BCAT BlackRock Capital Allocation Term Trust
XNYS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $1.4B
- List Date
- 2020-09-25
- CIK
- 0001809541
- Homepage
- https://www.blackrock.com
BlackRock Capital Allocation Trust, now BlackRock Capital Allocation Term Trust, is a diversified, closed-end management investment company. Its investment objectives are to provide total return and income through a combination of current income, current gains, and long-term capital appreciation. The Trust invests in a portfolio of both equity and debt securities of companies from different sectors such as Information Technology, Financials, Industrials, Communication, Health Care, etc. It also utilizes an option-writing (selling) plan in an effort to generate current gains from option premium…
- Expense ratio
- —
- Assets
- —
- Trailing yield
- —
- Average daily volume
- $17M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- —
- Listed
- Sep 25, 2020 NYSE
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (18% of its variance, beta 0.45); Value over growth (7% of its variance, beta -0.21); Long Treasuries (3% of its variance, beta 0.24). These factors explain 32% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBLCapital Group Core Balanced ETF | — | 0.33% | $7.9B | +5.7% | compare |
| AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | — | 0.15% | $3.9B | +5.9% | compare |
| AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF | — | 0.15% | $3.4B | +9.8% | compare |
| CGCVCapital Group Conservative Equity ETF | — | 0.33% | $2.2B | +9.5% | compare |
| INCMFranklin Income Focus ETF | — | 0.38% | $2.0B | +3.9% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Allocation category.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 2.14% | -5.81% | 7.62% | 2.75% | 1.58% | 2.73% | 1.84% |
| Feb | -3.00% | -7.04% | -2.82% | -0.06% | -0.52% | 3.12% | -1.72% |
| Mar | -5.70% | -2.70% | 1.88% | 5.78% | -6.61% | -6.86% | -2.37% |
| Apr | 6.55% | -6.43% | 0.80% | -7.22% | -0.69% | 5.15% | -0.31% |
| May | -1.39% | 2.33% | -2.44% | 4.63% | 1.09% | 4.74% | 1.49% |
| Jun | 1.81% | -7.75% | 2.28% | -2.09% | 0.53% | -0.06% | -0.88% |
| Jul | 0.41% | 3.87% | 0.26% | -1.26% | -2.04% | -0.41% | 0.14% |
| Aug | 0.82% | -3.80% | -2.99% | 1.10% | 1.49% | 0.76% | -0.44% |
| Sep | -8.47% | -7.10% | -3.78% | -0.24% | -1.00% | -13.29% | -5.65% |
| Oct | 0.35% | 2.94% | -2.78% | -3.75% | -1.61% | -2.69%* | -1.26% |
| Nov | -7.04% | 1.95% | 4.52% | 1.75% | -2.31% | -- | -0.23% |
| Dec | 3.84% | -5.84% | -0.20% | -6.77% | -2.07% | -- | -2.21% |
| Total | -10.30% | -30.97% | 1.71% | -6.12% | -11.76% | -8.05% | -10.91% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is a comprehensive stock analysis report for BCAT:
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level 6/10) Key drivers and primary risks: * The stock has been consolidating around its SMA 50, indicating a neutral trend. * Recent news headlines have been neutral, with no significant market-moving events. * Volatility is relatively low, which may indicate a lack of institutional interest or momentum catalysts.
Recent news sentiment impact: NEUTRAL
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: * Short-term (1-4 weeks): Neutral, as the stock has been trading sideways around its SMA 50. * Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish, with the MACD signal line crossover indicating a potential uptrend. * Long-term (3-12 months): Neutral, as the stock's price action has not shown a clear directional bias.
Support/Resistance Levels: * Key resistance level: $15.86 (upper Bollinger Band) * Support level: $15.09 (lower Bollinger Band)
Momentum Signals: * RSI interpretation: Neutral (64.64), indicating no clear overbought or oversold conditions. * MACD signal: Bullish, with the MACD line above the signal line. * Bollinger Bands position: Neutral, as the stock's price is trading within a narrow range.
