BSSX Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF

ETF

ETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

BSSX — —
Key stats
About

Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) ETF

No description available.

Exchange
XNAS
Inception
2023-09-20
Has Options
No
Fund profile
holdings as of May 31, 2026SEC filingthrough May 2026flows, SEC filings
Expense ratio
0.18%
prospectus, filed Dec 18, 2025
Assets
$128M
SEC filing, May 31, 2026
Trailing yield
3.48%
paid monthly
Average daily volume
$1.7M
30 sessions
Holdings
1,520
top 10 are 4.3%
Listed
Sep 20, 2023
Nasdaq
Closure risk, 12 months
1.4%
low: age · model
Tracking difference
-0.40 pts
vs index, after fees, FY 2025
FrenzyCap ETF score
63
how it is built
Cost71
Liquidity41
Scale41
Diversification100

Moves with. US large-cap stocks (14% of its variance, beta 0.12); Long Treasuries (13% of its variance, beta 0.12). These factors explain 30% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.

Stated objective. The Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (the Fund) seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2033 Index (the Underlying Index). (from the fund's prospectus)

All 1,520 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Target Maturity Muni ETFs

Fund flows
through May 2026SEC filings
May 2026
+$5.1M
latest reported month
Latest 3 months
+$10M
+8.0% of assets
Latest 12 months
+$51M
+39.8% of assets
Jun 2025: $0Jul 2025: +$9.9MJulAug 2025: +$5.0MSep 2025: +$2.5MSepOct 2025: $0Nov 2025: +$7.8MNovDec 2025: +$10M+$10MJan 2026: +$2.6MJanFeb 2026: +$2.6MMar 2026: $0MarApr 2026: +$5.2MMay 2026: +$5.1MMay
View as a table
Net flows of BSSX by month, Jun 2025 to May 2026
MonthNet flow
May 2026+$5.1M
Apr 2026+$5.2M
Mar 2026$0
Feb 2026+$2.6M
Jan 2026+$2.6M
Dec 2025+$10M
Nov 2025+$7.8M
Oct 2025$0
Sep 2025+$2.5M
Aug 2025+$5.0M
Jul 2025+$9.9M
Jun 2025$0

Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 33 months ago

Similar funds
FundOverlapFeeAssets1Y
IBMPiShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF—0.10%$689M−0.5%compare
IBMQiShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF—0.10%$684M−1.2%compare
IBMRiShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF—0.10%$509M−1.9%compare
IBMOiShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF—0.10%$508M+0.1%compare
BSMRInvesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF—0.18%$368M−1.1%compare

The largest other funds in the Target Maturity Muni category.

Under the hood
fiscal year to Aug 31, 2025SEC census
Authorized participants
4 active
of 28 with agreements; top 3 did 83%
Created · redeemed
$43M · $0
over the fiscal year
Redemptions in kind
0%
creations 25% in kind
Creation unit
100,000
shares
Securities lending
not authorized
Return vs index
-0.40 pts
after fees; -0.23 before; daily s.d. 0.35
Diversification status
Non-diversified
may concentrate in fewer issuers

From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.

