ECVT Ecovyst Inc.
XNYS 9.79 DelayedStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $7.41 – $15.09
- YTD
- -1.16%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 46.29
- Straddle Price
- $1.73
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 1.18
- Market Cap
- $1.1B
- Open
- $9.75
- Day Range
- $9.66 – $9.86
- Volume
- 300,026
- Prev Close
- $9.81
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.12% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.91 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.66% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.36% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +163.5pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +22.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -10.4% |
| Book / Price | 52.8% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 21.3% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 9.5% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.84 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +3.3% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $10.20 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $10.08 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 67.5% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.4B |
| Market Cap | $1B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $36.51 | 48% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 21.4× · 6 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $13.97 | 14% | median 11.8× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | $14.63 | 19% | median 2.8× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | $14.59 | 19% | median 1.7× · 6 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $10.20 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
- Industry (SIC)
- CHEMICALS & ALLIED PRODUCTS (2800) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $1.1B
- Employees
- 617
- List Date
- 2017-09-29
- CIK
- 0001708035
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-03 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- $0.18 (2 est.)
- Headquarters
- Wayne, PA
- Homepage
- https://www.ecovyst.com
Ecovyst Inc is an integrated and provider of materials, specialty catalysts and services. Its products contribute to lower emissions and cleaner air, higher fuel efficiency and cleaner fuels, and key enablers to advance transition to clean energy. The company has one operating segment. The Company's single reportable segment, Ecoservices, derives its revenue through the sale of virgin and regenerated sulfuric acid products and services.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 0.29% | 18.67% | -5.89% | 0.39% | 7.06% | 4.10% |
| Feb | -- | 6.12% | -5.55% | 4.10% | -11.82% | 4.45% | -0.54% |
| Mar | -- | 8.24% | 8.33% | 22.26% | -4.17% | 13.60% | 9.65% |
| Apr | -- | -14.53% | 3.37% | -13.88% | -3.39% | 8.08% | -4.07% |
| May | -- | 1.99% | -13.15% | -2.21% | 20.36% | -8.15% | -0.23% |
| Jun | -- | -3.43% | 14.71% | -2.39% | 10.77% | -4.45% | 3.04% |
| Jul | -- | 2.81% | 6.31% | 9.66% | 13.29% | 1.26% | 6.67% |
| Aug | -19.69% | -14.29% | -16.88% | -9.80% | 7.70% | -15.60% | -11.43% |
| Sep | -10.79% | -6.33% | -4.93% | 0.00% | -3.20% | -2.67% | -4.65% |
| Oct | -2.34% | 12.94% | -4.66% | -1.04% | -4.43% | -1.76%* | -0.22% |
| Nov | -18.76% | -3.23% | 5.54% | 4.33% | 11.25% | -- | -0.17% |
| Dec | 7.11% | -3.80% | -0.61% | -11.37% | 5.42% | -- | -0.65% |
| Total | -39.12% | -15.84% | 5.05% | -10.88% | 44.65% | -1.53% | -2.95% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary Overall assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level (6/10) Key drivers and primary risks: * Technical signals point to a neutral market environment, as RSI is oversold, but MACD suggests potential for a rebound. * Recent news sentiment is generally positive, which may support the stock's price movement. Primary risk: Moderate volatility, with a beta of 0.87 relative to the SPY.
Investment thesis: ECVT's recent performance has been driven by its ability to streamline operations and focus on high-growth areas. The company's Q2 earnings beat may have contributed to the positive sentiment in the options market. However, the stock's moderate volatility and relatively low beta suggest that it may not be as sensitive to market movements as some other stocks.
Recent news sentiment impact: The recent news headlines are generally positive, with several articles highlighting the company's growth potential and strategic decisions. This positivity may have contributed to the stock's upward movement over the past few days.
Technical Analysis
- Trend Direction: The short-term trend is neutral, as the RSI is oversold but the MACD suggests potential for a rebound.
- Support/Resistance Levels: Key price levels include:
- Resistance: $15.01 (upper Bollinger Band)
- Support: $13.47 (lower Bollinger Band), $13.67 (SMA 50)
- Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: oversold (<30) - potential for a rebound
- MACD signal: bullish crossover - suggests potential for a price increase
- Bollinger Bands position: neutral, with the stock trading near the middle of the band
- Volume Analysis: Volume trends suggest that institutional interest is moderate, with an On-Balance Volume (OBV) signal indicating a slight uptrend.
