MANH Manhattan Associates Inc
XNAS 235.83 DelayedStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $119.06 – $236.62
- YTD
- +40.98%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 62.51
- Straddle Price
- $31.60
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 1.44
- Market Cap
- $13.6B
- Open
- $230.64
- Day Range
- $229.75 – $236.62
- Volume
- 596,425
- Prev Close
- $232.86
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.15% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.15 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 11.50% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 11.55% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +34.9pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 25.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +8.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 12 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.08 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.4B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 133.5% |
| Book / Price | 1.1% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 55.8% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 35.4% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 5/6 — high quality (12y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +21.4% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $211.06 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $212.53 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 10.1% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.2B |
| Market Cap | $14B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $107.01 | 19% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $163.81 | 9% | median 43.6× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $151.70 | 9% | median 28.7× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $43.92 | 2% | median 16.8× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $337.80 | 6% | median 16.7× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $211.06 | 38% | stability 99% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $235.86 | 19% | 25 strikes · skew +0.11 |
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $13.6B
- Employees
- 4,100
- List Date
- 1998-04-23
- CIK
- 0001056696
- Next Earnings
- 2026-10-27 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- $1.03 (5 est.)
- Headquarters
- Atlanta, GA
- Homepage
- https://www.manh.com
Manhattan Associates provides software that helps users manage their supply chains, inventory, and omnichannel operations. Customers are generally retailers, wholesalers, manufacturers, and logistics providers. The company was founded in 1990 and serves more than 1,200 customers worldwide.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 9.63% | -12.29% | 7.74% | 17.31% | -22.41% | -9.73% | -1.62% |
| Feb | 6.57% | -0.37% | 5.37% | 1.71% | -11.68% | -10.13% | -1.42% |
| Mar | -9.62% | 4.35% | 7.63% | -2.54% | -0.03% | -4.89% | -0.85% |
| Apr | 13.52% | -6.83% | 5.77% | -16.80% | 1.50% | 2.67% | -0.03% |
| May | -0.33% | -7.93% | 7.25% | 5.66% | 5.68% | 7.08% | 2.90% |
| Jun | 6.23% | -5.83% | 8.97% | 15.00% | 7.04% | -13.57% | 2.97% |
| Jul | 8.58% | 19.99% | -3.24% | 4.12% | 10.94% | 30.38% | 11.79% |
| Aug | 1.37% | 0.78% | 5.76% | 5.49% | 0.36% | 19.20% | 5.49% |
| Sep | -6.46% | -5.04% | -1.76% | 9.75% | -2.33% | -8.10% | -2.32% |
| Oct | 16.60% | -10.27% | -1.95% | -4.15% | -8.77% | 15.52%* | 1.16% |
| Nov | -14.44% | 7.11% | 12.57% | 7.98% | -2.81% | -- | 2.08% |
| Dec | 2.84% | -4.44% | -5.53% | -5.63% | -1.85% | -- | -2.92% |
| Total | 34.06% | -22.31% | 58.33% | 38.41% | -25.56% | 20.97% | 17.32% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Manhattan Associates (MANH) - Comprehensive Stock Analysis
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL with moderate confidence (6/10)
Manhattan Associates presents a technically bullish setup contradicted by persistent negative legal headlines, creating a mixed outlook with elevated uncertainty. The stock is trading above all major moving averages with positive momentum indicators, but a material lawsuit investigation narrative is being repeatedly amplified in headlines without clear resolution.
