Spectral AI, Inc. Warrants(MDAIW)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Industry (SIC)
- SURGICAL & MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS & APPARATUS (3841)
- Exchange
- XNAS
Spectral AI Inc is an AI company focused on predictive medical diagnostics. Its DeepView System uses proprietary AI algorithms to distinguish between fully damaged, partially damaged and healthy human tissue characters invisible to the naked eye, at the initial time point of wound presentation. The DeepView System delivers a binary prediction on the wound's capacity to heal or not-heal by a specified time point in the future. The company focuses on the burn indication which is supported by the BARDA PBS contract.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -5.50% | 3 |
| Feb | +1.79% | 3 |
| Mar | -9.90% | 3 |
| Apr | +17.15% | 3 |
| May | -5.35% | 3 |
| Jun | +61.24% | 3 |
| Jul | -18.95% | 3 |
| Aug | -0.70% | 3 |
| Sep | -6.31% | 4 |
| Oct | +3.05% | 3 |
| Nov | +57.26% | 3 |
| Dec | +23.47% | 3 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: MDAIW
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Recent trend direction suggests a consolidation phase
- Technical indicators indicate a potential reversal, but momentum signals are mixed
- Beta analysis shows above-average volatility, aligning with market amplification
Primary Risks:
- Breakout below lower Bollinger Band could signal further decline
- Failure to break above upper Bollinger Band may indicate continued consolidation
Investment Thesis: MDAIW is in a neutral phase, with potential for a reversal or continuation of the current trend. Technical indicators suggest caution, while risk metrics highlight above-average volatility.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: No recent news headlines available; market sentiment remains uncertain.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Consolidation phase
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Neutral-to-bullish trend
- Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish trend
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $0.69
- Middle Bollinger Band: $0.49
- Lower Bollinger Band: $0.29
Momentum Signals: RSI interpretation: Neutral (37.35), not overbought or oversold MACD signal: Bearish (Histogram: -0.08) Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze, indicating potential reversal or continuation
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 25818.00 (neutral-to-bullish volume trend)
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 1710155.00 (strong upward momentum)
- Volume Rate of Change: 684.60% (high volatility)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news headlines available
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral, due to lack of recent market-moving events
Catalyst Identification:
- Earnings date: Not available
- Regulatory changes: None identified
- Product launches: None announced
Market Narrative: MDAIW's neutral-to-bullish trend is not strongly influenced by recent news or market sentiment.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Beta = 1.15 (above-average volatility, amplifying market movements)
Volatility Regime: Current vs historical volatility levels: Above average (1.56) but trending lower
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: Not available
- Put/call ratios: Not available
- Unusual activity: None identified
Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations: Focus on the middle Bollinger Band ($0.49) as a potential pivot point.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market: Neutral, aligning with MDAIW's neutral-to-bullish trend
Institutional Activity:
- Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest: Not available
- Institutional participation: Not available
Correlation Analysis: R-squared interpretation: Strong positive correlation with the market (0.14)
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range: Neutral, with potential for a reversal or continuation.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support level: $0.29 (lower Bollinger Band)
- Resistance level: $0.69 (upper Bollinger Band)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical levels that could trigger significant moves: Middle Bollinger Band ($0.49) as a potential pivot point.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- Earnings date: Not available
- Regulatory changes: None identified
- Product launches: None announced
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations: Focus on the middle Bollinger Band ($0.49) as a potential stop-loss level, considering risk management strategies based on market volatility.
This comprehensive analysis provides an objective evaluation of MDAIW's technical indicators, news sentiment, and market context. The neutral-to-bullish trend suggests caution, while above-average volatility highlights the need for risk management considerations.
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 1.07
- Correlation (SPY)
- 11.6%
- R²
- 0.01
- Ann. Volatility
- 121.4%
- SPY Volatility
- 13.1%
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ANGELO GORDON & CO., L.P. | $33.75K | 60.73% | 2025-12-31 |
| 2 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $21.83K | 39.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-01 | John Michael DiMaio | Director | Award (A) | +17,500 | $2.15 | $37.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | John Michael DiMaio | Director | Award (A) | +32,233 | $2.61 | $84.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-20 | Deepak Sadagopan | Director | Award (A) | +25,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-18 | John Michael DiMaio | Director | Award (A) | +26,887 | $2.16 | $58.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-18 | Richard John Cotton | Director | Award (A) | +14,700 | $2.37 | $34.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-27 | John Michael DiMaio | Director | Award (A) | +100,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-27 | Richard John Cotton | Director | Award (A) | +29,850 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-27 | Vincent S. Capone | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | +100,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-27 | Marion Ann Snyder | Director | Award (A) | +25,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-07 | John Michael DiMaio | Director | Award (A) | +7,619 | $1.58 | $12.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-06 | Vincent S. Capone | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | +16,750 | $1.52 | $25.5K | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-10 | John Michael DiMaio | Director | Award (A) | +11,700 | $2.11 | $24.7K | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-06 | Martin C.B. Mellish | Director | Award (A) | +5,000 | $1.73 | $8.7K | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-01 | Richard John Cotton | Director | Award (A) | +9,699 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-04-30 | Vincent S. Capone | CFO and General Counsel | Award (A) | +100,000 | — | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John Michael DiMaio | Director | 5,167,755 | $2.33M | $25.0K | 8 | 2026-06-01 |
| 2 | ERICH SPANGENBERG | Director | 4,787,131 | $2.15M | $0 | 2 | 2024-05-17 |
| 3 | Rosecliff Acquisition Sponsor I LLC | Director | 848,333 | $381.7K | $0 | 1 | 2023-09-13 |
| 4 | Vincent S. Capone | Chief Executive Officer | 286,450 | $128.9K | $0 | 5 | 2026-04-27 |
| 5 | Wensheng Fan | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | 145,489 | $65.5K | $0 | 1 | 2023-09-13 |
| 6 | Richard John Cotton | Director | 111,477 | $50.2K | $0 | 5 | 2026-05-18 |
| 7 | Peter M Carlson | Chief Executive Officer | 29,411 | $13.2K | $0 | 1 | 2024-05-13 |
| 8 | Brian J Radecki | Director | 25,000 | $11.2K | $0 | 1 | 2023-09-13 |
| 9 | Deepak Sadagopan | Director | 25,000 | $11.2K | $0 | 1 | 2026-05-20 |
| 10 | Marion Ann Snyder | Director | 25,000 | $11.2K | $0 | 1 | 2026-04-27 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.