BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF(XTWY · ETF)
ETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY) ETF
- Exchange
- ARCX
- Inception
- 2022-09-13
- Has Options
- No
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | $0.1530 | CD |
| 2026-08-03 | 2026-08-06 | $0.1544 | CD |
| 2026-07-01 | 2026-07-07 | $0.1499 | CD |
| 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-04 | $0.1357 | CD |
| 2026-05-01 | 2026-05-06 | $0.1605 | CD |
| 2026-04-01 | 2026-04-07 | $0.1516 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | US TREAS BDS 3.625% 02/15/53 | 5.68% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREAS BDS 2.375% 05/15/51 | 5.47% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREAS BDS 3.625% 05/15/53 | 5.34% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREAS BDS 2% 8/15/51 | 4.94% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREAS BDS 4.625% 11/15/55 | 4.90% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREAS BDS 2.875% 05/15/52 | 4.84% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREAS BDS 1.875% 02/15/51 | 4.83% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREAS BDS 3% 08/15/52 | 4.73% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREAS BDS 2.25% 02/15/52 | 4.46% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREAS BDS 1.875% 11/15/51 | 4.45% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREAS BDS 1.625% 11/15/50 | 4.06% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREAS BDS 1.375% 08/15/50 | 3.87% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREAS BDS 2% 02/15/50 | 3.48% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREAS BDS 1.25% 05/15/50 | 3.35% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREAS BDS 2.25% 08/15/49 | 3.19% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREAS BDS 2.375% 11/15/49 | 3.03% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 08/15/52 | 1.60% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 05/15/53 | 1.48% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 02/15/52 | 1.37% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 08/15/51 | 1.15% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 02/15/51 | 1.15% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 11/15/51 | 1.13% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 11/15/50 | 1.10% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 05/15/49 | 1.10% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 02/15/49 | 1.09% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 02/15/55 | 1.07% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 08/15/54 | 1.05% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 05/15/51 | 1.04% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 02/15/53 | 1.03% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 02/15/54 | 1.02% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 05/15/54 | 0.91% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 08/15/48 | 0.85% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 11/15/48 | 0.81% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 11/15/53 | 0.79% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 05/15/55 | 0.73% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 02/15/50 | 0.71% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 11/15/54 | 0.70% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 11/15/47 | 0.68% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 08/15/50 | 0.66% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 02/15/48 | 0.63% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 08/15/47 | 0.60% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 05/15/50 | 0.53% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 08/15/46 | 0.46% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 05/15/47 | 0.44% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 11/15/49 | 0.43% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 02/15/46 | 0.43% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 05/15/48 | 0.42% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 11/15/52 | 0.40% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 02/15/47 | 0.32% | Debt | US |
| — | US TREASURYSP ZCP 08/15/49 | 0.28% | Debt | US |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| US Treasury | 99.10% | $189.8M | 52 |
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +1.59% | 4 |
| Feb | -0.28% | 4 |
| Mar | -0.25% | 4 |
| Apr | -2.79% | 4 |
| May | +0.01% | 4 |
| Jun | +2.09% | 4 |
| Jul | -1.18% | 4 |
| Aug | -0.07% | 4 |
| Sep | -2.18% | 5 |
| Oct | -5.19% | 4 |
| Nov | +4.97% | 4 |
| Dec | -1.59% | 4 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: XTWY
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers: Technical trend indicators, recent news headlines, and volatility metrics.
Primary Risks: Uncertainty around market direction, potential for mean reversion in the short-term.
2-3 Sentence Investment Thesis: XTWY appears to be consolidating within a trading range, with technical indicators suggesting a neutral bias. Recent news headlines have been generally neutral, but the options market is showing signs of increased volatility. Investors should monitor support levels and consider hedging strategies to manage risk.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines summary suggests a neutral sentiment, with no significant bearish or bullish themes emerging.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Medium-term (1-3 months): Consolidation
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $37.57
- Middle Line: $36.68
- Lower Bollinger Band: $35.79
- SMA 20: $36.68
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 54.40 (neutral)
- MACD: -0.19 / Signal: 0.10 / Histogram: -0.28 (bearish)
Volume Analysis: Volume trends suggest institutional interest, with an increase in buying pressure.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Neutral news headlines, focusing on market commentary and routine announcements.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate sentiment is neutral, with no significant bearish or bullish themes emerging.
Catalyst Identification: No specific earnings dates or product launches announced recently.
Market Narrative: The recent news headlines align with the technical signals, suggesting a consolidation phase.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low risk (beta 0.14), indicating a defensive stance relative to the market.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility levels are low compared to historical norms.
Options Market Signals: IV rank is moderate, with put/call ratios suggesting increased volatility.
Downside Protection: Support levels at $36.68 and $35.79 should be monitored.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: XTWY is outperforming its sector peers in the short-term.
Institutional Activity: Institutional interest is increasing, as seen by volume trends.
Correlation Analysis: The stock's correlation with the market is relatively low (R-squared: 0.14).
Relative Valuation: XTWY appears to be trading within a reasonable range relative to its peers and sector averages.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Support at $36.68, resistance at $37.57.
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: A breakout above the upper Bollinger Band or a breakdown below the lower band could trigger significant moves.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No specific catalysts announced recently.
Risk Management: Consider hedging strategies to manage risk, focusing on support levels and potential mean reversion.
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 0.22
- Correlation (SPY)
- 24.7%
- R²
- 0.06
- Ann. Volatility
- 11.4%
- SPY Volatility
- 13.0%
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|