ONT Onterris, Inc.
XNYS
23.70
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
What changed
Recent filings, trades and moves- 52-Week Range
- $12.26 – $23.98
- YTD
- +11.11%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 6.08
- Straddle Price
- $4.10
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.41
- Market Cap
- $0.8B
- Open
- $23.08
- Day Range
- $22.79 – $23.80
- Volume
- 15,507
- Prev Close
- $23.66
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.84% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.84% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.75% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +53.6pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -2.6% |
| Book / Price | 55.9% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Quality Score | 0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +5.3% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $15.88 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $15.62 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 69.5% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.0B |
| Market Cap | $1B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $21.38 | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 20.9× · 4 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $25.33 | 28% | median 14.9× · 5 peers |
| Peer P/B | $31.10 | 36% | median 2.4× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | $53.70 | 36% | median 2.2× · 6 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $15.88 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $15.78 | 0% | 8 strikes · skew +0.13 |
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES (8742) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $0.8B
- Employees
- 3,500
- List Date
- 2020-07-23
- CIK
- 0001643615
- Last Earnings
- Nov 4 after close · +20.4% vs ±27.9% expected
- Next Earnings
- ~Feb 24, 2027 (estimated)
- Headquarters
- Irvine, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.onterris.com
Onterris Inc is an environmental solutions company. The company provides environmental solutions to organizations addressing regulatory, operational, and environmental challenges. Its services include the application of scientific, engineering, and data-driven approaches to support risk management, compliance, and environmental protection, including air, water, and soil.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -- |
| Feb | -- | -- |
| Mar | -- | -- |
| Apr | -- | -- |
| May | -24.94% | -24.94% |
| Jun | 23.91% | 23.91% |
| Jul | 2.29% | 2.29% |
| Aug | -24.03% | -24.03% |
| Sep | -19.11% | -19.11% |
| Oct | 17.20% | 17.20% |
| Nov | 49.75%* | 49.75% |
| Dec | -- | -- |
| Total | 2.61% | 2.61% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bearish momentum signal from MACD
- Trend direction indicates range-bound movement
- High volatility and beta indicate higher risk
Primary Risks:
- Continued selling pressure due to bearish momentum
- Potential for further market correction
Investment Thesis:
ONT is likely to experience short-term consolidation, potentially followed by a trend reversal. However, the high volatility and beta suggest a higher risk profile.
Recent News Sentiment Impact:
No recent news headlines available, but historical news sentiment analysis suggests a neutral tone, which may not have significantly impacted the stock price.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: Range-bound
- Medium-term: Downtrend
- Long-term: Neutral
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Key resistance at $18.12 (upper Bollinger Band)
- Key support at $16.50 (SMA 20)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI: Neutral (52.60), indicating no clear buy or sell signal
- MACD: Bearish, with a histogram reading of -0.64
- Bollinger Bands: Neutral, with the price trending sideways
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 686096.51
- OBV: 4183212.78, indicating a slight increase in buying pressure
- Volume Rate of Change: -36.93%, suggesting a decline in trading activity
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
No recent news headlines available.
Sentiment Assessment:
Neutral sentiment dominates the lack of recent news headlines.
Catalyst Identification:
No significant catalysts identified in the near term.
Market Narrative:
The market's neutral tone is likely to continue, with ONT experiencing short-term consolidation.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation:
High risk due to beta value of 1.42 (vs SPY).
Volatility Regime:
Current volatility regime indicates high volatility.
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: 14.0% (Low)
- Current IV: 123.8%
- Expected Move: $2.67 (42 DTE), 7-DTE: $2.33
- Volume Flow: 46 calls vs 38 puts
- Open Interest: 238 calls vs 54 puts
Downside Protection:
Key support at $16.50 (SMA 20) and $14.89 (lower Bollinger Band).
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance:
ONT's sector performance is neutral, with mixed signals from the broader market.
Institutional Activity:
No significant institutional activity observed in recent trading sessions.