Key Drivers:
- Positive: Strong uptrend structure, bullish MACD crossover, price 34% above 200-day MA
- Primary Risk: Ongoing Rosen Law Firm investigations into fiduciary duty breaches (4 headlines since July 31)
Investment Thesis: MANH exhibits healthy technical momentum with an uncommonly low beta (0.27) suggesting defensive characteristics, but the recurring litigation risk narrative creates headline-driven volatility that could cap gains or trigger sharp reversals. The approaching October 27 earnings call and continued legal scrutiny warrant cautious positioning until clarity emerges.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: Overwhelmingly negative. Four of six headlines focus on the Rosen Law Firm investigation (August 8, July 31, September 2, September 11), suggesting either an ongoing campaign or material deterioration in the legal situation. The positive earnings reaction (August 27) has been overshadowed by subsequent negative filings.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
| Timeframe | Direction | Confidence | Key Evidence | |-----------|-----------|-----------|--------------| | Short-term (1-4 weeks) | BULLISH | High | Price $217.72 above SMA20 ($206.76), SMA50 ($206.24); RSI 63.03 in neutral zone; +DI (31.12) > -DI (17.38) | | Medium-term (1-3 months) | BULLISH | High | Price +5.4% above SMA50; MACD histogram positive (0.31) with bullish crossover structure | | Long-term (3-12 months) | STRONGLY BULLISH | High | Price +34.3% above SMA200 ($162.14); established uptrend with higher lows and higher highs pattern |
Support/Resistance Levels
Immediate Resistance:
- $215.84 — Upper Bollinger Band (current price $217.72 = slightly extended beyond)
- $220-225 — Psychological level and prior consolidation zone
Primary Support:
- $206.76 — SMA20 (first dynamic support)
- $206.24 — SMA50 (secondary support, very tight cluster)
- $197.68 — Lower Bollinger Band (3.2% downside)
- $185-190 — Major technical support zone (3-month range low)
Critical Floor:
- $162.14 — SMA200 (9.7% downside, represents 3-month uptrend invalidation point)
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 63.03 — Neutral Zone
- Position: Upper-neutral (approaching overbought at 70)
- Interpretation: Momentum remains strong but NOT yet overbought; suggests room for further gains before pullback pressure
- Risk: Could accelerate above 70 on positive catalyst, or snap below 50 on negative headline
MACD: 0.73 (MACD) vs 0.43 (Signal) — BULLISH
- Signal: MACD > Signal line with positive histogram (0.31)
- Interpretation: Bullish crossover in place; momentum accelerating upward
- Reliability: This is a confirmed bullish signal; histogram expansion suggests strengthening momentum
Bollinger Bands: OVERBOUGHT — CRITICAL SIGNAL
- Current Price: $217.72
- Upper Band: $215.84
- Stock trading 1.88 above upper band (extended position)
- Width: 8.78 (relatively tight bands = low volatility environment)
- Interpretation: Price has moved beyond statistical extremes; historically this precedes mean reversion or consolidation
- Mean Reversion Risk: Pullback to middle band ($206.76 = $11 or 5.1% downside) or lower band possible
Volume Analysis
Volume Trends — CONCERNING SIGNALS:
- Volume SMA 20: 566,648 shares
- Volume Rate of Change: -31.42% ⚠️ MAJOR RED FLAG
- On-Balance Volume: -117,663 (negative = more volume on down days than up days)
Interpretation: Despite the uptrend, volume is declining sharply (-31% on 20-day basis). This suggests:
- Institutional interest may be fading on recent advance
- Advance is being driven by fewer shares traded (thinner momentum)
- OBV negative indicates selling pressure exceeding buying pressure over time
- Risk: Uptrend vulnerable to reversal on heavy selling if catalyst appears (like litigation update)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary (Last 10 Articles — June-October 2026)
| Date | Headline | Sentiment | Relevance | |------|----------|-----------|-----------| | 2026-10-06 | PTC Inc. Surges 33.5% | NEUTRAL | Sector commentary; not MANH-specific | | 2026-09-11 | Rosen Law Firm Investigation (MANH) | NEGATIVE | 4th iteration of same lawsuit | | 2026-09-02 | Rosen Law Firm Investigation (MANH) | NEGATIVE | Same lawsuit, repeated announcement | | 2026-08-27 | MANH Up 5.8% Since Earnings | POSITIVE | Earnings beat reaction (isolated positive) | | 2026-08-08 | Rosen Law Firm Investigation (MANH) | NEGATIVE | 2nd iteration of same lawsuit | | 2026-07-31 | Rosen Law Firm Investigation (MANH) | NEGATIVE | Initial investigation announcement |
