ETHU 2x Ether ETF
ETF 25.52 DelayedETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $10.72 – $142.57
- YTD
- -57.72%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 19.59
- Straddle Price
- $5.10
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 4.29
- Open
- $25.94
- Day Range
- $25.46 – $26.06
- Volume
- 2,906,845
- Prev Close
- $25.29
2x Ether ETF (ETHU) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- BATS
- Inception
- 2024-06-03
- Has Options
- Yes
- Expense ratio
- 2.97% prospectus, filed Jun 26, 2026
- Assets
- $1.1B shares × price, Oct 9, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 1.78% paid monthly
- Average daily volume
- $196M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 4 top 10 are 353.4%
- Listed
- Jun 3, 2024 Cboe BZX
- Last fee change
- +30 bp filed Jun 26, 2026
Moves with. Bitcoin (80% of its variance, beta 2.45). These factors explain 85% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The 2x Ether ETF (the Fund or ETHU) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of ether. (from the fund's prospectus)
All 4 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Leveraged & Inverse Crypto ETFs
- May 2026
- +$12M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$97M +12.3% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- +$1.6B +207.4% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| May 2026 | +$12M |
| Apr 2026 | +$25M |
| Mar 2026 | +$60M |
| Feb 2026 | +$176M |
| Jan 2026 | −$42M |
| Dec 2025 | +$237M |
| Nov 2025 | +$77M |
| Oct 2025 | +$468M |
| Sep 2025 | +$446M |
| Aug 2025 | +$238M |
| Jul 2025 | −$283M |
| Jun 2025 | +$225M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 24 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BITX2x Bitcoin ETF | — | 2.75% | $1.3B | −70.3% | compare |
| BITUProShares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | — | 0.95% | $577M | −76.1% | compare |
| ETHTProShares Ultra Ether ETF | — | — | $250M | −84.3% | compare |
| SBITProShares UltraShort Bitcoin ETF | — | — | $129M | +26.8% | compare |
| XXRPTeucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF | — | 2.77% | $88M | −90.9% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Leveraged & Inverse Crypto category.
- Authorized participants
- 6 active of 7 with agreements; top 3 did 89%
- Created · redeemed
- $3.7B · $2.0B over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 0% creations 0% in kind
- Creation unit
- 10,000 shares
- Securities lending
- not authorized
- Diversification status
- Non-diversified may concentrate in fewer issuers
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | 2026-09-24 | $0.0209 | CD |
| 2026-08-19 | 2026-08-20 | $0.0115 | CD |
| 2026-07-22 | 2026-07-23 | $0.0148 | CD |
| 2026-06-17 | 2026-06-18 | $0.0143 | CD |
| 2026-05-20 | 2026-05-21 | $0.0274 | CD |
| 2026-04-22 | 2026-04-23 | $0.0133 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | TREASURY BILL | 353.35% | Debt | US |
| — | US Bank Money Market Deposit Account | 19.50% | Short-term investment | US |
| — | N/A | -8.12% | Derivative (FX) | US |
| — | Marex | -349.71% | Repurchase agreement | US |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| US Treasury | 353.35% | $2.79B | 1 |
| Short-term investment | 19.50% | $154.2M | 1 |
| Derivative (FX) | -8.12% | $-64206785 | 1 |
| Repurchase agreement | -349.71% | $-2765000000 | 1 |
| Month | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -13.93% | -29.80% | -21.87% |
| Feb | -- | -35.40% | -36.49% | -35.95% |
| Mar | -- | -30.75% | 0.86% | -14.95% |
| Apr | -- | -19.45% | 8.79% | -5.33% |
| May | -- | 81.44% | -25.32% | 28.06% |
| Jun | -24.14% | -5.73% | -41.34% | -23.74% |
| Jul | -14.88% | 129.01% | 29.67% | 47.93% |
| Aug | -42.50% | 42.54% | 71.15% | 23.73% |
| Sep | 8.45% | -8.36% | 18.43% | 6.17% |
| Oct | -1.72% | -24.22% | -16.66%* | -14.20% |
| Nov | 90.49% | -32.62% | -- | 28.93% |
| Dec | -21.21% | 11.22% | -- | -5.00% |
| Total | -40.60% | -9.88% | -53.06% | -34.51% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
SYMBOL: ETHU
Executive Summary Overall Assessment: BEARISH (confidence level 7/10) Key drivers: High volatility, bearish MACD signals, oversold RSI Primary risks: Market sentiment aligning with technical signals, potential for further price decline Investment thesis: Risk-reward analysis suggests selling or hedging exposure, but medium-term trend direction unclear Recent news sentiment impact: Neutral to bearish headlines did not significantly influence stock price
Technical Analysis Trend Direction: Short-term: BEARISH (1-4 weeks), Medium-term: NEUTRAL (1-3 months), Long-term: BEARISH (3-12 months) Support/Resistance Levels: Key price levels: SMA 20 ($17.95), Bollinger Bands Upper ($25.90) Momentum Signals: * RSI interpretation: Oversold (<30) with room for potential bounce * MACD signal: Bearish (crossover below signal line) * Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze, with potential mean reversion * Volume Analysis: Low volume and institutional interest signals caution
News & Sentiment Analysis Recent Headlines Summary: Neutral headlines did not significantly impact stock price Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment: NEUTRAL (50%) Catalyst Identification: No upcoming earnings or product launches; regulatory changes may be a catalyst for future price movements Market Narrative: News sentiment aligns with bearish technical signals, indicating potential for further price decline
Risk & Volatility Assessment Beta Interpretation: High volatility, stock moves more than market (beta 6.03) Volatility Regime: Current vs historical volatility levels: Higher than average (HV20 121.2%, HV30 106.9%) Options Market Signals: IV rank: Medium (26.1%), current IV: 151.6% (historically high), expected move: $3.05 Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations: SMA 20 ($17.95), Bollinger Bands Lower ($10.00)
Market Context & Positioning Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market: Neutral to bearish Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest: Low volume, cautionary signals Correlation Analysis: Stock moves relatively strongly with market (R-squared interpretation) Relative Valuation: Position within trading range: Oversold and potentially near support
Key Levels & Action Items Critical Price Levels: Support/resistance to monitor: SMA 20 ($17.95), Bollinger Bands Upper ($25.90) Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical levels that could trigger significant moves: Breakout above upper band or breakdown below lower band Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No immediate earnings or product launches; regulatory changes may be a catalyst for future price movements Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations: Set stop-loss at SMA 20 ($17.95) and consider reducing exposure
Please note that this analysis is based on the provided data, and actual market conditions may differ. The report aims to provide a comprehensive risk-reward assessment and highlights potential catalysts for future price movements.
ETHU Options Activity & IV Rank
ETHU IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 20th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
ETHU Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $23.80M | 60.66% | 2025-09-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $7.44M | 18.97% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $4.23M | 10.78% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $2.55M | 6.50% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | LMR Partners LLP | $1.21M | 3.08% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $16.51M | 51.81% | 2025-09-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $7.04M | 22.11% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $5.31M | 16.66% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $2.49M | 7.80% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | LMR Partners LLP | $516.87K | 1.62% | 2026-06-30 |
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|