MarketWatchT3·44mo ago
EVF Eaton Vance Senior Income Trust
XNYS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
EVF
—
—
Key stats
About
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- List Date
- 1998-10-28
- CIK
- 0001070732
- Homepage
- https://www.eatonvance.com
Eaton Vance Senior Income Trust is a United States-based diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Trust's investment objective is to provide a high level of current income, consistent with the preservation of capital, by investing mainly in senior, secured floating-rate loans. The Trust operates as a single reportable segment, an investment company.
Fund profile
- Expense ratio
- —
- Assets
- $87M shares × price, Oct 23, 2026
- Trailing yield
- —
- Average daily volume
- $306K 30 sessions
- Holdings
- —
- Listed
- Oct 28, 1998 NYSE
Costn/a
Liquidity16
Scale35
Diversificationn/a
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (17% of its variance, beta 0.26). These factors explain 20% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.
Similar funds
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF | — | 0.40% | $16.7B | −5.1% | compare |
| PYLDPIMCO Multi Sector Bond Active ETF | — | 0.64% | $16.6B | −5.2% | compare |
| JPIEJPMorgan Income ETF | — | 0.39% | $11.2B | −2.9% | compare |
| BONDPIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund | — | 0.54% | $8.7B | −6.3% | compare |
| CGCPCapital Group Core Plus Income ETF | — | 0.34% | $8.6B | −6.3% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Multisector Bond category.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 2.53% | 0.00% | 6.84% | 3.46% | 1.87% | 0.76% | 2.58% |
| Feb | 2.31% | -1.69% | 1.61% | -4.50% | -1.91% | -4.14% | -1.39% |
| Mar | -0.75% | -4.50% | -6.30% | -0.93% | -4.58% | -2.35% | -3.23% |
| Apr | 1.06% | -4.40% | -1.30% | -0.47% | -2.84% | -0.40% | -1.39% |
| May | 0.15% | -4.97% | -1.69% | 1.26% | 0.18% | -0.20% | -0.88% |
| Jun | 0.89% | -5.21% | 3.41% | -0.94% | 0.53% | 0.40% | -0.15% |
| Jul | -1.62% | 2.90% | 1.82% | -0.94% | -1.75% | -0.40% | 0.00% |
| Aug | 3.87% | -1.93% | 2.87% | -1.42% | -0.54% | 0.00% | 0.48% |
| Sep | 1.59% | -5.56% | 2.25% | -1.12% | -1.62% | -1.82% | -1.05% |
| Oct | -0.57% | -0.56% | -1.20% | 0.48% | -1.45% | -0.83%* | -0.69% |
| Nov | -2.58% | 3.39% | 1.35% | 0.80% | -0.56% | -- | 0.48% |
| Dec | -0.44% | -3.48% | 3.78% | -1.92% | -1.13% | -- | -0.64% |
| Total | 6.43% | -23.54% | 13.60% | -6.26% | -13.09% | -8.72% | -5.26% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $4.82
SMA 50: $4.88
SMA 200: $5.01
Current: $4.80
EMA 12: $4.80
EMA 26: $4.83
MACD: -0.0269 | Signal: -0.0004
BEARISH
ADX (14): 33.24
TREND
+DI: 10.74
−DI: 31.64
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 42.40
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 36.36
Stoch %D: 30.89
Williams %R: -41.18
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $4.88
BB Lower: $4.76
NEUTRAL
OBV: -2,422,897
Vol SMA 20: 59,218
Vol ROC: 113.90%
ATR: $0.04
True Range: $0.06
HV 20: 6.4%
HV 30: 6.5%
HV 60: 6.7%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-28T00:00:00 – 2026-10-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report: EVF
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers and Primary Risks:
- Trend direction: Range-bound, with potential for an uptrend
- Support/resistance levels: $4.96-$5.00 (Bollinger Bands) and SMA 50/SMA 200 levels
- Momentum signals:
- RSI: Neutral (46.06)
- MACD: Bullish (0.00 / Signal: -0.00 / Histogram: 0.00)
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Range-bound, with potential for an uptrend
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Bollinger Bands: Upper ($5.00), Middle ($4.98), and Lower ($4.96)
- SMA 50/SMA 200 levels: $4.98 and $5.17, respectively
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): Neutral (46.06)
- MACD: Bullish (0.00 / Signal: -0.00 / Histogram: 0.00)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Neutral sentiment from news articles, with no major catalysts or events reported.
Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL
Catalyst Identification: None significant in the near term.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low risk (0.24 vs SPY), indicating that EVF moves less than the market.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility levels are low, with a stock volatility of 0.08 and historical volatility ranging from 3.3% to 4.8%.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Neutral, as the stock's sector is not particularly strong or weak relative to the market.
Institutional Activity: Low institutional interest, with no significant volume trends or unusual options activity reported.
Correlation Analysis: EVF has a moderate correlation (0.40) with the market, indicating that it moves somewhat in sync with the broader market.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support/resistance levels at $4.96-$5.00 (Bollinger Bands)
- SMA 50/SMA 200 levels at $4.98 and $5.17, respectively
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None significant in the near term.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No major earnings or events scheduled for the near future.
Risk Management: Consider using stop-loss levels around $4.96 and position sizing to manage risk.
Overall, EVF appears to be in a range-bound environment with some bullish momentum signals. The stock's low volatility and moderate correlation with the market suggest that it may not be as sensitive to market fluctuations. However, without significant catalysts or events on the horizon, the stock's price movement is likely to be influenced by market trends rather than company-specific news.
Generated
News
All EVF news →
BenzingaT3·66mo ago
EVF Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 0.2398
Alpha: -15.59%
Correlation: 0.3974
R-Squared: 15.8%
Stock Volatility: 7.7%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own EVF
2 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $90K | #5829 of 6285 | new | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $1K | #4514 of 4729 | +1.7% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
EVF Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
EVF Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-17Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-17 | Stanley Morgan | Other (J) | −94 | — | EDGAR | ||
| 2026-07-06 | ROYAL BANK OF CANADA | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | −118 | $12500.00 | -$1.48M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-29 | UBS Group AG | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | −1,022 | $24500.00 | -$25.04M | EDGAR |
| 2023-04-03 | John Redding | — | — | — | EDGAR | ||
| 2022-12-01 | Keith Quinton | Sell (S) | −15,000 | $5.45 | -$81.8K | EDGAR | |
| 2021-12-27 | Keith Quinton | Buy (P) | +15,000 | $6.74 | $101.1K | EDGAR | |
| 2021-08-04 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Disp (D) | −16,087,548 | $6.79 | -$109.23M | EDGAR |
| 2020-11-02 | Payson F Swaffield | — | — | — | EDGAR | ||
| 2020-08-27 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +16,478 | $5.85 | $96.4K | EDGAR |
| 2020-08-25 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +341,786 | $5.88 | $2.01M | EDGAR |
| 2020-08-20 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +500,000 | $5.84 | $2.92M | EDGAR |
| 2020-08-18 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +250,480 | $5.84 | $1.46M | EDGAR |
| 2020-08-14 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +134,898 | $5.76 | $777.0K | EDGAR |
| 2020-08-11 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +19,280 | $5.85 | $112.8K | EDGAR |
| 2020-08-07 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +109,556 | $5.85 | $640.5K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
ETF Holders
1 ETF hold EVF
1 shown · $389.70K total exposure
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VPC Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF | Nport | 1.28% | $389,698 | — | 2026-07-31 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.