DYNC Dynamix Corporation
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Industry (SIC)
- BLANK CHECKS (6770)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.2B
- Employees
- 2
- List Date
- 2024-12-09
- CIK
- 0002028699
- Headquarters
- Grand Cayman
- Homepage
- https://www.dynamix-corp.com
Dynamix Corp is a blank check company.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -- |
| Feb | -- | -- |
| Mar | -- | -- |
| Apr | -- | -- |
| May | 0.37% | 0.37% |
| Jun | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Jul | 0.64% | 0.64% |
| Aug | 0.32% | 0.32% |
| Sep | 0.18% | 0.18% |
| Oct | 0.64% | 0.64% |
| Nov | --* | -- |
| Dec | -- | -- |
| Total | 2.17% | 2.17% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: DYNC
Executive Summary
Assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level: 6/10)
Key Drivers: Strong technical signals, neutral sentiment, and low volatility.
Primary Risks: Negative beta, lack of earnings visibility, and limited recent news activity.
Investment Thesis: DYNC presents a relatively stable investment opportunity with moderate growth potential. The stock's negative beta and low volatility suggest it may be used as a defensive play or to hedge against market downturns.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: No recent news available; neutral sentiment due to lack of market-moving events.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Uptrend (SMA 20 above price)
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Trendless (SMA 50 and SMA 200 converged)
- Long-term (3-12 months): Neutral (no clear trend)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Key support: $10.74 (lower Bollinger Band)
- Resistance: $10.88 (upper Bollinger Band)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (63.99, not oversold or overbought)
- MACD signal: Bullish (crossover above signal line)
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral (price within bands)
Volume Analysis: Moderate volume with a slight decline (-78.14% in volume rate of change). Institutional interest appears low.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news available; neutral sentiment due to lack of market-moving events.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (no clear bullish or bearish bias).
Catalyst Identification: None identified; no earnings, product launches, or regulatory changes announced recently.
Market Narrative: DYNC's technical signals are currently driving the stock price, with no significant news-driven sentiment.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Negative beta (-0.03) indicates the stock moves opposite to market trends.
Volatility Regime: Low volatility (historical volatility: HV20 3.0%, HV30 2.8%, and HV60 2.4%).
Options Market Signals: No options data available; no IV premium or unusual activity detected.
Downside Protection: Support levels are relatively strong, but the stock's negative beta increases the risk of a potential downturn.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: DYNC is outperforming its sector peers.
Institutional Activity: Low institutional interest and volume suggest limited buying or selling pressure.
Correlation Analysis: The stock has a low correlation with market indices (R-squared: N/A).
Relative Valuation: DYNC appears to be trading within a relatively narrow range, with no clear overbought or oversold conditions.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: $10.74
- Resistance: $10.88
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None identified; the stock is trading within its current range.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming earnings, product launches, or regulatory changes announced recently.
Risk Management: Consider using stop-loss levels around $10.74 and position sizing based on your risk tolerance.
By analyzing the provided data, DYNC presents a relatively stable investment opportunity with moderate growth potential. The stock's negative beta, low volatility, and neutral sentiment suggest it may be used as a defensive play or to hedge against market downturns. However, the lack of recent news and earnings visibility increases the risk of a potential downturn.