Volume Analysis: * Volume trends: Decreasing (volume rate of change: -95.31%) * Institutional interest signals: Low institutional interest, indicated by low volume and volatility.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines have been neutral, with no significant market-moving events. Sentiment Assessment: Neutral Catalyst Identification: * No upcoming earnings reports or product launches that could impact the stock price. Market Narrative: The neutral market narrative is consistent with the technical analysis findings.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Interpretation: Low risk, as indicated by a beta of 0.68 (compared to SPY). Volatility Regime: Low volatility, as indicated by historical volatility metrics. Options Market Signals: * IV premium vs HV30: N/A (positive = implied richer than realized), indicating no unusual options activity.
Downside Protection: Support levels at $15.09 and potential buyers around the SMA 50 ($14.96).
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: The stock's performance has been neutral compared to its sector. Institutional Activity: Low institutional interest, as indicated by low volume and volatility. Correlation Analysis: * R-squared interpretation: Weak correlation with the market (0.62), indicating a relatively independent price action.
Relative Valuation: Neutral, as the stock's price is trading within a narrow range.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: * Support level: $15.09 * Resistance level: $15.86
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: * Breakout level: $16.00 (upper Bollinger Band) * Breakdown level: $14.50 (lower Bollinger Band)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: * No earnings reports or product launches in the near term.
Risk Management: * Stop-loss levels: Consider setting stop-loss orders around the support level ($15.09) for long positions and the resistance level ($15.86) for short positions. * Position sizing considerations: Start with a small position size, as the stock's price action has not shown clear directional bias.
Please note that this analysis is based on the provided data only and should be used as a starting point for further research.
BCAT Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $7.1M | #831 of 4729 | +5.9% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $309K | #5031 of 6285 | -78.5% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $195K | #3500 of 3716 | -36.2% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
BCAT Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
BCAT Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-07-15| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-15 | Richard M Rieder | Sell (S) | −35,734 | $15.96 | -$570.3K | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-03 | Russell Jared Koesterich | Mixed | — | $14.70 | -$81.6K | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-03 | Sarah Croughan Thompson | Mixed | — | $14.70 | -$10.2K | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-03 | Randy William Berkowitz | Mixed | — | $14.70 | -$54.1K | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-19 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −369,078 | $14.85 | -$5.48M | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-15 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −573,638 | $15.26 | -$8.75M | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-13 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −303,396 | $15.16 | -$4.60M | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-12 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −269,036 | $14.81 | -$3.98M | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-08 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −298,404 | $14.72 | -$4.39M | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-06 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −171,140 | $14.78 | -$2.53M | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-05 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −198,462 | $14.79 | -$2.94M | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-02 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −623,458 | $14.39 | -$8.97M | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-17 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −33,326 | $13.92 | -$463.9K | EDGAR |
| 2025-03-20 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −3,642 | $14.77 | -$53.8K | EDGAR |
| 2025-03-18 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −14,792 | $14.82 | -$219.2K | EDGAR |
BCAT Insider Holdings
6 insiders · @ $13.22| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 10,685,126 | $141.26M | $1.91M | 58 | 2025-05-15 |
| 2 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | 10,518,766 | $139.06M | -$26.74M | 38 | 2025-05-19 |
| 3 | Richard M Rieder | 272,353 | $3.60M | $5.58M | 20 | 2026-07-15 | |
| 4 | Russell Jared Koesterich | 38,554 | $509.7K | $684.9K | 21 | 2026-02-03 | |
| 5 | Sarah Croughan Thompson | 693 | $9.2K | $0 | 2 | 2026-02-03 | |
| 6 | Stayce D. Harris | Director | 60 | $793 | $962 | 1 | 2024-10-29 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | Invesco | 1.26% | $9.3M | — | 2026-10-20 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.