DMA Destra Multi-Alternative Fund
XNYS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- List Date
- 2022-01-13
- CIK
- 0001523289
- Homepage
- https://www.destracapital.com
Destra Multi-Alternative Fund is a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that operates as an interval fund with a continuous offering of fund shares. The investment objective of the fund is to seek returns from capital appreciation and income, with an emphasis on income generation. The Fund pursues its investment objective by investing mainly in the income-producing securities of real estate investment trusts (REITs) and alternative investment funds, as well as common stocks and structured notes, bonds, and asset-backed securities.
- Expense ratio
- —
- Assets
- —
- Trailing yield
- —
- Average daily volume
- $139K 30 sessions
- Holdings
- —
- Listed
- Jan 13, 2022 NYSE
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (8% of its variance, beta 0.34); Bitcoin (6% of its variance, beta 0.07). These factors explain 16% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IALTiShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF | — | 0.99% | $7.8B | — | compare |
| XOVREntrepreneurShares Series Trust ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | — | 1.81% | $1.5B | +3.1% | compare |
| PCEFInvesco CEF Income Composite ETF | — | 2.71% | $754M | −2.3% | compare |
| CEFSSaba Opportunistically Hedged Closed-End Funds ETF | — | 2.61% | $429M | +6.8% | compare |
| LALTFirst Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | — | 1.18% | $428M | +7.8% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Multi-Strategy category.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -7.30% | -2.59% | 17.47% | 1.76% | -0.44% | 1.78% |
| Feb | -4.16% | -0.88% | 9.12% | 1.50% | -4.80% | 0.16% |
| Mar | 15.28% | -11.60% | -1.39% | -2.42% | -4.81% | -0.99% |
| Apr | -7.13% | -2.00% | -6.50% | -0.24% | -8.65% | -4.90% |
| May | -2.30% | -4.48% | 4.30% | 3.54% | -4.38% | -0.66% |
| Jun | -15.54% | -9.57% | 7.03% | 0.46% | -0.80% | -3.68% |
| Jul | 2.75% | -0.60% | 3.20% | 0.46% | -1.53% | 0.86% |
| Aug | 5.22% | 20.16% | 0.72% | -0.11% | 1.47% | 5.49% |
| Sep | -11.08% | 0.17% | 3.83% | -0.23% | -0.72% | -1.61% |
| Oct | -1.07% | 2.18% | 0.35% | 0.12% | -5.22%* | -0.73% |
| Nov | 2.70% | -1.14% | 2.87% | 0.81% | -- | 1.31% |
| Dec | -0.29% | 1.96% | -5.90% | 3.34% | -- | -0.22% |
| Total | -23.56% | -10.97% | 38.31% | 9.21% | -26.50% | -2.70% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: DMA
Executive Summary:
This analysis is NEUTRAL with a confidence level of 6/10. The stock's recent price action has been characterized by a consolidation phase, with no clear trend emerging. The technical indicators suggest a neutral market environment, while the risk metrics indicate low volatility.
Key drivers and primary risks include:
- Neutral momentum signals: RSI is around 40, indicating a neutral market environment.
- Low volatility: Stock moves less than market, reducing risk.
- No recent news available: Lack of catalysts may continue to weigh on price action.
Primary risks are low due to the stock's low volatility and absence of significant news events.
Technical Analysis:
Trend Direction: Consolidation phase with no clear trend emerging. The SMA 20 is acting as resistance, while the SMA 50 and EMA 26 are supporting the current price.
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Resistance: SMA 20 ($7.25)
- Support: SMA 50 ($7.67) and EMA 26 ($7.34)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (40)
- MACD signal: Bearish (MACD is below its signal line)
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral (price within the bands, no significant squeeze or breakout)
Volume Analysis: Low volume activity with a declining OBV and negative Volume Rate of Change.
News & Sentiment Analysis:
Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news available. The lack of catalysts may continue to weigh on price action.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (no recent news available).
Catalyst Identification: None identified due to the absence of recent news events.
Market Narrative: The market environment is neutral, with no clear trend emerging.
Risk & Volatility Assessment:
Beta Interpretation: Low risk relative to the market (beta 0.39 vs SPY).
Volatility Regime: Low volatility regime, with stock moves less than market.
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels are established at SMA 50 ($7.67) and EMA 26 ($7.34), providing some downside protection.
Market Context & Positioning:
Sector Performance: The sector is neutral, with no clear trend emerging.
Institutional Activity: Low institutional interest, as reflected in the volume indicators.
Correlation Analysis: The stock has a low correlation (0.33) to the market, indicating reduced risk.
Relative Valuation: The stock is trading within its recent range, with no significant price movement or revaluation.
Key Levels & Action Items:
Critical Price Levels:
- Resistance: SMA 20 ($7.25)
- Support: SMA 50 ($7.67) and EMA 26 ($7.34)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None identified due to the consolidation phase.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No earnings dates or product launches scheduled for the near term.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set at SMA 20 ($7.25) to limit potential losses in case of a downward move.
This comprehensive analysis provides an objective assessment of the stock's technical, news, and risk metrics. The neutral market environment and low volatility regime reduce the overall risk profile. However, traders should remain cautious due to the lack of catalysts and the potential for the stock to break out or breakdown from its current range.
DMA Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $101K | #5803 of 6285 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
DMA Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
DMA Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-03-02| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-02 | Robert A. Watson | PRESIDENT | Buy (P) | +537 | $8.64 | $4.6K | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-02 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | −14,496 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-04 | Robert A. Watson | PRESIDENT | Buy (P) | +838 | $8.62 | $7.2K | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-11 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +136,898 | $8.60 | $1.18M | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-09 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +1,000 | $8.58 | $8.6K | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-08 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +55,846 | $8.57 | $478.6K | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-18 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +83,604 | $8.66 | $724.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-30 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +276,832 | $8.56 | $2.37M | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-19 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +6,600 | $8.63 | $57.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-15 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +39,190 | $8.53 | $334.3K | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-13 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +85,826 | $8.51 | $730.4K | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-12 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +79,366 | $8.43 | $669.1K | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-06 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +1,952 | $8.32 | $16.2K | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-05 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +42,196 | $8.46 | $356.9K | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-01 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +26,000 | $8.40 | $218.3K | EDGAR |
DMA Insider Holdings
3 insiders · @ $7.05| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 2,220,648 | $15.66M | $11.55M | 22 | 2025-12-02 |
| 2 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | 2,166,195 | $15.27M | $9.51M | 12 | 2025-09-08 |
| 3 | Robert A. Watson | PRESIDENT | 34,359 | $242.2K | $12.2K | 4 | 2026-03-02 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | Nport | 0.46% | $1.9M | — | 2026-05-31 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.