HUT Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock
XNAS
68.17
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
HUT
$68.17
—
Key stats
$68.17
After hours
$68.64
+0.69%
- 52-Week Range
- $31.67 – $140.80
- YTD
- +32.96%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 57.15
- Straddle Price
- $17.12
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.85
- Market Cap
- $8.4B
- Open
- $70.11
- Day Range
- $66.93 – $70.33
- Volume
- 5,147,209
- Prev Close
- $67.75
Fair Value
MODEL: SHORT
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.19% |
| Beta vs SPY | 2.18 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 17.18% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 16.61% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +27.7pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -10.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.8B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -41.6% |
| Book / Price | 22.7% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 62.3% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -256.0% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.21 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $88.02 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $89.04 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 49.8% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.1B |
| Market Cap | $8B |
Peers used for multiples: CIFR, CLSK, COIN, KEEL, MARA, MSTR, RIOT, WULF
60-Day Conviction
98%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Nov 17, 2026
$67.51
α -1.0%
rank 20%
conviction
57%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 16, 2026
$66.23
α -2.8%
rank 20%
conviction
80%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 14, 2027
$64.25
α -5.8%
rank 20%
conviction
98%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/B | $52.70 | 22% | median 3.4× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $34.05 | 22% | median 12.2× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $88.02 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $65.28 | 56% | 36 strikes · skew +0.17 |
As of 2026-10-19 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- FINANCE SERVICES (6199) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $8.4B
- Employees
- 248
- List Date
- 2023-12-04
- CIK
- 0001964789
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-04 (Pre-Market)
- EPS Forecast
- ($1.17) (5 est.)
- Headquarters
- Miami, FL
- Homepage
- https://www.hut8.com
Hut 8 Corp is an energy infrastructure platform that integrates power, digital infrastructure, and compute at scale to fuel next-generation, energy-intensive use cases. The company has four reportable business segments: Power, Digital Infrastructure, Compute, and Other. It derives maximum revenue from the Compute segment which consists of Bitcoin Mining, GPU-as-a-Service, and Data Center Cloud operations. Its geographical segments include the United States and Canada, of which it generates the majority of revenue from the United States.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -23.55% | 136.06% | -40.71% | -0.91% | 8.89% | 15.96% |
| Feb | -- | -5.71% | -23.61% | 13.65% | -31.84% | -5.25% | -10.55% |
| Mar | -- | -9.66% | 12.80% | 23.77% | -17.47% | -11.02% | -0.32% |
| Apr | -- | -35.97% | 0.00% | -27.36% | -7.58% | 60.01% | -2.18% |
| May | -- | -31.08% | 30.12% | 8.76% | 13.03% | 62.16% | 16.60% |
| Jun | 2.56% | -42.42% | 52.78% | 67.30% | 22.29% | -12.79% | 14.95% |
| Jul | -0.21% | 53.62% | 1.14% | -4.00% | 14.88% | 0.89% | 11.05% |
| Aug | 64.78% | -2.40% | -28.32% | -27.27% | 35.14% | -29.84% | 2.02% |
| Sep | 3.58% | -9.18% | -17.72% | 34.87% | 27.04% | 11.00% | 8.26% |
| Oct | 44.55% | 17.28% | 8.50% | 36.65% | 38.68% | -21.06%* | 20.77% |
| Nov | -14.30% | -45.41% | -13.64% | 74.91% | -18.18% | -- | -3.32% |
| Dec | -33.36% | -29.17% | 17.53% | -20.98% | 5.44% | -- | -12.11% |
| Total | 44.20% | -89.78% | 165.63% | 96.05% | 68.02% | 28.85% | 52.16% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $87.27
SMA 50: $87.61
SMA 200: $82.18
Current: $68.17
EMA 12: $79.60
EMA 26: $84.98
MACD: -5.3779 | Signal: -2.3740
BEARISH
ADX (14): 18.90
RANGE
+DI: 15.45
−DI: 31.12
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 33.13
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 12.40
Stoch %D: 15.46
Williams %R: -95.28
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $107.82
BB Lower: $66.73
NEUTRAL
OBV: 288,470,973
Vol SMA 20: 6,010,631
Vol ROC: 43.07%
ATR: $7.36
True Range: $3.40
HV 20: 81.6%
HV 30: 88.1%
HV 60: 100.6%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-21T00:00:00 – 2026-10-19T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Here is a comprehensive stock analysis report for Hut (HUT) based on the provided data:
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level 6/10
Key Drivers:
- Recent positive news headlines about AI-related deals and collaborations
- Strong technical momentum signals, including MACD bearish signal and RSI neutral reading
- High volatility and beta indicating potential for significant price movements
Primary Risks:
- Bearish MACD signal may indicate further declines
- High volatility and beta suggest increased risk for investors
2-3 Sentence Investment Thesis: Hut (HUT) is a high-risk, high-reward stock with potential for significant price movements. The recent positive news headlines and strong technical momentum signals are bullish signs, but the bearish MACD signal and high volatility indicate caution is warranted.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent positive news headlines about AI-related deals and collaborations have likely contributed to the stock's recent rally, supporting our NEUTRAL assessment.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Neutral
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish
- Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish
Support/Resistance Levels: The SMA 20 and EMA 12 are key support levels, while the upper Bollinger Band ($97.25) is a potential resistance level.