DYNC Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 125
Period: 252 trading days
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $13.7M | #1363 of 6285 | new | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $6.5M | #1885 of 3716 | +1349.7% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
DYNC Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 9 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $115.45K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
DYNC Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2018-03-12| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-12 | Dean Ellis | Executive Vice President | Mixed Exer +2,059 · Disp −2,059 |
— | $13.47 | -$27.7K | EDGAR |
| 2018-03-12 | Carolyn Jeanne Burke | EVP, Strategic Development | Mixed Tax −3,655 · Exer +9,793 |
+6,138 | $13.47 | -$49.2K | EDGAR |
| 2018-03-12 | John Clinton Walden | VP and Chief Acct Officer | Mixed Disp −2,376 · Exer +2,376 |
— | $13.47 | -$32.0K | EDGAR |
| 2018-03-12 | Clint Freeland | Exec. VP and CFO | Mixed Tax −4,265 · Exer +10,846 |
+6,581 | $13.47 | -$57.4K | EDGAR |
| 2018-03-12 | Henry D. Jones | EVP & Chief Commercial Officer | Mixed Exer +11,130 · Tax −4,154 |
+6,976 | $13.47 | -$56.0K | EDGAR |
| 2018-03-12 | Sheree M. Petrone | Executive Vice President | Mixed Exer +5,709 · Tax −2,420 |
+3,289 | $13.47 | -$32.6K | EDGAR |
| 2018-03-12 | Catherine C. James | Exec VP and General Counsel | Mixed Exer +9,700 · Tax −3,621 |
+6,079 | $13.47 | -$48.8K | EDGAR |
| 2018-03-12 | Martin W. Daley | EVP and COO | Mixed Tax −2,594 · Disp −294 · Exer +6,407 |
+3,519 | $13.47 | -$38.9K | EDGAR |
| 2018-03-12 | Robert C Flexon | President and CEO | Mixed Tax −22,626 · Exer +57,542 |
+34,916 | $13.47 | -$304.8K | EDGAR |
| 2018-03-12 | Julius Cox | EVP | Mixed Exer +5,543 · Tax −2,180 |
+3,363 | $13.47 | -$29.4K | EDGAR |
| 2018-03-06 | Clint Freeland | Exec. VP and CFO | Tax (F) | −1,854 | $12.65 | -$23.5K | EDGAR |
| 2018-03-06 | Catherine C. James | Exec VP and General Counsel | Tax (F) | −1,440 | $12.65 | -$18.2K | EDGAR |
| 2018-03-06 | Sheree M. Petrone | Executive Vice President | Tax (F) | −801 | $12.65 | -$10.1K | EDGAR |
| 2018-03-06 | Martin W. Daley | EVP and COO | Tax (F) | −1,000 | $12.65 | -$12.7K | EDGAR |
| 2018-03-06 | Carolyn Jeanne Burke | EVP, Strategic Development | Tax (F) | −1,440 | $12.65 | -$18.2K | EDGAR |
DYNC Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Nov 20, 2024Directors 4
- Andrea Bernatova · since Nov 20, 2024
- Diaco Aviki · since Nov 20, 2024
- Lynn A Peterson · since Nov 20, 2024
- Steven Tyler Crabtree · since Nov 20, 2024
Officers 3
- Andrea Bernatova · CEO and Chairman · since Nov 20, 2024
- Nader Daylami · Chief Financial Officer · since Nov 20, 2024
- Philip Rajan · VP, M&A and Strategy · since Nov 20, 2024
10% owners 2
- Andrea Bernatova · since Nov 20, 2024
- DynamixCore Holdings, LLC (entity) · since Nov 20, 2024
Changes in the last 10 years (9)
| Nov 20, 2024 | Steven Tyler Crabtree became a director |
| Nov 20, 2024 | Philip Rajan became VP, M&A and Strategy |
| Nov 20, 2024 | Nader Daylami became Chief Financial Officer |
| Nov 20, 2024 | Lynn A Peterson became a director |
| Nov 20, 2024 | DynamixCore Holdings, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Nov 20, 2024 | Diaco Aviki became a director |
| Nov 20, 2024 | Andrea Bernatova became a director |
| Nov 20, 2024 | Andrea Bernatova became a 10% owner |
| Nov 20, 2024 | Andrea Bernatova became CEO and Chairman |
| Filing Date | Event | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-29 | Other events | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-13 | 0001213900-26-089131 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
DYNC vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCCX Churchill Capital Corp X Class A Ordinar | $711M | — | — | −19.1% | — |
| DMII Drugs Made In America Acquisition II Cor | $650M | — | — | +3.3% | — |
| EVAC EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II | $606M | — | — | +3.3% | — |
| BCSS Bain Capital GSS Investment Corp. | $598M | — | — | +1.3% | — |
| CEPF Cantor Equity Partners IV, Inc. Class A | $589M | — | — | −0.0% | — |
| CXII Churchill Capital Corp XII Class A Ordin | $575M | — | — | +2.8% | — |
| AEXA American Exceptionalism Acquisition Corp | $526M | — | — | −7.3% | 17 |
| CAEP Cantor Equity Partners III, Inc. Class A | $526M | — | — | +46.9% | — |
| DYNC Dynamix Corporation Class A Ordinary Sha | $243M | — | — | +2.1% | — |
| Peer median | $593M | — | — | +2.0% | 17 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.