Sentiment Assessment: NEGATIVE (67% negative headlines)
Quantitative Breakdown:
- Negative: 4 of 6 MANH-specific headlines (67%)
- Positive: 1 of 6 headlines (17%) — limited impact
- Neutral: 1 of 6 headlines (17%) — unrelated sector news
Key Concern: The Rosen Law Firm investigation is not a one-time announcement but a recurring narrative (July 31 → Aug 8 → Sept 2 → Sept 11). This pattern suggests:
- Either escalating legal action/new evidence
- Or aggressive litigation marketing campaign
- Either way, headlines maintain negative pressure
Catalyst Identification
Immediate Catalysts (Next 30 days):
-
EARNINGS: October 27, 2026 (21 days away) — This is the CRITICAL catalyst
- Options market pricing $31.50 expected move (14% swing)
- Current RSI and Bollinger Band readings suggest vulnerability to miss-driven selloff
- If litigation costs materialize in guidance, stock could gap down
-
Litigation Resolution/Update — Timing unknown but material
- Rosen Law Firm investigations typically take 6-18 months
- Could result in: settlement, shareholder lawsuit, or dismissal
- No near-term court dates visible from headlines
Medium-term Catalysts (1-3 months):
- Product announcements or customer wins (supply chain software company focus)
- Analyst coverage changes (likely if litigation escalates)
- Institutional positioning adjustments pre-earnings
Market Narrative: CONTRADICTION ALERT
| Signal | Technical | News/Sentiment | |--------|-----------|-----------------| | Trend | BULLISH (+34% above 200-day MA) | BEARISH (repeated litigation) | | Momentum | BULLISH (MACD +, RSI 63) | BEARISH (4 negative headlines) | | Volume Support | WEAKENING (-31% volume rate of change) | WEAKENING (no positive catalysts) |
Narrative Disconnect: The technical uptrend appears to be running on fumes (declining volume) while negative headlines maintain pressure. This is a classic "reach for the sky, step on a rake" setup where technical gains are not validated by improving fundamentals or investor enthusiasm.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: ULTRA-DEFENSIVE (Beta: 0.27)
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-02 | After-Close | 10.12% | 2.40% | 0.24x | Within |
| 2021-04-27 | After-Close | 10.05% | 12.24% | 1.22x | Exceeded |
| 2021-07-27 | After-Close | 9.33% | 7.57% | 0.81x | Within |
| 2021-10-26 | After-Close | 8.44% | 5.67% | 0.67x | Within |
| 2022-02-01 | After-Close | 8.98% | 4.91% | 0.55x | Within |
| 2022-04-26 | After-Close | 11.74% | 0.00% | 0.00x | Within |
| 2022-07-26 | After-Close | 6.77% | 17.85% | 2.64x | Exceeded |
| 2022-10-25 | After-Close | 12.55% | 11.42% | 0.91x | Within |
| 2023-02-02 | After-Close | 5.77% | 7.99% | 1.38x | Exceeded |
| 2023-04-25 | After-Close | 7.07% | 8.53% | 1.21x | Exceeded |
| 2023-07-25 | After-Close | 8.66% | 2.50% | 0.29x | Within |
| 2023-10-24 | After-Close | 9.20% | 1.84% | 0.20x | Within |
| 2024-01-30 | After-Close | 8.22% | 8.39% | 1.02x | Exceeded |
| 2024-04-23 | After-Close | 8.69% | 10.54% | 1.21x | Exceeded |
| 2024-07-23 | After-Close | 14.18% | 10.54% | 0.74x | Within |
| 2024-10-22 | After-Close | 10.64% | 7.17% | 0.67x | Within |
| 2025-01-28 | After-Close | 10.50% | 24.49% | 2.33x | Exceeded |
| 2025-04-22 | unknown | 13.77% | 1.08% | 0.08x | Within |
| 2025-07-22 | After-Close | 11.47% | 7.36% | 0.64x | Within |
| 2025-10-21 | After-Close | 12.78% | 4.95% | 0.39x | Within |
| 2026-01-27 | After-Close | 13.32% | 5.06% | 0.38x | Within |
| 2026-04-21 | After-Close | 14.53% | 5.92% | 0.41x | Within |
| 2026-07-28 | After-Close | 14.12% | 21.32% | 1.51x | Exceeded |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
MANH Options Activity & IV Rank
MANH IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 67th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $62.5M | #264 of 3138 | -31.5% | 13F | |
| Fundsmith Asset manager Terry Smith | $24.1M | #31 of 41 | +43.1% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $22.6M | #555 of 1945 | +114.2% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $9.2M | #1629 of 3716 | +8.8% | 13F | |
| Bridgewater Associates Hedge fund Ray Dalio | $2.7M | #626 of 997 | new | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $559K | #2022 of 4729 | -15.6% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
