ARCO ARCOS DORADOS HOLDINGS INC.
XNYS
7.92
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $6.67 – $9.75
- YTD
- +8.64%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 17.8
- Straddle Price
- $1.05
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 172.62
- Market Cap
- $1.7B
- Open
- $8.00
- Day Range
- $7.88 – $8.08
- Volume
- 400,890
- Prev Close
- $8.09
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.15% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.69 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 8.58% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 5.27% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +79.0pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Debt / Equity | 1.46 |
| Quality Score | 0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $7.82 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $7.69 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 288.7% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.8B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $6.28 | 100% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 35.5× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 14.7× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | median 7.8× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 1.4× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $7.82 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $8.09 | 0% | 5 strikes · skew +0.28 |
- Industry (SIC)
- RETAIL-EATING PLACES (5812) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $1.7B
- Employees
- 96,782
- List Date
- 2011-04-14
- CIK
- 0001508478
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-12 (Pre-Market)
- EPS Forecast
- $0.17 (2 est.)
- Homepage
- https://www.arcosdorados.com
Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc operates McDonald's branded restaurants in various countries and territories in Latin America and the Caribbean. The Company manages its business as distinct geographic segments and its operations are divided into three geographic divisions, as follows: Brazil, the North Latin American division, or NOLAD, which is comprised of Costa Rica, Mexico, Panama, Puerto Rico, Martinique, Guadeloupe, French Guiana and the U.S. Virgin Islands of St. Croix and St. Thomas and the South Latin American division, or SLAD, which is comprised of Argentina, Chile, Ecuador, Peru, Urugua…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 1.44% | 7.49% | 9.25% | 1.31% | 3.33% | 12.21% | 5.84% |
| Feb | 6.46% | 13.01% | -3.05% | -8.56% | 0.66% | 6.80% | 2.55% |
| Mar | -7.29% | 2.52% | -6.55% | -5.92% | 6.19% | -6.57% | -2.94% |
| Apr | 11.48% | -11.04% | 4.47% | -3.58% | -7.05% | 6.83% | 0.19% |
| May | 10.98% | 9.37% | 6.16% | -10.56% | -1.85% | -0.91% | 2.20% |
| Jun | -10.23% | -14.03% | 17.41% | -5.96% | 6.77% | -8.20% | -2.37% |
| Jul | 2.96% | 5.07% | 10.35% | 7.33% | -16.56% | 1.30% | 1.74% |
| Aug | -12.36% | -0.68% | -10.84% | -8.05% | 7.03% | -4.46% | -4.89% |
| Sep | -6.23% | 0.00% | -4.54% | 1.28% | -2.60% | -11.29% | -3.90% |
| Oct | -6.84% | -1.57% | -3.11% | -11.81% | 7.17% | 14.76%* | -0.23% |
| Nov | 6.03% | -2.85% | 22.78% | -4.60% | 7.51% | -- | 5.77% |
| Dec | 20.21% | 13.90% | 4.53% | -10.89% | -2.39% | -- | 5.07% |
| Total | 11.72% | 18.40% | 50.53% | -47.04% | 5.25% | 7.20% | 7.68% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers and Primary Risks:
- Technical signals are mixed, with RSI indicating neutrality, while MACD is bearish
- Recent news headlines are generally positive, but some negative sentiment exists
- Volatility metrics suggest moderate risk
Investment Thesis: ARCO's recent performance has been driven by positive earnings releases and a strong options market. However, the stock's technical indicators are mixed, suggesting potential for both upside and downside movements.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The majority of recent news headlines have been neutral or positive, with some negative sentiment detected in one headline. This could be contributing to the bearish MACD signal.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: NEUTRAL (SMA 20 and SMA 50 are near current price)
- Medium-term: BEARISH (SMA 200 is below current price, indicating a potential downtrend)
- Long-term: NEUTRAL (no clear trend exists)
Support/Resistance Levels: $8.07 (current price), $8.28 (SMA 20), and $8.48 (upper Bollinger Band) are key levels to monitor.
Momentum Signals:
- RSI: Neutral (42.47)
- MACD: Bearish (-0.01 / Signal: 0.00 / Histogram: -0.02)
- Bollinger Bands: Oversold
Volume Analysis: Volume is trending downward, indicating decreasing institutional interest and potential market sentiment shift.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The majority of recent news headlines have been neutral or positive, with some negative sentiment detected in one headline.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is NEUTRAL, but with a slightly positive bias due to the number of positive headlines.
