BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF
ETFETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Inception
- 2019-09-25
- Has Options
- No
- Expense ratio
- 0.18% prospectus, filed Dec 18, 2025
- Assets
- $367M shares × price, Oct 20, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 2.74% paid monthly
- Average daily volume
- $2.7M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 2,677 top 10 are 3.4%
- Listed
- Sep 25, 2019 Nasdaq
- Tracking difference
- -0.47 pts vs index, after fees, FY 2025
Moves with. Long Treasuries (10% of its variance, beta 0.06). These factors explain 15% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.
Stated objective. The Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (the Fund) seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index (the Underlying Index). (from the fund's prospectus)
All 2,677 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Target Maturity Muni ETFs
- May 2026
- +$4.7M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$24M +6.9% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- +$85M +24.9% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| May 2026 | +$4.7M |
| Apr 2026 | +$4.7M |
| Mar 2026 | +$14M |
| Feb 2026 | +$9.5M |
| Jan 2026 | +$7.1M |
| Dec 2025 | +$7.1M |
| Nov 2025 | +$9.5M |
| Oct 2025 | +$12M |
| Sep 2025 | +$4.7M |
| Aug 2025 | +$2.4M |
| Jul 2025 | +$9.4M |
| Jun 2025 | $0 |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 81 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBMPiShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF | — | 0.10% | $689M | −0.5% | compare |
| IBMQiShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF | — | 0.10% | $684M | −1.2% | compare |
| IBMRiShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF | — | 0.10% | $509M | −1.9% | compare |
| IBMOiShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF | — | 0.10% | $508M | +0.1% | compare |
| IBMSiShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Muni Bond ETF | — | 0.10% | $364M | −2.7% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Target Maturity Muni category.
- Authorized participants
- 3 active of 28 with agreements; top 3 did 100%
- Created · redeemed
- $101M · $0 over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 0% creations 69% in kind
- Creation unit
- 100,000 shares
- Securities lending
- not authorized
- Return vs index
- -0.47 pts after fees; -0.29 before; daily s.d. 0.35
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-23 | $0.0565 | CD |
| 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-25 | $0.0530 | CD |
| 2026-08-24 | 2026-08-28 | $0.0545 | CD |
| 2026-07-20 | 2026-07-24 | $0.0550 | CD |
| 2026-06-22 | 2026-06-26 | $0.0546 | CD |
| 2026-05-18 | 2026-05-22 | $0.0550 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | Illinois (State of) | 0.46% | Debt | US |
| — | New Jersey (State of) | 0.31% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (City of), NY Municipal Water Finance Authority | 0.30% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (City of), NY Transitional Finance Authority | 0.30% | Debt | US |
| — | Clark (County of), NV | 0.30% | Debt | US |
| — | Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp. | 0.29% | Debt | US |
| — | Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp. | 0.28% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) Health Facilities Financing Authority (Kaiser Permanente) | 0.25% | Debt | US |
| — | Texas (State of) Water Development Board | 0.24% | Debt | US |
| — | Houston (City of), TX | 0.24% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (City of), NY Municipal Water Finance Authority | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (State of) Dormitory Authority (New School (The)) | 0.21% | Debt | US |
| — | Maryland (State of) Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority (University of Maryland Medical System) | 0.21% | Debt | US |
| — | Illinois (State of) | 0.20% | Debt | US |
| — | Auburn School District No. 408 of King & Pierce Counties | 0.20% | Debt | US |
| — | Pennsylvania (Commonwealth of) Turnpike Commission | 0.20% | Debt | US |
| — | Anaheim (City of), CA Housing & Public Improvements Authority | 0.20% | Debt | US |
| — | Minnesota (State of) | 0.19% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (City of), NY Transitional Finance Authority | 0.19% | Debt | US |
| — | Virginia (Commonwealth of) Public Building Authority | 0.18% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) | 0.18% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) | 0.18% | Debt | US |
| — | Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority | 0.18% | Debt | US |
| — | Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority | 0.18% | Debt | US |
| — | North Texas Tollway Authority | 0.17% | Debt | US |
| — | Illinois (State of) | 0.17% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (City of), NY | 0.17% | Debt | US |
| — | University of California | 0.17% | Debt | US |
| — | Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority | 0.17% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) Health Facilities Financing Authority (Children's Hospital Los Angeles) | 0.17% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (City of), NY Transitional Finance Authority | 0.17% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (City of), NY Municipal Water Finance Authority | 0.17% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) | 0.17% | Debt | US |
| — | North Carolina (State of) | 0.17% | Debt | US |
| — | Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) | 0.17% | Debt | US |
| — | Tampa (City of) & Hillsborough (County of), FL Expressway Authority | 0.16% | Debt | US |
| — | Illinois (State of) | 0.16% | Debt | US |
| — | Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority | 0.16% | Debt | US |
| — | Central Florida Expressway Authority | 0.16% | Debt | US |
| — | Connecticut (State of) | 0.16% | Debt | US |
| — | North Carolina (State of) | 0.16% | Debt | US |
| — | Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority (Green Bonds) | 0.16% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (City of), NY Transitional Finance Authority | 0.16% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (City of), NY Transitional Finance Authority | 0.16% | Debt | US |
| — | Pennsylvania (Commonwealth of) | 0.15% | Debt | US |
| — | Mississippi (State of) | 0.15% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) | 0.15% | Debt | US |
| — | San Francisco (City & County of), CA Airport Commission (San Francisco International Airport) | 0.15% | Debt | US |
| — | Virginia (Commonwealth of) Public Building Authority | 0.15% | Debt | US |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Municipal | 96.91% | $331.5M | 2492 |
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 0.35% | -2.71% | 1.85% | -0.26% | 0.04% | 0.13% | -0.10% |
| Feb | -2.24% | -0.62% | -2.47% | -0.42% | 0.55% | 0.38% | -0.80% |
| Mar | 0.55% | -3.14% | 1.86% | -0.44% | -0.76% | -0.53% | -0.41% |
| Apr | 0.70% | -2.58% | -0.65% | -0.76% | -0.51% | -0.23% | -0.67% |
| May | 0.21% | 1.25% | -0.82% | -0.66% | -0.28% | 0.01% | -0.05% |
| Jun | 0.31% | -0.85% | 0.19% | 0.34% | 0.64% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
| Jul | 0.44% | 1.73% | -0.08% | 0.98% | -0.11% | -0.19% | 0.46% |
| Aug | -0.41% | -2.60% | -0.78% | 0.03% | -0.17% | 0.02% | -0.65% |
| Sep | -0.79% | -3.10% | -1.95% | 0.06% | 0.51% | -1.35% | -1.10% |
| Oct | -0.23% | -1.03% | -0.53% | -0.46% | -0.13% | 0.60%* | -0.30% |
| Nov | 0.64% | 3.70% | 3.68% | 0.66% | 0.06% | -- | 1.75% |
| Dec | 0.00% | -0.30% | 1.20% | -0.63% | 0.11% | -- | 0.08% |
| Total | -0.51% | -10.02% | 1.34% | -1.57% | -0.06% | -1.05% | -1.98% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is my comprehensive stock analysis report for BSMR:
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level 6/10)
Key drivers: Consolidation within a range, with bearish momentum signals and moderate volatility.
Primary risks: Earnings miss or negative news sentiment could lead to further downside pressure.
2-3 sentence investment thesis: BSMR is trading in a consolidation phase, with mixed technical and fundamental signals. The stock's low volatility and beta suggest it may be less prone to large price movements, but caution is advised due to bearish momentum indicators and the potential for earnings misses or negative news.
Recent news sentiment impact: Recent headlines have been neutral, which is consistent with the stock's consolidation phase.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: NEUTRAL (range-bound), Medium-term: BEARISH (downward trend), Long-term: NEUTRAL (sideways trend)
Support/Resistance Levels: Lower resistance at $23.61 (SMA 20) and upper support at $23.66 (SMA 200)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (40.87)
- MACD signal: Bearish (-0.01 / -0.01 histogram)
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral (width: 0.56)
Volume Analysis: Volume is trading within a range, with no clear directional bias.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Two recent headlines were neutral, indicating no significant market-moving news.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate sentiment is NEUTRAL.
Catalyst Identification: No upcoming earnings or catalysts to impact the stock's price in the near term.
Market Narrative: The neutral market narrative aligns with the stock's consolidation phase and mixed technical signals.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low beta (0.01) suggests less volatility than the broader market.
Volatility Regime: Moderate volatility, as indicated by the historical volatility metrics (HV20 2.0%, HV30 1.9%, HV60 1.8%).
Options Market Signals: No options data available, but IV premium is N/A, suggesting an implied richness that may not be justified.
Downside Protection: Support levels are in place at $23.54 (lower Bollinger Band) and $23.61 (SMA 20), providing some downside protection.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: The stock's sector has been relatively strong, which supports the current consolidation phase.
Institutional Activity: No significant institutional activity is evident in recent trading data.
Correlation Analysis: The stock has a low correlation with the broader market (0.10), suggesting it may be less affected by market-wide trends.
Relative Valuation: The stock is positioned within a trading range, with no clear value or growth biases emerging.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: $23.61 (SMA 20) and $23.66 (SMA 200)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No clear levels for breakout or breakdown, as the stock is trading within a range.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming earnings or catalysts to impact the stock's price in the near term.
Risk Management: Monitor the stock's price action and adjust position sizing accordingly based on technical and fundamental developments.
BSMR Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
BSMR Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|