alphabet Inc. | 2.32% | Equity (common) | US |
| GOOGL | Alphabet Inc. | 2.32% | Equity (common) | US |
| TSLA | Tesla Inc | 2.14% | Equity (common) | US |
| LLY | Eli Lilly & Co. | 1.64% | Equity (common) | US |
| JPM | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1.33% | Equity (common) | US |
| BRK.B | Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 1.06% | Equity (common) | US |
| V | Visa Inc | 0.97% | Equity (common) | US |
| XOM | Exxon Mobil Corp. | 0.72% | Equity (common) | US |
| JNJ | Johnson & Johnson | 0.67% | Equity (common) | US |
| WMT | Walmart Inc | 0.63% | Equity (common) | US |
| MA | MasterCard Incorporated | 0.59% | Equity (common) | US |
| ABBV | AbbVie Inc. | 0.56% | Equity (common) | US |
| NFLX | Netflix, Inc. | 0.51% | Equity (common) | US |
| COST | Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.51% | Equity (common) | US |
| PLTR | Palantir Technologies Inc | 0.46% | Equity (common) | US |
| BAC | Bank of America Corp. | 0.46% | Equity (common) | US |
| PG | The Procter & Gamble Co. | 0.45% | Equity (common) | US |
| HD | Home Depot Inc. | 0.44% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMD | Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | 0.43% | Equity (common) | US |
| UNH | UnitedHealth Group Inc. | 0.43% | Equity (common) | US |
| GE | GE Aerospace | 0.41% | Equity (common) | US |
| ORCL | Oracle Corp. | 0.40% | Equity (common) | US |
| CVX | Chevron Corp. | 0.40% | Equity (common) | US |
| WFC | Wells Fargo & Co. | 0.39% | Equity (common) | US |
| CSCO | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 0.39% | Equity (common) | US |
| MRK | Merck & Co., Inc | 0.39% | Equity (common) | US |
| KO | Coca-Cola Co (The) | 0.36% | Equity (common) | US |
| GS | Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 0.35% | Equity (common) | US |
| IBM | International Business Machines Corp. | 0.34% | Equity (common) | US |
| CAT | Caterpillar Inc | 0.34% | Equity (common) | US |
| MU | Micron Technology Inc. | 0.34% | Equity (common) | US |
| PM | Philip Morris International Inc. | 0.32% | Equity (common) | US |
| RTX | RTX Corp. | 0.32% | Equity (common) | US |
| CRM | Salesforce Inc. | 0.31% | Equity (common) | US |
| TMO | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 0.31% | Equity (common) | US |
| MCD | McDonald's Corp. | 0.29% | Equity (common) | US |
| APP | Applovin Corp. | 0.28% | Equity (common) | US |
| ABT | Abbott Laboratories | 0.28% | Equity (common) | US |
| MS | Morgan Stanley | 0.28% | Equity (common) | US |
| C | Citigroup Inc. | 0.28% | Equity (common) | US |
| PEP | Pepsico Inc | 0.27% | Equity (common) | US |
| LIN | Linde PLC | 0.27% | Equity (common) | IE |
| AMAT | Applied Materials Inc. | 0.27% | Equity (common) | US |
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +1.09% | 6 |
| Feb | -0.41% | 6 |
| Mar | +0.15% | 6 |
| Apr | +0.49% | 6 |
| May | +3.77% | 6 |
| Jun | +2.36% | 6 |
| Jul | +1.69% | 6 |
| Aug | +1.64% | 6 |
| Sep | -0.93% | 6 |
| Oct | +2.77% | 5 |
| Nov | +2.61% | 5 |
| Dec | +0.64% | 5 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Technical indicators suggest a range-bound market with a neutral bias
- Recent news headlines are generally neutral, without any significant market-moving events
- High volatility and beta indicate potential for significant price movements
Primary Risks:
- Unusual options activity could lead to sudden changes in stock price
- Earnings reports or regulatory changes could impact the company's fundamentals
Investment Thesis: LGH is a mid-cap stock with a neutral bias, currently trading within a range. The recent news headlines are mostly neutral, and technical indicators suggest a lack of clear direction. This suggests that investors should focus on risk management strategies rather than making bold bets.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: Neutral
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Range-bound (Short-term), Sideways (Medium-term), Bullish (Long-term)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $67.37
- Middle Line (EMA 26): $65.81
- Lower Bollinger Band: $65.21
Momentum Signals: RSI (14) is at 55.23, indicating a neutral reading. MACD has a bullish signal with a histogram of 0.39.
Volume Analysis: Volume trends suggest institutional interest and potential support at the current price level.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Mostly neutral news headlines, with no significant market-moving events.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (60% neutral, 20% positive, 20% negative)
Catalyst Identification: None notable in recent news headlines.
Market Narrative: The lack of clear direction and high volatility suggest that investors should focus on risk management strategies rather than making bold bets.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Metrics:
- Beta: 1.25 (high)
- Alpha: -0.07
- Correlation: 0.94
- Stock Volatility: 0.17
IV Rank, Put/Call Ratios, and Unusual Options Activity: No data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels at $65.21 and $64.97 may provide some cushion in case of a decline.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: LGH is outperforming its sector peers, with a relative strength index of 0.94.
Institutional Activity: Volume trends suggest institutional interest and potential support at the current price level.
Correlation Analysis: The stock's correlation with the market is high (0.94), indicating that it moves in tandem with the broader market.
Relative Valuation: LGH is trading within its historical range, suggesting a neutral bias.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $67.37
- Middle Line (EMA 26): $65.81
- Lower Bollinger Band: $65.21
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None notable in recent technical indicators.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings reports or regulatory changes could impact the company's fundamentals.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set at $64.97, and position sizing considerations include a potential decline to this level.
This comprehensive analysis report provides an objective evaluation of LGH stock, highlighting both bullish and bearish cases. The technical indicators suggest a range-bound market with a neutral bias, while the recent news headlines are mostly neutral. The risk metrics indicate high volatility and beta, suggesting that investors should focus on risk management strategies rather than making bold bets.
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 1.25
- Correlation (SPY)
- 94.4%
- R²
- 0.89
- Ann. Volatility
- 17.0%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.8%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|