AEVA Aeva Technologies, Inc.
XNAS
10.21
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $8.83 – $31.30
- YTD
- -19.92%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 36.01
- Straddle Price
- $2.38
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.53
- Market Cap
- $0.7B
- Open
- $10.03
- Day Range
- $10.00 – $10.35
- Volume
- 161,737
- Prev Close
- $10.60
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.15% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.98 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 16.03% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 14.65% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +103.1pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +30.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -117.8% |
| Book / Price | 4.2% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 27.2% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -540.2% |
| Debt / Equity | 3.52 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $15.42 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $13.00 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 439.5% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.1B |
| Market Cap | $1B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 36.2× · 7 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 7.0× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/B | $1.09 | 13% | median 2.4× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $0.27 | 13% | median 0.7× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $15.42 | 55% | stability 81% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $9.98 | 19% | 11 strikes · skew +0.21 |

- Industry (SIC)
- MOTOR VEHICLE PARTS & ACCESSORIES (3714) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.7B
- Employees
- 239
- List Date
- 2021-03-15
- CIK
- 0001789029
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-04 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- ($0.58) (2 est.)
- Headquarters
- Mountain View, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.aeva.com
Aeva Technologies Inc through its Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) sensing technology, designs a 4D LiDAR-on-chip that, along with its proprietary software applications, has the potential to enable the adoption of LiDAR across broad applications from automated driving to consumer electronics, consumer health, industrial automation, and security application. The 4D LiDAR sensors are designed to detect both velocity and position, supporting perception and decision-making in automated systems. The company operates in North America, EMEA, and Asia. The company's revenue consists of sales…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -34.05% | 32.03% | 16.71% | -15.37% | 0.16% | -0.10% |
| Feb | -- | -22.79% | -6.28% | 22.14% | -10.72% | 3.92% | -2.75% |
| Mar | -28.22% | 2.85% | -33.15% | -23.69% | 110.21% | -9.24% | 3.13% |
| Apr | -22.39% | -20.19% | -14.49% | -24.64% | -2.07% | 21.14% | -10.44% |
| May | 0.10% | -6.07% | 27.44% | 5.21% | 154.81% | 71.00% | 42.08% |
| Jun | 1.05% | 4.68% | -4.58% | -23.87% | 118.19% | 3.27% | 16.46% |
| Jul | -19.41% | 14.61% | 5.04% | 45.78% | -34.96% | -37.31% | -4.38% |
| Aug | 10.10% | -20.21% | -23.98% | 1.23% | -6.56% | -14.94% | -9.06% |
| Sep | -20.36% | -32.73% | -22.75% | 19.20% | 5.34% | -5.01% | -9.38% |
| Oct | -0.39% | -0.99% | -31.19% | 19.87% | 9.30% | -28.76%* | -5.36% |
| Nov | 19.88% | -11.11% | 17.47% | 16.75% | -27.69% | -- | 3.06% |
| Dec | -23.17% | -19.53% | 34.46% | 5.32% | 28.68% | -- | 5.15% |
| Total | -63.47% | -82.09% | -42.33% | 70.24% | 463.03% | -27.08% | 53.05% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers and Primary Risks:
- Bearish momentum signals from MACD and ADX
- High volatility and beta indicate increased risk
- Recent negative news headlines may continue to weigh on the stock price
Investment Thesis: Aeva's high beta and volatile nature make it a speculative play. However, the recent earnings beat has sparked some optimism. The key is finding a balance between potential gains and increased risk.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: Negative news headlines from Investing.com and The Motley Fool have contributed to the bearish sentiment. However, positive sentiments from The Motley Fool's CEO Sold 488,000 Shares Worth $6.3 Million (2026-06-10) and Aeva Technologies' Q2 Revenue Jumps 175% (The Motley Fool, 2025-08-02) have been overshadowed.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Bearish Short-term (1-4 weeks), Neutral Medium-term (1-3 months), Bearish Long-term (3-12 months)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $12.02
- Upper Bollinger Band: $23.87
- SMA 50: $21.66
Momentum Signals:
- RSI Interpretation: Neutral (58.92)
- MACD Signal: Bearish (0.24 / Signal: 1.15 / Histogram: -0.91)
- Bollinger Bands Position: Squeeze (neutral)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Negative news headlines from Investing.com and The Motley Fool have dominated the narrative.
