IES Holdings, Inc. Common Stock(IESC)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $291.55 – $804.00
- YTD
- +52.62%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 44.63
- Straddle Price
- $125.10
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 11.27
- Market Cap
- $12.2B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.57% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.07% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 10.00% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +18.5pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 23.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +9.5% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.09 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.2B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 35.3% |
| Book / Price | 8.6% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.1% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 6.6% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 3/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +26.3% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $683.20 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $668.21 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 5.0% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $13B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $244.00 | 23% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $915.18 | 10% | median 44.6× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $768.25 | 10% | median 29.4× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $687.92 | 2% | median 12.9× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $1242.57 | 7% | median 6.3× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $683.20 | 47% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
- Industry (SIC)
- ELECTRICAL WORK (1731)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $12.2B
IES Holdings Inc owns and manages subsidiaries that design and installs integrated electrical and technology systems and provide infrastructure products and services. It has four business segments; Communications, Residential, Infrastructure Solutions, and Commercial & Industrial. The majority of the revenue for the company is generated from its Residential segment in which the company provides electrical installation services for single-family housing and multi-family apartment complexes, as well as heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and plumbing installation services. This seg…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +0.04% | 6 |
| Feb | +4.25% | 6 |
| Mar | +1.48% | 6 |
| Apr | +7.89% | 6 |
| May | +12.27% | 6 |
| Jun | +3.18% | 6 |
| Jul | +4.15% | 6 |
| Aug | +7.08% | 5 |
| Sep | -0.06% | 5 |
| Oct | +6.77% | 5 |
| Nov | +10.26% | 5 |
| Dec | -4.24% | 5 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-02 | Pre-Market | 14.83% | 7.15% | 0.48x | Within |
| 2024-11-22 | Pre-Market | 19.69% | 1.85% | 0.09x | Within |
| 2025-02-04 | Pre-Market | 16.30% | 2.40% | 0.15x | Within |
| 2025-05-02 | Pre-Market | 15.03% | 12.78% | 0.85x | Within |
| 2025-08-01 | Pre-Market | 13.20% | 0.75% | 0.06x | Within |
| 2025-11-21 | Pre-Market | 10.34% | 3.70% | 0.36x | Within |
| 2026-01-30 | Pre-Market | 14.18% | 19.81% | 1.40x | Exceeded |
| 2026-05-01 | Pre-Market | 13.38% | 1.79% | 0.13x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 44.63
- IV Rank (7D)
- 44.63
- Avg IV
- 86.8%
- Straddle (30D)
- $125.10
- Straddle (7D)
- $125.10
- P/C Volume
- 11.27
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 2.69
- Correlation (SPY)
- 52.3%
- R²
- 0.27
- Ann. Volatility
- 65.0%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.6%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $22.78M | 32.45% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $16.30M | 23.22% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $13.82M | 19.69% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $7.62M | 10.86% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $2.76M | 3.94% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | PEAK6 LLC | $1.72M | 2.44% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $1.24M | 1.77% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP | $905.29K | 1.29% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $810.00K | 1.15% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $714.71K | 1.02% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $619.41K | 0.88% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | Walleye Trading LLC | $476.47K | 0.68% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | MAI Capital Management Custodian | $190.59K | 0.27% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | Walleye Capital LLC | $190.59K | 0.27% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $47.65K | 0.07% | 2026-03-31 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $11.58M | 31.11% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $8.10M | 21.77% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $7.58M | 20.36% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $4.10M | 11.01% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $1.76M | 4.74% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $1.14M | 3.07% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | Walleye