BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF
ETFETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Inception
- 2023-03-01
- Has Options
- No
- Expense ratio
- 0.18% prospectus, filed Dec 18, 2025
- Assets
- $202M SEC filing, May 31, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 3.38% paid monthly
- Average daily volume
- $2.7M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 1,768 top 10 are 4.1%
- Listed
- Mar 1, 2023 Nasdaq
- Tracking difference
- -0.42 pts vs index, after fees, FY 2025
Moves with. Long Treasuries (11% of its variance, beta 0.09); US large-cap stocks (8% of its variance, beta 0.07); Developed markets ex-US over US (3% of its variance, beta 0.05). These factors explain 24% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.
Stated objective. The Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (the Fund) seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2032 Index (the Underlying Index). (from the fund's prospectus)
All 1,768 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Target Maturity Muni ETFs
- May 2026
- +$5.0M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$40M +19.8% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- +$98M +48.2% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| May 2026 | +$5.0M |
| Apr 2026 | +$33M |
| Mar 2026 | +$2.5M |
| Feb 2026 | +$7.6M |
| Jan 2026 | +$7.6M |
| Dec 2025 | +$10M |
| Nov 2025 | +$7.6M |
| Oct 2025 | +$7.5M |
| Sep 2025 | +$5.0M |
| Aug 2025 | +$2.5M |
| Jul 2025 | +$4.9M |
| Jun 2025 | +$4.9M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 40 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBMPiShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF | — | 0.10% | $689M | −0.5% | compare |
| IBMQiShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF | — | 0.10% | $684M | −1.2% | compare |
| IBMRiShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF | — | 0.10% | $509M | −1.9% | compare |
| IBMOiShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF | — | 0.10% | $508M | +0.1% | compare |
| BSMRInvesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF | — | 0.18% | $368M | −1.1% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Target Maturity Muni category.
- Authorized participants
- 4 active of 28 with agreements; top 3 did 94%
- Created · redeemed
- $42M · $0 over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 0% creations 56% in kind
- Creation unit
- 100,000 shares
- Securities lending
- not authorized
- Return vs index
- -0.42 pts after fees; -0.24 before; daily s.d. 0.37
- Diversification status
- Non-diversified may concentrate in fewer issuers
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-23 | $0.0685 | CD |
| 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-25 | $0.0672 | CD |
| 2026-08-24 | 2026-08-28 | $0.0735 | CD |
| 2026-07-20 | 2026-07-24 | $0.0729 | CD |
| 2026-06-22 | 2026-06-26 | $0.0697 | CD |
| 2026-05-18 | 2026-05-22 | $0.0620 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | Regents of the University of California Medical Center | 0.55% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (City of), NY Municipal Water Finance Authority | 0.53% | Debt | US |
| — | Iowa (State of) Finance Authority (Iowa Fertilizer Co.) | 0.45% | Debt | US |
| — | University of California | 0.44% | Debt | US |
| — | University of California | 0.40% | Debt | US |
| — | New Jersey (State of) | 0.38% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (State of) Dormitory Authority | 0.37% | Debt | US |
| — | Los Angeles Unified School District | 0.34% | Debt | US |
| — | New Jersey (State of) Transportation Trust Fund Authority | 0.32% | Debt | US |
| — | Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Baylor Scott & White Health) | 0.31% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) | 0.30% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (City of), NY Transitional Finance Authority | 0.30% | Debt | US |
| — | Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority | 0.29% | Debt | US |
| — | Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (Northshore Edward Elmhurst Health Credit Group) | 0.29% | Debt | US |
| — | Texas (State of) Transportation Commission State Highway Fund | 0.29% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) | 0.29% | Debt | US |
| — | Maryland (State of) | 0.29% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (State of) Thruway Authority (Bidding Group 4) | 0.29% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (State of) Dormitory Authority | 0.29% | Debt | US |
| — | Miami-Dade (County of), FL Transit System | 0.28% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) | 0.28% | Debt | US |
| — | San Francisco (City & County of), CA Airport Commission (San Francisco International Airport) | 0.27% | Debt | US |
| — | Duluth (City of), MN Economic Development Authority (St. Luke's Hospital of Duluth) | 0.27% | Debt | US |
| — | Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority (Green Bonds) | 0.27% | Debt | US |
| — | Colorado (State of) Health Facilities Authority (Intermountain Healthcare) | 0.27% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (City of), NY Transitional Finance Authority | 0.27% | Debt | US |
| — | Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) | 0.26% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (State of) Dormitory Authority | 0.26% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (City of), NY Municipal Water Finance Authority | 0.26% | Debt | US |