Catalyst Identification: Earnings releases and product launches could be key catalysts for ARCO's future performance.
Market Narrative: The technical signals are mixed, which may indicate that market participants are waiting for additional information or a catalyst before making significant decisions about the stock.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Beta is 0.99, indicating moderate risk relative to the S&P 500.
Volatility Regime: Moderate volatility exists, with a high IV rank and current IV of 121.5%.
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: Medium
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: 0.30 (Bullish sentiment)
- Market Expectation: Options market pricing $1.27 move by expiration
Downside Protection: The lower Bollinger Band and SMA 200 provide support levels to monitor.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: ARCO's sector has been performing relatively well, with a slight decline in recent weeks.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest decreasing institutional interest.
Correlation Analysis: Correlation is moderate (0.36) and positive, indicating that the stock generally follows market trends.
Relative Valuation: ARCO's price is slightly below its historical average, indicating potential value.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: $8.07 (current price), $8.28 (SMA 20), and $8.48 (upper Bollinger Band) are key levels to monitor for potential breaks or bounces.
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: The upper Bollinger Band ($8.48) is a potential breakout level, while the SMA 200 is a potential breakdown level.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings releases and product launches could be key catalysts in the near term.
Risk Management: Consider setting stop-loss levels at $7.80 (5% below current price) or implementing position sizing strategies based on market volatility.
Please let me know if you need any further information or clarification!
ARCO Options Activity & IV Rank
ARCO IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 12th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $11.3M | #1493 of 3716 | +922.1% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $8.0M | #830 of 1945 | +102.6% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $4.7M | #2148 of 6285 | +257.3% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $4.2M | #1051 of 4729 | -0.8% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
ARCO Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $214.40K | 43.58% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $156.64K | 31.84% | 2025-09-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $113.65K | 23.10% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $4.03K | 0.82% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $3.22K | 0.66% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $93.50K | 46.96% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $92.69K | 46.56% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $12.90K | 6.48% | 2026-06-30 |
ARCO Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-08-25| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-25 | Artigas Carlos Hernandez | Director | Sell (S) | −32,343 | $8.11 | -$262.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-28 | Artigas Carlos Hernandez | Director | Sell (S) | −20,000 | $9.01 | -$180.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-12 | Michael Chu | Director | Grant (A) | +4,435 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-12 | Annette Franqui | Director | Grant (A) | +4,435 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-12 | Cadavid Jose Alberto Velez | Director | Grant (A) | +4,435 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-12 | Jose Raul Fernandez | Director | Grant (A) | +4,435 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-12 | Mariano Tannenbaum | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | — | $9.02 | -$203.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-12 | Marcelo Rabach | Director | Grant (A) | +4,435 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-12 | Cristina Presz Palmaka De Luca | Director | Grant (A) | +4,435 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-12 | Woods Staton | Executive Chairman | Mixed | — | $9.02 | -$525.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-12 | Avila Carlos Eduardo Gonzalez | Chief Operating Officer | Mixed | — | $9.02 | -$67.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-12 | Artigas Carlos Hernandez | Director | Grant (A) | +4,435 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-12 | Sergio Daniel Alonso | Director | Grant (A) | +4,435 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-12 | Martin Karla Paola Berman | Director | Grant (A) | +4,435 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-12 | Luis Alberto Raganato | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | — | $9.02 | -$218.6K | EDGAR |
ARCO Insider Holdings
12 insiders · @ $7.92| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Artigas Carlos Hernandez | Director | 305,711 | $2.42M | -$442.5K | 4 | 2026-08-25 |
| 2 | Sergio Daniel Alonso | Director | 238,935 | $1.89M | $0 | 2 | 2026-05-12 |
