CLPR Clipper Realty Inc.
XNYS 3.21 DelayedStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
What changed
Recent filings, trades and moves- 52-Week Range
- $2.69 – $3.92
- YTD
- -9.83%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 24.43
- Straddle Price
- $8.25
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.39
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- Open
- $3.21
- Day Range
- $3.21 – $3.21
- Volume
- 138
- Prev Close
- $3.20
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.86% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.74 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 8.58% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.67% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +119.1pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -2.4% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 36.0% |
| Book / Price | -184.8% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 100.0% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 10.0% |
| Quality Score | 3/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $3.24 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $3.20 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 12.0% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $13.34 | 23% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $4.24 | 18% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 22.6× · 6 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $59.08 | 10% | median 13.8× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | median 1.0× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $37.16 | 7% | median 4.0× · 7 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $3.24 | 41% | stability 90% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
- Industry (SIC)
- REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (6798) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- Employees
- 161
- List Date
- 2017-02-10
- CIK
- 0001649096
- Last Earnings
- Nov 4 after close · −0.9% vs ±32.3% expected
- Headquarters
- Brooklyn, NY
- Homepage
- https://www.clipperrealty.com
Clipper Realty Inc is a self-administered and self-managed real estate company. It acquires, owns, manages, operates, and repositions multifamily residential and commercial properties in the New York metropolitan area, with a portfolio in Manhattan and Brooklyn. It has classified its reporting segments into Residential Rental Properties and Commercial Rental Properties. The company derives its revenue mostly from the Residential segment.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 1.89% | -7.75% | 4.45% | -5.60% | -8.11% | -1.97% | -2.85% |
| Feb | 22.27% | 5.31% | -6.34% | -7.51% | 16.42% | -9.94% | 3.37% |
| Mar | -10.00% | -4.93% | -11.83% | 3.65% | -12.73% | -5.92% | -6.96% |
| Apr | 2.49% | -2.08% | -3.31% | -12.32% | -7.46% | 14.92% | -1.29% |
| May | -6.36% | -3.75% | 2.63% | -7.36% | 5.85% | -5.99% | -2.50% |
| Jun | -9.15% | -7.88% | 5.00% | -7.67% | -12.62% | -18.32% | -8.44% |
| Jul | 12.13% | 14.78% | 12.48% | 7.07% | -8.18% | -0.18% | 6.35% |
| Aug | 1.69% | -5.93% | -7.93% | 30.16% | 30.23% | 19.64% | 11.31% |
| Sep | -6.90% | -17.32% | -13.23% | 18.01% | -12.84% | -3.08% | -5.89% |
| Oct | 5.41% | -0.84% | -6.31% | 15.44% | 1.30% | 3.86% | 3.14% |
| Nov | -0.46% | 9.70% | 9.21% | -14.24% | -3.74% | -6.14%* | -0.94% |
| Dec | 21.66% | -15.01% | 4.05% | -4.38% | 5.23% | -- | 2.31% |
| Total | 32.48% | -33.82% | -14.02% | 5.67% | -14.54% | -17.30% | -6.92% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
SYMBOL: CLPR
Executive Summary Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Technical signals indicate a neutral trend, with momentum oscillators suggesting potential support around $3.54.
- Recent news sentiment is unclear due to the lack of recent headlines.
Primary Risks:
- Volatility is moderate, and the stock generally follows market movements.
- Options market pricing suggests a $1.00 move by expiration, which may be driven by earnings or regulatory events.
Investment Thesis: CLPR appears poised for consolidation, with potential support around $3.54. The lack of recent news headlines limits our confidence in predicting significant price moves. We suggest monitoring technical signals and staying attuned to any upcoming catalysts that could impact the stock's trajectory.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The absence of recent headlines means we cannot assess sentiment or identify specific drivers for the stock. As more information becomes available, this assessment will be refined.
Technical Analysis Trend Direction: Short-term: Neutral Medium-term: Neutral Long-term: Uptrend
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $3.54
- Upper Bollinger Band: $4.00
- SMA 20: $3.77
- SMA 50: $3.92
Momentum Signals: RSI (14): Neutral at 38.41, indicating no clear buy or sell signal. MACD: Bearish with a histogram reading of -0.08.
Volume Analysis: Volume SMA 20: 58632.00, indicating moderate volume activity. On-Balance Volume (OBV) has been decreasing, suggesting a potential downtrend in buying pressure.
News & Sentiment Analysis Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news available
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral sentiment due to the lack of recent headlines and unclear market drivers.
Catalyst Identification: Earnings information is currently unavailable. The options market suggests a $1.00 move by expiration, which may be driven by earnings or regulatory events.
Market Narrative: The lack of recent news headlines limits our ability to assess market sentiment. We will need more information to refine this assessment and predict the stock's trajectory.
Risk & Volatility Assessment Beta Interpretation: Moderate risk with a beta of 0.99 relative to the SPY.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is moderate, similar to historical levels.
Options Market Signals: IV Rank: Medium at 47.4%, indicating historically average volatility. Put/Call Volume Ratio: Bearish at 8.75.