ETF Profile
holdings as of 2026-05-31
Holdings
1520
AUM
$126.1M
Provider
Nport
Inception
2023-09-20
Exchange
XNAS
Data As Of
2026-05-31
Expense Ratio
0.18%
Dividend Yield
3.48%
Distribution
Monthly
Recent distributions
Ex-Date Pay Date Amount Type
2026-10-19 2026-10-23 $0.0718 CD
2026-09-21 2026-09-25 $0.0683 CD
2026-08-24 2026-08-28 $0.0751 CD
2026-07-20 2026-07-24 $0.0735 CD
2026-06-22 2026-06-26 $0.0719 CD
2026-05-18 2026-05-22 $0.0712 CD
Asset Allocation
Top Holdings
top 50 of 1520 holdings
Symbol Name Weight % Asset Class Country
— California (State of) 0.55% Debt US
— Jefferson (County of), AL 0.50% Debt US
— New York (State of) Dormitory Authority 0.46% Debt US
— Pennsylvania (Commonwealth of) Turnpike Commission 0.43% Debt US
— New Jersey (State of) Transportation Trust Fund Authority 0.43% Debt US
— Connecticut State Health & Educational Facilities Authority 0.42% Debt US
— New York (City of), NY Transitional Finance Authority 0.41% Debt US
— New Jersey (State of) Transportation Trust Fund Authority 0.38% Debt US
— Jefferson (County of), AL 0.37% Debt US
— New Jersey (State of) Turnpike Authority 0.37% Debt US
— California (State of) 0.35% Debt US
— Illinois (State of) 0.35% Debt US
— California (State of) 0.35% Debt US
— New York (City of), NY Municipal Water Finance Authority 0.35% Debt US
— University of California 0.34% Debt US
— California (State of) 0.34% Debt US
— Texas (State of) Transportation Commission State Highway Fund 0.34% Debt US
— Texas (State of) Water Development Board 0.34% Debt US
— Pennsylvania (Commonwealth of) 0.34% Debt US
— State of California 0.34% Debt US
— Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) 0.33% Debt US
— Ohio (State of) Water Development Authority (Water Pollution Control Loan Fund) (Green Bonds) 0.32% Debt US
— New York (City of), NY Municipal Water Finance Authority 0.32% Debt US
— Irvine Facilities Financing Authority (Irvine Great Park Infrastructure) 0.31% Debt US
— Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) Bay Transportation Authority 0.30% Debt US
— Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority 0.29% Debt US
— California (State of) 0.29% Debt US
— California (State of) Health Facilities Financing Authority (Scripps Health) 0.29% Debt US
— California (State of) 0.29% Debt US
— Chicago (City of), IL 0.28% Debt US
— Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) 0.28% Debt US
— Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) (Rail Enhancement Program) (Green Bonds) 0.28% Debt US
— New York State Urban Development Corp. (Bidding Group 4) 0.27% Debt US
— New York (State of) Dormitory Authority (State University of New York Dormitory Facilities) (Green Bonds) 0.27% Debt US
— St. Louis (City of), MO 0.27% Debt US
— New York State Dormitory Authority 0.27% Debt US
— Georgia (State of) (Bidding Group 2) 0.26% Debt US
— San Antonio (City of), TX 0.26% Debt US
— California (State of) 0.26% Debt US
— Permanent University Fund - University of Texas System 0.26% Debt US
— University of California 0.26% Debt US
— JEA Water & Sewer System 0.25% Debt US
— California State University 0.25% Debt US
— Dallas & Fort Worth (Cities of), TX (Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport) 0.25% Debt US
— Madison (City of), AL Water & Wastewater Board 0.24% Debt US
— Missouri (State of) Health & Educational Facilities Authority (BJC Health System) 0.24% Debt US
— University of California 0.24% Debt US
— District of Columbia 0.24% Debt US
— Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 0.24% Debt US
— City of Springfield MO Public Utility Revenue 0.23% Debt US
Non-Equity Breakdown
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF · NPORT-P period 2026-05-31 (filed 2026-07-29)
Net assets: $128M · 1520 total positions · equity 0.00% · non-equity 98.32%
Non-equity holdings — 1520 positions, 98.32% of NAV
Category Weight Value Positions
Municipal 98.32% $126.1M 1520
Chart
Seasonality
Month'23'24'25'26Avg
Jan--0.04%-0.43%0.31%-0.03%
Feb---1.14%1.36%1.04%0.42%
Mar---0.64%-2.80%-2.89%-2.11%
Apr---1.53%-1.64%0.98%-0.73%
May---0.88%-0.02%-0.23%-0.38%
Jun--1.69%0.97%0.51%1.06%
Jul--1.08%-1.24%-1.98%-0.71%
Aug---0.21%0.00%-0.92%-0.38%
Sep-2.32%0.44%2.47%-3.62%-0.76%
Oct-1.44%-2.29%1.02%1.97%*-0.18%
Nov6.80%1.61%-0.08%--2.78%
Dec3.06%-2.15%0.17%--0.36%
Total5.97%-4.01%-0.33%-4.87%-0.81%
* Only 4 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $24.23
SMA 50: $24.68
SMA 200: $25.47
Current: $24.59
EMA 12: $24.40
EMA 26: $24.42
MACD: -0.0273 | Signal: 0.0724
BEARISH
ADX (14): 21.08
WEAK TREND
+DI: 24.80
−DI: 22.50

