Informatica Inc.(INFA)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $24.73 – $24.98
- IV Rank (30D)
- 55.04
- Straddle Price
- $3.50
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.28
- Market Cap
- $7.6B
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $7.6B
Informatica Inc provides artificial intelligence (AI) enabled data management products on a cloud native platform that connects, manages, and unifies data across multi-vendor, multi-cloud, and hybrid systems at an enterprise scale. The company's platform includes a suite of interoperable data management products that leverage the shared services and metadata of the underlying platform, including products for Data Catalog, Data Integration & Engineering, API & Application Integration, Data Quality and Observability, Master Data Management, Customer and Business 360 Applications, Governance, Acc…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-30 | After-Close | 15.21% | 4.65% | 0.31x | Within |
| 2024-10-30 | After-Close | 20.80% | 1.62% | 0.08x | Within |
| 2025-02-13 | After-Close | 36.23% | 21.53% | 0.59x | Within |
| 2025-05-07 | After-Close | 13.55% | 0.58% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2025-08-06 | After-Close | 1.82% | 0.16% | 0.09x | Within |
| 2025-11-05 | After-Close | 1.51% | 0.16% | 0.11x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 55.04
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 167.8%
- Straddle (30D)
- $3.50
- Straddle (7D)
- $3.50
- P/C Volume
- 0.28
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HAP TRADING, LLC | $500 | 100.00% | 2025-09-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-19 | PENSION PLAN INVESTMENT BOARD CANADA | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | −64,379,838 | $25.00 | -$1.61B | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-18 | Michael I. McLaughlin | EVP & Chief Financial Officer | Disp (D) | −712,385 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-18 | Mitesh Dhruv | Director | Disp (D) | −27,289 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-18 | JANICE CHAFFIN | Director | Disp (D) | −66,830 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-18 | Francis R. Santiago | Chief Accounting Officer | Disp (D) | −43,851 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-18 | John Arthur Schweitzer | EVP & Chief Revenue Officer | Disp (D) | −309,204 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-18 | GERALD HELD | Director | Disp (D) | −198,845 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-18 | Jill A Ward | Director | Disp (D) | −48,845 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-18 | BRUCE R CHIZEN | Director | Disp (D) | −1,083,457 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-18 | Permira V G.P. L.P. | Director | Disp (D) | −239,920,656 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-18 | Ansa Sekharan | EVP & Chief Customer Officer | Disp (D) | −355,111 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-18 | Ithaca L.P. | Director | Disp (D) | −44,517,294 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-18 | Amit Walia | Chief Executive Officer | Disp (D) | −1,773,882 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-14 | Ansa Sekharan | EVP & CHIEF CUSTOMER OFFICER | Gift (G) | −13,342 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-17 | John Arthur Schweitzer | EVP & CHIEF REVENUE OFFICER | Sell (S) | −10,193 | $24.89 | -$253.7K | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ryan Lanpher | Director | 116,366,490 | $2.88B | $0 | 1 | 2023-11-07 |
| 2 | Brian Ruder | Director | 116,366,490 | $2.88B | $0 | 1 | 2023-11-07 |
| 3 | EvomLux S.a r.l. | Director | 59,980,164 | $1.49B | -$511.51M | 1 | 2024-11-14 |
| 4 | Ithaca G.P. Ltd | Director | 22,258,647 | $551.79M | -$94.91M | 3 | 2024-11-14 |
| 5 | Jitesh Ghai | EVP & CHIEF PRODUCT OFFICER | 539,548 | $13.38M | -$5.16M | 26 | 2024-02-16 |
| 6 | ERIC F BROWN | EVP & Chief Financial Officer | 371,749 | $9.22M | -$1.28M | 9 | 2022-12-15 |
| 7 | Mark Pellowski | CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER | 142,092 | $3.52M | -$3.72M | 27 | 2025-02-19 |
| 8 | BETSY RAFAEL | Director | 31,318 | $776.4K | -$145.7K | 5 | 2024-06-14 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-15 | JOHN SCHWEITZER | Officer | 10,193 | $253.7K | 2025-10-15 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-10 | FRANCIS SANTIAGO | Officer | 16,790 | $416.1K | 2025-09-10 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-02 | GERALD D HELD | Director | 70,212 | $1.75M | 2025-09-02 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-02 | BRUCE R CHIZEN | Director, Chair | 246,590 | $6.15M | 2025-09-02 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-18 | AMIT WALIA | Officer | 508,089 | $12.56M | 2025-08-18 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-16 | JOHN SCHWEITZER | Officer | 185,704 | $4.47M | 2025-06-16 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-10 | FRANCIS SANTIAGO | Officer | 4,190 | $101.2K | 2025-06-10 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-05 | ANSA SEKHARAN | Director | 99,348 | $2.40M | 2025-06-05 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-03 | MARK A. PELLOWSKI | Former Affiliate | 52,250 | $1.26M | 2025-06-03 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-27 | MARK A. PELLOWSKI | Former Affiliate | 85,860 | $2.05M | 2025-05-27 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 1239.5 |
| TTM Revenue | $1.7B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.0B |
| TTM EPS | $0.02 |