Correlation Analysis:
ONT has a high correlation of 0.94 with its own volatility, indicating a strong relationship between price and volatility.
Relative Valuation:
ONT appears to be trading within its historical range, suggesting a neutral valuation.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support at $16.50 (SMA 20)
- Resistance at $18.12 (upper Bollinger Band)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout above $18.12 could trigger further buying pressure
- Breakdown below $16.50 could lead to increased selling pressure
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
No significant catalysts identified in the near term.
Risk Management:
Stop-loss levels should be set around $15.50 (lower Bollinger Band) for a 10% potential loss, with position sizing considering the high volatility and beta.
Overall Assessment
ONT is likely to experience short-term consolidation due to bearish momentum signals and high volatility. The lack of recent news headlines suggests a neutral market tone, which may not have significantly impacted the stock price. As such, I recommend a cautious approach with stop-loss levels set around $15.50 (lower Bollinger Band) for a 10% potential loss, considering the high risk profile.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-05 | After-Close | 19.00% | 33.32% | 1.75x | Exceeded |
| 2026-11-04 | After-Close | 27.90% | 20.40% | 0.73x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
ONT Options Activity & IV Rank
ONT IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow · All expiries
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 93rd percentile of this name's own daily history, near the high end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 132
Period: 252 trading days
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $8.9M | #1656 of 3716 | +41.8% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $3.7M | #2330 of 6285 | -18.2% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $2.6M | #1250 of 4729 | +2.2% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
ONT Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 57 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caption Management, LLC | $2.50M | 53.71% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $1.05M | 22.65% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $658.85K | 14.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $239.50K | 5.14% | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $203.38K | 4.37% | 2026-09-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caption Management, LLC | $2.74M | 85.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $461.61K | 14.35% | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $12.04K | 0.37% | 2026-09-30 |
ONT Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-06-08| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-08 | Peter Graham | Director | Buy (P) | +25,140 | $17.19 | $432.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-05 | Peter Graham | Director | Buy (P) | +4,860 | $15.94 | $77.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-12 | Allan Dicks | Chief Financial Officer | Buy (P) | +6,535 | $15.36 | $100.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-12 | Jose Revuelta | Chief Strategy Officer | Exer (M) | +27,349 | $6.03 | $164.9K | EDGAR |
| 2010-01-14 | J Allen Kosowsky | Director | Exer (M) | +205,000 | $0.53 | $108.1K | EDGAR |
| 2010-01-14 | Matthew Calhoun Frost | COO and Interim CEO | Mixed Exer +246,666 · Tax −78,747 |
+167,919 | $0.40 | $98.7K | EDGAR |
| 2010-01-12 | Paul Wilkins | CTO, SVP of R&D | Exer (M) | +34,333 | $0.40 | $13.7K | EDGAR |
| 2010-01-12 | Timothy Reusing | General Counsel, Exec VP | Exer (M) | +166,666 | $0.42 | $70.0K | EDGAR |
| 2010-01-12 | James Bankoski | CTO-SVP of Core Technologies | Exer (M) | +34,333 | $0.40 | $13.7K | EDGAR |
| 2009-11-17 | Matthew Calhoun Frost | COO and Interim CEO | Tax (F) | −3,124 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2009-09-29 | Matthew Calhoun Frost | COO and Interim CEO | Tax (F) | −46,850 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2009-09-22 | Timothy Reusing | General Counsel, Exec VP | Tax (F) | −9,370 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2009-08-25 | Wayne Boomer | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +67,000 | $0.58 | $38.9K | EDGAR |
| 2009-03-25 | Wayne Boomer | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +175,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2009-03-05 | James Bankoski | CTO-SVP of Core Technologies | Award (A) | +160,000 | $0.33 | $52.0K | EDGAR |
ONT Insider Holdings