MANH Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $9.41M | 49.85% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $3.81M | 20.19% | 2025-09-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $2.20M | 11.65% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $1.52M | 8.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $1.14M | 6.05% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $560.71K | 2.97% | 2025-09-30 |
| 7 | Walleye Trading LLC | $236.72K | 1.25% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $4.71M | 38.92% | 2025-09-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $1.92M | 15.86% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $1.91M | 15.75% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $1.78M | 14.71% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Walleye Trading LLC | $557.00K | 4.60% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $501.30K | 4.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $459.52K | 3.79% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $269.97K | 2.23% | 2025-09-30 |
MANH Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-08-11| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-11 | Eric Andrew Clark | President & CEO | Sell (S) | −3,000 | $197.76 | -$593.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-10 | Linda T. Hollembaek | Director | Sell (S) | −1,579 | $189.88 | -$299.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-31 | James Stewart Gantt | EVP, Professional Services | Sell (S) | −5,139 | $195.53 | -$1.00M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | Charles E Moran | Director | Gift (G) | −1,330 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-10 | Eric Andrew Clark | President & CEO | Sell (S) | −1,000 | $146.77 | -$146.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-18 | Eddie Capel | Director | Award (A) | +1,940 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-18 | Charles E Moran | Director | Award (A) | +1,940 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-18 | Thomas E Noonan | Director | Award (A) | +1,940 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-18 | Edmond Eger | Director | Award (A) | +1,940 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-18 | Linda T. Hollembaek | Director | Award (A) | +1,940 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-18 | Kimberly A Kuryea | Director | Award (A) | +1,940 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-18 | Danielle Sheer | Director | Award (A) | +1,940 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-24 | James Stewart Gantt | EVP, Professional Services | Sell (S) | −7,300 | $139.25 | -$1.02M | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-02 | Linda C. Pinne | SVP, CFO, CAO & Treasurer | Award (A) | +5,323 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-03 | James Stewart Gantt | EVP, Professional Services | Tax (F) | −1,467 | $135.43 | -$198.7K | EDGAR |
MANH Insider Holdings
13 insiders · @ $235.83| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robert G Howell | EVP, Americas Sales | 177,706 | $41.91M | -$3.67M | 55 | 2026-03-03 |
| 2 | Eddie Capel | Executive Chairman | 156,329 | $36.87M | -$74.77M | 97 | 2026-05-18 |
| 3 | Dennis B Story | EVP, CFO & Treasurer | 118,588 | $27.97M | -$26.36M | 83 | 2026-03-03 |
| 4 | Thomas E Noonan | Director | 103,800 | $24.48M | -$13.59M | 50 | 2026-05-18 |
| 5 | Eric Andrew Clark | President & CEO | 89,638 | $21.14M | -$1.02M | 8 | 2026-08-11 |
| 6 | James Stewart Gantt | EVP, Professional Services | 55,676 | $13.13M | -$8.41M | 24 | 2026-07-31 |
| 7 | Linda C. Pinne | SVP, CFO, CAO & Treasurer | 47,920 | $11.30M | $0 | 42 | 2026-04-02 |
| 8 | Bruce Richards | SVP, CLO & Secretary | 30,389 | $7.17M | -$9.91M | 73 | 2026-03-03 |
| 9 | Charles E Moran | Director | 24,078 | $5.68M | $0 | 12 | 2026-06-16 |
| 10 | Linda T. Hollembaek | Director | 12,268 | $2.89M | -$1.47M | 14 | 2026-08-10 |
MANH Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Aug 11, 2026Directors 8
- Thomas E Noonan · on file since 2006
- Eddie Capel · listed since Jan 2013
- Edmond Eger · since Oct 15, 2015
- Charles E Moran · since May 18, 2017
- Linda T. Hollembaek · since May 17, 2018
- Kimberly A Kuryea · since May 12, 2022
- Eric Andrew Clark · since Feb 12, 2025
- Danielle Sheer · since May 13, 2025
Officers 5
- Eric Andrew Clark · President & CEO · since Feb 12, 2025
