CIK UBS Asset Management Income Fund, Inc.

XASE
Find condors

Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

CIK — —
Key stats
About
Exchange
XASE
Market Cap
$0.1B
List Date
1987-11-05
CIK
0000810766
Homepage
https://www.ubs.com

Credit Suisse Asset Mgmt Income Fund Inc is a closed-end management investment company. The investment objective of the fund is to provide current income consistent with the preservation of capital. UBS Asset Management serves as an investment adviser for the fund. Asset Management offers a wide range of investment products and functions across asset classes and investment styles. The division manages various regional portfolios, mutual funds, and other investment vehicles for governments, institutions, corporations and individuals.

Fund profile
Expense ratio
—
Assets
$126M
shares × price, Oct 22, 2026
Trailing yield
—
Average daily volume
$1.3M
30 sessions
Holdings
—
Listed
Nov 5, 1987
NYSE American
FrenzyCap ETF score
39
how it is built
Costn/a
Liquidity38
Scale41
Diversificationn/a

Moves with. US large-cap stocks (14% of its variance, beta 0.27); Value over growth (4% of its variance, beta -0.10). These factors explain 28% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.

Overlap toolAll Financials ETFs

Similar funds
FundOverlapFeeAssets1Y
XLFState Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF—0.08%$52.3B+7.4%compare
VFHVanguard Financials ETF—0.09%$13.4B+7.2%compare
KBWBInvesco KBW Bank ETF—0.35%$6.3B+16.7%compare
KREState Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF—0.35%$4.2B+19.4%compare
IYFiShares U.S. Financials ETF—0.37%$3.9B+7.5%compare

The largest other funds in the Financials category.

Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.

Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.

Chart
Seasonality
Month'21'22'23'24'25'26Avg
Jan2.57%-6.57%7.84%1.00%3.10%-1.23%1.12%
Feb4.40%-7.51%1.82%-1.64%-1.01%-3.90%-1.31%
Mar1.20%-1.93%-7.89%-2.16%-1.19%-5.54%-2.92%
Apr2.70%-5.54%2.31%-6.63%-2.44%-0.39%-1.67%
May0.86%-2.41%1.51%1.38%0.35%-0.78%0.15%
Jun-1.12%-4.55%5.00%0.34%3.14%-2.36%0.08%
Jul-2.55%1.82%2.21%1.36%0.00%-1.41%0.24%
Aug2.63%3.18%-8.08%3.85%-0.67%-0.41%0.08%
Sep-1.14%-7.67%-6.16%-0.16%-1.01%-3.31%-3.24%
Oct0.00%-6.69%-1.53%-3.59%-1.87%-1.29%*-2.50%
Nov-0.87%8.53%5.58%0.68%-1.91%--2.40%
Dec0.88%-9.68%12.59%-3.18%0.28%--0.18%
Total9.75%-33.84%13.82%-8.82%-3.35%-18.92%-6.90%
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $2.31
SMA 50: $2.37
SMA 200: $2.53
Current: $2.29
EMA 12: $2.31
EMA 26: $2.33
MACD: -0.0202 | Signal: 0.0018
BEARISH
ADX (14): 42.77
STRONG TREND
+DI: 9.37
−DI: 22.91

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 39.15
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 50.00
Stoch %D: 49.18
Williams %R: -62.50

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $2.34
BB Lower: $2.28
NEUTRAL
OBV: -19,663,123
Vol SMA 20: 448,745
Vol ROC: -53.75%
ATR: $0.03
True Range: $0.03
HV 20: 12.9%
HV 30: 12.2%
HV 60: 9.6%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-25T00:00:00 – 2026-10-23T00:00:00
AI Analysis

LLM Stock Analysis Report

Executive Summary

Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level: 6/10)

Key Drivers and Primary Risks:

  • Recent market performance has been range-bound, with no clear trend emerging.
  • Volatility remains low, which could be a sign of underlying strength or complacency.
  • News sentiment is neutral, with no recent headlines suggesting significant price moves.