News & Sentiment Analysis
- Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines are generally positive, highlighting the company's growth potential and strategic decisions.
- Sentiment Assessment: The sentiment analysis suggests that the overall sentiment is positive, with several articles highlighting the company's strengths.
- Catalyst Identification: No specific catalysts identified in the recent news headlines.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
- Beta Interpretation: Ecovyst has a beta of 0.87 relative to the SPY, indicating moderate volatility and relatively low risk compared to some other stocks.
- Volatility Regime: The stock is currently trading within its historical volatility range, with no clear signs of increased or decreased volatility.
- Options Market Signals: The options market signals suggest that investors are pricing in a 21-DTE move of $1.52, which may indicate moderate volatility and relatively low risk.
Market Context & Positioning
- Sector Performance: Ecovyst is trading within its historical range relative to the sector average.
- Institutional Activity: Institutional interest is moderate, with an On-Balance Volume (OBV) signal indicating a slight uptrend.
- Correlation Analysis: The stock has a relatively low correlation coefficient of 0.31 compared to some other stocks, suggesting that it may not be as sensitive to market movements.
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical Price Levels: Support/resistance levels include $15.01 (upper Bollinger Band) and $13.47 (lower Bollinger Band).
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: The stock may experience a breakout above the upper Bollinger Band if it continues to trend upwards.
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No specific time-sensitive catalysts identified in the recent news headlines.
- Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations should be based on the stock's moderate volatility and relatively low risk.
Additional Notes
- The technical analysis suggests that Ecovyst is trading within a neutral market environment, with no clear signs of increased or decreased volatility.
- The options market signals suggest that investors are pricing in a moderate move by expiration, which may indicate relatively low risk.
- The recent news headlines are generally positive, highlighting the company's growth potential and strategic decisions.
Recommendations
Based on this analysis, I would recommend maintaining a neutral stance on Ecovyst (ECVT), as the technical signals suggest a neutral market environment. The options market signals suggest moderate volatility and relatively low risk, which may indicate that investors are pricing in a moderate move by expiration. The recent news headlines are generally positive, highlighting the company's growth potential and strategic decisions.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-09 | After-Close | 4.47% | 3.18% | 0.71x | Within |
| 2022-02-25 | After-Close | 12.98% | 5.10% | 0.39x | Within |
| 2023-05-04 | After-Close | 7.90% | 0.28% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2023-08-03 | After-Close | 10.17% | 3.00% | 0.29x | Within |
| 2023-11-02 | After-Close | 16.48% | 4.90% | 0.30x | Within |
| 2024-02-28 | After-Close | 9.71% | 0.73% | 0.08x | Within |
| 2024-05-02 | After-Close | 11.61% | 1.90% | 0.16x | Within |
| 2024-08-01 | After-Close | 42.71% | 15.95% | 0.37x | Within |
| 2024-10-31 | Pre-Market | 64.76% | 4.55% | 0.07x | Within |
| 2025-02-27 | After-Close | 9.02% | 2.02% | 0.22x | Within |
| 2025-05-01 | After-Close | 34.33% | 6.79% | 0.20x | Within |
| 2025-08-07 | After-Close | 35.98% | 3.17% | 0.09x | Within |
| 2025-11-04 | After-Close | 20.41% | 7.91% | 0.39x | Within |
| 2026-02-26 | Pre-Market | 18.11% | 1.15% | 0.06x | Within |
| 2026-05-05 | After-Close | 7.13% | 0.34% | 0.05x | Within |
| 2026-08-05 | Pre-Market | 10.73% | 5.45% | 0.51x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
ECVT Options Activity & IV Rank
ECVT IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 41st percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $5.5M | #2021 of 6285 | -32.3% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $2.7M | #1815 of 3138 | -30.5% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $1.1M | #1464 of 1945 | -91.7% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $738K | #3032 of 3716 | -54.1% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
ECVT Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $3.56M | 93.64% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $240.28K | 6.33% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $1.25K | 0.03% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
ECVT Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-14| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-14 | Patti A. Humble | Director | Buy (P) | +24,875 | $10.05 | $250.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-26 | Laurie Bergman | See Remarks | Award (A) | +43,353 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-03 | Sarah Lorance | Director | Sell (S) | −8,450 | $13.33 | -$112.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | Patti A. Humble | Director | Award (A) | +9,099 | $13.61 | $123.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-16 | Kurt Bitting | See Remarks | Exer (M) | +38,064 | $3.04 | $115.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-06 | Michael Feehan | See Remarks | Award (A) | +11,052 | $11.31 | $125.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-06 | Joseph S. Koscinski | See Remarks | Award (A) | +11,052 | $11.31 | $125.