Downside Protection: Support levels include the lower Bollinger Band at $3.54 and SMA 20 at $3.77.
Market Context & Positioning Sector Performance: CLPR is trading within its sector's performance, with no clear outperformance or underperformance evident.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest moderate institutional interest, but this may be driven by market trends rather than specific stock drivers.
Correlation Analysis: The stock generally follows market movements, with a correlation coefficient of 0.29.
Relative Valuation: CLPR is trading within its sector's relative valuation, with no clear overvaluation or undervaluation evident.
Key Levels & Action Items Critical Price Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $3.54
- Upper Bollinger Band: $4.00
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- SMA 20: $3.77
- SMA 50: $3.92
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings information is currently unavailable, but the options market suggests a potential earnings-driven move.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set around $3.54, with position sizing considerations based on the stock's volatility and trading range.
By analyzing the provided data, we have identified a neutral trend with potential support around $3.54. The lack of recent news headlines limits our confidence in predicting significant price moves. We suggest monitoring technical signals and staying attuned to any upcoming catalysts that could impact the stock's trajectory.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-09 | After-Close | 2.58% | 4.85% | 1.88x | Exceeded |
| 2022-03-15 | After-Close | 3.15% | 2.94% | 0.93x | Within |
| 2022-05-10 | After-Close | 14.42% | 1.92% | 0.13x | Within |
| 2022-08-10 | After-Close | 11.84% | 0.89% | 0.08x | Within |
| 2022-11-09 | After-Close | 2.49% | 9.95% | 4.00x | Exceeded |
| 2023-03-16 | After-Close | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00x | Within |
| 2023-05-04 | After-Close | 11.26% | 4.50% | 0.40x | Within |
| 2023-08-03 | After-Close | 30.37% | 2.18% | 0.07x | Within |
| 2023-11-02 | After-Close | 6.28% | 2.09% | 0.33x | Within |
| 2024-03-14 | After-Close | 8.03% | 3.81% | 0.47x | Within |
| 2024-05-07 | After-Close | 31.14% | 2.78% | 0.09x | Within |
| 2024-08-01 | Pre-Market | 93.27% | 4.06% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2024-10-31 | After-Close | 20.14% | 10.33% | 0.51x | Within |
| 2025-02-14 | After-Close | 22.73% | 12.53% | 0.55x | Within |
| 2025-05-12 | After-Close | 24.15% | 0.48% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2025-08-07 | After-Close | 29.83% | 13.92% | 0.47x | Within |
| 2025-11-13 | After-Close | 94.67% | 2.13% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2026-02-26 | Pre-Market | 318.51% | 1.75% | 0.01x | Within |
| 2026-05-14 | After-Close | 17.22% | 3.31% | 0.19x | Within |
| 2026-08-06 | After-Close | 76.79% | 2.14% | 0.03x | Within |
| 2026-11-04 | After-Close | 32.28% | 0.90% | 0.03x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
CLPR Options Activity & IV Rank
CLPR IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow · All expiries
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 22nd percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $289K | #3364 of 3716 | new | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $246K | #2832 of 3138 | -4.6% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $242K | #5292 of 6285 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
CLPR Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 21 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $486.34K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $238.00K | 81.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $54.40K | 18.60% | 2026-06-30 |
CLPR Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-02| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | Sam Levinson | Director | Gift (G) | +1,950,993 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-02 | David Bistricer | Co-Chairman and CEO | Mixed Other −4,945,253 · Gift +1,762,640 |
−3,182,613 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-30 | Jacob Bistricer | Chief Operating Officer | Mixed Buy +73,500 · Gift −63,000 |
+10,500 | $3.35 | $246.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-25 | Sam Levinson | Director | Buy (P) | +22,923 | $3.38 | $77.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-16 | Sam Levinson | Director | Buy (P) | +9,084 | $3.29 | $29.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-10 | Sam Levinson | Director | Buy (P) | +117,552 | $3.30 | $388.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-02 | Sam Levinson | Director | Buy (P) | +8,063 | $3.24 | $26.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-20 | Sam Levinson | Director | Buy (P) | +98,635 | $3.15 | $310.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-14 | Sam Levinson | Director | Buy (P) | +154,764 | $3.16 | $488.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-11 | Roberto Angelo Verrone | Director | Exer (M) | +11,020 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-26 | Lawrence E Kreider | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +71,686 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-26 | Roberto Angelo Verrone | Director | Grant (A) | +7,961 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-26 | Richard N Burger | Director | Grant (A) | +7,961 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-26 | Robert Jay Ivanhoe | Director | Grant (A) | +7,961 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-26 | Jacob Bistricer | Chief Operating Officer | Grant (A) | +76,637 RSU | — | EDGAR |