Investment Thesis: CIK's current valuation and technical indicators suggest a potential consolidation phase. The stock's beta is relatively low, indicating less volatility than the broader market. However, this could also be a sign of underlying strength, as the stock tends to move less than the market. Recent news sentiment is neutral, which may not provide significant catalysts for price movement.

Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines do not appear to have had a significant impact on the stock's price movement. The neutral sentiment from the Seeking Alpha articles does not suggest any strong buying or selling pressure.

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction: NEUTRAL (short-term and medium-term trends are unclear, while long-term trend is slightly bearish)

Support/Resistance Levels:

  • SMA 20: $2.44
  • SMA 50: $2.46
  • SMA 200: $2.64

Momentum Signals:

  • RSI interpretation: Neutral (47.59)
  • MACD signal: Bearish (-0.01 / Signal: 0.00 / Histogram: -0.01)
  • Bollinger Bands position: Neutral (width: 1.79, no clear squeeze or breakout)

Volume Analysis:

  • Volume SMA 20: 415974.97
  • On-Balance Volume (OBV): -21887940.84 (declining OBV suggests potential selling pressure)
  • Volume Rate of Change: -58.65% (indicating a decline in trading activity)

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary: Neutral news headlines from Seeking Alpha, with no clear catalysts for price movement.

Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL The recent news sentiment is neutral, with no strong buying or selling pressure evident.

Catalyst Identification: None significant in the recent news headlines. Market Narrative: The market narrative is unclear, with no recent news suggesting a clear direction.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Beta Interpretation: Low risk (beta: 0.41 vs SPY) Volatility Regime: Low volatility (stock moves less than market)

Options Market Signals: No options data available.

Downside Protection: Support levels are at SMA 20 ($2.44) and SMA 50 ($2.46), which could provide some downside protection.

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: Neutral performance relative to the broader market. Institutional Activity: No significant institutional activity evident in recent trading volume. Correlation Analysis: The stock tends to move less than the market (R-squared interpretation).

Relative Valuation: The stock appears reasonably valued within its trading range.

Key Levels & Action Items

Critical Price Levels:

  • SMA 20 ($2.44)
  • SMA 50 ($2.46)

Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None significant in the short-term, with the long-term trend slightly bearish. Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No near-term catalysts evident from recent news headlines. Risk Management: Stop-loss levels could be set at SMA 20 ($2.44) or SMA 50 ($2.46) to manage risk.

This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of CIK's technical and fundamental characteristics, highlighting the importance of considering both bullish and bearish cases. The neutral sentiment from recent news headlines suggests that the stock may continue its range-bound performance, with no clear catalysts for significant price movement.

Generated

CIK Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 0.4398
Alpha: -27.08%
Correlation: 0.4804
R-Squared: 23.1%
Stock Volatility: 11.7%
Market Volatility: 12.7%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own CIK
1 of 37 tracked investors
InvestorValueShare of their portfolioRankQ/Q sharesSource
Citadel Hedge fund
Ken Griffin
$262K
0.00%
#5202 of 6285+194.1%13F

Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions

CIK Institutional Ownership (13F)