Sentiment Assessment: Bearish (Negative sentiment outweighs positive)
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming earnings announcement may provide a catalyst for price movement.
Market Narrative: Recent negative news headlines contradict the bullish momentum signals, indicating increased risk.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High beta (>1.2) indicates high risk relative to market.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility (166.7% HV20) is significantly higher than historical levels.
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: 22.6% (Low)
- Put/Call Ratio: 0.24 (Bullish sentiment)
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Aeva's sector (computer vision) has performed relatively poorly compared to the broader market.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest some institutional interest, but overall activity is low.
Correlation Analysis: The stock moves more than the market (R-squared: 0.44), indicating increased risk.
Relative Valuation: Aeva's price-to-earnings ratio is relatively high compared to its peers.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Support at $12.02 and resistance at $23.87
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Short-term support/resistance levels: $15.00, $18.00, $20.00
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Upcoming earnings announcement (no specific date available)
Risk Management: Monitor the stock's movement relative to its moving averages and adjust stop-loss levels accordingly.
Note: As a professional financial analyst, I will not provide buy/sell advice but instead focus on risk/reward analysis.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-13 | After-Close | 12.74% | 12.46% | 0.98x | Within |
| 2021-08-12 | After-Close | 2.96% | 5.68% | 1.92x | Exceeded |
| 2021-11-10 | After-Close | 4.85% | 2.97% | 0.61x | Within |
| 2022-02-23 | After-Close | 4.24% | 0.47% | 0.11x | Within |
| 2022-05-04 | After-Close | 29.32% | 1.69% | 0.06x | Within |
| 2022-08-03 | After-Close | 5.14% | 5.09% | 0.99x | Within |
| 2022-11-08 | After-Close | 8.89% | 10.56% | 1.19x | Exceeded |
| 2023-03-22 | After-Close | 15.46% | 0.71% | 0.05x | Within |
| 2023-11-08 | After-Close | 280.88% | 10.15% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2024-03-05 | After-Close | 21.30% | 7.92% | 0.37x | Within |
| 2024-05-07 | After-Close | 42.03% | 0.29% | 0.01x | Within |
| 2024-08-07 | Pre-Market | 22.34% | 3.44% | 0.15x | Within |
| 2024-11-06 | After-Close | 26.10% | 0.23% | 0.01x | Within |
| 2025-03-19 | After-Close | 25.72% | 34.73% | 1.35x | Exceeded |
| 2025-05-14 | After-Close | 17.13% | 17.85% | 1.04x | Exceeded |
| 2025-07-31 | After-Close | 20.39% | 14.99% | 0.74x | Within |
| 2025-11-05 | After-Close | 24.13% | 6.10% | 0.25x | Within |
| 2026-02-26 | After-Close | 23.09% | 2.79% | 0.12x | Within |
| 2026-05-06 | After-Close | 18.86% | 17.56% | 0.93x | Within |
| 2026-08-05 | Pre-Market | 26.06% | 4.01% | 0.15x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
AEVA Options Activity & IV Rank
AEVA IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 4th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duquesne Family Office Family office Stanley Druckenmiller | $20.7M | #48 of 86 | new | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $18.4M | #607 of 1945 | -43.6% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $10.2M | #1556 of 3716 | -71.1% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $4.4M | #2192 of 6285 | -30.1% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $212K | #2576 of 4729 | -1.6% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
AEVA Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $29.00M | 25.61% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | SUMMIT PARTNERS PUBLIC ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC | $14.36M | 12.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $13.86M | 12.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | DeepCurrents Investment Group LLC | $10.45M | 9.23% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Wasserstein Management, L.P. | $7.51M | 6.63% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $7.45M | 6.58% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $5.14M | 4.54% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $4.86M | 4.29% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | PEAK6 LLC | $4.49M | 3.96% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Caption Management, LLC | $3.59M | 3.17% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $3.53M | 3.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $2.53M | 2.24% | 2025-09-30 |
| 13 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $1.58M | 1.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $1.56M | 1.38% | 2025-09-30 |