CLPR Insider Holdings
6 insiders · @ $3.21| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David Bistricer | Co-Chairman and CEO | 5,347,573 | $17.17M | $9.95M | 20 | 2026-10-02 |
| 2 | Sam Levinson | Director | 4,735,249 | $15.20M | $7.65M | 27 | 2026-10-02 |
| 3 | Jacob Bistricer | Chief Operating Officer | 136,500 | $438.2K | $246.2K | 12 | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | Roberto Angelo Verrone | Director | 26,999 | $86.7K | $0 | 11 | 2026-03-11 |
| 5 | Howard M Lorber | Director | 25,369 | $81.4K | $229.2K | 11 | 2026-02-26 |
| 6 | Harmon Spolan | Director | 1,000 | $3.2K | $6.2K | 9 | 2026-02-26 |
CLPR Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 2, 2026Directors 7
- David Bistricer · since Feb 9, 2017
- Howard M Lorber · since Feb 9, 2017
- Robert Jay Ivanhoe · since Feb 9, 2017
- Roberto Angelo Verrone · since Feb 9, 2017
- Sam Levinson · since Feb 9, 2017
- Harmon Spolan · since Feb 1, 2018
- Richard N Burger · since Feb 1, 2018
Officers 4
- David Bistricer · Co-Chairman and CEO · since Feb 9, 2017
- Lawrence E Kreider · Chief Financial Officer · since Feb 9, 2017
- Jacob Bistricer · Chief Operating Officer · since Feb 9, 2017
- Jacob Schwimmer · Chief Property Mgmt Officer · listed since Jul 2022
10% owners 2
- David Bistricer · since Feb 9, 2017
- Sam Levinson · since Feb 9, 2017
Changes in the last 10 years (16)
| Jul 27, 2022 | Jacob Schwimmer listed as Chief Property Mgmt Officer (previously Chief PM Offcier) in SEC filings |
| Jul 1, 2019 | Michael Charles Frenz became Chief Financial Officer |
| Feb 1, 2018 | Richard N Burger became a director |
| Feb 1, 2018 | Harmon Spolan became a director |
| Apr 21, 2017 | Jacob Schwimmer listed as Chief PM Offcier (previously Chief Property Mgmt Officer) in SEC filings |
| Feb 9, 2017 | Sam Levinson became a director |
| Feb 9, 2017 | Sam Levinson became a 10% owner |
| Feb 9, 2017 | Roberto Angelo Verrone became a director |
| Feb 9, 2017 | Robert Jay Ivanhoe became a director |
| Feb 9, 2017 | Lawrence E Kreider became Chief Financial Officer |
| Feb 9, 2017 | Jacob Schwimmer became Chief Property Mgmt Officer |
| Feb 9, 2017 | Jacob Bistricer became Chief Operating Officer |
| Feb 9, 2017 | Howard M Lorber became a director |
| Feb 9, 2017 | David Bistricer became a director |
| Feb 9, 2017 | David Bistricer became a 10% owner |
| Feb 9, 2017 | David Bistricer became Co-Chairman and CEO |
Not reported recently (1)
- Michael Charles Frenz · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Mar 16, 2021
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RIET Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF | Nport | 1.39% | $1.5M | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 2 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $565,497 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $506,596 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $271,033 | — | 2026-11-09 |
| 5 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $138,911 | $1.2B | 2026-11-09 |
| 6 | DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $47,911 | $4.0B | 2026-11-09 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $38.12M | $-4.91M | $-0.30 | $3.57M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $37.07M | $-4.87M | $-0.31 | $6.11M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $37.70M | $-2.33M | $-0.14 | $1.42M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $39.04M | $-1.10M | $-0.07 | $8.37M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $39.40M | $-13.93M | $-0.86 | $6.68M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $38.05M | $-787.00K | $-0.05 | $10.53M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $37.62M | $-781.00K | $-0.05 | $6.29M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $37.35M | $-1.03M | $-0.06 | $8.79M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $35.76M | $-1.38M | $-0.09 | $6.25M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $34.87M | $-116.00K | $-0.09 | $8.23M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $35.13M | $-1.20M | $-0.09 | $-91.00K |
| Q2 '23 | 2023-06-30 | $34.54M | $-1.57M | $-0.10 | $9.80M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
CLPR vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLY Annaly Capital Management. Inc. | $14.9B | 4.6 | +18.8% | −19.1% | 37 |
| DOC Healthpeak Properties, Inc. | $14.2B | 37.6 | +9.3% | +25.2% | 22 |
| AGNC AGNC Investment Corp. Common Stock | $11.4B | 864.5 | — | −20.9% | 72 |
| RITM Rithm Capital Corp. | $5.3B | 14.6 | +17.2% | −16.4% | 15 |
| APLE Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. | $4.6B | 27.1 | +1.2% | +66.1% | 17 |
| KRC Kilroy Realty Corp. | $4.3B | 142.9 | −3.6% | −6.0% | 31 |
| HIW Highwoods Properties Inc. | $3.5B | 18.3 | +5.4% | +19.6% | 15 |
| GNL Global Net Lease, Inc. | $1.5B | — | −14.8% | −22.6% | 45 |
| CLPR Clipper Realty Inc. Common Stock | $53M | — | −0.3% | −9.8% | 24 |
| Peer median | $5.0B | 27.1 | +5.4% | −11.2% | 26 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.