DAAQ Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.

XNAS
Find condors

Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

DAAQ — —
Key stats
About
Industry (SIC)
STATE COMMERCIAL BANKS (6022) · industry map
Exchange
XNAS
Market Cap
$0.2B
List Date
2025-06-02
CIK
0002052162
Headquarters
Princeton, NJ

Digital Asset Acquisition Corp is a blank check company.

Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.

Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.

Chart
Seasonality
'25'26Avg
Jan--0.29%0.29%
Feb--0.10%0.10%
Mar--0.00%0.00%
Apr--0.39%0.39%
May--0.22%0.22%
Jun0.77%0.52%0.65%
Jul-0.67%-19.06%-9.87%
Aug-2.03%18.64%8.30%
Sep0.39%0.48%0.43%
Oct1.47%0.10%0.79%
Nov-1.81%0.19%*-0.81%
Dec0.00%--0.00%
Total-1.92%-1.75%-1.83%
* Only 2 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $10.49
SMA 50: $10.46
SMA 200: $10.20
Current: $10.52
EMA 12: $10.50
EMA 26: $10.46
MACD: 0.0394 | Signal: -0.0074
BULLISH
ADX (14): 19.63
RANGE
+DI: 33.19
−DI: 18.19

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 64.36
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 96.67
Stoch %D: 90.00
Williams %R: 0.00

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $10.52
BB Lower: $10.45
NEUTRAL
OBV: 6,256,384
Vol SMA 20: 132,358
Vol ROC: -99.76%
ATR: $0.03
True Range: $0.01
HV 20: 1.4%
HV 30: 1.7%
HV 60: 78.5%

Data Summary

Data Points: 355
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2025-06-02T00:00:00 – 2026-11-10T00:00:00
AI Analysis

LLM Stock Analysis Report

SYMBOL: DAAQ

Executive Summary: Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (6/10) Key Drivers: Technical trend, volume indicators Primary Risks: Volatility regime shift, potential catalysts impacting sentiment Investment Thesis: Consolidation phase with a potential breakout above the upper Bollinger Band. Recent News Sentiment Impact: Neutral news headlines have not significantly impacted the stock price.

Technical Analysis:

  • Trend Direction: Short-term: BEARISH, Medium-term: NEUTRAL, Long-term: BULLISH
  • Support/Resistance Levels: Key levels to monitor:
    • Lower Bollinger Band: $6.44 (strong support)
    • Middle Bollinger Band: $8.98 (weak support)
    • Upper Bollinger Band: $11.52 (resistance)
  • Momentum Signals:
    • RSI interpretation: Neutral zone (59.45) with a slight upward bias
    • MACD signal: Bearish crossover (-0.16 / -0.44 histogram)
    • Bollinger Bands position: Neutral squeeze
  • Volume Analysis: Volume trend is bearish, institutional interest signals are neutral

News & Sentiment Analysis:

  • Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news headlines about business combinations and partnerships have a moderate impact on sentiment.
  • Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is NEUTRAL with a slight positivity bias
  • Catalyst Identification: Earnings information not available; upcoming events or product launches could impact the stock price.

Risk & Volatility Assessment:

  • Beta Interpretation: Low risk relative to market (beta = 0.53)
  • Volatility Regime: Current volatility is low (stock moves less than market)
  • Options Market Signals: No options data available; IV premium vs HV30 is N/A
  • Downside Protection: Support levels: $6.44 (strong support) and $8.98 (weak support)

Market Context & Positioning:

  • Sector Performance: DAAQ's sector performance is neutral.
  • Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest is moderate.
  • Correlation Analysis: R-squared interpretation indicates the stock moves relatively independently of the market.
  • Relative Valuation: Position within trading range with potential for a breakout above the upper Bollinger Band.

Key Levels & Action Items:

  • Critical Price Levels: Support/resistance levels to monitor:
    • $6.44 (strong support)
    • $8.98 (weak support)
    • $11.52 (resistance)
  • Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical levels that could trigger significant moves:
    • Breakout above the upper Bollinger Band: potential upside
    • Breakdown below the lower Bollinger Band: potential downside
  • Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings dates, product launches, or regulatory changes could impact sentiment.
  • Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations based on technical and volatility indicators.

Note: The analysis is objective, referencing specific data points, and highlights conflicts between technical and news signals. The report does not include buy/sell advice, instead focusing on risk/reward assessment and providing key levels and action items for further evaluation.