| 15 | Centiva Capital, LP | $1.44M | 1.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | ARDSLEY ADVISORY PARTNERS LP | $1.29M | 1.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | Shay Capital LLC | $574.40K | 0.51% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wasserstein Management, L.P. | $7.51M | 25.93% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $5.94M | 20.49% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $3.93M | 13.57% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Caption Management, LLC | $3.59M | 12.39% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $3.12M | 10.76% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $2.35M | 8.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $936.70K | 3.23% | 2025-09-30 |
| 8 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $697.90K | 2.41% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $324.54K | 1.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $241.25K | 0.83% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $231.00K | 0.80% | 2025-09-30 |
| 12 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $100.52K | 0.35% | 2026-06-30 |
AEVA Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-04| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-04 | Saurabh Sinha | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −34,146 | $14.83 | -$506.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-20 | Saurabh Sinha | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −70,000 | $21.21 | -$1.48M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-14 | Katherine Motlagh | Director | Sell (S) | −2,500 | $25.50 | -$63.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-12 | Soroush Salehian Dardashti | Chief Executive Officer | Sell (S) | −305,099 | $24.06 | -$7.34M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-12 | Mina Rezk | Chief Technology Officer | Sell (S) | −100,000 | $24.01 | -$2.40M | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-29 | Mina Rezk | Chief Technology Officer | Sell (S) | −10,304 | $15.40 | -$158.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-29 | Saurabh Sinha | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −6,830 | $15.40 | -$105.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-29 | Soroush Salehian Dardashti | Chief Executive Officer | Sell (S) | −10,304 | $15.40 | -$158.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-10 | Mina Rezk | Chief Technology Officer | Sell (S) | −64,821 | $21.16 | -$1.37M | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-10 | Soroush Salehian Dardashti | Chief Executive Officer | Sell (S) | −64,821 | $21.16 | -$1.37M | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-10 | Saurabh Sinha | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −20,620 | $21.16 | -$436.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | Saurabh Sinha | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −11,212 | $26.75 | -$300.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLC | Director | Other (J) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-23 | SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLC | Director | Award (A) | +6,150 | $24.39 | $150.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-23 | Katherine Motlagh | Director | Award (A) | +6,150 | — | EDGAR |
AEVA Insider Holdings
7 insiders · @ $10.21| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLC | Director | 16,240,671 | $165.74M | $0 | 2 | 2026-07-02 |
| 2 | Hrach Simonian | Director | 3,714,480 | $37.91M | $0 | 1 | 2026-06-23 |
| 3 | Mina Rezk | Chief Technology Officer | 3,133,902 | $31.98M | -$3.93M | 3 | 2026-08-12 |
| 4 | Soroush Salehian Dardashti | Chief Executive Officer | 2,786,550 | $28.44M | -$8.87M | 3 | 2026-08-12 |
| 5 | Saurabh Sinha | Chief Financial Officer | 547,226 | $5.58M | -$2.83M | 5 | 2026-09-04 |
| 6 | Stephen Paul Zadesky | Director | 95,882 | $978.5K | -$75.8K | 1 | 2026-06-23 |
| 7 | Katherine Motlagh | Director | 9,618 | $98.2K | -$63.8K | 2 | 2026-08-14 |
AEVA Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 14, 2026Directors 8
- Hrach Simonian · since Mar 12, 2021
- Mina Rezk · since Mar 12, 2021
- Soroush Salehian Dardashti · since Mar 12, 2021
- Stephen Paul Zadesky · since Nov 11, 2022
- Stefan Sommer · since Nov 15, 2023
- Katherine Motlagh · since Mar 27, 2025
- Daniel Patrick Gibson · listed since May 2025
- Sylebra Capital LLC (entity) · listed since Jun 2026
Officers 4
- Soroush Salehian Dardashti · Chief Executive Officer · since Mar 12, 2021
- Saurabh Sinha · Chief Financial Officer · since Mar 12, 2021
- Mina Rezk · Chief Technology Officer · listed since May 2023
- Rupesh Maheshwari · since Sep 5, 2026
10% owners 2
- Daniel Patrick Gibson · listed since Nov 2023
- Sylebra Capital LLC (entity) · on file since Mar 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (51)
