CRAN Crane Harbor Acquisition Corp. II

XNAS
Find condors

Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

CRAN — —

What changed

Recent filings, trades and moves
Key stats
About
Industry (SIC)
BLANK CHECKS (6770)
Exchange
XNAS
Market Cap
$0.5B
List Date
2026-01-12
CIK
0002081358
Headquarters
Philadelphia, PA

Crane Harbor Acquisition Corp II is a blank check company formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, amalgamation, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses or entities.

Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.

Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.

Chart
Seasonality
Month'26Avg
Jan1.01%1.01%
Feb-0.20%-0.20%
Mar-0.30%-0.30%
Apr1.01%1.01%
May0.30%0.30%
Jun0.60%0.60%
Jul0.10%0.10%
Aug0.00%0.00%
Sep-0.39%-0.39%
Oct0.30%0.30%
Nov0.00%*0.00%
Dec----
Total2.45%2.45%
* Only 1 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $10.11
SMA 50: $10.13
SMA 200: —
Current: $10.12
EMA 12: $10.12
EMA 26: $10.12
MACD: 0.0017 | Signal: 0.0038
BEARISH
ADX (14): 59.92
STRONG TREND
+DI: 16.56
−DI: 53.00

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 51.94
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 58.97
Stoch %D: 68.92
Williams %R: -46.15

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $10.14
BB Lower: $10.07
NEUTRAL
OBV: -683,089
Vol SMA 20: 152,713
Vol ROC: -88.50%
ATR: $0.03
True Range: $0.01
HV 20: 1.9%
HV 30: 1.8%
HV 60: 2.1%

Data Summary

Data Points: 145
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2026-01-12T00:00:00 – 2026-11-09T00:00:00
AI Analysis

Click Frenzy-Pro™ for an AI analysis of this ticker.

Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.

CRAN Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Loading the implied volatility surface…

Volatility Smile

Loading the implied volatility smile…

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 0.0146
Alpha: 3.60%
Correlation: 0.0822
R-Squared: 0.7%
Stock Volatility: 2.7%
Market Volatility: 15.0%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 144
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own CRAN
1 of 37 tracked investors
InvestorValueShare of their portfolioRankQ/Q sharesSource
Millennium Management Hedge fund
Izzy Englander
$3.5M
0.00%
#2260 of 3716new13F

Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions

CRAN Institutional Ownership (13F)

Filings for 2026-06-30 · 11 already for 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

60 filers28,065,490 shares$283.34M value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 ADAGE CAPITAL PARTNERS GP, L.L.C. 2,700,000 $27.35M 9.65% — 2026-06-30
2 Meteora Capital, LLC 2,397,812 $24.29M 8.57% — 2026-06-30
3 Linden Advisors LP 1,200,000 $12.17M 4.29% — 2026-06-30
4 TENOR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT Co., L.P. 1,100,000 $11.14M 3.93% — 2026-06-30
5 AQR Arbitrage LLC 1,071,509 $10.87M 3.83% — 2026-06-30
6 HIGHBRIDGE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1,000,000 $10.13M 3.58% — 2026-06-30
7 Polar Asset Management Partners Inc. 1,000,000 $10.13M 3.58% — 2026-06-30
8 Verition Fund Management LLC 907,417 $9.20M 3.25% — 2026-06-30
9 Magnetar Financial LLC 900,000 $9.13M 3.22% — 2026-06-30
10 HEALTHCARE OF ONTARIO PENSION PLAN TRUST FUND 900,000 $9.13M 3.22% — 2026-06-30
11 Governors Lane LP 900,100 $9.12M 3.22% — 2026-06-30
12 D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian 691,560 $7.01M 2.47% — 2026-06-30
13 MMCAP International Inc. SPC 650,000 $6.58M 2.32% — 2026-06-30
14 BNP Paribas Financial Markets Custodian 647,184 $6.56M 2.32% — 2026-06-30
15 Radcliffe Capital Management, L.P. 633,764 $6.42M 2.27% — 2026-06-30
16 Alberta Investment Management Corp 600,000 $6.08M 2.15% — 2026-06-30
17 First Trust Capital Management L.P. 600,000 $6.06M 2.14% — 2026-09-30
18 Periscope Capital Inc. 545,000 $5.52M 1.95% — 2026-09-30
19 Two Sigma Investments, LP Custodian 543,750 $5.51M 1.94% — 2026-06-30
20 Hudson Bay Capital Management LP 525,000 $5.32M 1.88% — 2026-06-30
21 PICTON MAHONEY ASSET MANAGEMENT 500,000 $5.07M 1.79% — 2026-06-30
22 RIVERNORTH CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC 500,000 $5.07M 1.79% — 2026-06-30
23 Centiva Capital, LP 490,000 $4.97M 1.75% — 2026-06-30
24 SONA ASSET MANAGEMENT (US) LLC 451,963 $4.58M 1.62% — 2026-06-30
25 ARISTEIA CAPITAL, L.L.C. 450,000 $4.56M 1.61% — 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period

CRAN Board & Officers

As of SEC filings through Jan 27, 2026

Directors 7

Officers 3

10% owners 2

  • Crane Harbor Sponsor II, LLC (entity) · since Dec 15, 2025
  • William Fradin · since Dec 15, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (12)
Dec 15, 2025William Fradin became a director
Dec 15, 2025William Fradin became a 10% owner
Dec 15, 2025William Fradin became Chief Executive Officer
Dec 15, 2025Thomas C Elliott became Chief Financial Officer
Dec 15, 2025Stephen James Howard became a director
Dec 15, 2025Robert W Karlovich III became a director
Dec 15, 2025Koryn Estrada became a director
Dec 15, 2025Jonathan Z Cohen became a director
Dec 15, 2025Jeffrey F Brotman became COO & Chief Legal Officer
Dec 15, 2025Edward E Cohen became a director
Dec 15, 2025Crane Harbor Sponsor II, LLC became a 10% owner
Dec 15, 2025Adam Guren became a director
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-11-06
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
Filing Date Event Link
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
Filing Date Accession Link
Quarterly report — unaudited financials and MD&A. Filed 40–45 days after each of the first three fiscal quarters.
Filing Date Accession Link
2026-11-06 0001213900-26-116963 EDGAR
2026-08-12 0001213900-26-088374 EDGAR
ETF Holders
# ETF Provider Weight $ Exposure ETF AUM As Of
Fundamentals

Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.

Metrics
  • Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
  • Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
  • Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
  • Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
  • YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
  • Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
  • Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.

TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.

CRAN vs Peers

Related companies, largest first
Company Market cap P/E Revenue growth YTD IV rank
CCCX Churchill Capital Corp X Class A Ordinar $711M — — −19.1% —
DMII Drugs Made In America Acquisition II Cor $650M — — +3.3% —
EVAC EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II $606M — — +3.3% —
BCSS Bain Capital GSS Investment Corp. $598M — — +1.3% —
CEPF Cantor Equity Partners IV, Inc. Class A $589M — — −0.0% —
CXII Churchill Capital Corp XII Class A Ordin $575M — — +2.8% —
AEXA American Exceptionalism Acquisition Corp $526M — — −7.3% 17
CAEP Cantor Equity Partners III, Inc. Class A $526M — — +46.9% —
CRAN Crane Harbor Acquisition Corp. II Class $475M — — +2.2% —
Peer median $593M — — +2.0% 17

P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.