MDAIW Spectral AI, Inc. Warrants

XNAS
Find condors

Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

MDAIW — —
Key stats
About
Industry (SIC)
SURGICAL & MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS & APPARATUS (3841) · industry map
Exchange
XNAS
Employees
65
List Date
2023-09-12
CIK
0001833498
Headquarters
Dallas, TX
Homepage
https://www.spectral-ai.com

Spectral AI Inc is an AI company focused on predictive medical diagnostics. Its DeepView System uses proprietary AI algorithms to distinguish between fully damaged, partially damaged and healthy human tissue characters invisible to the naked eye, at the initial time point of wound presentation. The DeepView System delivers a binary prediction on the wound's capacity to heal or not-heal by a specified time point in the future. The company focuses on the burn indication which is supported by the BARDA PBS contract.

Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.

Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.

Chart
Seasonality
'23'24'25'26Avg
Jan---30.78%-18.60%12.24%-12.38%
Feb--9.72%-5.52%-19.61%-5.14%
Mar---4.55%-35.80%36.53%-1.27%
Apr---12.51%39.74%21.39%16.21%
May---29.73%8.76%-6.39%-9.12%
Jun--93.44%100.00%-18.83%58.20%
Jul---31.48%-0.27%-20.00%-17.25%
Aug---6.82%-27.21%1.92%-10.70%
Sep8.33%-3.85%26.91%0.00%7.85%
Oct-6.67%30.87%-5.28%-24.26%-1.34%
Nov-23.62%208.59%-31.73%-6.38%*36.72%
Dec26.51%34.80%9.76%--23.69%
Total-2.30%188.12%-1.86%-34.31%37.41%
* Only 4 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $0.46
SMA 50: $0.49
SMA 200: $0.55
Current: $0.44
EMA 12: $0.46
EMA 26: $0.47
MACD: -0.0129 | Signal: -0.0026
BEARISH
ADX (14): 18.64
RANGE
+DI: 20.63
−DI: 30.74

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 45.03
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 27.50
Stoch %D: 38.73
Williams %R: -70.00

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $0.52
BB Lower: $0.41
NEUTRAL
OBV: 3,772,471
Vol SMA 20: 11,606
Vol ROC: -15.70%
ATR: $0.04
True Range: $0.01
HV 20: 112.5%
HV 30: 133.5%
HV 60: 123.0%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-09T00:00:00 – 2026-11-06T00:00:00
AI Analysis

LLM Stock Analysis Report: MDAIW

Executive Summary

Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (6/10)

Key Drivers:

  • Recent trend direction suggests a consolidation phase
  • Technical indicators indicate a potential reversal, but momentum signals are mixed
  • Beta analysis shows above-average volatility, aligning with market amplification

Primary Risks:

  • Breakout below lower Bollinger Band could signal further decline
  • Failure to break above upper Bollinger Band may indicate continued consolidation

Investment Thesis: MDAIW is in a neutral phase, with potential for a reversal or continuation of the current trend. Technical indicators suggest caution, while risk metrics highlight above-average volatility.

Recent News Sentiment Impact: No recent news headlines available; market sentiment remains uncertain.

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction:

  • Short-term (1-4 weeks): Consolidation phase
  • Medium-term (1-3 months): Neutral-to-bullish trend
  • Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish trend

Support/Resistance Levels:

  • Upper Bollinger Band: $0.69
  • Middle Bollinger Band: $0.49
  • Lower Bollinger Band: $0.29

Momentum Signals: RSI interpretation: Neutral (37.35), not overbought or oversold MACD signal: Bearish (Histogram: -0.08) Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze, indicating potential reversal or continuation

Volume Analysis:

  • Volume SMA 20: 25818.00 (neutral-to-bullish volume trend)
  • On-Balance Volume (OBV): 1710155.00 (strong upward momentum)
  • Volume Rate of Change: 684.60% (high volatility)

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news headlines available

Sentiment Assessment: Neutral, due to lack of recent market-moving events

Catalyst Identification:

  • Earnings date: Not available
  • Regulatory changes: None identified
  • Product launches: None announced

Market Narrative: MDAIW's neutral-to-bullish trend is not strongly influenced by recent news or market sentiment.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Beta Interpretation: Beta = 1.15 (above-average volatility, amplifying market movements)

Volatility Regime: Current vs historical volatility levels: Above average (1.56) but trending lower

Options Market Signals:

  • IV rank: Not available
  • Put/call ratios: Not available
  • Unusual activity: None identified

Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations: Focus on the middle Bollinger Band ($0.49) as a potential pivot point.