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-05 | Sarah Lorance | Director | Award (A) | +19,399 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-05 | Susan F Ward | Director | Award (A) | +19,399 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-05 | Michael Feehan | See Remarks | Mixed | +14,565 | $10.31 | -$49.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-05 | Bryan K. Brown | Director | Award (A) | +19,399 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-05 | Kurt Bitting | See Remarks | Mixed | +90,467 | $10.31 | -$267.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-05 | David A. Bradley | Director | Award (A) | +19,399 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-05 | Anna C Catalano | Director | Award (A) | +19,399 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-05 | Kevin Michael Fogarty | Director | Award (A) | +38,798 | — | EDGAR |
ECVT Insider Holdings
14 insiders · @ $9.79| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kurt Bitting | See Remarks | 698,382 | $6.83M | $206.4K | 22 | 2026-03-16 |
| 2 | Joseph S. Koscinski | See Remarks | 595,784 | $5.83M | $180.4K | 15 | 2026-03-06 |
| 3 | Michael Feehan | See Remarks | 389,071 | $3.81M | $298.8K | 21 | 2026-03-06 |
| 4 | Kevin Michael Fogarty | Director | 255,998 | $2.50M | $394.1K | 6 | 2026-02-05 |
| 5 | David A. Bradley | Director | 127,999 | $1.25M | $194.5K | 6 | 2026-02-05 |
| 6 | Bryan K. Brown | Director | 109,015 | $1.07M | $0 | 5 | 2026-02-05 |
| 7 | Anna C Catalano | Director | 102,805 | $1.01M | $0 | 5 | 2026-02-05 |
| 8 | Susan F Ward | Director | 97,660 | $955.6K | -$377.3K | 7 | 2026-02-05 |
| 9 | Paul Whittleston | See Remarks | 72,847 | $712.8K | $50.7K | 7 | 2025-02-05 |
| 10 | George L. Vann Jr. | See Remarks | 69,679 | $681.8K | $0 | 8 | 2025-02-05 |
ECVT Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 14, 2026Directors 9
- Susan F Ward · since Jun 1, 2020
- Bryan K. Brown · since Apr 27, 2022
- David A. Bradley · since Apr 27, 2022
- Kevin Michael Fogarty · since Apr 27, 2022
- Kurt Bitting · listed since May 2022
- Anna C Catalano · since Jul 27, 2022
- Sarah Lorance · since Mar 1, 2024
- Donald L. Althoff · since May 8, 2024
- Patti A. Humble · since May 20, 2026
Officers 3
- Kurt Bitting · Director and Chief Executive Officer · listed since Aug 2022
- Joseph S. Koscinski · Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Secretary · listed since Jan 2023
- Laurie Bergman · Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer · since Aug 24, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (90)
| Aug 24, 2026 | Laurie Bergman became Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| May 20, 2026 | Patti A. Humble became a director |
| Aug 11, 2025 | The company announced the departure of George L. Vann Jr. as President, Ecoservices in an SEC filing |
| May 8, 2024 | Donald L. Althoff became a director |
| May 3, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Robert Coxon from the board in an SEC filing |
| Mar 1, 2024 | Sarah Lorance became a director |
| Jan 9, 2024 | Paul Whittleston listed as President, Advanced Materials & Catalysts (previously President, Catalyst Technologies) in SEC filings |
| Dec 12, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Jonny Ginns from the board in an SEC filing |
| May 26, 2023 | James A Ratcliffe reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| May 26, 2023 | INEOS Ltd reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 7, 2023 | Quartz Co-Invest, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 7, 2023 | CCMP Co-Invest III A GP, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 7, 2023 | CCMP Capital, LP reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 7, 2023 | CCMP Capital Investors III, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 7, 2023 | CCMP Capital Investors III (Employee), L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 7, 2023 | CCMP Capital Investors III (AV-9), L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 7, 2023 | CCMP Capital Investors III (AV-8), L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 7, 2023 | CCMP Capital Investors III (AV-7), L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 7, 2023 | CCMP Capital Investors III (AV-10), L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 7, 2023 | CCMP Capital GP, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 7, 2023 | CCMP Capital Associates III, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 7, 2023 | CCMP Capital Associates III GP, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jan 18, 2023 | Joseph S. Koscinski listed as Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Secretary (previously Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel) in SEC filings |
| Jan 1, 2023 | Paul Whittleston became President, Catalyst Technologies |
| Nov 3, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Thomas Schneberger as President in an SEC filing |
| Aug 8, 2022 | Kurt Bitting listed as Director and Chief Executive Officer (previously Vice President and President-Refining Services) in SEC filings |
| Aug 8, 2022 | George L. Vann Jr. became President, Ecoservices |
| Jul 27, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Martin S Craighead from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jul 27, 2022 | Anna C Catalano became a director |
| May 23, 2022 | Thomas Schneberger listed as President (previously Vice President and President, Catalysts) in SEC filings |
