FMAT vs TRUM

Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF against VanEck Materials TruSector ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
7 bp
FMAT is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
FMAT
$578M

Side by side

FMATTRUM
FundFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETFVanEck Materials TruSector ETF
IssuerFidelityVanEck
CategoryMaterialsMaterials
Expense ratio0.08%0.15%
Assets$578M—
Average daily dollar volume$3.4M$57K
ListedOct 21, 2013Jul 7, 2026
FrenzyCap score6946
1-month return−2.7%−1.4%
3-month return−1.5%−0.5%
Year to date+6.6%—
1-year return+7.4%—
30-day volatility15.4%14.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−13.8%−9.1%
Trailing 12-month yield1.45%0.35%
Holdings106—
Top 10 weight55.9%—
Look-through P/E35.5—
Holdings vs fair value+12.0%—
Holdings above 200-day average41%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$129K thru Jul 2026—
30-day implied volatility23.3%—
Holdings as ofas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · FMAT holdings · TRUM holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.