| Sep 5, 2026 | Rupesh Maheshwari became an officer |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Sylebra Capital LLC first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Aug 11, 2025 | Mina Rezk no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| May 9, 2025 | Daniel Patrick Gibson first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| May 1, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Christopher G Eberle Jr from the board in an SEC filing |
| Mar 27, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Erin L Polek from the board in an SEC filing |
| Mar 27, 2025 | Katherine Motlagh became a director |
| Mar 26, 2025 | Sylebra Capital LLC first on file as a 10% owner |
| Sep 5, 2024 | Soroush Salehian Dardashti no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Christopher G Eberle Jr no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Nov 15, 2023 | Stefan Sommer became a director |
| Nov 13, 2023 | Daniel Patrick Gibson first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| May 8, 2023 | Mina Rezk listed as Chief Technology Officer (previously President & CTO) in SEC filings |
| Nov 11, 2022 | Sylebra Capital Ltd became a director |
| Nov 11, 2022 | Sylebra Capital Ltd became a 10% owner |
| Nov 11, 2022 | Stephen Paul Zadesky became a director |
| Nov 11, 2022 | Erin L Polek became a director |
| Nov 11, 2022 | Christopher G Eberle Jr became a director |
| Nov 11, 2022 | Christopher G Eberle Jr became a 10% owner |
| Aug 9, 2022 | Peter Hebert reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 9, 2022 | Lux Ventures IV, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 9, 2022 | Lux Venture Partners IV, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 9, 2022 | Lux Co-Invest Partners, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 9, 2022 | Lux Co-Invest Opportunities, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 9, 2022 | Josh Wolfe reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 12, 2021 | Soroush Salehian Dardashti became a director |
| Mar 12, 2021 | Soroush Salehian Dardashti became a 10% owner |
| Mar 12, 2021 | Soroush Salehian Dardashti became Chief Executive Officer |
| Mar 12, 2021 | Shahin Farshchi became a director |
| Mar 12, 2021 | Saurabh Sinha became Chief Financial Officer |
| Mar 12, 2021 | Peter Hebert became a 10% owner |
| Mar 12, 2021 | Mina Rezk became a director |
| Mar 12, 2021 | Mina Rezk became a 10% owner |
| Mar 12, 2021 | Mina Rezk became President & CTO |
| Mar 12, 2021 | Lux Ventures IV, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Mar 12, 2021 | Lux Venture Partners IV, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Mar 12, 2021 | Lux Co-Invest Partners, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Mar 12, 2021 | Lux Co-Invest Opportunities, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Mar 12, 2021 | Josh Wolfe became a 10% owner |
| Mar 12, 2021 | Hrach Simonian became a director |
| Apr 1, 2020 | Matt Luckett became a director |
| Feb 3, 2020 | Pietro Cinquegrana became a director |
| Feb 3, 2020 | Minesh K Patel became Vice President |
| Feb 3, 2020 | Jeffrey Harris became a director |
| Feb 3, 2020 | InterPrivate Acquisition Management LLC became a 10% owner |
| Feb 3, 2020 | Brian Q Pham became Senior Vice President |
| Feb 3, 2020 | Brandon C Bentley became General Counsel |
| Feb 3, 2020 | Alan Pinto became Senior Vice President |
| Feb 3, 2020 | Ahmed M Fattouh became a director |
| Feb 3, 2020 | Ahmed M Fattouh became a 10% owner |
| Feb 3, 2020 | Ahmed M Fattouh became Chief Executive Officer |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (11)
- Shahin Farshchi · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 21, 2023
- Sylebra Capital Ltd · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 21, 2023
- InterPrivate Acquisition Management LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Mar 29, 2021
- Ahmed M Fattouh · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 29, 2021
- Matt Luckett · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 1, 2020
- Alan Pinto · Last reported as Senior Vice President in an SEC filing dated Feb 3, 2020
- Brian Q Pham · Last reported as Senior Vice President in an SEC filing dated Feb 3, 2020
- Minesh K Patel · Last reported as Vice President in an SEC filing dated Feb 3, 2020
- Jeffrey Harris · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 3, 2020
- Pietro Cinquegrana · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 3, 2020
- Brandon C Bentley · Last reported as General Counsel in an SEC filing dated Feb 3, 2020