| May 16, 2022 | Kurt Bitting first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Apr 27, 2022 | Kevin Michael Fogarty became a director |
| Apr 27, 2022 | David A. Bradley became a director |
| Apr 27, 2022 | Bryan K. Brown became a director |
| Apr 25, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Belgacem Chariag as Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President in an SEC filing |
| Aug 5, 2021 | Michael Feehan became Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| May 3, 2021 | James A Ratcliffe first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Mar 15, 2021 | Ray Kolberg left as Vice President and President-Catalysts, per their own SEC filing |
| Mar 10, 2021 | Thomas Schneberger became Vice President and President, Catalysts |
| Jun 1, 2020 | Susan F Ward became a director |
| Jan 22, 2020 | Belgacem Chariag listed as Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President (previously CEO, President & Director) in SEC filings |
| Dec 1, 2019 | Albert F Beninati JR became Vice President and President - Performance Chemicals |
| May 2, 2019 | Christopher C Behrens became a director |
| Mar 22, 2019 | James A Ratcliffe reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 22, 2019 | INEOS Investments Partnership reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 20, 2019 | INEOS Ltd became a 10% owner |
| Mar 13, 2019 | William J. Sichko Jr. listed as Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer (previously Chief Administrative Officer, Assistant Secretary and Vice President) in SEC filings |
| Mar 13, 2019 | Scott Randolph listed as Vice President and President-Performance Materials (previously Executive Vice President and Group President-Performance Materials and Chemicals) in SEC filings |
| Mar 13, 2019 | David James Taylor listed as Vice President and President-Performance Chemicals (previously Senior Vice President - Strategic Development) in SEC filings |
| Mar 1, 2019 | Ray Kolberg became Vice President and President-Catalysts |
| Mar 1, 2019 | Kurt Bitting became Vice President and President-Refining Services |
| Dec 31, 2018 | James Gentilcore reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Dec 31, 2018 | James Gentilcore reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board |
| Aug 9, 2018 | Belgacem Chariag became a director |
| Aug 9, 2018 | Belgacem Chariag became CEO, President & Director |
| Mar 27, 2018 | James Gentilcore listed as Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board (previously Chief Executive Officer, President and Director) in SEC filings |
| Sep 29, 2017 | William J. Sichko Jr. became Chief Administrative Officer, Assistant Secretary and Vice President |
| Sep 29, 2017 | Timothy J. Walsh became a director |
| Sep 29, 2017 | Scott Randolph became Executive Vice President and Group President-Performance Materials and Chemicals |
| Sep 29, 2017 | Robert Coxon became a director |
| Sep 29, 2017 | Robert B Toth became a director |
| Sep 29, 2017 | Quartz Co-Invest, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Sep 29, 2017 | Paul Ferrall became Senior Vice President-Strategic Development |
| Sep 29, 2017 | Michael Ross Boyce became a director |
| Sep 29, 2017 | Michael C. Crews became Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| Sep 29, 2017 | Martin S Craighead became a director |
| Sep 29, 2017 | Mark McFadden became a director |
| Sep 29, 2017 | Kyle D Vann became a director |
| Sep 29, 2017 | Kimberly A. Ross became a director |
| Sep 29, 2017 | Joseph S. Koscinski became Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel |
| Sep 29, 2017 | Jonny Ginns became a director |
| Sep 29, 2017 | John Lau became Chief Technology Officer |
| Sep 29, 2017 | James Gentilcore became a director |
| Sep 29, 2017 | James Gentilcore became Chief Executive Officer, President and Director |
| Sep 29, 2017 | James A Ratcliffe became a 10% owner |
| Sep 29, 2017 | INEOS Investments Partnership became a 10% owner |
| Sep 29, 2017 | Greg Dean Brenneman became a director |
| Sep 29, 2017 | David James Taylor became Senior Vice President - Strategic Development |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CCMP Co-Invest III A GP, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CCMP Capital, LP became a 10% owner |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CCMP Capital Investors III, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CCMP Capital Investors III (Employee), L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CCMP Capital Investors III (AV-9), L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CCMP Capital Investors III (AV-8), L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CCMP Capital Investors III (AV-7), L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CCMP Capital Investors III (AV-10), L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CCMP Capital GP, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CCMP Capital Associates III, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CCMP Capital Associates III GP, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Sep 29, 2017 | Andrew Currie became a director |
- Prev
- 1
- …
Not reported recently (19)
- Michael Feehan · Last reported as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Mar 6, 2026
- Paul Whittleston · Last reported as President, Advanced Materials & Catalysts in an SEC filing dated Feb 5, 2025
- Kyle D Vann · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 24, 2024
- William J. Sichko Jr. · Last reported as Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer in an SEC filing dated Aug 8, 2022