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market: Neutral, aligning with MDAIW's neutral-to-bullish trend

Institutional Activity:

  • Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest: Not available
  • Institutional participation: Not available

Correlation Analysis: R-squared interpretation: Strong positive correlation with the market (0.14)

Relative Valuation: Position within trading range: Neutral, with potential for a reversal or continuation.

Key Levels & Action Items

Critical Price Levels:

  • Support level: $0.29 (lower Bollinger Band)
  • Resistance level: $0.69 (upper Bollinger Band)

Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical levels that could trigger significant moves: Middle Bollinger Band ($0.49) as a potential pivot point.

Time-Sensitive Catalysts:

  • Earnings date: Not available
  • Regulatory changes: None identified
  • Product launches: None announced

Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations: Focus on the middle Bollinger Band ($0.49) as a potential stop-loss level, considering risk management strategies based on market volatility.

This comprehensive analysis provides an objective evaluation of MDAIW's technical indicators, news sentiment, and market context. The neutral-to-bullish trend suggests caution, while above-average volatility highlights the need for risk management considerations.

Generated

MDAIW Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner
Full Algorithm Docs ↗

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Loading the implied volatility surface…

Volatility Smile

Loading the implied volatility smile…

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 0.7005
Alpha: 19.68%
Correlation: 0.0812
R-Squared: 0.7%
Stock Volatility: 121.4%
Market Volatility: 14.1%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 229
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time

MDAIW Institutional Ownership (13F)

Filings for 2026-06-30 · 3 already for 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

19 filers2,127,964 shares$1.29M value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 LMR Partners LLP 503,694 $279.55K 21.60% — 2026-06-30
2 ARISTEIA CAPITAL, L.L.C. 359,943 $199.77K 15.44% — 2026-06-30
3 Oasis Management Co Ltd. 100,000 $173.00K 13.37% — 2026-06-30
4 Clear Street Group Inc. 233,357 $129.51K 10.01% — 2026-06-30
5 Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian 123,629 $68.61K 5.30% — 2026-06-30
6 TORONTO DOMINION BANK 117,931 $65.45K 5.06% — 2026-06-30
7 MOORE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP 100,000 $55.50K 4.29% — 2026-06-30
8 Q Global Advisors, LLC 99,670 $55.00K 4.25% — 2026-06-30
9 Caption Management, LLC 83,537 $46.36K 3.58% — 2026-06-30
10 TPG GP A, LLC 74,999 $41.62K 3.22% — 2026-06-30
11 Calamos Advisors LLC 81,526 $39.54K 3.06% — 2026-09-30
12 HEALTHCARE OF ONTARIO PENSION PLAN TRUST FUND 66,666 $39.33K 3.04% — 2026-06-30
13 TENOR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT Co., L.P. 66,666 $37.00K 2.86% — 2026-06-30
14 Saba Capital Management, L.P. 59,763 $33.17K 2.56% — 2026-06-30
15 Empery Asset Management, LP 33,336 $18.50K 1.43% — 2026-06-30
16 HRT FINANCIAL LP 12,147 $7.00K 0.54% — 2026-06-30
17 HBW ADVISORY SERVICES LLC 10,000 $4.70K 0.36% — 2026-09-30
18 Farther Finance Advisors, LLC Custodian 1,000 $470 0.04% — 2026-09-30
19 LONGFELLOW INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CO LLC 100 $56 <0.01% — 2026-06-30
1 filers$21.83K notional
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
1 Millennium Management LLC Custodian $21.83K 100.00% 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period

MDAIW Insider Trading (Form 4)