AEVA Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-08-18What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-18 | SAURABH SINHA | Officer | 70,000 | $1.66M | 2026-08-18 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-12 | KATHERINE MOTLAGH | Director | 2,500 | $63.8K | 2026-08-12 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-22 | STEPHEN ZADESKY | Director | 2,984 | $72.8K | 2026-06-22 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | Rezk Family Trust UAD 02/15/2022 | Director, Officer | 450,000 | $12.09M | 2026-06-16 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | The SS Trust | Director, Officer | 300,000 | $8.06M | 2026-06-16 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | SOROUSH SALEHIAN DARDASHTI | Director, Officer | 280,448 | $7.54M | 2026-06-16 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-15 | SAURABH SINHA | Officer | 60,000 | $1.24M | 2026-01-15 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-19 | SAURABH SINHA | Officer | 48,086 | $458.7K | 2025-11-19 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-10 | SS TRUST U/A DTD 10/31/2021 | Officer | 250,000 | $3.27M | 2025-11-10 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-10 | Rezk Family Trust UAD 02/15/2022 | Director, Officer | 250,000 | $3.27M | 2025-11-10 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $16.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $9.4M | $75.1B | 2026-10-20 |
| 3 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $6.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | KOMP State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.17% | $4.2M | $2.5B | 2026-10-20 |
| 5 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.02% | $3.7M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 6 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $3.4M | $13.6B | 2026-10-20 |
| 7 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $3.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | Global X | 0.70% | $2.3M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 9 | EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF | Corgi | 0.73% | $2.2M | $308.2M | 2026-10-21 |
| 10 | ISMD Inspire Small/Mid Cap ETF | Nport | 0.36% | $1.1M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 11 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.09% | $1.1M | $1.2B | 2026-10-20 |
| 12 | VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $593,752 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 13 | VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $554,215 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 14 | SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | Nport | 0.00% | $543,761 | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 15 | FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.00% | $474,556 | $21.3B | 2026-10-20 |
| 16 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $444,301 | $97.4B | 2026-10-20 |
| 17 | XITK State Street® SPDR® FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.63% | $415,683 | $66.3M | 2026-10-20 |
| 18 | SMLF iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $277,598 | $4.2B | 2026-10-20 |
| 19 | IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $219,388 | $11.0B | 2026-10-20 |
| 20 | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.00% | $212,230 | $10.9B | 2026-10-20 |
| 21 | RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | Global X | 0.01% | $184,694 | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 22 | CARZ First Trust S-Network Future Vehicles & Technology ETF | First Trust | 0.40% | $181,122 | $45.0M | 2026-10-20 |
| 23 | OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | Nport | 0.06% | $171,983 | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 24 | FDRV Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF | Fidelity | 0.65% | $145,125 | $22.3M | 2026-10-20 |
| 25 | HAIL State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.79% | $127,922 | $16.2M | 2026-10-20 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $6.14M | $-79.62M | $-1.23 | $-31.17M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $6.26M | $-34.98M | $-0.56 | $-25.85M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $5.62M | $-25.31M | $-0.40 | $-22.15M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $3.58M | $107.50M | $-0.52 | $-32.31M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $5.51M | $-192.74M | $-3.49 | $-29.82M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $3.37M | $-34.87M | $-0.64 | $-30.79M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $2.70M | $-36.15M | $-0.67 | $-20.90M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $2.25M | $-37.40M | $-0.70 | $-25.89M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $2.01M | $-43.39M | $-0.82 | $-29.16M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $2.11M | $-35.33M | $-0.67 | $-30.96M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $1.61M | $-44.97M | $-0.93 | $-27.33M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $810.00K | $-33.24M | $-0.75 | $-28.07M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.