| 3 | Woods Staton | Executive Chairman | 164,336 | $1.30M | $0 | 1 | 2026-05-12 |
| 4 | Mariano Tannenbaum | Chief Financial Officer | 87,063 | $690.0K | $0 | 1 | 2026-05-12 |
| 5 | Luis Alberto Raganato | Chief Executive Officer | 60,034 | $475.8K | $0 | 1 | 2026-05-12 |
| 6 | Jose Raul Fernandez | Director | 49,191 | $389.8K | $0 | 2 | 2026-05-12 |
| 7 | Annette Franqui | Director | 30,940 | $245.2K | $0 | 2 | 2026-05-12 |
| 8 | Francisco Alberto Staton | Director | 13,033 | $103.3K | $0 | 1 | 2026-05-12 |
| 9 | Michael Chu | Director | 10,796 | $85.6K | $0 | 2 | 2026-05-12 |
| 10 | Avila Carlos Eduardo Gonzalez | Chief Operating Officer | 7,522 | $59.6K | $0 | 1 | 2026-05-12 |
ARCO Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Aug 25, 2026Directors 13
- Annette Franqui · since Mar 18, 2026
- Artigas Carlos Hernandez · since Mar 18, 2026
- Cadavid Jose Alberto Velez · since Mar 18, 2026
- Cristina Presz Palmaka De Luca · since Mar 18, 2026
- Francisco Alberto Staton · since Mar 18, 2026
- Jose Raul Fernandez · since Mar 18, 2026
- Marcelo Rabach · since Mar 18, 2026
- Martin Karla Paola Berman · since Mar 18, 2026
- Michael Chu · since Mar 18, 2026
- Sergio Daniel Alonso · since Mar 18, 2026
- Woods Staton · since Mar 18, 2026
- Alicia Staton · since Apr 10, 2026
- Mario Eugenio Quintana · since Apr 10, 2026
Officers 4
- Luis Alberto Raganato · Chief Executive Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Mariano Tannenbaum · Chief Financial Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Avila Carlos Eduardo Gonzalez · Chief Operating Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Woods Staton · Executive Chairman · since Mar 18, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (17)
| Apr 10, 2026 | Mario Eugenio Quintana became a director |
| Apr 10, 2026 | Alicia Staton became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Woods Staton became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Woods Staton became Executive Chairman |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Sergio Daniel Alonso became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Michael Chu became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Martin Karla Paola Berman became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Mariano Tannenbaum became Chief Financial Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Marcelo Rabach became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Luis Alberto Raganato became Chief Executive Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Jose Raul Fernandez became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Francisco Alberto Staton became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Cristina Presz Palmaka De Luca became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Cadavid Jose Alberto Velez became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Avila Carlos Eduardo Gonzalez became Chief Operating Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Artigas Carlos Hernandez became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Annette Franqui became a director |
ARCO Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2025-03-17What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-17 | Rabach Marcelo | Officer | 100,000 | $834.0K | 2025-03-17 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-27 | BASTIDAS SALDARRIAGA JUAN DAVID | Officer | 7,889 | $64.3K | 2024-11-27 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-08-30 | Annette Franqui | Director | 200,000 | — | 2024-08-30 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-21 | Erica Roberts | Affiliate | 20,000 | $226.8K | 2023-11-21 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-20 | Staton Woods | Director | 25,047 | $285.7K | 2023-11-20 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ARGT Global X MSCI Argentina ETF | Global X | 3.17% | $21.9M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 2 | PEJ Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF | Invesco | 2.81% | $10.1M | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 3 | PBJ Invesco Food & Beverage ETF | Nport | 2.57% | $2.8M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 4 | SMLV State Street® SPDR® US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.18% | $445,316 | $248.6M | 2026-10-20 |
| 5 | BRF VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF | VanEck | 1.55% | $429,190 | $27.2M | 2026-10-20 |
| 6 | JLVP JPMorgan U.S. Large Cap Value Plus ETF | JPMorgan | 0.27% | $78,408 | $28.6M | 2026-10-21 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '22 | 2022-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '21 | 2021-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '20 | 2020-12-31 | $607.39M | $22.04M | $0.12 | $66.15M |
| Q1 '20 | 2020-03-31 | $617.50M | $-52.33M | $-0.25 | $-56.09M |
| Q4 '19 | 2019-12-31 | $754.37M | $32.96M | $0.15 | $85.70M |
| Q1 '19 | 2019-03-31 | $731.00M | $12.16M | $0.06 | $28.00M |
| Q4 '18 | 2018-12-31 | $753.34M | $9.24M | $0.05 | $95.33M |
| Q1 '18 | 2018-03-31 | $849.89M | $518.00K | — | $-25.85M |
| Q4 '17 | 2017-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.