Latest: 2026-06-01
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
Filed Reporter Role Action Shares Avg Price Net $ Link
2026-06-01 John Michael DiMaio Director Award (A) +17,500 $2.15 $37.7K EDGAR
2026-05-27 John Michael DiMaio Director Award (A) +32,233 $2.61 $84.1K EDGAR
2026-05-20 Deepak Sadagopan Director Award (A) +25,000 — EDGAR
2026-05-18 John Michael DiMaio Director Award (A) +26,887 $2.16 $58.0K EDGAR
2026-05-18 Richard John Cotton Director Award (A) +14,700 $2.37 $34.9K EDGAR
2026-04-27 John Michael DiMaio Director Award (A) +100,000 — EDGAR
2026-04-27 Richard John Cotton Director Award (A) +29,850 — EDGAR
2026-04-27 Vincent S. Capone Chief Executive Officer Award (A) +100,000 — EDGAR
2026-04-27 Marion Ann Snyder Director Award (A) +25,000 — EDGAR
2026-04-07 John Michael DiMaio Director Award (A) +7,619 $1.58 $12.0K EDGAR
2026-04-06 Vincent S. Capone Chief Executive Officer Award (A) +16,750 $1.52 $25.5K EDGAR
2025-06-10 John Michael DiMaio Director Award (A) +11,700 $2.11 $24.7K EDGAR
2025-06-06 Martin C.B. Mellish Director Award (A) +5,000 $1.73 $8.7K EDGAR
2025-05-01 Richard John Cotton Director Award (A) +9,699 — EDGAR
2025-04-30 Vincent S. Capone CFO and General Counsel Award (A) +100,000 — EDGAR
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.

MDAIW Insider Holdings

6 insiders · @ $0.44
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
# Insider Role Shares Disclosed Exposure Lifetime OM Net Filings Last Filed
1 John Michael DiMaio Director 5,167,755 $2.27M $25.0K 8 2026-06-01
2 Vincent S. Capone Chief Executive Officer 286,450 $126.0K $0 5 2026-04-27
3 Richard John Cotton Director 111,477 $49.0K $0 5 2026-05-18
4 Deepak Sadagopan Director 25,000 $11.0K $0 1 2026-05-20
5 Marion Ann Snyder Director 25,000 $11.0K $0 1 2026-04-27
6 Martin C.B. Mellish Director 24,398 $10.7K $0 3 2025-06-06
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-09-15
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
Filing Date Event Link
2026-09-15 Regulation FD disclosure EDGAR
2026-08-12 Earnings results · Regulation FD disclosure EDGAR
2026-07-08 Director or officer change · Regulation FD disclosure EDGAR
2026-06-01 Shareholder vote results · Regulation FD disclosure EDGAR
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
Filing Date Accession Link
Quarterly report — unaudited financials and MD&A. Filed 40–45 days after each of the first three fiscal quarters.
Filing Date Accession Link
2026-08-11 0001213900-26-087764 EDGAR
ETF Holders
# ETF Provider Weight $ Exposure ETF AUM As Of
Fundamentals

Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.

Metrics
  • Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
  • Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
  • Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
  • Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
  • YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
  • Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
  • Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.

TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.

MDAIW vs Peers

Related companies, largest first
Company Market cap P/E Revenue growth YTD IV rank
SYK Stryker Corporation $124.1B 34.8 +7.9% −6.1% 27
MMM 3M Company $95.5B 28.4 +1.7% +17.6% 22
BSX Boston Scientific Corp. $62.0B 18.8 +8.9% −53.2% 19
BDX Becton, Dickinson and Co. $57.7B 54.8 +6.4% +11.0% 29
MDLN Medline Inc. Class A common stock $34.8B 0.0 — +0.9% 5
RMD ResMed Inc. $33.1B 21.6 +9.0% −3.2% 21
DXCM DexCom, Inc. $29.6B 31.9 +13.0% +21.6% 36
WST West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. $27.9B 46.1 +12.6% +48.8% 18
MDAIW Spectral AI, Inc. Warrants — — — −10.2% —
Peer median $46.3B 30.1 +8.9% +6.0% 22

P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.