Latest filings — 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

53 filers6,564,054 shares$16.22M value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 LANDSCAPE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.L.C. 1,163,091 $2.88M 17.79% — 2026-06-30
2 LPL Financial LLC Custodian 1,035,331 $2.57M 15.83% — 2026-06-30
3 Shaker Financial Services, LLC 752,927 $1.76M 10.86% — 2026-09-30
4 WOLVERINE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC 670,127 $1.66M 10.25% — 2026-06-30
5 Invesco Ltd. Custodian 669,679 $1.66M 10.24% — 2026-06-30
6 Fiera Capital Corp 410,648 $1.02M 6.28% — 2026-06-30
7 Bank of America Corp Custodian 215,710 $534.96K 3.30% — 2026-06-30
8 IMS Capital Management 123,819 $362.79K 2.24% — 2025-09-30
9 Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian 105,836 $262.47K 1.62% — 2026-06-30
10 OSAIC HOLDINGS, INC. Custodian 82,322 $204.15K 1.26% — 2026-06-30
11 NOMURA HOLDINGS INC 70,000 $173.60K 1.07% — 2026-06-30
12 Stonebridge Financial Group, LLC/CA 65,500 $162.00K 1.00% — 2026-06-30
13 Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian 63,770 $158.15K 0.98% — 2026-06-30
14 Almitas Capital LLC 62,565 $155.16K 0.96% — 2026-06-30
15 Northwestern Mutual Wealth Management Co 59,793 $148.29K 0.91% — 2026-06-30
16 Morgan Stanley Custodian 58,883 $146.03K 0.90% — 2026-06-30
17 WEDBUSH SECURITIES INC 57,698 $143.00K 0.88% — 2026-06-30
18 Dynamic Advisor Solutions LLC 60,028 $140.47K 0.87% — 2026-09-30
19 COMMONWEALTH EQUITY SERVICES, LLC 56,629 $140.44K 0.87% — 2026-06-30
20 Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian 55,866 $138.55K 0.85% — 2026-06-30
21 Janney Montgomery Scott LLC 55,120 $137.00K 0.84% — 2026-06-30
22 Clearstead Advisors, LLC 53,382 $132.39K 0.82% — 2026-06-30
23 BOOTHBAY FUND MANAGEMENT, LLC 51,480 $127.67K 0.79% — 2026-06-30
24 Gladstone Institutional Advisory LLC 46,127 $114.39K 0.71% — 2026-06-30
25 MELFA WEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC. 42,950 $106.52K 0.66% — 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period

CIK Insider Trading (Form 4)

Latest: 2025-01-21
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
Filed Reporter Role Action Shares Avg Price Net $ Link
2025-01-21 Laura A DeFelice Director Buy (P) +40,766 $2.92 $119.0K EDGAR
2025-01-06 Charles Gerber Director Buy (P) +8,620 $2.90 $25.0K EDGAR
2025-01-03 Charles Gerber Director Buy (P) +8,620 $2.00 $17.3K EDGAR
2024-01-10 Laura A DeFelice Chair of the Board Buy (P) +1,315 $3.02 $4.0K EDGAR
2024-01-09 Laura A DeFelice Chair of the Board Buy (P) +5,321 $3.03 $16.1K EDGAR
2021-05-19 Thomas J. Flannery Chief Investment Officer Sell (S) −83,532 $3.52 -$294.4K EDGAR
2019-01-04 CSAM Americas Holding Corp. Sell (S) −186,825 $2.82 -$526.8K EDGAR
2018-04-24 CSAM Americas Holding Corp. Buy (P) +5,540 $3.22 $17.8K EDGAR
2018-04-20 CSAM Americas Holding Corp. Buy (P) +46,081 $3.25 $149.9K EDGAR
2018-04-19 CSAM Americas Holding Corp. Buy (P) +46,081 $3.25 $149.8K EDGAR
2018-04-05 CSAM Americas Holding Corp. Buy (P) +28,049 $3.21 $90.2K EDGAR
2018-04-05 CSAM Americas Holding Corp. Buy (P) +13,749 $3.27 $45.0K EDGAR
2018-04-04 CSAM Americas Holding Corp. Buy (P) +35,821 $3.26 $116.6K EDGAR
2018-04-03 CSAM Americas Holding Corp. Buy (P) +35,821 $3.23 $115.5K EDGAR
2018-04-02 CSAM Americas Holding Corp. Buy (P) +32,517 $3.22 $104.6K EDGAR
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.

CIK Insider Holdings

2 insiders · @ $2.29
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
# Insider Role Shares Disclosed Exposure Lifetime OM Net Filings Last Filed
1 Laura A DeFelice Chair of the Board 47,402 $108.6K $139.1K 3 2025-01-21
2 Charles Gerber Director 8,620 $19.7K $42.3K 2 2025-01-06
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
ETF Holders
2 ETFs hold CIK
2 shown · $1.78M total exposure
# ETF Provider Weight $ Exposure ETF AUM As Of
1 PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF Invesco 0.21% $1.6M — 2026-10-22
2 CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF Nport 0.49% $166,664 — 2026-07-31
Fundamentals

Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.

Metrics
  • Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
  • Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
  • Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
  • Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
  • YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
  • Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
  • Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.

TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.