3 insiders · @ $23.66| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jose Revuelta | Chief Strategy Officer | 296,631 | $7.02M | $0 | 1 | 2026-05-12 |
| 2 | Peter Graham | Director | 256,689 | $6.07M | $509.6K | 2 | 2026-06-08 |
| 3 | Allan Dicks | Chief Financial Officer | 218,178 | $5.16M | $100.4K | 1 | 2026-05-12 |
ONT Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Jun 8, 2026Directors 9
- J Thomas Presby · since Jul 22, 2020
- James K Price · since Jul 22, 2020
- Peter Graham · since Jul 22, 2020
- Richard E Perlman · since Jul 22, 2020
- Robin Newmark · since Jul 22, 2020
- Vijay Manthripragada · since Jul 22, 2020
- de Castro Jose Miguel Fernandez · since Jul 22, 2020
- Janet Risi Field · since Oct 19, 2021
- Vincent Colman · on file since Mar 2025
Officers 5
- Vijay Manthripragada · President & CEO · since Jul 22, 2020
- Allan Dicks · Chief Financial Officer · since Jul 22, 2020
- James Laws · Chief Operating Officer · since Jan 19, 2026
- Jose Revuelta · Chief Strategy Officer · since Jul 22, 2020
- Nasym Afsari · General Counsel and Secretary · since Jul 22, 2020
Changes in the last 10 years (47)
| Jan 19, 2026 | James Laws became Chief Operating Officer |
| Mar 12, 2025 | Vincent Colman first on file as a director |
| Oct 19, 2021 | Janet Risi Field became a director |
| Dec 2, 2020 | Partners Ltd reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 2, 2020 | Ocm Holdings I, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 2, 2020 | Ocm Fie, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 2, 2020 | Oaktree Holdings, Ltd. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 2, 2020 | Oaktree Holdings, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 2, 2020 | Oaktree Fund Gp I, L.p. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 2, 2020 | Oaktree Fund GP, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 2, 2020 | Oaktree Capital Management LP reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 2, 2020 | Oaktree Capital I, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 2, 2020 | Oaktree Capital Group, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 2, 2020 | OCM Montrose II Holdings, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 2, 2020 | OCM Montrose Holdings, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 2, 2020 | Brookfield Asset Management Inc. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 1, 2020 | Richard E Perlman no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Dec 1, 2020 | James K Price no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Jul 27, 2020 | Partners Ltd became a 10% owner |
| Jul 27, 2020 | Ocm Holdings I, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Jul 27, 2020 | Ocm Fie, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Jul 27, 2020 | Oaktree Holdings, Ltd. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 27, 2020 | Oaktree Holdings, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Jul 27, 2020 | Oaktree Fund Gp I, L.p. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 27, 2020 | Oaktree Fund GP, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Jul 27, 2020 | Oaktree Capital Management LP became a 10% owner |
| Jul 27, 2020 | Oaktree Capital I, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 27, 2020 | Oaktree Capital Group, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Jul 27, 2020 | OCM Montrose II Holdings, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 27, 2020 | OCM Montrose Holdings, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 27, 2020 | Brookfield Asset Management Inc. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 22, 2020 | de Castro Jose Miguel Fernandez became a director |
| Jul 22, 2020 | Vijay Manthripragada became a director |
| Jul 22, 2020 | Vijay Manthripragada became President & CEO |
| Jul 22, 2020 | Robin Newmark became a director |
| Jul 22, 2020 | Richard E Perlman became a director |
| Jul 22, 2020 | Richard E Perlman became a 10% owner |
| Jul 22, 2020 | Peter Joseph Jonna became a director |
| Jul 22, 2020 | Peter Graham became a director |
| Jul 22, 2020 | Nasym Afsari became General Counsel and Secretary |
| Jul 22, 2020 | Joshua W. LeMaire became Chief Operating Officer |
| Jul 22, 2020 | Jose Revuelta became Chief Strategy Officer |
| Jul 22, 2020 | James K Price became a director |
| Jul 22, 2020 | James K Price became a 10% owner |
| Jul 22, 2020 | J Thomas Presby became a director |
| Jul 22, 2020 | Brook Hinchman became a director |
| Jul 22, 2020 | Allan Dicks became Chief Financial Officer |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (3)
- Joshua W. LeMaire · Last reported as Chief Operating Officer in an SEC filing dated Mar 3, 2022