| — | Los Angeles (City of), CA Department of Water & Power | 0.26% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (City of), NY | 0.26% | Debt | US |
| — | Great Lakes Water Authority | 0.26% | Debt | US |
| — | New York City Transitional Finance Authority Future Tax Secured Revenue | 0.25% | Debt | US |
| — | Louisiana (State of) Local Government Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority (Westlake Chemical Corp.) | 0.25% | Debt | US |
| — | Wisconsin (State of) Public Finance Authority (Cone Health) | 0.25% | Debt | US |
| — | State of Oregon Department of Transportation | 0.25% | Debt | US |
| — | New Jersey (State of) Transportation Trust Fund Authority | 0.24% | Debt | US |
| — | General Authority of Southcentral Pennsylvania | 0.24% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (City of), NY Transitional Finance Authority | 0.24% | Debt | US |
| — | Pennsylvania (Commonwealth of) | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | South Carolina (State of) Public Service Authority (Santee Cooper) | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | Delaware Valley Regional Finance Authority | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority (MTA Bridges & Tunnels) | 0.22% | Debt | US |
| — | Illinois (State of) Toll Highway Authority | 0.22% | Debt | US |
| — | Pflugerville Independent School District | 0.22% | Debt | US |
| — | Philadelphia (City of), PA | 0.22% | Debt | US |
| — | Metropolitan Transportation Authority Dedicated Tax Fund | 0.22% | Debt | US |
| — | New York (City of), NY | 0.21% | Debt | US |
| — | Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) Development Finance Agency (Green Bonds) (Harvard University) | 0.21% | Debt | US |
| — | Dallas (City of), TX Independent School District | 0.21% | Debt | US |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Municipal | 98.76% | $199.9M | 1768 |
| Month | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -0.58% | -0.06% | 0.72% | 0.03% |
| Feb | -- | -0.98% | 0.98% | 0.83% | 0.28% |
| Mar | 2.50% | -0.76% | -2.81% | -2.42% | -0.87% |
| Apr | -0.47% | -1.81% | -1.37% | 0.33% | -0.83% |
| May | -0.91% | -0.78% | -0.50% | -0.05% | -0.56% |
| Jun | 0.67% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 0.47% | 0.78% |
| Jul | -0.06% | 1.00% | -0.86% | -1.63% | -0.39% |
| Aug | -2.15% | -0.04% | 0.25% | -0.62% | -0.64% |
| Sep | -3.52% | 0.71% | 2.21% | -3.64% | -1.06% |
| Oct | -1.17% | -2.68% | 0.78% | 1.60%* | -0.37% |
| Nov | 6.81% | 1.65% | -0.03% | -- | 2.81% |
| Dec | 2.90% | -2.01% | -0.16% | -- | 0.24% |
| Total | 4.29% | -5.14% | -0.79% | -4.44% | -1.52% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: BSMW
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level 6/10) Key drivers: Trend direction, momentum signals, volume trends Primary risks: Volatility regime, risk relative to market (beta)
Recent news sentiment impact: Neutral, with no recent news available
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: Uptrend (20-day SMA above 50-day SMA), Medium-term: Weak trend (14-day ADX below 20), Long-term: Uptrend (200-day SMA above 50-day SMA)
Support/Resistance Levels: Key price levels: * Resistance: $25.16 (Upper Bollinger Band) * Support: $25.04 (Lower Bollinger Band) and $24.98 (EMA 12)
Momentum Signals: * RSI interpretation: Neutral (50.26) * MACD signal: Bullish (0.01 above -0.01, with histogram at 0.02) * Bollinger Bands position: Neutral (price within the bands)
Volume Analysis: Volume trends and institutional interest signals: * Volume SMA 20: 26733.45 * On-Balance Volume (OBV): 1686854.00 * Volume Rate of Change: 93.97%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news available
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral, with no recent news sentiment available
Catalyst Identification: None identified from the given data
Market Narrative: Technical signals are neutral, with a bullish trend in short-term and long-term timeframes. No recent news is available to contradict or align with these signals.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low risk relative to market (beta: 0.05 vs SPY)
Volatility Regime: Current volatility regime: Low (ATR: $0.08, HV20: 2.1%)
Options Market Signals: No options data available
Downside Protection: Support levels: * Lower Bollinger Band: $25.04 * EMA 12: $24.98
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Not applicable (no sector performance data provided)
Institutional Activity: No institutional activity signals available from the given data
Correlation Analysis: Stock moves less than market, with a low correlation coefficient of 0.23
Relative Valuation: Stock is trading within its historical range, with no clear relative valuation signal.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: * Resistance: $25.16 (Upper Bollinger Band) * Support: $25.04 (Lower Bollinger Band) and $24.98 (EMA 12)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None identified from the given data
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No time-sensitive catalysts identified from the given data
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels: * Below Lower Bollinger Band: $25.04 * Above Upper Bollinger Band: $25.16
BSMW Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
BSMW Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|