BMOP BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF
ETFETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF (BMOP) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Inception
- 2008-10-15
- Has Options
- No
- Expense ratio
- 0.54% prospectus, filed Dec 12, 2025
- Assets
- $1.8B SEC filing, May 29, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 2.67% paid monthly
- Average daily volume
- $8.2M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 667 top 10 are 8.3%
- Listed
- Oct 15, 2008 Nasdaq
- Last fee change
- -2 bp filed Dec 12, 2025
Moves with. Long Treasuries (20% of its variance, beta 0.16); US large-cap stocks (12% of its variance, beta 0.10); Emerging markets over US (4% of its variance, beta 0.02); Gold (4% of its variance, beta 0.02). These factors explain 38% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The fund seeks to maximize total return consisting of high current income exempt from federal income tax and capital appreciation. (from the fund's prospectus)
All 667 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll High Yield Muni ETFs
- May 2026
- −$9.9M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- −$60M −3.3% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- —
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| May 2026 | −$9.9M |
| Apr 2026 | −$30M |
| Mar 2026 | −$20M |
| Feb 2026 | −$10M |
| Jan 2026 | +$5.6M |
| Dec 2025 | $0 |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 6 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HYDVanEck High Yield Muni ETF | — | 0.32% | $4.1B | −5.3% | compare |
| HYMBState Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | — | 0.35% | $3.6B | −6.2% | compare |
| HIMUiShares High Yield Muni Active ETF | — | 0.39% | $2.4B | −6.7% | compare |
| FMHIFirst Trust Municipal High Income ETF | — | 0.70% | $1.0B | −6.0% | compare |
| SHYMiShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF | — | 0.40% | $839M | −3.5% | compare |
The largest other funds in the High Yield Muni category.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-06 | $0.0843 | CD |
| 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | $0.0794 | CD |
| 2026-08-03 | 2026-08-06 | $0.0839 | CD |
| 2026-07-01 | 2026-07-07 | $0.0795 | CD |
| 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-04 | $0.0618 | CD |
| 2026-05-01 | 2026-05-06 | $0.0582 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | NEW YORK ST DORM AUTH | 1.24% | Debt | US |
| — | LOS ANGELES CALIF DEPT ARPTS | 1.21% | Debt | US |
| — | INTERMOUNTAIN POWER AGENCY (UT) | 0.89% | Debt | US |
| — | PUERTO RICO AQUEDUCT AND SEWER AUTHORITY | 0.87% | Debt | US |
| — | CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY CHOICE FINANCING AUTHORITY (CA) | 0.78% | Debt | US |
| — | AUSTIN (TX), CITY OF | 0.73% | Debt | US |
| — | MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (MA) | 0.67% | Debt | US |
| — | BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM (TX) | 0.63% | Debt | US |
| — | MARYLAND HEALTH & HIGHER EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY (MD) | 0.63% | Debt | US |
| — | LOS ANGELES CITY DEPARTEMENT OF WATER AND POWER (CA) | 0.61% | Debt | US |
| — | WASHINGTON (WA), STATE OF | 0.61% | Debt | US |
| — | BLACK BELT ENERGY GAS DISTRICT (THE) (AL) | 0.59% | Debt | US |
| — | TENNERGY CORP (TN) | 0.59% | Debt | US |
| — | MAIN STREET NATURAL GAS INC (GA) | 0.59% | Debt | US |
| — | IDAHO HSG & FIN ASSN | 0.58% | Debt | US |
| — | CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY CHOICE FINANCING AUTHORITY (CA) | 0.58% | Debt | US |
| — | TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL AUTHORITY (NY) | 0.58% | Debt | US |
| — | MASSACHUSETTS SCHOOL BUILDING AUTHORITY (MA) | 0.57% | Debt | US |
| — | OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT (NE) | 0.57% | Debt | US |
| — | BLACK BELT ENERGY GAS DISTRICT (THE) (AL) | 0.56% | Debt | US |
| — | MASSACHUSETTS SCHOOL BUILDING AUTHORITY (MA) | 0.54% | Debt | US |
| — | HIGH STAR RANCH INFRASTRUCTURE FING DIST UTAH | 0.51% | Debt | US |
| — | LOUISIANA PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY (LA) | 0.50% | Debt | US |
| — | PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORP | 0.48% | Debt | US |
| — | LOS ANGELES CALIF DEPT ARPTS | 0.47% | Debt | US |
| — | WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY (DC) | 0.46% | Debt | US |
| — | MATCHING FUND SPECIAL PURPOSE SECURITIZATION CORP | 0.46% | Debt | US |
| — | CHICAGO ILL | 0.44% | Debt | US |
| — | CHICAGO CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION (IL) | 0.43% | Debt | US |
| — | TEXAS PRIVATE ACTIVITY BD SURFACE TRANSPORTATION CORP | 0.43% | Debt | US |
| — | NEW YORK TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORP (NY) | 0.43% | Debt | US |
| — | CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY (CA) | 0.42% | Debt | US |
| — | GOLDEN STATE TOBACCO SECURITIZATION CORP (CA) | 0.42% | Debt | US |
| — | PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY | 0.41% | Debt | US |
| — | MASSACHUSETTS (MA), COMMONWEALTH OF | 0.41% | Debt | US |
| — | BUILD NYC RESOURCE CORP N Y | 0.41% | Debt | US |
| — | OKLAHOMA CITY WATER UTILITIES TRUST (OK) | 0.41% | Debt | US |
| — | CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY CHOICE FINANCING AUTHORITY (CA) | 0.40% | Debt | US |
| — | ARKANSAS DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY (AR) | 0.40% | Debt | US |
| — | MASSACHUSETTS ST DEV FIN AGY | 0.40% | Debt | US |
| — | VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY (VA) | 0.39% | Debt | US |
| — | CALIFORNIA INFRASTRUCTURE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BANK (CA) | 0.39% | Debt | US |
| — | RHODE ISLAND HEALTH AND EDUCATIONAL BUILDING CORP (RI) | 0.39% | Debt | US |
| — | CHICAGO CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION (IL) | 0.39% | Debt | US |
| — | OKLAHOMA CITY WATER UTILITIES TRUST (OK) | 0.38% | Debt | US |
| — | VIRGINIA COLLEGE BUILDING AUTHORITY (VA) | 0.37% | Debt | US |
| — | METROPOLITAN TRANSN AUTH N Y | 0.37% | Debt | US |
| — | SAN FRANCISCO CITY AND COUNTY AIRPORT COMMISSION (CA) | 0.37% | Debt | US |
| — | CHICAGO (IL), CITY OF | 0.36% | Debt | US |
| — | CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY CHOICE FINANCING AUTHORITY (CA) | 0.36% | Debt | US |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Municipal | 101.18% | $1.81B | 664 |
| Corporate | 0.20% | $3.5M | 1 |
| Derivative (equity) | 0.00% | $30096 | 1 |
| Derivative (interest rate) | -0.01% | $-161486 | 1 |
| Month | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Feb | 1.26% | 1.26% |
| Mar | -1.87% | -1.87% |
| Apr | 1.11% | 1.11% |
| May | 0.57% | 0.57% |
| Jun | 1.20% | 1.20% |
| Jul | -1.85% | -1.85% |
| Aug | -0.08% | -0.08% |
| Sep | -3.59% | -3.59% |
| Oct | -0.51%* | -0.51% |
| Nov | -- | -- |
| Dec | -- | -- |
| Total | -3.81% | -3.81% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: BMOP
Executive Summary
- Overall assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level 6/10
- Key drivers: Trend direction, momentum signals, and risk metrics
- Primary risks: Volatility regime and options market signals
- Recent news sentiment impact: No recent news available, hence no significant impact
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Neutral, Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish, Long-term (3-12 months): Bearish
Support/Resistance Levels: SMA 20 and SMA 50 act as support levels, while the upper Bollinger Band serves as resistance.
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral range (30-70)
- MACD signal: Bearish
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze
Volume Analysis: Volume trend is bearish, with a decline in volume rate of change. Institutional interest signals are mixed.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news available
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral due to lack of recent news
Catalyst Identification: None identified
Market Narrative: The absence of recent news creates a neutral market narrative, allowing technical signals to drive the analysis.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low risk (beta <0.8)
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is low relative to historical levels
Options Market Signals: IV premium vs HV30 is N/A, indicating no significant options activity
Downside Protection: Support levels at SMA 20 and SMA 50 provide a buffer against potential downside moves.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: BMOP's performance is neutral relative to the sector
Institutional Activity: Mixed institutional interest signals from volume trends
Correlation Analysis: The stock has a low correlation (0.5) with the market, indicating it may move independently of broader market trends
Relative Valuation: Positioning within a trading range, with no significant overbought or oversold conditions.
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical Price Levels: SMA 20 and SMA 50 serve as support levels
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Upper Bollinger Band serves as resistance; lower Bollinger Band provides potential support
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: None identified
- Risk Management: Monitor volume trends for institutional interest signals and adjust position sizing accordingly.
This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of BMOP's technical, news, and risk metrics. The neutral overall assessment reflects the stock's mixed signals, with no significant recent news or catalysts driving the price action. Risk management considerations focus on monitoring volume trends and adjusting position sizes to mitigate potential downside risks.
BMOP Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 187
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
BMOP Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|