- Bruce Richards · SVP, CLO & Secretary · listed since Mar 2023
- James Stewart Gantt · EVP, Professional Services · listed since Mar 2023
- Robert G Howell · EVP, Americas Sales · listed since Mar 2023
- Linda C. Pinne · SVP, Global Corp Controller · listed since Mar 2023
Changes in the last 10 years (14)
| Feb 26, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Dennis B Story as EVP, CFO & Treasurer in an SEC filing |
| May 13, 2025 | Danielle Sheer became a director |
| Feb 12, 2025 | Eric Andrew Clark became a director |
| Feb 12, 2025 | Eric Andrew Clark became President & CEO |
| Feb 10, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Eddie Capel as President & CEO in an SEC filing |
| Jul 19, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Deepak Raghavan from the board in an SEC filing |
| Mar 2, 2023 | Robert G Howell listed as EVP, Americas Sales (previously Sr VP, Americas Sales) in SEC filings |
| Mar 2, 2023 | Linda C. Pinne listed as SVP, Global Corp Controller (previously Sr VP, Global Corp Controller) in SEC filings |
| Mar 2, 2023 | James Stewart Gantt listed as EVP, Professional Services (previously Executive Vice President) in SEC filings |
| Mar 2, 2023 | Bruce Richards listed as SVP, CLO & Secretary (previously Sr. V.P. & Chief Legal Officer) in SEC filings |
| Jan 26, 2023 | James Stewart Gantt became Executive Vice President |
| May 12, 2022 | Kimberly A Kuryea became a director |
| May 17, 2018 | Linda T. Hollembaek became a director |
| May 18, 2017 | Charles E Moran became a director |
Not reported recently (2)
- John J Huntz Jr · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 28, 2024
- John H Heyman · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 21, 2018
MANH Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-08-11What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-11 | Eric A Clark | Officer | 3,000 | $593.0K | 2026-08-11 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-06 | LINDA HOLLEMBAEK | Director | 1,579 | $299.8K | 2026-08-06 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-30 | JAMES S GANTT | Officer | 5,139 | $1.00M | 2026-07-30 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-10 | Erik Clark | Officer | 1,000 | $146.8K | 2026-06-10 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-24 | JAMES S GANTT | Officer | 7,300 | $1.02M | 2026-04-24 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-28 | Eric Clark | Officer | 1,600 | — | 2025-11-28 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-29 | JAMES STEWART GANTT | OFFICER | 2,300 | $503.0K | 2025-08-28 | LPL FINANCIAL | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-29 | EDDIE CAPEL | Officer, Director | 37,342 | $8.30M | 2025-07-29 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-29 | LINDA T HOLLEMBAEK | Officer, Director | 2,024 | $448.4K | 2025-07-29 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-03-06 | STORY DENNIS B | Officer | 2,788 | $476.3K | 2025-03-06 | Rockefeller Capital Management | — | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-01 | 0001193125-26-251382 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-20 | 0001193125-26-232142 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-18 | 0001193125-26-228194 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-21 | 0001193125-26-166709 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-26 | 0001193125-26-073584 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-27 | 0001193125-26-024382 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-21 | 0001193125-25-245073 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-22 | 0000950170-25-097562 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-14 | 0000950170-25-071356 | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-22 | 0000950170-25-056718 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-04 | 0001193125-26-037138 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-07 | 0000950170-25-016295 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-06 | 0000950170-24-011411 | EDGAR |
| 2023-02-06 | 0000950170-23-001892 | EDGAR |
| 2022-02-07 | 0001564590-22-004100 | EDGAR |
| 2021-02-05 | 0001564590-21-004542 | EDGAR |
| 2020-02-10 | 0001564590-20-003915 | EDGAR |
| 2019-02-08 | 0001564590-19-002439 | EDGAR |
| 2018-02-09 | 0001564590-18-001747 | EDGAR |