- Mark McFadden · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 26, 2022
- Belgacem Chariag · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 3, 2022
- Michael C. Crews · Last reported as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Jan 22, 2021
- Albert F Beninati JR · Last reported as Vice President and President - Performance Chemicals in an SEC filing dated Jan 22, 2021
- Scott Randolph · Last reported as Vice President and President-Performance Materials in an SEC filing dated Oct 6, 2020
- Kimberly A. Ross · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 22, 2020
- David James Taylor · Last reported as Vice President and President-Performance Chemicals in an SEC filing dated Oct 4, 2019
- Christopher C Behrens · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 13, 2019
- John Lau · Last reported as Chief Technology Officer in an SEC filing dated Oct 4, 2018
- Paul Ferrall · Last reported as Senior Vice President-Strategic Development in an SEC filing dated Sep 20, 2018
- Michael Ross Boyce · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Oct 4, 2017
- Robert B Toth · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Sep 29, 2017
- Timothy J. Walsh · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Sep 29, 2017
- Greg Dean Brenneman · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Sep 29, 2017
- Andrew Currie · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Sep 29, 2017
ECVT Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-07-17What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-17 | Susan Ward | Director | 29,886 | $385.5K | 2026-07-17 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-02 | SARAH J LORANCE | Director | 8,450 | $112.6K | 2026-06-02 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-07 | Susan Ward | Director | 15,000 | $126.0K | 2025-11-07 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-03-22 | Ward Susan F | Director | 24,436 | $251.3K | 2024-03-22 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $34.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $27.3M | $74.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 3 | VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $24.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.08% | $21.6M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 5 | AVUV Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | Avantis | 0.07% | $21.0M | $31.5B | 2026-10-21 |
| 6 | DFAT Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.05% | $16.0M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 7 | VBR Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $15.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $12.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 9 | FNDA Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF | Nport | 0.12% | $11.0M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 10 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.03% | $8.9M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 11 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.06% | $7.8M | $13.6B | 2026-10-21 |
| 12 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.03% | $7.2M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 13 | BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | Nport | 0.29% | $7.0M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.04% | $6.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 15 | USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | Nport | 0.35% | $6.1M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.01% | $4.9M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 17 | MGMT BALLAST SMALL/MID CAP ETF | Nport | 2.70% | $4.8M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.05% | $3.8M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 19 | HWO Hotchkis & Wiley Opportunities Fund | Nport | 0.39% | $3.5M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | Vanguard | 0.07% | $3.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 21 | AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.08% | $2.5M | $3.1B | 2026-10-21 |
| 22 | PRFZ Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | Nport | 0.08% | $2.3M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 23 | FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | Fidelity | 0.09% | $2.3M | $2.5B | 2026-10-21 |
| 24 | IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $2.2M | $13.9B | 2026-10-21 |
| 25 | IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $1.7M | $4.0B | 2026-10-21 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $249.96M | $7.87M | $0.07 | $34.35M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $214.95M | $4.31M | $0.04 | $16.94M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $199.43M | $5.74M | $0.05 | $41.76M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $204.91M | $-79.25M | $-0.69 | $55.25M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $176.06M | $5.99M | $0.05 | $33.04M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $143.11M | $-3.60M | $-0.03 | $10.26M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $148.87M | $-30.42M | $-0.26 | $43.49M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $153.87M | $14.25M | $0.12 | $59.94M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $182.82M | $8.29M | $0.07 | $9.96M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $160.54M | $1.22M | $0.01 | $36.50M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $172.81M | $29.93M | $0.26 | $64.19M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $173.33M | $16.57M | $0.14 | $32.27M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.