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 55.41
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 75.53
Stoch %D: 74.95
Williams %R: -8.23

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $24.65
BB Lower: $23.82
NEUTRAL
OBV: 585,613
Vol SMA 20: 83,338
Vol ROC: -97.45%
ATR: $0.21
True Range: $0.14
HV 20: 8.4%
HV 30: 7.8%
HV 60: 6.3%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-23T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis

Click Frenzy-Pro™ for an AI analysis of this ticker.

Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.

BSSX Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 0.1119
Alpha: -6.50%
Correlation: 0.3335
R-Squared: 11.1%
Stock Volatility: 4.3%
Market Volatility: 12.7%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time

BSSX Institutional Ownership (13F)

Latest filings — 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

70 filers3,237,252 shares$82.96M value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 LPL Financial LLC Custodian 291,269 $7.52M 9.06% — 2026-06-30
2 Atlantic Union Bankshares Corp 233,605 $6.03M 7.27% — 2026-06-30
3 Bank of America Corp Custodian 197,195 $5.09M 6.13% — 2026-06-30
4 CONFLUENCE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC 210,029 $5.06M 6.10% — 2026-09-30
5 Raymond James Financial, Inc. Custodian 168,398 $4.35M 5.24% — 2026-06-30
6 PRECEDENT WEALTH PARTNERS, LLC 156,010 $4.03M 4.85% — 2026-06-30
7 Sterling Financial Group, Inc. 154,131 $3.94M 4.75% — 2025-09-30
8 Kestra Advisory Services, LLC 152,003 $3.92M 4.73% — 2026-06-30
9 HighTower Advisors, LLC 134,180 $3.46M 4.17% — 2026-06-30
10 Hills Bank & Trust Co 133,998 $3.46M 4.17% — 2026-06-30
11 Envision Financial Planning, LLC 108,391 $2.80M 3.37% — 2026-06-30
12 Sequoia Financial Advisors, LLC 101,789 $2.63M 3.17% — 2026-06-30
13 Invesco Ltd. Custodian 90,969 $2.35M 2.83% — 2026-06-30
14 Morgan Stanley Custodian 90,685 $2.34M 2.82% — 2026-06-30
15 Clark Asset Management, LLC 51,238 $1.32M 1.59% — 2026-06-30
16 Northwestern Mutual Wealth Management Co 50,877 $1.31M 1.58% — 2026-06-30
17 Lido Advisors, LLC 50,600 $1.31M 1.57% — 2026-06-30
18 OSAIC HOLDINGS, INC. Custodian 47,579 $1.23M 1.48% — 2026-06-30
19 Envestnet Asset Management, Inc. 47,011 $1.21M 1.46% — 2026-06-30
20 Key Financial Inc 45,809 $1.18M 1.42% — 2026-06-30
21 Stifel Financial Corp Custodian 44,721 $1.15M 1.39% — 2026-06-30
22 Ameriprise Financial, Inc. Custodian 38,870 $1.00M 1.21% — 2026-06-30
23 Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian 38,739 $999.66K 1.21% — 2026-06-30
24 Jacobi Capital Management LLC 38,173 $985.07K 1.19% — 2026-06-30
25 UBS Group AG Custodian 36,200 $934.14K 1.13% — 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
Constituent Performance

Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.

Constituents
Symbol Name Weight % Price 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month