Capital LLC | $1.10M | 2.94% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP | $619.41K | 1.66% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $476.47K | 1.28% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $428.82K | 1.15% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | Walleye Trading LLC | $285.88K | 0.77% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $47.65K | 0.13% | 2026-03-31 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-06 | John Louis Fouts | Director | Award (A) | +69 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | Todd M Cleveland | Director | Award (A) | +37 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | Joe D Koshkin | Director | Award (A) | +39 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | David B. Gendell | Director | Award (A) | +34 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | Jennifer A Baldock | Director | Award (A) | +36 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | Kelly Janzen | Director | Award (A) | +34 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-16 | Todd M Cleveland | Director | Sell (S) | −5,000 | $761.89 | -$3.81M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | Tontine Capital Overseas GP, LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −373,760 | $756.47 | -$282.74M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-28 | TONTINE CAPITAL PARTNERS L P | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −258,920 | $705.70 | -$182.72M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-15 | JEFFREY L ET AL GENDELL | Executive Chairman | Sell (S) | −434,888 | $693.65 | -$301.66M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-12 | Tracy McLauchlin | SVP & CFO | Sell (S) | −3,000 | $662.61 | -$1.99M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-08 | Todd M Cleveland | Director | Sell (S) | −12,500 | $664.85 | -$8.31M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-08 | Tontine Associates, LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −377,248 | $676.75 | -$255.30M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-07 | Matthew J Simmes | President and CEO | Sell (S) | −7,000 | $658.24 | -$4.61M | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-02 | Kelly Janzen | Director | Award (A) | +53 | — | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TONTINE PARTNERS L P | 10%+ Owner | 13,385,300 | $8.31B | $24.27M | 2 | 2015-10-02 |
| 2 | TONTINE MANAGEMENT LLC | 10%+ Owner | 10,802,428 | $6.71B | -$271.18M | 5 | 2025-09-12 |
| 3 | TONTINE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 10%+ Owner | 10,777,414 | $6.69B | -$789.8K | 16 | 2025-11-28 |
| 4 | TONTINE CAPITAL OVERSEAS MASTER FUND II, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 10,776,615 | $6.69B | $0 | 5 | 2025-11-25 |
| 5 | TONTINE ASSET ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. | 10%+ Owner | 10,643,456 | $6.61B | -$533.03M | 12 | 2025-12-12 |
| 6 | Tontine Associates, LLC | 10%+ Owner | 10,547,057 | $6.55B | -$425.03M | 11 | 2026-05-08 |
| 7 | JEFFREY L ET AL GENDELL | Executive Chairman | 10,525,005 | $6.54B | -$348.59M | 14 | 2026-05-15 |
| 8 | TONTINE CAPITAL PARTNERS L P | 10%+ Owner | 10,483,638 | $6.51B | -$229.26M | 17 | 2026-05-28 |
| 9 | Tontine Capital Overseas GP, LLC | 10%+ Owner | 10,433,279 | $6.48B | -$1.03B | 14 | 2026-06-16 |
| 10 | Southpoint GP, LP | 1,853,501 | $1.15B | $9.71M | 1 | 2007-01-12 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Parsed directly from EDGAR primary-doc XML. Daily refresh; new filings typically appear here the morning after they hit EDGAR.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-12 | Cleveland Todd M | Director | 15,000 | $11.25M | 2026-06-12 | CJS Securities, Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-11 | Cleveland Todd M | Director | 10,000 | $6.63M | 2026-05-08 | CJS Securities, Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-08 | Tracy Mclauchlin | Affiliate | 3,000 | $2.00M | 2026-05-08 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-05 | Simmes Matthew J | Officer | 7,000 | $4.60M | 2026-05-05 | Wells Fargo Clearing Services | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-24 | Cleveland Todd M | Director | 10,000 | $5.15M | 2026-02-24 | CJS SECURITIES, INC. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-18 | Simmes Matthew J | Officer | 5,000 | $2.53M | 2026-02-18 | Wells Fargo Clearing Services | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-12 | Newman Mary K | Officer | 2,000 | $955.7K | 2025-12-11 | Charles Schwab Corp. | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-10 | Gendell David B. | Director | 17,867 | $8.24M | 2025-12-10 | Vanguard Marketing Corporation | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-09 | Koshkin Joe D | Director | 5,000 | $2.21M | 2025-12-09 | Charles Schwab & Co | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-02 | Tracy McLauchlin | CFO | 5,000 | $20.70M | 2025-12-02 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 33.1 |
| P/B Ratio | 11.4 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.4 |
| EV/EBITDA | 25.4 |
| TTM Revenue | $3.6B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.4B |
| TTM EPS | $18.75 |
| ROE | 35.3% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.03 |