| 2017-02-03 | 0001564590-17-000938 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-24 | 0001193125-26-175715 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-24 | 0001193125-25-249633 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-25 | 0000950170-25-098656 | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-25 | 0000950170-25-058642 | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-25 | 0000950170-24-117433 | EDGAR |
| 2024-07-26 | 0000950170-24-086805 | EDGAR |
| 2024-04-26 | 0000950170-24-049203 | EDGAR |
| 2023-10-26 | 0000950170-23-055604 | EDGAR |
| 2023-07-28 | 0000950170-23-035377 | EDGAR |
| 2023-04-28 | 0000950170-23-015838 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.40% | $486.5M | $123.0B | 2026-10-20 |
| 2 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $367.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.15% | $260.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | Invesco | 3.71% | $206.1M | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 5 | VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | Vanguard | 0.08% | $145.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | VBK Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.33% | $145.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.14% | $130.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | MDY State Street® SPDR® S&P MIDCAP 400® ETF Trust | SPDR (State Street) | 0.39% | $101.7M | $25.8B | 2026-10-20 |
| 9 | IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.40% | $75.6M | $19.3B | 2026-10-20 |
| 10 | SPMD State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 400™ Mid Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.40% | $73.2M | $18.4B | 2026-10-20 |
| 11 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.21% | $71.3M | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 12 | IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.47% | $66.1M | $14.4B | 2026-10-20 |
| 13 | IWR iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.10% | $56.2M | $57.3B | 2026-10-20 |
| 14 | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $51.1M | $126.1B | 2026-10-20 |
| 15 | IJK iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.48% | $49.8M | $10.5B | 2026-10-20 |
| 16 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.04% | $35.1M | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 17 | IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.31% | $26.9M | $8.5B | 2026-10-20 |
| 18 | SCHM Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.17% | $24.3M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 19 | JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | JPMorgan | 0.25% | $23.4M | $9.4B | 2026-10-21 |
| 20 | FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.10% | $21.8M | $21.3B | 2026-10-20 |
| 21 | FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX® Fund | First Trust | 0.72% | $19.7M | $2.7B | 2026-10-20 |
| 22 | IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | Vanguard | 0.34% | $19.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 23 | VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $18.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 24 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $17.7M | $97.4B | 2026-10-20 |
| 25 | IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.07% | $16.4M | $25.0B | 2026-10-20 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $297.79M | $50.35M | $0.85 | $90.68M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $282.21M | $49.30M | $0.82 | $84.05M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $270.39M | $51.95M | $0.85 | $147.05M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $275.80M | $58.63M | $0.96 | $93.11M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $272.42M | $56.78M | $0.93 | $74.05M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $262.79M | $52.58M | $0.85 | $75.26M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $255.80M | $48.02M | $0.77 | $104.70M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $266.68M | $63.78M | $1.03 | $62.30M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $265.32M | $52.77M | $0.85 | $73.26M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $254.55M | $53.80M | $0.86 | $54.74M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $238.25M | $48.74M | $0.77 | $88.36M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $238.44M | $49.42M | $0.79 | $58.57M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.