- Peter Joseph Jonna · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jul 22, 2020
- Brook Hinchman · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jul 22, 2020
ONT Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-03-13What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | Manthripragada Vijay | Officer, Director | 46,121 | $1.17M | 2026-03-13 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-09 | Revuelta Jose | Officer | 7,858 | $212.2K | 2026-03-09 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-04 | Revuelta Jose | Officer | 42,668 | $1.18M | 2026-03-04 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-03 | Afsari Nasym | Officer | 43,348 | $1.23M | 2026-03-03 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-03 | Revuelta Jose | Officer | 60,000 | $1.68M | 2026-03-03 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-02 | Afsari Nasym | Officer | 200 | $6.0K | 2026-03-02 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-02 | PRESBY J THOMAS | Director | 10,000 | $290.9K | 2026-03-02 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-12 | Manthripragada Vijay | Officer, Director | 44,984 | $1.08M | 2025-11-11 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-10 | Manthripragada Vijay | Officer, Director | 44,983 | $1.19M | 2025-11-10 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-06 | Manthripragada Vijay | Officer, Director | 12,500 | $581.4K | 2024-05-06 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $21.1M | $77.8B | 2026-11-09 |
| 2 | VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $18.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $13.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $12.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $11.2M | $191.7B | 2026-11-09 |
| 6 | DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.04% | $10.4M | — | 2026-11-09 |
| 7 | IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.05% | $7.6M | $14.1B | 2026-11-09 |
| 8 | DFAT Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.02% | $7.1M | — | 2026-11-09 |
| 9 | SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $5.0M | $12.9B | 2026-11-09 |
| 10 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $5.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 11 | VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World EX-US Small-Cap Index Fund | Vanguard | 0.03% | $4.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 12 | SPDW State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.01% | $3.8M | $41.1B | 2026-11-09 |
| 13 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.01% | $3.1M | — | 2026-11-09 |
| 14 | VGK Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $2.9M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 15 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.01% | $2.7M | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 16 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $2.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 17 | IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $2.2M | $34.1B | 2026-11-09 |
| 18 | CGW Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF | Invesco | 0.20% | $2.1M | — | 2026-11-09 |
| 19 | IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $2.1M | $57.6B | 2026-11-09 |
| 20 | SMLF iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.05% | $1.9M | $4.3B | 2026-11-09 |
| 21 | BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | Nport | 0.07% | $1.7M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | PSC Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.06% | $1.4M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | GWX State Street® SPDR® S&P® International Small Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.11% | $1.0M | $897.4M | 2026-11-09 |
| 24 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $1.0M | $95.3B | 2026-11-09 |
| 25 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $970,243 | — | 2026-09-30 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
ONT vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECL Ecolab, Inc. | $86.0B | 41.6 | +9.3% | +16.5% | 39 |
| VLTO Veralto Corporation | $28.7B | 29.3 | +6.4% | +20.0% | 21 |
| XYL Xylem Inc | $22.8B | 21.4 | +1.9% | −29.4% | 43 |
| IEX IDEX Corporation | $17.3B | 32.9 | +6.9% | +32.3% | 16 |
| GGG Graco Inc | $11.2B | 22.4 | +5.4% | −15.7% | 57 |
| ITRI Itron Inc | $4.4B | 16.1 | −3.6% | +5.4% | 30 |
| WS Worthington Steel, Inc. | $2.0B | — | +69.1% | +12.0% | 48 |
| ONT Onterris, Inc. | $829M | — | — | +10.9% | 7 |
| GEVO Gevo, Inc. | $363M | — | +121.4% | −32.5% | 18 |
| Peer median | $14.3B | 25.9 | +6.7% | +8.7% | 34 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.