Momentum Signals:
- RSI: Neutral (50.78)
- MACD: Bearish signal (-0.68 / Signal: 2.17 / Histogram: -2.86)
- Bollinger Bands: Squeeze
Volume Analysis: The volume rate of change is negative, indicating a decrease in trading activity.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines have been generally positive, focusing on AI-related deals and collaborations.
Sentiment Assessment: The sentiment is mostly positive, with 3 out of the 5 recent headlines having a positive tone.
Catalyst Identification: There are no immediate catalysts identified, but future earnings reports and potential AI-related deal announcements could impact the stock's price.
Market Narrative: The news headlines have supported the stock's rally, but the bearish MACD signal suggests caution is warranted.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: The beta of 4.43 indicates that Hut (HUT) is a high-risk stock relative to the market.
Volatility Regime: The current volatility level is higher than historical levels, indicating increased risk for investors.
Options Market Signals: The IV rank is low, and the put-call volume ratio is bearish, suggesting caution is warranted.
Downside Protection: Support levels are key, including the SMA 20 and EMA 12, which could provide a floor for potential declines.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Hut (HUT) has outperformed its sector peers in recent weeks.
Institutional Activity: The institutional activity is mixed, with both buyers and sellers present in the options market.
Correlation Analysis: The stock's price movement is highly correlated with the overall market, indicating a high degree of interconnectedness.
Relative Valuation: The stock is currently trading within a trading range, with potential for further increases or declines.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20: $85.50 (support)
- EMA 12: $88.94 (support)
- Upper Bollinger Band: $97.25 (resistance)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: The stock's price movement is likely to be influenced by the recent news headlines and technical momentum signals.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: There are no immediate catalysts identified, but future earnings reports and potential AI-related deal announcements could impact the stock's price.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set around the SMA 20 ($85.50) or EMA 12 ($88.94), depending on market conditions. Position sizing considerations include the beta of 4.43 and the current volatility level.
Generated
News
All HUT news →
Earnings History
8 of 11 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
11.16%
Avg Actual Move
7.72%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | Pre-Market | 10.45% | 11.97% | 1.15x | Exceeded |
| 2024-05-15 | Pre-Market | 11.55% | 13.35% | 1.16x | Exceeded |
| 2024-08-13 | After-Close | 7.85% | 0.09% | 0.01x | Within |
| 2024-11-13 | Pre-Market | 13.29% | 3.86% | 0.29x | Within |
| 2025-03-03 | Pre-Market | 15.15% | 4.54% | 0.30x | Within |
| 2025-05-08 | Pre-Market | 7.94% | 11.93% | 1.50x | Exceeded |
| 2025-08-07 | Pre-Market | 7.56% | 3.24% | 0.43x | Within |
| 2025-11-04 | Pre-Market | 15.23% | 12.53% | 0.82x | Within |
| 2026-02-25 | Pre-Market | 13.05% | 6.57% | 0.50x | Within |
| 2026-05-06 | After-Close | 7.55% | 7.12% | 0.94x | Within |
| 2026-08-04 | Pre-Market | 13.14% | 9.74% | 0.74x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
HUT Options Activity & IV Rank
HUT IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 108.5%
7-DTE IV: 107.3%
Expected Move: $17.12
7-DTE Move: $6.43
Days to Exp: 32 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 3,675
Put Volume: 3,107
P/C Volume: 0.845
NEUTRAL
Call OI: 54,351
Put OI: 16,316
P/C OI: 0.3
Total OI: 70,667
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $8.88
ATM Put: $8.25
Call %: 13.0%
Put %: 12.1%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 38,487
Chain OI: 347,779
Last Updated: 10/19/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
LOW γ vs HISTORY
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 4th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
4%
vs own history
GEX tilt
-0.40
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.13
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.20
δ-decay vs time
? What is this?