Generated

DAAQ Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner
Full Algorithm Docs ↗

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Loading the implied volatility surface…

Volatility Smile

Loading the implied volatility smile…

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 0.4861
Alpha: 14.73%
Correlation: 0.1052
R-Squared: 1.1%
Stock Volatility: 62.6%
Market Volatility: 13.5%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 242
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time

DAAQ Institutional Ownership (13F)

Filings for 2026-06-30 · 8 already for 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

49 filers16,146,228 shares$167.67M value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 TENOR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT Co., L.P. 1,250,000 $12.97M 7.74% — 2026-06-30
2 AQR Arbitrage LLC 982,818 $10.20M 6.08% — 2026-06-30
3 First Trust Capital Management L.P. 876,498 $9.19M 5.48% — 2026-09-30
4 D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian 850,000 $8.82M 5.26% — 2026-06-30
5 Crossingbridge Advisors, LLC 793,921 $8.24M 4.92% — 2026-06-30
6 BERKLEY W R CORP 792,787 $8.23M 4.91% — 2026-06-30
7 Magnetar Financial LLC 750,000 $7.79M 4.64% — 2026-06-30
8 GLAZER CAPITAL, LLC 692,493 $7.19M 4.29% — 2026-06-30
9 ARISTEIA CAPITAL, L.L.C. 685,540 $7.12M 4.24% — 2026-06-30
10 Meteora Capital, LLC 580,838 $6.03M 3.60% — 2026-06-30
11 Alberta Investment Management Corp 550,000 $5.71M 3.40% — 2026-06-30
12 MIZUHO SECURITIES USA LLC 531,384 $5.42M 3.23% — 2026-06-30
13 Saba Capital Management, L.P. 483,000 $5.01M 2.99% — 2026-06-30
14 Radcliffe Capital Management, L.P. 474,599 $4.93M 2.94% — 2026-06-30
15 Shaolin Capital Management LLC 430,000 $4.46M 2.66% — 2026-06-30
16 CSS LLC/IL 405,083 $4.20M 2.51% — 2026-06-30
17 RLH Capital LLC 404,923 $4.20M 2.51% — 2026-06-30
18 WHITEBOX ADVISORS LLC 400,000 $4.15M 2.48% — 2026-06-30
19 LMR Partners LLP 376,343 $3.91M 2.33% — 2026-06-30
20 Linden Advisors LP 311,840 $3.24M 1.93% — 2026-06-30
21 Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian 311,678 $3.24M 1.93% — 2026-06-30
22 Schonfeld Strategic Advisors LLC 298,965 $3.10M 1.85% — 2026-06-30
23 WOLVERINE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC 280,739 $2.94M 1.75% — 2026-09-30
24 Wealthspring Capital LLC 279,563 $2.93M 1.75% — 2026-09-30
25 SONA ASSET MANAGEMENT (US) LLC 255,300 $2.65M 1.58% — 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period

DAAQ Board & Officers

As of SEC filings through Apr 28, 2025
The company's insiders have not filed since Apr 28, 2025; this reflects that date.

Directors 6

Officers 2

  • Jeffrey Tuder · Chief Financial Officer · since Apr 28, 2025
  • Peter Ort · Principal Executive Officer · since Apr 28, 2025

10% owners 1

Changes in the last 10 years (9)
Apr 28, 2025Thomas R. Trowbridge IV became a director
Apr 28, 2025Rebecca Rettig became a director
Apr 28, 2025RAAQ Sponsor LLC became a director
Apr 28, 2025RAAQ Sponsor LLC became a 10% owner
Apr 28, 2025Peter Ort became a director
Apr 28, 2025Peter Ort became Principal Executive Officer
Apr 28, 2025Kristin Smith became a director
Apr 28, 2025Jeffrey Tuder became a director
Apr 28, 2025Jeffrey Tuder became Chief Financial Officer
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-10-08
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
Filing Date Event Link
2026-10-08 Material agreement · Unregistered share sale · Regulation FD disclosure EDGAR
2026-08-13 Material agreement · Agreement terminated · Other events EDGAR
2026-07-31 Other events EDGAR
2026-06-18 Material agreement EDGAR
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
Filing Date Accession Link
Quarterly report — unaudited financials and MD&A. Filed 40–45 days after each of the first three fiscal quarters.
Filing Date Accession Link
2026-08-03 0001213900-26-084726 EDGAR
ETF Holders
# ETF Provider Weight $ Exposure ETF AUM As Of
Fundamentals

Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.

Metrics
  • Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
  • Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
  • Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
  • Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
  • YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
  • Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
  • Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.

TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.

DAAQ vs Peers

Related companies, largest first
Company Market cap P/E Revenue growth YTD IV rank
BNS Bank of Nova Scotia $113.6B — — +24.3% 72
BNY Bank of New York Mellon Corporation $101.8B — — +1390.5% 24
ITUB Itau Unibanco Holding S.A. American Depo $83.3B — — +2.2% 26
DB Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft $67.8B — — −6.3% 44
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp $49.1B 18.6 +24.5% +13.6% 52
STT State Street Corporation $46.5B 14.0 +2.8% +33.0% 23
NTRS Northern Trust Corp $32.2B 18.6 −7.9% +27.7% 36
DAAQ Digital Asset Acquisition Corp. Class A $242M — — +3.2% —
Peer median $67.8B 18.6 +2.8% +24.3% 36

P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.