· 130 ATM contracts, 46k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
64%
+7.3
pts
EXTREME
ATM 107.1% / Wing 114.4%
30 DTE / 10d
72%
+8.3
pts
EXTREME
ATM 107.4% / Wing 115.7%
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)44.0MediumOct 19
IV Rank (30 DTE)57.1MediumOct 19
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$17.12Oct 19
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 4.5517
Alpha: 22.50%
Correlation: 0.5349
R-Squared: 28.6%
Stock Volatility: 108.3%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
HUT Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 114,159,663 (as of 2026-06-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
38 filers$1.48B notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $302.35M | 20.47% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $234.24M | 15.86% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $168.61M | 11.42% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $138.21M | 9.36% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Optiver Holding B.V. | $91.14M | 6.17% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $75.93M | 5.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Caption Management, LLC | $43.37M | 2.94% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $35.26M | 2.39% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | SUMMIT PARTNERS PUBLIC ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC | $33.02M | 2.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $30.32M | 2.05% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $29.57M | 2.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $27.86M | 1.89% | 2025-09-30 |
| 13 | Value Aligned Research Advisors, LLC | $26.45M | 1.79% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian | $24.24M | 1.64% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $23.18M | 1.57% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | PEAK6 LLC | $22.29M | 1.51% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | SCOGGIN MANAGEMENT LP | $20.20M | 1.37% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | NOMURA HOLDINGS INC | $18.22M | 1.23% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $14.85M | 1.01% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | Compass Rose Asset Management, LP | $14.43M | 0.98% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | Walleye Trading LLC | $13.54M | 0.92% | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $13.47M | 0.91% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | SIG North Trading, ULC | $11.75M | 0.80% | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | Tidal Investments LLC | $11.39M | 0.77% | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | Alphadyne Asset Management LP | $10.44M | 0.71% | 2026-06-30 |
25 filers$849.02M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $193.44M | 22.78% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $177.94M | 20.96% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $153.50M | 18.08% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $57.81M | 6.81% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $30.54M | 3.60% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Tidal Investments LLC | $28.43M | 3.35% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $27.96M | 3.29% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $25.27M | 2.98% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $24.86M | 2.93% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | PEAK6 LLC | $19.66M | 2.32% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian | $17.32M | 2.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Intrinsic Edge Capital Management LLC | $17.32M | 2.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Alphadyne Asset Management LP | $11.91M | 1.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $10.55M | 1.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | Walleye Trading LLC | $10.54M | 1.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $10.40M | 1.23% | 2025-09-30 |
| 17 | Optiver Holding B.V. | $9.09M | 1.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $6.05M | 0.71% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $5.74M | 0.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | SIG North Trading, ULC | $5.44M | 0.64% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $2.83M | 0.33% | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $1.42M | 0.17% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | Walleye Capital LLC | $531.05K | 0.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | National Bank of Canada Custodian | $358.11K | 0.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | Barclays PLC Custodian | $126.99K | 0.01% | 2026-06-30 |
HUT Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-30Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 | Michael Ho | Chief Strategy Officer | Other (J) | +1,500,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-28 | Mayo A Shattuck III | Director | Sell (S) | −20,000 | $100.00 | -$2.00M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | Sean Joseph Glennan | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | +5,910 | $78.76 | -$507.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-18 | Victor Semah | Chief Legal Officer | Sell (S) | −10,000 | $125.00 | -$1.25M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-15 | Sean Joseph Glennan | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +27,229 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | William Tai | Director | Exer (M) | +15,713 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Amy Marie Wilkinson | Director | Exer (M) | +15,713 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Mayo A Shattuck III | Director | Exer (M) | +16,416 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Victor Semah | Chief Legal Officer | Grant (A) | +27,229 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Rick Rickertsen | Director | Exer (M) | +14,775 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | E Stanley Oneal | Director | Exer (M) | +15,478 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Joseph Flinn | Director | Mixed | +728 | $116.55 | -$4.45M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-26 | Amy Marie Wilkinson | Director | Sell (S) | −20,000 | $100.78 | -$2.02M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-13 | Rick Rickertsen | Director | Sell (S) | −33,987 | $107.57 | -$3.66M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-04 | Victor Semah | Chief Legal Officer | Mixed | +16,582 | $76.83 | -$808.1K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
HUT Insider Holdings
8 insiders · @ $68.17
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amy Marie Wilkinson | Director | 277,849 | $18.94M | -$2.02M | 8 | 2026-06-15 |
| 2 | E Stanley Oneal | Director | 240,590 | $16.40M | $0 | 6 | 2026-06-15 |
| 3 | William Tai | Director | 189,901 | $12.95M | $0 | 7 | 2026-06-15 |
| 4 | Mayo A Shattuck III | Director | 89,408 | $6.09M | -$2.00M | 7 | 2026-09-28 |
| 5 | Victor Semah | Chief Legal Officer | 31,378 | $2.14M | -$2.48M | 7 | 2026-06-18 |
| 6 | Sean Joseph Glennan | Chief Financial Officer | 24,423 | $1.66M | -$868.3K | 6 | 2026-08-25 |
| 7 | Rick Rickertsen | Director | 14,775 | $1.01M | -$3.66M | 8 | 2026-06-15 |
| 8 | Joseph Flinn | Director | 10,527 | $717.6K | -$4.98M | 8 | 2026-06-15 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
HUT Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-09-29
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
2 filings
· $141.1M notice value
· Last 90d:
3 filings
· $141.6M notice value
· 3 unique filers
· 33% under 10b5-1 plans
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
Michael Ho (1, $139.1M) · SHATTUCK MAYO A III (1, $2.0M) · Glennan Sean Joseph (1, $508K)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-29 | Michael Ho | Officer, Director | 1,500,000 | $139.06M | 2026-09-29 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-24 | SHATTUCK MAYO A III | Director | 20,000 | $2.00M | 2026-09-24 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-24 | Glennan Sean Joseph | Officer | 6,445 | $507.6K | 2026-08-24 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-17 | Semah Victor | Officer | 10,000 | $1.25M | 2026-06-17 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-12 144/A | Flinn Joseph | Director | 30,500 | $3.54M | 2026-06-11 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-12 | Flinn Joseph | Director | 7,719 | $910.2K | 2026-06-12 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-21 | Amy Wilkinson | Director | 20,000 | $2.01M | 2026-05-21 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-13 | RICKERTSEN CARL J | Director | 17,491 | $1.92M | 2026-05-13 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-11 | RICKERTSEN CARL J | Director | 16,496 | $1.73M | 2026-05-11 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-04 | Semah Victor | Officer | 10,518 | $808.1K | 2026-05-04 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
91 ETFs hold HUT
25 shown · $1.53B total exposure · 0.17% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $303.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.12% | $215.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.27% | $203.9M | $75.2B | 2026-10-15 |
| 4 | VBK Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.27% | $119.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | Vanguard | 0.07% | $116.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.12% | $108.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.25% | $57.7M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 8 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.29% | $51.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 9 | IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.29% | $43.8M | $14.5B | 2026-10-15 |
| 10 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.28% | $38.7M | $13.4B | 2026-10-15 |
| 11 | WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF | Nport | 10.77% | $37.0M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.25% | $34.6M | $13.6B | 2026-10-15 |
| 13 | BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | Amplify | 3.08% | $28.9M | $939.3M | 2026-10-16 |
| 14 | BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | Nport | 8.23% | $23.4M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 15 | BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | Nport | 4.82% | $19.8M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF | Fidelity | 0.28% | $18.8M | $6.6B | 2026-10-15 |
| 17 | DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF | VanEck | 5.21% | $18.1M | $321.9M | 2026-10-15 |
| 18 | AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | Global X | 0.16% | $16.0M | — | 2026-10-16 |
| 19 | STCE Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF | Nport | 5.20% | $14.0M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.06% | $13.3M | $21.6B | 2026-10-15 |
| 21 | AGIX KraneShares Artificial Intelligence and Technology Public and Private ETF | Nport | 1.48% | $11.9M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $11.2M | $96.0B | 2026-10-15 |
| 23 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $7.5M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 24 | SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | Nport | 0.02% | $7.1M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 25 | FDIG Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF | Fidelity | 2.98% | $6.6M | $223.3M | 2026-10-15 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
$-5.45
TTM Revenue
$317.95M
TTM Net Income
$-599.90M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$-89.44M
Quarterly figures (11 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $74.93M | $-150.19M | $-1.27 | $-5.62M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $71.02M | $-219.85M | $-1.98 | $-27.22M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $88.49M | $-280.20M | $-2.63 | $-57.36M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $83.51M | $50.34M | $0.43 | $770.00K |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $41.30M | $137.31M | $1.18 | $-48.79M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $21.82M | $-133.89M | $-1.30 | $-33.85M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $31.69M | $142.86M | $1.33 | $-21.64M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $43.73M | $647.00K | $0.01 | $-4.20M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $35.22M | $-71.87M | $-0.78 | $-16.35M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $51.74M | $250.88M | $2.76 | $-26.34M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $1.99M | $-5.06M | $-0.14 | $-19.28M |
Q2 2026 • period ending 2026-06-30 • filed 2026-08-04
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
—
P/B
4.44
P/S
24.48
EV/EBITDA
—
EV/Sales
24.91
ROE
-34.2%
ROA
-6.0%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
-1.15%
Debt/Equity
0.21
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$7.78B
as of 2026-10-19
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
19.02M
SI % of Float
18.99%
Days to Cover
4.45
Short Vol Ratio
46.6%
Free Float
100.17M
Float %
81.3%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-16 • Float 2026-08-24